Skip to main content

The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness on the Firms' Export Competitiveness and Products Diversification Among East African Community Members

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trade and Investment in East Africa

Abstract

This chapter examines the effect of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and trade openness on competitiveness and diversification among East African Community (EAC) members. Unlike previous studies, we investigated this issue in the emerging region of EAC. This chapter uses fixed and random effects panel estimates from 2010 to 2019, inclusive. We find that the effect of FDI on a firm’s export competitiveness and trade diversification is positive and statistically significant. However, the effect of trade openness is positive and statistically significant for export diversification but insignificant for export competitiveness. Results are robust to the alternative dependent variable, control variables, specifications and estimation methods. Policy reforms to improve economic freedom, technological development, and strengthening the inter-relationship of the domestic sector with FDI and trade openness are required to improve export competitiveness and diversification.

Authors are thankful to Peter van Bergeijk and Binyam Afewerk Demena of Erasmus University, International Institute of Social Studies for technical guidance in carrying out the research work. The study was financially supported by Research on Poverty Alleviation (REPOA), the African Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP Group) of this project, grant number FED/2019/408-112

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.tralac.org/news/article/8618-eastern-africa-s-manufacturing-sector-promoting-technology-innovation-productivity-and-linkages.html, accessed on 10-August 2020.

  2. 2.

    According to this definition, export competitiveness encompasses both quantitative and qualitative factors such as quality of exports, capacity for technological innovation and degree of product specialization. However, these factors are difficult to measure in quantitative terms.

  3. 3.

    South Sudan was not be included due to unavailability of enough data from 2010 to 2019.

  4. 4.

    The lists of these variables were sourced from databases such as World Development Indicators (WDI) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator accessed on 20th, 23rd March, 2021. UNCTAD https://unctad.org/statistics accessed on 19th, 20th March 2021. Heritage foundation https://www.heritage.org/index/about accessed on 20th March 2021. UNIDO https://stat.unido.org/ accessed on 20th and 21st March 2021.

  5. 5.

    FDI stock used to serve the purpose of robustness test.

  6. 6.

    We also use sample size for the period 2009-2018 and the results remain the same (positive and significant) to conserve the space we have not reported here. The results are available upon request.

  7. 7.

    We also use sample size for the period 2009-2018 and the results remain the same (positive and significant).

  8. 8.

    We ignore the results of RE model when the EF become negative and statistically significant in columns (3) and (4) as the Hausman test supported FE effect model.

  9. 9.

    We ignore the results of Random Effect model which show negative and statistically significant as our Hausman test prefer Fixed Effect model.

  10. 10.

    The EAC report used only trend analysis of industrial competitiveness within EAC unlike our study.

References

  • Achandi EL (2011) Effect of foreign direct investments on export performance in Uganda. Makerere University, Uganda

    Google Scholar 

  • AfDB (2019) East Africa Economic Outlook, Macroeconomic developments and prospects, Political economy of regional integration. Africa Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosin MR, Alvarez R, Bravo‐Ortega C (2012) Determinants of Export Diversification around the World: 1962–2000. World Econ 35(3):295–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken H, Aitken BJ (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Am Econ Rev 1:605–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajayi A (2006) The influence of school type and location on resource availability and pupils learning outcome in primary schools in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Educ Thought. Accessed https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P3-2613272731/effects-of-school-location-on-students-learning-outcomes.

  • Anwar S, LP Nguyen (2011) Foreign direct investment and export spillovers: evidence from Vietnam. Int Bus Rev 20:177–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubraman V, Salisu M, Sapsford D (1996) Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and is countries. Econ J 106(434):92–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. R. and Gu, W. (2003) Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Canadian Journal of Economics 36:634–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström M, Ari Kokko A (1996) The impact of foreign investment on host countries: a review of the empirical evidence. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1745

