Abstract
In the present study we attempt to incorporate the philosophical dialogue about physical reality into the instructional process of quantum mechanics. Taking into account that both scientific realism and constructivism represent, on the basis of a rather broad spectrum, prevalent philosophical currents in the domain of science education, the compatibility of their essential commitments is examined against the conceptual structure of quantum theory. It is argued in this respect that the objects of science do not simply constitute ‘personal constructions’ of the human mind for interpreting nature, as individualist constructivist consider, neither do they form products of a ‘social construction’, as sociological constructivist assume; on the contrary, they reflect objective structural aspects of the physical world. A realist interpretation of quantum mechanics, we suggest, is not only possible but also necessary for revealing the inner meaning of the theory’s scientific content. It is pointed out, however, that a viable realist interpretation of quantum theory requires the abandonment or radical revision of the classical conception of physical reality and its traditional metaphysical presuppositions. To this end, we put forward an alternative to traditional realism interpretative scheme, that is in harmony with the findings of present-day quantum theory, and which, if adequately introduced into the instructional process of contemporary physics, is expected to promote the conceptual reconstruction of learners towards an appropriate view of nature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Bachelard (1938) La Formation de l’ Esprit Scientifique: Contribution a une Psychanalyse de la Connaissance Objective J. Vrin Paris
A. Baltas (1997) ArticleTitle‘Constraints and Resistance: Stating a Case for Negative Realism’ Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 55 74–96
J. Bell (1966) ArticleTitle‘On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’ Review of Modern Physics 38 447–452
D. Bloor (1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery EditionNumber2 University of Chicago Press Chicago
N Bohr (1949) ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’ P.A. Schilpp (Eds) Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist Library of Living Philosophers Evanston 200–241
Bohr N: 1955/1999, N. Bohr’s letters to Pauli on March 2, 1955 and on March 25, 1955, in D. Favrholdt (ed.), Niels Bohr Collected Works, Vol. 10, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 567–569 and 572–575.
D. Bohm B. Hiley (1993) The Undivided Universe.An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory Routledge London
R. Boyd (1983) ‘On the Current Status of Scientific Realism’ R. Boyd P. Gasper J.D. Trout (Eds) , The Philosophy of Science EditionNumber3 The MIT Press Massachussets 195–222
H. Chi D. Slotta N. Leeuw (1994) ArticleTitle‘From Things to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts’ Learning and Instruction 4 27–43 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
H. Collins (1981) ArticleTitle‘Stages in the Empirical Program of Relativism’ Social Studies of Science 11 3–10
B. D’ Espagnat (1995) Veiled Reality Addison-Wesley Reading
G. De Zeeuw (2001) ArticleTitle‘Constructivism: A ‘Next’ Area of Scientific Development?’ Foundations of Science 6 77–98 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011361409819
M. Devitt (1997) Realism and Truth EditionNumber2 Princeton University Press Princeton New Jersey
R. Driver H. Asoko E. Mortimer P. Scott (1994) ArticleTitle‘Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom’ Educational Researcher 23 5–12
M. Dumett (1978) Truth and Other Enigmas Duckorth London
A. Einstein (1948) ‘Quantun Mechanics and Reality’ M Born (Eds) The Bohr–Einstein Letters MacMillan London 168–173
P. Feyerabend (1981) ‘Two Models of Epistemic Change: Mill and Hegel’ P Feyerabend (Eds) Problems of Empiricism, Vol. 2 Cambridge University Press Cambridge 65–79
Fischler H. & Peuchert J. (1999). ’Stability of Students’ Conceptions Concerning Particle Models’, Abstracts of 2nd International Conference of ESERA, Kiel, Germany, 396–398.
