Abstract
The motivation of this paper is to explore the impact of the Sino-US trade war on the R&D investment of Chinese exporting family firms (FFs). Applying a difference in difference (DID) methodology, we are able to compare FFs who have export business with FFs who have not export business, and compare FFs that have export business before and after the Sino-US trade war. We find that family firm export significantly promotes R&D investment in an emerging market context, but the Sino-US trade war negatively affects the R&D investment effect of exports. This means that the trade war has indeed reduced R&D investment by Chinese FFs. Moreover, the relationship between trade war and export R&D investment effect is governed by family ownership, institutional ownership, and government subsidy. This paper contributes to our understanding of the important role of trade war in technological innovation strategy of FFs.
Plain English Summary
This research demonstrates that family firm export significantly promotes R&D investment, but the Sino-US trade war negatively affects the R&D investment effect of exports. In addition, the study found that there are three factors that can mediate the above relationship. Family ownership boosts FF’s export R&D investment effect and insulates it from the trade war. On the contrary, institutional shareholding inhibits the promotion effect of exports on R&D investment and exacerbates the negative impact of the trade war. Although government subsidies will enhance the effect of family firms’ export R&D investment, they will also increase the adverse impact of the trade war. Thus, the principal implications of this study are (1) families should increase their shareholding in FFs as it plays an important role in increasing the R&D input effect of exports and reducing the adverse impact of trade wars, and (2) government subsidies are a double-edged sword for FFs and should be used with caution.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Because of the short dimension of the panel we did not insert the lagged R&D as a further control. Since the lagged dependent is endogenous, to instrument it with further lags implies a huge loss of observations.
References
Aghion, P., Bergeaud, A., Lequien, & Melitz, M. J. (2018). The impact of exports on innovation: theory and evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal, (1), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3171084
Alessandri, T. M., Cerrato, D., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). The mixed gamble of internationalization in family and nonfamily firms: The moderating role of organizational slack. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1201
Amann, B., & Jaussaud, J. (2012). Family and non-family business resilience in an economic downturn. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2010.537057
Amato, S., Basco, R., Backman, M., & Lattanzi, N. (2021). Family-managed firms and local export spillovers: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. European Planning Studies, 29(3), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1743238
Antonelli, C., Orsatti, G., & Pialli, G. (2023). The knowledge-intensive direction of technological change. Eurasian Business Review, 13, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-022-00234-z
Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2575
Arrondo-García, R., Fernández-Méndez, C., & Menéndez-Requejo, S. (2016). The growth and performance of family businesses during the global financial crisis: The role of the generation in control. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(4), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.11.003
Bannò, M. (2016). Propensity to patent by family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(4), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.07.002
Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
Bloom, N. (2007). Uncertainty and the dynamics of R&D. American Economic Review, 97(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.11.1459
Brouwer, E., & Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent: An exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy, 28(6), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00003-7
Cai, Z. H., Che, X. Y., & He, H. D. (2023). An empirical research on the impact of Sino- US tradewar on enterprise R&D investment. Studies in Science of Science, 41(03), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220309.001
Carney, M., Zhao, J., & Zhu, L. (2019). Lean innovation: Family firm succession and patenting strategy in a dynamic institutional landscape. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.03.002
Chen, H. L., & Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509341062
Chen, C. J., Li, Z., Su, X., & Sun, Z. (2010). Rent-seeking incentives, corporate political connections, and the control structure of private firms: Chinese evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.09.009
Chen, R., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Wang, H. (2017). Do state and foreign ownership effect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.09.001
Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. (2008). Human agents, contexts, and institutional change: Thedecline of family in the leadership of business groups. Organization Science, 19(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0272
Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and nonfamily SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z
Cruz, C., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9265-8
Cucculelli, M., & Bettinelli, C. (2016). Corporate governance in family firms, learning and reaction to recession: Evidence from Italy. Futures, 75, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.011
Cui, Y. G., Lu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020). The impact of financial subsidies on the enterprises’ intangible asset investment strategy: Empirical test based on independent research and outsourcing Perspective. Public Finance Research, (12), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.19477/j.cnki.11-1077/f.2020.12.005
Czarnitzki, D., & Toole, A. A. (2007). Business R&D and the interplay of R&D subsidies and product market uncertainty. Review of Industrial Organization, 31(3), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9152-x
Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Č, & Polanec, S. (2010). From innovation to exporting or vice versa? World Economy, 33(3), 374–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01260.x
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1744/3/032143
Della Corte, V., Del Gaudio, G., & Sepe, F. (2018). Innovation and tradition-based firms: A multiple case study in the agro-food sector. British Food Journal, 120(6), 1295–1314. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2017-0380
Diéguez-Soto, J., Manzaneque, M., & Rojo-Ramírez, A. A. (2016). Technological innovation inputs, outputs, and performance: The moderating role of family involvement in management. Family Business Review, 29(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516646917
Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.
Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
Freixanet, J., Monreal, J., & Sanchez-Marin, G. (2021). Family firms’ selective learning-by-exporting: Product vs process innovation and the role of technological capabilities. Multinational Business Review, 29(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-01-2020-0011
Girma, S., & Gorg, H. (2007). Evaluating the foreign ownership wage premium using a difference-in-difference matching approach. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.006
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2011.593320
González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2007). The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74(294), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00547.x
Grühn, B., Strese, S., Flatten, T. C., Jaeger, N. A., & Brettel, M. (2017). Temporal changepatterns of entrepreneurial orientation: A longitudinal investigation of CEO successions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(4), 591–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12239
Gu, L. L., Cai, L., & Lei, Y. (2017). Family governance, alteration of ownership and firm innovation: Empirical study based on Chinese family-owned firms. Journal of Management Science, 30(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2017.02.004
Jarchow, S., Kaserer, C., & Keppler, H. (2023). Family firm performance in times of crisis—New evidence from Germany. Eurasian Business Review, 13(3), 543–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40821-023-00248-1
Jiannan, Y. (2022). Financial products and family business innovation strategy. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 13(3), 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1515/ERJ-2021-0303
Jing, L., & Xiaogang, H. (2012). Ownership intensity and innovative performance: A comparative analysis between state-owned and family-owned firms. Journal of Business Economics, 252(10), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2012.10.004
Khan, M. A., Qin, X., & Jebran, K. (2020). Uncertainty and R&D investment: Does product market competition matter? Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101167
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S., & Aulakh, P. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491006
Kotlar, J., Fang, H., De Massis, A., & Frattini, F. (2014). Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12165
Kylheiko, K., Jantunen, A., & Puumalainen, K. (2011). Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and appropriability. International Business Review, 20(5), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.09.004
Levine, R. (1999). Law, finance, and economic growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8(1), 8–35. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1998.0255
Lööf, H., Larijani, P. N., Cook, G., & Johansson, B. (2015). Learning-by-exporting and innovation strategies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(1–2), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.897863
Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2015). The dynamic linkages among exports, R&D and productivity. The World Economy, 38(4), 583–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12160
Martínez-Romero, M. J., Diéguez-Soto, J., & Vandekerkhof, P. (2023). Enlightening the influence of family TMT involvement on firm growth and degrowth rates. Eurasian Business Review, 13, 581–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40821-022-00220-5
Matzler, K., Veider, V., Hautz, J., & Stadler, C. (2015). The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12202
Mou, Q., & Wu, B. J. (2018). Heterogeneous institutional ownership, government subsidies and enterprise technological innovation. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 35(22), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2017120099
Nieto, M. J., Santamaria, L., & Fernandez, Z. (2015). Understanding the innovation behavior of family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12075
Ortega-Argiles, R., Moreno, R., & Caralt, J. S. (2005). Ownership structure and innovation: Is there a real link? Annals of Regional Science, 39(4), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0026-6
Sanchez-Marin, G., Pemartin, M., & Monreal-Perez, J. (2020). The influence of family involvement and generational stage on learning-by-exporting among family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 14(1), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00350-7
Schmid, T., Achleitner, A.-K., Ampenberger, M., & Kaserer, C. (2014). Family firms and R&D behavior—New evidence from a large-scale survey. Research Policy, 43, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.006
Segarra-Blasco, A., Teruel, M., & Cattaruzzo, S. (2022). Innovation, productivity and learning induced by export across European manufacturing firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(5), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1823673
Steier, L. P. (2009). Familial capitalism in global institutional contexts: Implications for corporate governance and entrepreneurship in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9117-0
Tomàs-Porres, J., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2023). Export and variability in the innovative status. Eurasian Business Review, 13, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40821-022-00232-1
Tse, C. H., Yu, L., & Zhu, J. (2017). A multimediation model of learning by exporting: Analysis of export-induced productivity gains. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2118–2146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573998
Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. (2013). Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00466.x
Zheng, J. H., Zhang, Y. C. H. (2019). The effectiveness of government r&d funding in promoting enterprise innovation: Hypothesis and test of heterogeneity of incentive effect. Economic Theory and Business Management, (12), 17–34. CNKI:SUN:JJLL.0.2019-12-002 https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJLL.0.2019-12-002
Zhou, D. H., Peng, J. F., Zhao, Y. J.(2023). China-US trade friction and enterprise innovation. Journal of International Trade, (11), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2023.11.007
Zhu, B., Zhang, R. T., Li, L. L. (2023). A study on the multiple models of private enterprise development in China. Journal of Social Sciences, (11), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2023.11.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, J., Mao, Y. & Guo, P. Firm export, trade war, and R&D investment of family firm. Small Bus Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00924-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00924-0