Abstract
This mixed-methods research study aimed to observe the changes in relational conceptual changes and achievement in photosynthesis and cellular respiration in 15 seventh-grade students using the variation theory of learning, a framework for contextual distinctions, and supports the Common Knowledge Construction Model (CKCM) for science education. The strategy used was prediction-observation-explanation, where students wrote and drew to express their macroscopic and sub-microscopic concepts, depicting any changes. Pre- and post-assessment tests were given to measure achievement in science. Through phenomenography analysis, five descriptive categories were generated for photosynthesis and nine for cellular respiration, revealing variations within and between students' ideas. Statistical tests showed significant improvements (p < .001) in photosynthesis and cellular respiration knowledge after implementing the CKCM learning sequence, with scores increasing from 37 to 77% and 33% to 72%, respectively. These findings suggest that inquiry-based learning based on relational conceptual change, guided by variation theory and an understanding of the nature of science, can lead to a deeper understanding of scientific explanations and improve overall science achievement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2022
Achieve Inc. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Washington DC: Achieve Inc.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2018). What future for phenomenographic research? On continuity and development in the phenomenography and variation theory research tradition. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(6), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324899
Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). In-depth analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing research-based remedial instruction: The case of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 56(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449760
Anderson, C. W., Sheldon, T. H., & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270806
Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0230
Bakirci, H., & Ensari, F. (2018). The effect of common knowledge construction model on academic achievement and conceptual understandings of high school students on heat and temperature. Education and Science, 43(196), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7457
Barker, M., & Carr, M. (1989). Teaching and learning about photosynthesis. Part 1: An assessment in terms of students’ prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 49–56.
Barker, M. (1985). Teaching and learning about photosynthesis. Science Education Research Unit, Working Papers 220–9. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., & Barman, N. S. (2006). Students’ ideas about plants and plant growth. The American Biology. Teacher, 68(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451935
Bell, B. (1985). Students’ ideas about plant nutrition: What are they? Journal of Biological Education, 19(3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1985.9654731
Bishop, B., Roth, K., & Anderson, C. (1985). Respiration and photosynthesis: A teaching module. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Brown, M. H., & Schwartz, R. S. (2009). Connecting photosynthesis and cellular respiration: Preservice teachers’ conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(7), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20287
Calik, M., & Cobern, W. W. (2017). A cross-cultural study of common knowledge construction model efficacy in an undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00016B
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.
Cañal, P. (1999). Photosynthesis and “inverse respiration” in plants: An inevitable misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290598
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. MIT Press.
Caymaz, B., & Aydin, A. (2021). The effect of common knowledge construction model-based instruction on seventh grade students’ academic achievement and their views about the nature of science in electrical energy unit at schools of different socio-economic levels. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 19(2), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10054-0
Celik, H., Pektas, H. M., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2018). Science teaching laboratory applications: Common knowledge construction, learning cycle models and STEM approach. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(3), 11–29.
Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cope, C. (2004). Ensuring validity and reliability in phenomenographic research using the analytical framework of a structure of awareness. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(2), 5–18.
Cornell University Misconceptions Conference. (1983). The Proceedings of the International Seminar Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Cornell University Misconceptions Conference. (1993). The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Inc.
D’Avanzo, C. (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching: Ecological examples. BioScience, 53(11), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1121:AOROLT]2.0.CO;2
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge Falmer.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Conceptual change: Still a powerful framework for improving the practice of science education. In K. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 43–54). Springer.
Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1–17.
Ebenezer, J., Chacko, S., Kaya, O., Koya, K., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2010). The Effects of Common Knowledge Construction Model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 25–46.
Ebenezer, J., Columbus, R., Kaya, O. N., Zhang, L., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2012). One science teacher’s professional development experience: A case study exploring changes in students’ perceptions of their fluency with innovative technologies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9277-9
Ebenezer, J. (2020). Hark, Hark! Hear the Story of a Science Educator! Professor Ali Eftekhari, PFHEA, Editor, Global Science Education, Belfast Academy, United Kingdom, CRC Press (Taylor & Francis) (https://www.crcpress.com/Global-Science-Education/book-series/GSESERIES).
Ebenezer, J. (2022). Machine Learning in Hybrid Science Pedagogical Spaces. SCE 5060 Course Package. XanEdu Press, MI.
Eisen, Y., & Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 50(4), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448710
Eisen, B., & Stavy, R. (1993). How to make learning of photosynthesis more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150201
Ekici, F., Ekici, E., & Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of concept cartoons in diagnosing and overcoming misconceptions related to photosynthesis. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(4), 111–124.
Halldén, O., Scheja, M., & Haglund, L. (2008). The contextuality of knowledge: An intentional approach to meaning making and conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 509–532). New York: Taylor & Francis – Routledge.
Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1987.9654897
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
Hewson, P. W. (1980). A case study of the effect of metaphysical commitments on the learning of a complex scientific theory. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Boston (MA), USA.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.
Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2015). Prior knowledge: Acquisition and revision. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading: Reader, Text, and Context: Reader, Text, and Context (pp. 151–163). Taylor and Francis Inc.