J. Forge (2003) ArticleTitle‘Sharp and Blunt Values’ Science & Education 12 479–493
R. Glanville (2001) ArticleTitle‘An Observing Science’ Foundations of Science 6 45–75 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011353225749
E. Glaserfeld von (1995) Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning The Falmer Press London
E. Glaserfeld von (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Radical Constructivist View of Science’ Foundations of Science 6 31–43
D. Greenberger M. Horn A. Shimony A. Zeilinger (1990) ArticleTitle‘Bell’s Theorem Without Inequalities’ American Journal of Physics 58 1131–1143 Occurrence Handle10.1119/1.16243
P. Hadzidaki (2003) ArticleTitle‘History and Philosophy of Science: An Instructional Base for Attaining a Qualitative Approach to Quantum Mechanics Worldview’ Themes in Education 4 37–48
P. Hadzidaki G. Kalkanis D. Stavrou (2000) ArticleTitle‘Quantum Mechanics: a Systemic Component of the Modern Physics’ Paradigm’ Physics Education 35 386–392 Occurrence Handle10.1088/0031-9120/35/6/302
Hadzidaki P. & Karakostas V. (2001). ‘Exploring Analogical Reasoning in the Framework of an Instructional Qualitative Approach to Quantum Mechanics’, Abstracts of 3rd International Conference of ESERA, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 426–428.
W. Heisenberg (1958) Physics and Philosophy Harper & Row New York
A. Hwang (1996) ArticleTitle‘Positivist and Constructivist Persuasions in Instructional Development’ Instructional Science 24 343–356 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00118112
Ireson G. (1999). ’On the Quantum Thinking of Physics’ Undergraduates’, Abstracts of 2nd International Conference of ESERA, Kiel, Germany, pp. 77–79.
G. Kalkanis P. Hadzidaki D. Stavrou (2003) ArticleTitle‘An Instructional Model for a Radical Conceptual Change Towards Quantum Mechanical Concepts’ Science Education 87 257–280 Occurrence Handle10.1002/sce.10033
V. Karakostas (1994) ArticleTitle‘Limitations on Stochastic Localization Models of State Vector Reduction’ International Journal of Theoretical Physics 33 1673–1687 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00672689
Karakostas V. (2003). ’The Nature of Physical Reality in the Light of Quantum Non-separability’, Abstracts of 12th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Oviedo, Spain, 329–330.
Karakostas V.: 2004a, ’Forms of Quantum Nonseparability and Related Philosophical Consequences’, forthcoming in Journal for General Philosophy of Science 35B.
V. Karakostas M. Dickson (1995) ArticleTitle‘Decoherence in Unorthodox Formulations of Quantum Mechanics’ Synthese 10 61–97
S. Kochen E. Specker (1967) ArticleTitle‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’ Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 59–87
A. Lorbsbach K. Tobin (1992) ArticleTitle‘Constructivism as a Referent for Science Teaching’ Newsletter 30 5–7
M. Matthews (1994) Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science Routledge New York
M. Matthews (Eds) (1998) Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
D. Mermin (1998) ArticleTitle‘What is Quantum Mechanics Trying to Tell Us?’ American Journal of Physics 66 753–767
M. Pauri (2003) ArticleTitle‘Don’t Ask Pythagoras about the Quantum’ Science & Education 12 467–477
S. Psillos (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debate’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 705–728 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bjps/51.4.705
J. Petri H. Niedderer (1998) ArticleTitle‘A Learning Pathway in High School Level Quantum Atomic Physics’ International Journal of Science Education 20 1075–1088
A. Riegler (2001) ArticleTitle‘Towards a Radical Constructivist Understanding of Science’ Foundations of Science 6 1–30
E. Schrödinger (1935) ‘The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics’ J. Wheeler W. Zurek (Eds) Quantum Theory and Measurement Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey 152–167
J. Staver (1998) ArticleTitle‘Constructivism: Sound Theory of Explicating the Practice of Science and Science Teaching’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 501–520 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199805)35:5<501::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
C. Weizcäcker Particlevon (1971) ‘The Copenhagen Interpretation’ T Bastin (Eds) Quantum Theory and Beyond Cambridge University Press Cambridge 25–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karakostas, V., Hadzidaki, P. Realism vs. Constructivism in Contemporary Physics: The Impact of the Debate on the Understanding of Quantum Theory and its Instructional Process. Sci Educ 14, 607–629 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5156-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5156-1