Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: Start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics,
9, 21–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Antonelli, C., & Scellato, G. (2015). Firms size and directed technological change. Small Business Economics,
44(1), 207–218.
Article
Google Scholar
Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy,
42, 303–314.
Article
Google Scholar
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Brancati, E. (2015). Innovation financing and the role of relationship lending for SMEs. Small Business Economics,
44(2), 449–473.
Article
Google Scholar
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy,
32, 69–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics,
6, 83–108.
Article
Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review,
20(2), 343–378.
Google Scholar
Capasso, M., Treibich, T., & Verspagen, B. (2015). The medium-term effect of R&D on firm growth. Small Business Economics,
45(1), 39–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Chiu, Y., Lai, H., Liaw, Y., & Lee, T. (2010). Technological scope: Diversified or specialized. Scientometrics,
82, 37–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Coad, A., & Guenther, C. (2013). Diversification patterns and survival as firms mature. Small Business Economics,
41, 633–649.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,
35, 128–152.
Article
Google Scholar
Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). Open innovation and within-industry diversification in small and medium enterprises: The case of open source software firms. Research Policy,
43, 891–902.
Article
Google Scholar
Corradini, C., Battisti, G., & Demirel, P. (2015). Serial innovators in the UK: Does size matter? Industrial and Corporate Change,. doi:10.1093/icc/dtu040.
Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review,
75, 332–337.
Google Scholar
De Jong, J. P. J., & Vermeulen, P. A. M. (2006). Determinants of product innovation in small firms: A comparison across industries. International Small Business Journal,
24(6), 587–609.
Article
Google Scholar
Deschryvere, M. (2014). R&D, firm growth and the role of innovation persistence: An analysis of finnish SMEs and large firms. Small Business Economics,
43, 767–785.
Article
Google Scholar
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy,
11, 147–162.
Article
Google Scholar
Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. R. (2013). The evolution of technologies: An assessment of the state-of-the-art. Eurasian Business Review,
3, 3–46.
Google Scholar
Fai, F. (2003). Corporate technological competence and the evolution of technological diversification. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar
Fai, F., & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2001). Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: Evidence from patents. Structural change and economic dynamics,
12, 141–170.
Article
Google Scholar
Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science,
47, 117–132.
Article
Google Scholar
Gambardella, A., & Torrisi, S. (1998). Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27(5), 445–463.
Article
Google Scholar
García-Quevedo, J., Pellegrino, G., & Vivarelli, M. (2014). R&D drivers and age: Are young firms different? Research Policy,
43, 1544–1556.
Article
Google Scholar
Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy,
35, 230–246.
Article
Google Scholar
Granstrand, O. (1998). Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy,
17, 465–489.
Article
Google Scholar
Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-technology corporations: Why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies. California Management Review,
39, 8–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Hall, B. H. (2005). A note on the bias in herfindahl-type measures based on count data. Revue d’Economie Industrielle. Programme National Persee,
110, 149–156.
Article
Google Scholar
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenber, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics,
36, 16–38.
Google Scholar
Hall, B., Lotti, F., & Mairesse, J. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics,
33, 13–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Hicks, D., & Hegde, D. (2005). Highly innovative small firms in the markets for technology. Research Policy,
34, 703–716.
Article
Google Scholar
Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics,
33, 59–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal,
45, 1183–1194.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim, D. J., & Kogut, B. (1996). Technological platforms and diversification. Organization Science,
7, 283–301.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim, M., & Wang, I. K. (2014). Dynamic product differentiation strategies: An examination of the interplay of firm and industry characteristics. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,
26(8), 959–983.
Article
Google Scholar
Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy,
24, 185–205.
Article
Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science,
3, 393–397.
Article
Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal,
13, 111–125.
Article
Google Scholar
Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management,
24, 567–579.
Article
Google Scholar
Libaers, D., & Meyer, M. (2011). Highly innovative small technology firms, industrial clusters and firm internationalization. Research Policy,
40, 1426–1437.
