Bidding against the odds? The impact evaluation of grants for young micro and small firms during the recession
- 151 Downloads
Impact evaluations of business development grants targeting young firms have been somewhat neglected in the literature. While most research studies focus on the impact of research and development grants, a larger percentage of young firms would benefit from grants that assist them in business development activities. In this paper, we examine the impact of small business development grants on young small firm survival, turnover growth, labor growth, and access to external finances. We study this topic in the context of a long recession in Croatia (2009 to 2014), which makes it possible to better observe the effect of the public instrument intervention. Results show positive effect on firm survival and on obtaining long-term bank loans and no significant effects on firm performance. The grant scheme was most successful for firms newest to the market.
KeywordsGrants Recession Young firms Survival Firm performance Bank loans
JEL classificationH25 L26
We thank the associate editor László Szerb and the two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. Draft version of the paper was presented during Training Workshop ‘Evaluations of Innovation Policies’ held from 21 to 22 November 2017 in Zagreb, within the project “Strengthening scientific and research capacity of the Institute of Economics, Zagreb as a cornerstone for Croatian socioeconomic growth through the implementation of Smart Specialization Strategy” (H2020-TWINN-2015-692191-SmartEIZ). This research is also supported by TVOJ GRANT@EIZ, financed by the Institute of Economics, Zagreb. The manuscript has been awarded the Hans Raupach 2018 Award by the Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies Economics Department, best paper award at the final conference of the EU Horizon 2020 Twinning project H2020-TWINN-2015-692191-SmartEIZ, and was also presented at the DRUID2018 conference in Copenhagen in June 2018. The views expressed in this paper are solely of the authors and do not represent the views of the either of two projects.
- Acevedo, G. L., & Tan, H. W. (Eds.). (2011). Impact evaluation of small and medium enterprise programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington. D.C.: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- Backman, M., Mellander, C., & Gabe, T. (2016). Effects of human capital on the growth and survival of Swedish businesses. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 46(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
- Burger, A., & Rojec, M. (2018). Impotence of crisis-motivated subsidization of firms: The case of Slovenia. Eastern European Economics, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2017.1416294.
- Bruhn, M., Karlan, D. S., & Schoar, A. (2012). The Impact of Consulting Services on Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Mexico. Yale Economics Department Working Paper No. 100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2010710Google Scholar
- Calvino, F., Criscuolo, C., & Menon, C. (2015). Cross-country evidence on start-up dynamics. In OECD science, technology and industry working papers, no. 2015/06. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Quas, A., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2016). How high-tech entrepreneurial ventures cope with the global crisis: Changes in product innovation and internationalization strategies. Industry and Innovation, 23(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1196438.
- Crépon, B., & Duguet, E. (2003). Bank loans, start-up subsidies and the survival of the new firms: An econometric analysis at the entrepreneur level. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.421921.
- Désiage, L. J., Duhautois, R., & Redor, D. (2010). Do public subsidies have an impact on new firm survival? An empirical study with French data. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1640560.
- DiPrete, T. A., & Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing Bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 271–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00154.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galindo-Rueda, F., & Verger, F. (2016). OECD taxonomy of economic activities based on R&D intensity. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gilchrist, S., & Sim, J. W. (2007). Investment during the Korean financial crisis: A structural econometric analysis. NBER Working Paper No. w13315. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13315
- Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9), 1523–1543Google Scholar
- Hsu, F.-M., Horng, D.-J., & Hsueh, C.-C. (2009). The effect of Government-sponsored R&D Programmes in additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed--and what to do about it. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
- Neicu, D., Teirlinck, P., & Kelchtermans, S. (2016). Dipping in the policy mix: do R&D subsidies foster behavioral additionality effects of R&D tax credits?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25(3), 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1076192Google Scholar
- OECD, ETF, EU, EBRD, & SEECEL. (2016). SME Policy Index: Western Balkans and Turkey 2016. Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264254473-en