Skip to main content
Log in

Two-sided intergenerational moral hazard, long-term care insurance, and nursing home use

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-sided intergenerational moral hazard occurs (i) if the parent’s decision to purchase long-term care (LTC) coverage undermines the child’s incentive to exert effort because the insurance protects the bequest from the cost of nursing home care, and (ii) when the parent purchases less LTC coverage, relying on child’s effort to keep him out of the nursing home. However, a “net” moral hazard effect obtains only if the two players’ responses to exogenous shocks fail to neutralize each other, entailing a negative relationship between child’s effort and parental LTC coverage. We focus on outcomes out of equilibrium, interpreting them as a break in the relationship resulting in no informal care provided and hence high probability nursing home admission. Changes in the parent’s initial wealth, LTC subsidy received, and child’s expected inheritance are shown to induce “net” moral hazard, in contradistinction to changes in child’s opportunity cost and share in the bequest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For other reasons explaining the slow development of private LTC insurance, please refer to Brown and Finkelstein (2007).

  2. See for instance the works of Sloan and Norton (1997), Mellor (2001), Doerpinghaus and Gustavson (2002), and Courbage and Roudaut (2008), who empirically addressed this issue.

  3. We thank the referee for having raised this point.

  4. Alternatively, the child could also decide to hire help to care for the parent if the child’s wage is above the helper’s wage. The reduction in child wealth would then come from having to pay for help rather than from lowered earnings.

  5. We owe this point to Ken Clements of the University of Western Australia.

References

  • Brown, J., & Finkelstein, A. (2007). Why is the market for long-term care insurance so small? Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1967–1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Finkelstein, A. (2008). The interaction of public and private insurance: Medicaid and the long-term care insurance market. The American Economic Review, 98(3), 1083–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mansfield, J., & Wirtz, P. A. (2007). Characteristics of adult day care participants who enter the nursing home. Psychology and Aging, 22(2), 354–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courbage, C., & Roudaut, N. (2008). Empirical evidence of long-term care insurance purchase in France. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice, 33(4), 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerpinghaus, H. I., & Gustavson, G. G. (2002). Long-term care insurance purchase patterns. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 5(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W. N., & Viscusi, W. K. (1991). Estimation of state dependent utility function using survey data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A., Luttmer, E., & Notowidigdo, M. (2009). Approaches to estimating the health state dependence of the utility function. The American Economic Review, 99(2), 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, J. E., Yu, F., Krichbaum, K., & Wyman, J. F. (2009). Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia. Medical Care, 47(5), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, J. E., Jr. (1987). Theory of financial decision making. Totawa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, J. M. (2001). Long-term care and nursing home coverage: are adult children substitutes for insurance policies? Journal of Health Economics, 20(4), 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M. V. (1990). The rational non-purchase of long-term care insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 153–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, F. A., & Norton, E. C. (1997). Adverse selection, bequests, crowding out, and private demand for insurance: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel, P., & Strüwe, W. (1996). Long-term care insurance and bequests as instruments for shaping intergenerational relationships. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel, P., & Strüwe, W. (1998). Long-term care insurance in a two generation model. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 65, 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Courbage.

Additional information

This paper was written in part while the second author was an invited scholar with the Brocher Foundation in Hermance (Geneva). Support by the Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. The authors benefitted from comments provided by participants at the 2nd World Risk and Insurance Economists Congress in Singapore and at the Economics seminar of The University of Western Australia (Perth) as well as by an anonymous referee. The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Courbage, C., Zweifel, P. Two-sided intergenerational moral hazard, long-term care insurance, and nursing home use. J Risk Uncertain 43, 65–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9120-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9120-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation