Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586–612.
Article
Google Scholar
Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the corporate future: Plan or be planned for. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Anthony, E. (1963). Approach, method, and technique. ELT Journal, 17(2), 63–67.
Article
Google Scholar
Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 630–651.
Article
Google Scholar
Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375.
Article
Google Scholar
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.
Article
Google Scholar
Banks, G. C., Pollack, J. M., Bochantin, J. E., Kirkman, B. L., Whelpley, C. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). Management’s science–practice gap: a grand challenge for all stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2205–2231.
Article
Google Scholar
Baron, R. A. (2004). Potential benefits of the cognitive perspective: expanding entrepreneurship’s array of conceptual tools. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 169–172.
Article
Google Scholar
Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. (1988). Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In D. E. Bell, H. Raiffa, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Decision making: descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions (pp. 9–32). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Blank, S. G. (2007). The four steps to the epiphany: successful strategies for products that win. San Mateo, CA: Cafepress.
Google Scholar
Blank, S. G. (2013). Why the lean startup changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.
Google Scholar
Blank, S. G., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: the step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K&S Ranch Publishers, Inc..
Google Scholar
Brinckmann, J., Grichnik, D., & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar
Bruyat, C., & Julien, P.-A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180.
Article
Google Scholar
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc..
Google Scholar
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing design thinking: the concept in idea and enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 195–215.
Article
Google Scholar
Christiansen, J. (2009). Copying Y Combinator, a framework for developing seed accelerator programmes. MBA Dissertation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
Article
Google Scholar
Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4), 446–462.
Article
Google Scholar
D’Abate, C. P., Eddy, E. R., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (2003). What’s in a name? A literature-based approach to understanding mentoring, coaching, and other constructs that describe developmental interactions. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 360–384.
Article
Google Scholar
Dean, J. W., & Bowen, D. E. (1994). Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 392–418.
Article
Google Scholar
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165–1185.
Article
Google Scholar
Delmar, F., & Shane, S. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385–410.
Article
Google Scholar
Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413.
Article
Google Scholar
Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). What effectuation is not: further development of an alternative to rational choice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO, 12 August 2010.
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(1), 37–59.
Article
Google Scholar
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Dew, N., Ramesh, A., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2018). Toward deliberate practice in the development of entrepreneurial expertise: The anatomy of the effectual ask. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 389–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Dimov, D. (2016). Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In J. Katz & A. C. Corbett (Eds.), Models of start-up thinking and action: theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (pp. 1–31). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.
Article
Google Scholar
Draman, R. H. (1995). A new approach to the development of business plans: a cross functional model using the theory of constraints philosophies. Doctoral dissertation. Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
Google Scholar
Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523.
Article
Google Scholar
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9), 833–859.
Article
Google Scholar
Eisenmann, T., Ries, E., & Dillard, S. (2012). Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: the lean startup. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Case, No. 812-095, Boston, MA.
Fiet, J. O. (2002). The systematic search for entrepreneurial discoveries. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Google Scholar
Fiet, J. O. (2007). A prescriptive analysis of search and discovery. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 592–611.
Article
Google Scholar
Fiet, J. O. (2008). Prescriptive entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Book
Google Scholar
Fiet, J. O., & Patel, P. C. (2008). Entrepreneurial discovery as constrained, systematic search. Small Business Economics, 30(3), 215–229.
Article
Google Scholar
Fiet, J. O., Norton, W. I., & Clouse, V. G. (2013). Search and discovery by repeatedly successful entrepreneurs. International Small Business Journal, 31(8), 890–913.
Article
Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051.
Article
Google Scholar
Foss, K., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2007). Original and derived judgment: an entrepreneurial theory of economic organization. Organization Studies, 28(12), 1893–1912.
Article
Google Scholar
Frank, H., & Landström, H. (2016). What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigor–relevance gap. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 28(1–2), 51–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Furr, N., & Ahlstrom, P. (2011). Nail it then scale it: the entrepreneur’s guide to creating and managing breakthrough innovation. Lexington, KY: NISI Institute.
Google Scholar
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300.
Article
Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. F., Penzel, M., & Marmer, M. (2017). Global startup ecosystem report 2017. https://startupgenome.com/report2017/. Accessed February 7, 2018.
Gomory, R. E. (1995). The known, the unknown and the unknowable. Scientific American, 272(6), 120–120.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanks, S. H., Watson, C. J., Jansen, E., & Chandler, G. N. (1994). Tightening the life-cycle construct: a taxonomic study of growth stage configurations in high-technology organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 5–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Harmeling, S. S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2013). When contingency is a resource: educating entrepreneurs in the Balkans, the Bronx, and beyond. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 713–744.
Article
Google Scholar
Harper, D. A. (2008). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 613–626.
Article
Google Scholar
Hart, S. L., & Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 7–18.
Google Scholar
Heitmann, J. (2014). The lean startup: a pragmatic view on its flaws and pitfalls. Master’s thesis, University of Twente, Twente, The Netherlands.
Hong, J., Song, T. H., & Yoo, S. (2013). Paths to success: how do market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation produce new product success? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 44–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146.
Article
Google Scholar
Jones, C., & Penaluna, A. (2013). Moving beyond the business plan in enterprise education. Education + Training, 55(8/9), 804–814.
Article
Google Scholar
Karlsson, T., & Honig, B. (2009). Judging a business by its cover: an institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 27–45.
Article
Google Scholar
Khanna, R., Guler, I., & Nerkar, A. (2016). Fail often, fail big, and fail fast? Learning from small failures and R&D performance in the pharmaceutical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 436–459.
Article
Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.
Google Scholar
Klein, L. (2013). UX for lean startups: faster, smarter user experience research and design. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc..
Google Scholar
Klotz, A. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Bradley, B. H., & Busenitz, L. W. (2014). New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research. Journal of Management, 40(1), 226–255.
Article
Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York, NY: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.
Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Korsgaard, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2011). Enacting entrepreneurship as social value creation. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 135–151.
Article
Google Scholar
Kotha, R., & George, G. (2012). Friends, family, or fools: entrepreneur experience and its implications for equity distribution and resource mobilization. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 525–543.
Article
Google Scholar
Lackéus, M. (2016). Value creation as educational practice— - towards a new educational philosophy grounded in entrepreneurship? Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Landa, L. N. (1999). Landamatics instructional design theory and methodology for teaching general methods of thinking. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: a new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 341–369). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Leavy, B. (2010). Design thinking—a new mental model of value innovation. Strategy & Leadership, 38(3), 5–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: a determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 263–278.
Article
Google Scholar
Levie, J., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010). A terminal assessment of stages theory: introducing a dynamic states approach to entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 317–350.
Article
Google Scholar
Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938.
Article
Google Scholar
Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for growth: a design thinking toolkit for managers. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalization. In B.-Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National Systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp. 45–67). London: Pinter Publishers.
Google Scholar
Mansoori, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurial methods. Licentiate dissertation. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
Google Scholar
Mansoori, Y. (2017). Entrepreneurial methods as vehicles of entrepreneurial action. Doctoral dissertation. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology.
Google Scholar
March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.
Article
Google Scholar
Marmer, M., Herrmann, B.L., Dogrultan, E., Berman, R., Eesley, C., & Blank, S. (2011). Startup genome report extra: premature scaling. http://innovationfootprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/startup-genome-report-extra-on-premature-scaling.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2018.
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Google Scholar
Maurya, A. (2012). Running lean: iterate from plan A to a plan that works. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc..
Google Scholar
McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1995). Discovery driven planning. Harvard Business Review, 1995(July-August), 44-54.
McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
McKelvie, A., Haynie, J. M., & Gustavsson, V. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 273–292.
Article
Google Scholar
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.
Article
Google Scholar
Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 5–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Murray, F., & Tripsas, M. (2004). The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: the role of purposeful experimentation. In J. A. C. Baum & A. M. McGahan (Eds.), Business strategy over the industry lifecycle (advances in strategic management) (Vol. 2, pp. 45–75). Bingley, West Yorkshire: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G., & Brush, C. G. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship: a practice-based approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Ozdemir, S. Z., Moran, P., Zhong, X., & Bliemel, M. J. (2016). Reaching and acquiring valuable resources: the entrepreneur’s use of brokerage, cohesion, and embeddedness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 49–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Parsons, T., Shils, E. A., & Smelser, N. J. (1965). Toward a general theory of action: theoretical foundations for the social sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 62.
Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Google Scholar
Rauth, I. (2015). Understanding management ideas: the development of interpretability. Doctoral dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of marketing, 73(3), 1–18.
Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., & Wiltbank, R. (2016). Effectual entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Reymen, I. M., Andries, P., Berends, H., Mauer, R., Stephan, U., & Burg, E. (2015). Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: a process study of effectuation and causation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(4), 351–379.
Article
Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: how today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York, NY: Random House Digital.
Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (Third ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: organization as design. Organization Science, 14(5), 558–573.
Article
Google Scholar
Romme, A. G. L. (2016). The quest for professionalism: the case of management and entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Romme, A. G. L., & Endenburg, G. (2006). Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organization Science, 17(2), 287–297.
Article
Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340–355.
Article
Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
Article
Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(2), 203–220.
Article
Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2009). Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005a). Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 385–406.
Article
Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005b). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565.
Article
Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113–135. Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial research (pp. 141–160). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies, 29(3), 331–350.
Article
Google Scholar
Sonalkar, N., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. (2016). Developing a design thinking curriculum for venture creation in resource-constrained environment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1372–1384.
Google Scholar
Steinhoff, H. W. (1971). Dynamic business planning under conditions of uncertainty. Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of the Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, CA.
Sull, D. (2004). Disciplined entrepreneurship. Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 71–77.
Google Scholar
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77–94.
Article
Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2016). Superforecasting: the art and science of prediction. New York, NY: Random House.
Google Scholar
Thomke, S. H. (1998). Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Science, 44(6), 743–762.
Article
Google Scholar
Thomke, S. H. (2003). Experimentation matters: unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar
Tietz, R. (1992). Semi-normative theories based on bounded rationality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(2), 297–314.
Article
Google Scholar
Tsang, E. W. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization: a dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50(1), 73–89.
Google Scholar
Tunisini, A., & Zanfei, A. (1998). Exploiting and creating knowledge through customer–supplier relationships: lessons from a case study. R&D Management, 28(2), 111–118.
Article
Google Scholar
Upton, N., Teal, E. J., & Felan, J. T. (2001). Strategic and business planning practices of fast growth family firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 60–72.
Article
Google Scholar
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.
Article
Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.
Article
Google Scholar
Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2001). Gapping the relevance bridge: fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British Journal of Management, 12(S1), S71–S75.
Article
Google Scholar
Wiltbank, R., Dew, N., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2006). What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 981–998.
Article
Google Scholar
Wiltbank, R., Read, S., Dew, N., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2009). Prediction and control under uncertainty: outcomes in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), 116–133.
Article
Google Scholar
Wiltbank, R.E. & Sarasvathy, S.D. (2010). What effectuation is not: Further development of an alternative to rational choice. Academy of Management Conference, Montreal Canada.
Wolf, J., & Rosenberg, T. (2012). How individual scholars can reduce the rigor-relevance gap in management research. Business Research, 5(2), 178–196.
Article
Google Scholar
Wood, J. (2000). The culture of academic rigor: does design research really need it? The Design Journal, 3(1), 44–57.
Article
Google Scholar