Article
Google Scholar
Lin, C., & Chang, C. C. (2015). The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,
90, 575–586.
Article
Google Scholar
Malerba, F., Mancusi, M., & Montobbio, F. (2013). Innovation, international R&D spillovers and the sectoral heterogeneity of knowledge flows. Review of World Economics,. doi:10.1007/s10290-013-0167-0.
Google Scholar
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1993). Technological regimes and firm behaviour. Industrial and Corporate Change,
2, 45–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Máñez, J. A., Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis-Llopis, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2015). The determinants of R&D persistence in SMEs. Small Business Economics,
44, 505–528.
Article
Google Scholar
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,
2, 71–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Marsili, O. (2002). Technological regimes and sources of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics,
19, 217–231.
Article
Google Scholar
Martinez, C. (2011). Patent families: When do different definitions really matter? Scientometrics,
86, 39–63.
Article
Google Scholar
McGrath, R. G., & Nerkar, A. (2004). Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 1–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Miller, D. J. (2006). Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal,
27, 601–619.
Article
Google Scholar
Modrego, F., McCann, P., Foster, W. E., & Olfert, M. R. (2015). Regional entrepreneurship and innovation in Chile: A knowledge matching approach. Small Business Economics,
44(3), 685–703.
Article
Google Scholar
Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1998). Paths to innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation,
24, 153–161.
Article
Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Google Scholar
Nesta, L., & Saviotti, P. P. (2005). Coherence of the knowledge base and the firm’s innovative performance: Evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics,
53, 123–142.
Article
Google Scholar
Newey, L. R., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). The evolving firm: How dynamic and operating capabilities interact to enable entrepreneurship. British Journal of Management,
20, S81–S100.
Article
Google Scholar
Nunes, P. M., Goncalves, M., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2013). The influence of age on SMEs’ growth determinants: Empirical evidence. Small Business Economics,
40, 249–272.
Article
Google Scholar
OECD. (2001). Science, technology and industry scoreboard: Towards a knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar
Ortega-Argilés, R., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2009). R&D in SMEs: A paradox? Small Business Economics,
33(1), 3–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics,
11, 619–632.
Article
Google Scholar
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy,
26, 141–156.
Article
Google Scholar
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1998). The wide (and increasing) spread of technological competencies. In the world’s largest firms: A challenge to conventional wisdom. In A. D. Chandler, P. Hageström, Ö. Slölvell (Eds.), The Dynamic Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peters, B. (2009). Persistence of innovation: Stylised facts and panel data evidence. The Journal of Technology Transfer,
34, 226–243.
Article
Google Scholar
Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy,
37, 492–507.
Article
Google Scholar
Rammer, C., Czarnitzki, D., & Spielkamp, A. (2009). Innovation success of non-R&D-performers: Substituting technology by management in SMEs. Small Business Economics,
33, 35–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Raymond, W., Mohnen, P., Palm, F., & Van Der Loeff, S. S. (2010). Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: Is it spurious? The Review of Economics and Statistics,
92, 495–504.
Article
Google Scholar
Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1994). Innovation and size of firm. In M. Dodgson (Ed.), Handbook of industrial innovation (pp. 310–324). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar
Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/classifications/en/ipc_ce_41/ipc_ce_41_5-annex1.pdf.
Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics,
33(1), 77–89.
Article
Google Scholar
Stuart, T., & Podolny, J. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,
17, 21–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Suzuki, J., & Kodama, F. (2004). Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy,
33, 531–549.
Article
Google Scholar
Toh, P. K., & Kim, T. (2013). Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. Organization Science,
24, 1214–1236.
Article
Google Scholar
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics,
21, 172–187.
Article
Google Scholar
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. (1992). Organizational determinants of technological-change-toward a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior,
14, 311–347.
Google Scholar
Vossen, R. W. (1998). Relative strengths and weaknesses of small firms in innovation. International Small Business Journal,
16, 88–95.
Article
Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2000). Complexity and the functions of the firm: Breadth and depth. Research Policy,
29, 805–818.
Article
Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar