Notes
Elaboration of Chalmers’ on this matter can be seen in my review of his The Scientist’s Atom (Science & Education 2011, vol. 20(2), 173–190).
Reasons for this high estimation of Mach and critical judgement on his omission from the anthology can be found in my Science Teaching: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, 2015, pp. 33–37.
On this matter, see my review of Wootton’s book in Science & Education 2017, vol. 26(1–2), pp. 175–184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthews, M.R. Illustrating the History of Science. Sci & Educ 27, 551–554 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9980-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9980-0