Kiryak, Z., & Calik, M. (2018). Improving grade seventh students’ conceptual understanding of water pollution via common knowledge construction model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9820-8
Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293.
Lederman, N. G. (2019). Contextualizing the relationship between nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00030-8
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
Lin, C-Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Student’s understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1529–1544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052045
Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J. R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320108
Marmaroti, P., & Galanopoulou, D. (2006). Pupils’ understanding of photosynthesis: A questionnaire for the simultaneous assessment of all aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277805
Marton, F. (1981). Phenonmenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy of conceptual change. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed., 2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 533–559). Educational Psychology Handbook Series, Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London.
McComas, W. (Ed.). (1998). The Nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Michigan Department of Education (DE). (2022). Standards for the preparation of high school (7–12) science teachers. HS Science Teacher Preparation Standards.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. The National Academy Press.
Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. Heinemann.
Özay, E., & Öztaş, H. (2003). Secondary students’ interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655853
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
Roth, K. J., Smith, E. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1983). Students' conceptions of photosynthesis and food for plants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Serreyn, M. (2022). Science Graduate Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science and Lived Experiences in Science: A Mixed Methods Study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University.
Seymour, J., & Longden, B. (1991). Respiration—That’s breathing isn’t it? Journal of Biological Education, 25(3), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1991.9655203
Simpson, M., & Arnold, B. (1982). Availability of prerequisite concepts for learning biology at certificate level. Journal of Biological Education, 16(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1982.9654420
Södervik, I., Virtanen, V., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2015). Challenges in understanding photosynthesis in a university introductory biosciences class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9571-8
Stavy, R., Eisen, Y., & Yaakobi, D. (1987). How students aged 13–15 understand photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090111
Suzuki, D. (2009). The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering Our Place in Nature. Greystone Books, Nature, pp. 304.
Švandová, K. (2004). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about photosynthesis and plant respiration: Preliminary results. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1018a
Tang, K.-S. (2023). The characteristics of diagrams in scientific explanations: Multimodal integration of written and visual modes of representation in junior high school textbooks. Science Education, 107(3), 741–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21787
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.
Thorn, C. J., Bissinger, K., Thorn, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). “Trees live on soil and sunshine!” - Coexistence of scientific and alternative conception of tree assimilation. PLoS ONE, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147802
Treagust, D. F., & Haslam, F. (1986). Evaluating secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (ED283713).
Uke, I. (2022). Enacting a Photosynthesis and Cellular Learning Sequence in a Seventh Grade Classroom: Research into A Relational Conceptual Change Inquiry. Wayne State University. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University.
Vosniadou, S. (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Educational Psychology Handbook Series (1st Ed.), 768 pages, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Educational Psychology Handbook Series (2nd Ed.), 656 pages, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
Waheed, T., & Lucas, A. M. (1992). Understanding interrelated topics: Photosynthesis at age14+. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655272
Wandersee, J. H. (1983) Students' misconceptions about photosynthesis: A cross age study. Paper presented at the international seminar on misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Wierdsma, M. D., Knippels, M. P., van Oers, B., & Boersma, K. (2016). Recontextualising cellular respiration in upper secondary biology education. Characteristics and practicability of a learning and teaching strategy. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3),239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1058842
Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2021). Multimodal interaction analysis: A powerful tool for examining plurilingual students’ engagement in science practices. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z
Wood, L., Ebenezer, J., & Boone, R. (2013). Effects of an intellectually caring model on urban African American alternative high school students’ conceptual change and achievement. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00021D
Wood-Robinson, C. (1991). Young people’s ideas about plants. Studies in Science Education, 19(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269108559995
Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2021). Promoting conceptual understanding with explicit epistemic intervention in metacognitive instruction: Interaction between the treatment and epistemic cognition. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9807-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There is no potential monetary conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A Some items of both achievement tests
Appendix A Some items of both achievement tests
Lights supplies the energy for photosynthesis. What is the overall chemical reaction?
-
A)
Oxygen and water are converted into glucose sugar and carbon dioxide.
-
B)
Carbon dioxide and water are converted into glucose sugar and oxygen.
-
C)
Sugar is broken into water and oxygen.
-
D)
Carbon dioxide and oxygen are converted into glucose sugar and water.
Which of the following organisms can perform photosynthesis?
-
A)
Animals only
-
B)
Plants only
-
C)
Plants, algae, some bacteria, some protists
-
D)
Only plants and animals
Cellular respiration’s goal is
-
A)
Make water
-
B)
Make ATP
-
C)
Make glucose
-
D)
Make oxygen
What is the correct equation for cellular respiration?
-
A)
6O2 + C6H12O6- > 6CO2 + 6H2O + energy
-
B)
6O2 + C6H12O6 + energy—> 6CO2 + 6H2O
-
C)
6CO2 + 6H2O—> 6O2 + C6H12O6 + energy
-
D)
6CO2 + 6H2O + energy—> 6O2 + C6H12O6
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Uke, I., Ebenezer, J. & Kaya, O.N. Seventh-Grade Students’ Relational Conceptual Change and Science Achievement: Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration Duo. Res Sci Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10156-7
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10156-7