  • Borensztein E, De Gregorio J, Lee J-W (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? J Int Econ Elsevier 45(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botta A (2015) The Macroeconomics of a Financial Dutch Disease (Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 850)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bwalya SM (2006) Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Evidence from panel data analysis of manufacturing firms in Zambia. J Dev Econ 81(2):514–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Hsu, W. C., and Wang, C. (2012) Effects of outward FDI on home‐country export competitiveness: The role of location and industry heterogeneity. Journal of Chinese economic and foreign trade studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerides S, Lach S, Tybout J (1998) Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Q J Econ 113(3):903–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA (2017) Essays on intra-industry spillovers from FDI in developing countries: a firm- level analysis with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa’. Erasmus University, The Hague, PhD diss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, Murshed SM (2018) Transmission channels matter: identifying spillovers from FDI’. J Int Trade Econ Dev 27(7):701–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, van Bergeijk PAG (2019) Observing FDI spillover transmission channels: evidence from firms in Uganda. Third World Q 40(9):1708–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demena BA, Msami J, Mmari D, van Bergeijk PAG (2022) Productivity premia and firm heterogeneity in Eastern Africa. In: Demena BA, van Bergeijk P (eds) Trade and investment in East Africa: prospect, challenges and pathways to sustainability. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Ðurić D, Ristić J, Ðurić D (2016) Foreign direct investments in the role of strengthening the export competitiveness of the Serbian economy. Econ Agric 63:531–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, N., and Williamson, C. R. (2016) Aiding economic freedom: Exploring the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 24-38

    Google Scholar 

  • EAC (2017) EAC trade and investment report 2017 accelerating market driven integration, East African Community, Annex VII-Draft EAC Trade Report 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • EAC (2018) EAC trade and investmnet report. Maximizing benefits of regional integration. Accessed http://repository.eac.int/handle/11671/2041

  • EAC (2019) East African community trade and investment report, East Africa community

    Google Scholar 

  • Eryiğit M (2012) The long run relationship between foreign direct investments, exports, and gross domestic product: panel data implications. Theor Appl Econ 10(10):71

    Google Scholar 

  • Farole, T., and Winkler, D. (Eds.). (2014) Making foreign direct investment work for Sub-Saharan Africa: local spillovers and competitiveness in global value chains. World Bank Publications. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16390

  • Fontagné L (1999) Foreign direct investment and international trade: complements or substitutes? No 1999/3, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamariel G, Hove S (2019) Foreign direct investment and export competitiveness in Africa: investing the channels. J Afr Trade. https://doi.org/10.2991/jat.k.191115.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway D, Sousa N, Wakelin K (2004) Do domestic firms learn to exportfrom multinationals? Eur J Polit Econ 20(4):1027–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway D, Guariglia A, Kneller R (2005) Do financial factors affect exporting decisions? University of Nottingham, GEP Research Paper 2005/28

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq R (2012) The managing diversity mindset in public versus private organizations in India. Int J Hum Resour Manag 23(5):892–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding T, Javorcik BS (2011) Roll out the red carpet and they will come: investment promotion and FDI inflows. Econ J 121(557):1445–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02454

  • Harrison, (1996) Openness and growth: a time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. J Dev Econ 48(2):419–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Pritchett L, Rodrik D (2006) Growth accelerations. J Econ Growth 10:303–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D (2007) What you export matters. J Econ Growth 12:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman PR (1985) Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y (2020) Heterogeneous environmental regulations, R&D innovation and manufacturing enterprises' export technological sophistication. EconStor Preprints 222983, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Huchet-Bourdon M, Le Mouël C, Vijil M (2018) The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: some new insights on the openness measurement issue. World Econ 41:59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang J (2006) Introduction of new goods, convergence and growth, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University job market paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbs J, Wacziarg R (2003) Stages of diversification. Am Econ Rev Am Econ Assoc 93(1):63–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto, M., and Nabeshima, K. (2012) Can FDI promote export diversification and sophistication of host countries?: dynamic panel system GMM analysis (No. 347). Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • Jana SS, Sahu TN, Pandey KD (2019) Foreign direct investment and economic growth in India: a sector-specific analysis. Asia-Pac J Manag Res Innov 15(1–2):53–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X19849731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik B (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am Econ Rev 94(3):605–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaweera, S. (2009) Foreign direct investment and export diversification in low income nations. Available at SSRN 1566044

    Google Scholar 

  • John Baldwin and Wulong Gu (2003) Export-market participation and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing. Can J Econ 36(3):634–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabaklarli, E., Mangir, F., Sawhney, B. (2018) Impact of Infrastructure on Economic Growth: A Panel Data Approach Using PMG Estimator. International Review of Business and Economics, 2(2), 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria V (2000) Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms. J Int Dev 12(3):343–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200004)12:3<343::AID-JID639>3.0.CO;2-R

