Abstract
There are currently both scientific and public debates surrounding Darwinism. In the scientific debate, the details of evolution are in dispute, but not the central thesis of Darwin’s theory; in the public debate, Darwinism itself is questioned. I concentrate on the public debate because of its direct impact on education in the United States. Some critics of Darwin advocate the teaching of intelligent design theory along with Darwin’s theory, and others seek to eliminate even the mention of evolution from science classes altogether. Many of these critics base their objections on the claim that non-living matter cannot give rise to living matter. After considering some of the various meanings assigned to ‘vitalism’ over the years, I argue that a considerable portion of Darwin deniers support a literal version of vitalism that is not scientifically respectable. Their position seems to be that since life cannot arise naturally, Darwin’s theory accomplishes nothing: If it can only account for life forms changing from one to another (even this is disputed by some) but not how life arose in the first place, what’s the point? I argue that there is every reason to believe that living and non-living matter differ only in degree, not in kind, and that all conversation about Darwinism should start with the assumption that abiogenesis is possible unless or until compelling evidence of its impossibility is presented. That is, I advocate a position that the burden of proof lies with those who claim “Life only comes from life.” Until that case is made, little weight should be given to their position.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, S. (2005). Space, time, and deity: The Gifford lectures at Glasgow, 1916–1918 (Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Adamant Media Corporation.
Baltimore, D. (2003). Viruses, viruses, viruses. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://eands.caltech.edu/articles/LXVII1/viruses.html.
Bauer, G. (2008). Intelligence ‘expelled’ from evolution debate. http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25046 (last accessed February 17, 2011).
Behe, M. (1996). Darwin’s black box. New York: Free Press.
Bergman, J. (2000). Why abiogenesis is impossible. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.trueorigin.org/abio.asp.
Brayton, E. (2006). Bill Buckingham’s Dover testimony. Retrieved July 23, 2011 from http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2006/12/bill_buckinghams_dover_testimo.php.
Britt, R. (2009). Swine flu is evolution in action. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.livescience.com/health/090428-swine-flu-viral-evolution.html.
Cahn, A. (2005). Fireworks in court yesterday. Retrieved July 23, 2011 from http://blog.aclupa.org/page/18.
Catholic Encyclopedia. (2009). life. Retrieved September 24, 2011 from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/.
Darwin, C. (2010). The works of Charles Darwin, Volume 16: The origin of species, 1876. New York: NYU Press.
Demar, G. (2007). Why evolution is impossible. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://americanvision.org/1087/why-evolution-impossible/.
Dembski, W. (1998). The design inference: Eliminating chance through small probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diderot, D. (2003). Science in the enlightenment: An encyclopedia. Retrieved September 28, 2011 from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/abcscienl/diderot_denis.
Discovery Institute. (1998). The wedge. Retrieved September 22, 2011 from http://ncse.com/creationism/general/wedge-document.
Etinger, J. (2003). Foolish faith. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.
Gold, T. (1999). The deep hot biosphere. New York: Copernicus Books.
Knoll, A. (2004). How did life begin? Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/evolution/how-did-life-begin.html.
Montopli, B. (2010). Rick Santorum returns—And eyes the white house. Retrieved September 18, 2011 from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/04/20/politics/main6415666.shtml.
Moreira, D., & Lopez-Garcia, P. (2009). Ten reasons to exclude viruses from the tree of life. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v7/n4/full/nrmicro2108.html.
Morris, H. (1978). Thermodynamics and the origin of life (Part I). Retrieved September 24, 2011 from http://www.icr.org/article/thermodynamics-origin-life-part-i/.
Muller-Sievers, H. (1997). Self-generation: Biology, philosophy, and literature around 1800. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Novella, S. (2006). Buchanan’s inane rant against Darwin. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.theness.com/index.php/buchanan%E2%80%99s-inane-rant-against-darwin/.
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. (2006). Emergent properties. Retrieved July 23, 2011 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/properties-emergent/#CDBro.
Pearson, H. (2008). ‘Virophage’ suggests viruses are alive. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v454/n7205/full/454677a.html.
Quanten, P. (2004). Viruses. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://freespace.virgin.net/ahcare.qua/literature/science/viruses.html.
Sewell, C. (1999). Life—god’s creation or abiogenesis? Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.rae.org/bits13.htm.
Sharp, D. (1998). The instantaneous transition from non-life to life. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.rae.org/goo.html.
Villarreal, L. (2008). Are viruses alive? Retrieved February 17, 2011 from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=are-viruses-alive-2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, J. Vitalism and the Darwin Debate. Sci & Educ 21, 1139–1149 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9406-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9406-8