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutan A, Vukšić G (2007) Foreign direct investment and export performance: empirical evidence. Comp Econ Stud 49 (3):430–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Keho, Y. (2017) The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1332820

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z (2008) Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence. J Dev Econ 85(1–2):176–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi B, Karim M (2016) Competitiveness determinants of Moroccan exports: quantity-based analysis. Int J Econ Financ 8(7):140. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n7p140

  • Markusen J, Venables A (1999) Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijiyawa AG (2016) Does foreign direct investment promote exports? Evidence from African countries. World Econ 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12465

  • Mondal S, Pant M (2014) FDI and firm competitiveness: evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Econ Polit Wkly XLIX(38)

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore M (1998) Foreign direct investment and development: The new policy agenda for developing countries and economies in transition, peterson institute for international economics. http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_7_3.pdf

  • Moss T, Ramachandran V, Shah M (2004) Is Africa’s skepticism of foreign capital justified? Evidence from East African firm survey data, Centre for Global Development, Working Paper No. 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Osakwe PN, Santos-Paulino AU, Dogan B (2018) Trade dependence, liberalization, and exports diversification in developing countries. J Afr Trade 5:19–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasanna N (2010) Impact of foreign direct investment on export performance in India. J Soc Sci 24(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2010.11892838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rădulescu M, Şerbănescu L (2012) The impact of FDIs on exports, and export competitiveness in Central and Eastern European Countries. J Knowl Manag Econ Inf Technol

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5, Part 2): S71–S102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy. London: J. Murray

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs JD, Warner AM (2001) The curse of natural resources. Eur Econ Rev 4–6, 827–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples JA, Milham N (1990) Long-run competitiveness of Australian agriculture, foreign agricultural economic report (FAER) 147996, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Shobande OA (2019) Effect of economic integration on agricultural export performance in selected West African countries. Economies 7(3):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan Z (2013) A causal relationship between FDI inflows and export: the case of India. J Econ Sustain Dev 4(2):20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, D. V. (2019) A study on the impact of economic freedom on economic growth in ASEAN countries. Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), 15(1232-2020-355), 423-449

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner P, Jozef van’t dack (1993) Measuring international price and cost competitiveness. Bank for international settlemenents, Monetary and economics department. ISBN92-9131-037-9

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, United Nation. Sustainabledevelopment.un.org

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1999) World investment report 1999, foreign direct investment and the challenge of development. United nations conference on trade and development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir1999_en.pdf

  • UNCTAD (2015a) World investment Report, 2015a, reforming international investment governance, key messages and overview, United Nations conference on trade and development. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/bop/2015a/pdf/15-21.pdf

  • UNCTAD (2015b) Technology and innovative report 2015b: fostering innovation policies for industrial development, UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015b

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2018) World investment report, investment and new industrial policies, United Nations conference on trade and development, World investment report 2018 - investment and new industrial policies (unctad.org)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, UNCTAD Statistics [Internet] (2016). http://unctadstat.unctad.org

  • Ustabaş, A.,  Ersin, Ö. Ö. (2016) The effects of R&D and high technology exports on economic growth: A comparative cointegration analysis for Turkey and South Korea. In International conference on Eurasian economies (pp. 44–55)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bergeijk PAG (1995) The accuracy of international economic observations. Bull Econ Res 47(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wako, H. A. (2021) Foreign direct investment in sub-Saharan Africa: Beyond its growth effect. Research in Globalization, 3, 100054

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Hsu W, Wang C (2012) Effects of outward FDI on home-country export competitiveness. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 5(1):56–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang KH (2006) The role of FDI in China's export performance. In: Zhang KH (ed) Chinas as the world factory. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang (2015) China’s manufacturing performance and industrial competitiveness upgrading, international comparison and policy reflection

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Mohammed Albiman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Albiman, M.M., Yussuf, H.A., Hemed, I.M. (2022). The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Openness on the Firms' Export Competitiveness and Products Diversification Among East African Community Members. In: Demena, B.A., Van Bergeijk, P.A. (eds) Trade and Investment in East Africa. Frontiers in African Business Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4211-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4211-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4210-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4211-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics