Skip to main content
Log in

Seventh-Grade Students’ Relational Conceptual Change and Science Achievement: Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration Duo

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This mixed-methods research study aimed to observe the changes in relational conceptual changes and achievement in photosynthesis and cellular respiration in 15 seventh-grade students using the variation theory of learning, a framework for contextual distinctions, and supports the Common Knowledge Construction Model (CKCM) for science education. The strategy used was prediction-observation-explanation, where students wrote and drew to express their macroscopic and sub-microscopic concepts, depicting any changes. Pre- and post-assessment tests were given to measure achievement in science. Through phenomenography analysis, five descriptive categories were generated for photosynthesis and nine for cellular respiration, revealing variations within and between students' ideas. Statistical tests showed significant improvements (p < .001) in photosynthesis and cellular respiration knowledge after implementing the CKCM learning sequence, with scores increasing from 37 to 77% and 33% to 72%, respectively. These findings suggest that inquiry-based learning based on relational conceptual change, guided by variation theory and an understanding of the nature of science, can lead to a deeper understanding of scientific explanations and improve overall science achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

(Adapted from Creswell & Plano Clark (2007, p.68, Table 4.2b)

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.2022

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Achieve Inc. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Washington DC: Achieve Inc.

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2018). What future for phenomenographic research? On continuity and development in the phenomenography and variation theory research tradition. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(6), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). In-depth analysis of misconceptions as a basis for developing research-based remedial instruction: The case of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 56(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. W., Sheldon, T. H., & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors’ conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270806

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bakirci, H., & Ensari, F. (2018). The effect of common knowledge construction model on academic achievement and conceptual understandings of high school students on heat and temperature. Education and Science, 43(196), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., & Carr, M. (1989). Teaching and learning about photosynthesis. Part 1: An assessment in terms of students’ prior knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 49–56.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (1985). Teaching and learning about photosynthesis. Science Education Research Unit, Working Papers 220–9. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

  • Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., & Barman, N. S. (2006). Students’ ideas about plants and plant growth. The American Biology. Teacher, 68(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/4451935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. (1985). Students’ ideas about plant nutrition: What are they? Journal of Biological Education, 19(3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1985.9654731

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B., Roth, K., & Anderson, C. (1985). Respiration and photosynthesis: A teaching module. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. H., & Schwartz, R. S. (2009). Connecting photosynthesis and cellular respiration: Preservice teachers’ conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(7), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20287

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Calik, M., & Cobern, W. W. (2017). A cross-cultural study of common knowledge construction model efficacy in an undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00016B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañal, P. (1999). Photosynthesis and “inverse respiration” in plants: An inevitable misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290598

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caymaz, B., & Aydin, A. (2021). The effect of common knowledge construction model-based instruction on seventh grade students’ academic achievement and their views about the nature of science in electrical energy unit at schools of different socio-economic levels. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 19(2), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10054-0

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, H., Pektas, H. M., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2018). Science teaching laboratory applications: Common knowledge construction, learning cycle models and STEM approach. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(3), 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, C. (2004). Ensuring validity and reliability in phenomenographic research using the analytical framework of a structure of awareness. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(2), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University Misconceptions Conference. (1983). The Proceedings of the International Seminar Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

  • Cornell University Misconceptions Conference. (1993). The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • D’Avanzo, C. (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching: Ecological examples. BioScience, 53(11), 1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1121:AOROLT]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Conceptual change: Still a powerful framework for improving the practice of science education. In K. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 43–54). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1–17.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J., Chacko, S., Kaya, O., Koya, K., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2010). The Effects of Common Knowledge Construction Model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 25–46.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J., Columbus, R., Kaya, O. N., Zhang, L., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2012). One science teacher’s professional development experience: A case study exploring changes in students’ perceptions of their fluency with innovative technologies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9277-9

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. (2020). Hark, Hark! Hear the Story of a Science Educator! Professor Ali Eftekhari, PFHEA, Editor, Global Science Education, Belfast Academy, United Kingdom, CRC Press (Taylor & Francis) (https://www.crcpress.com/Global-Science-Education/book-series/GSESERIES).

  • Ebenezer, J. (2022). Machine Learning in Hybrid Science Pedagogical Spaces. SCE 5060 Course Package. XanEdu Press, MI.

  • Eisen, Y., & Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 50(4), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, B., & Stavy, R. (1993). How to make learning of photosynthesis more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 15(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150201

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekici, F., Ekici, E., & Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of concept cartoons in diagnosing and overcoming misconceptions related to photosynthesis. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(4), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, O., Scheja, M., & Haglund, L. (2008). The contextuality of knowledge: An intentional approach to meaning making and conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 509–532). New York: Taylor & Francis – Routledge.

  • Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1987.9654897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P. W. (1980). A case study of the effect of metaphysical commitments on the learning of a complex scientific theory. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Boston (MA), USA.

  • Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2015). Prior knowledge: Acquisition and revision. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading: Reader, Text, and Context: Reader, Text, and Context (pp. 151–163). Taylor and Francis Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiryak, Z., & Calik, M. (2018). Improving grade seventh students’ conceptual understanding of water pollution via common knowledge construction model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 1025–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9820-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2019). Contextualizing the relationship between nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00030-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C-Y., & Hu, R. (2003). Student’s understanding of energy flow and matter cycling in the context of the food chain, photosynthesis, and respiration. International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1529–1544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052045

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. T., & Staver, J. R. (1995). Peer collaboration and concept development: Learning about photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320108

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Marmaroti, P., & Galanopoulou, D. (2006). Pupils’ understanding of photosynthesis: A questionnaire for the simultaneous assessment of all aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277805

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenonmenography-describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2008). The idea of phenomenography and the pedagogy of conceptual change. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed., 2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 533–559). Educational Psychology Handbook Series, Taylor & Francis Group, New York and London.

  • McComas, W. (Ed.). (1998). The Nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Department of Education (DE). (2022). Standards for the preparation of high school (7–12) science teachers. HS Science Teacher Preparation Standards.

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children’s science. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özay, E., & Öztaş, H. (2003). Secondary students’ interpretations of photosynthesis and plant nutrition. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J., Smith, E. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1983). Students' conceptions of photosynthesis and food for plants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

  • Serreyn, M. (2022). Science Graduate Students' Conceptions of the Nature of Science and Lived Experiences in Science: A Mixed Methods Study. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University.

  • Seymour, J., & Longden, B. (1991). Respiration—That’s breathing isn’t it? Journal of Biological Education, 25(3), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1991.9655203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M., & Arnold, B. (1982). Availability of prerequisite concepts for learning biology at certificate level. Journal of Biological Education, 16(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1982.9654420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Södervik, I., Virtanen, V., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2015). Challenges in understanding photosynthesis in a university introductory biosciences class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9571-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., Eisen, Y., & Yaakobi, D. (1987). How students aged 13–15 understand photosynthesis. International Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069870090111

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. (2009). The Sacred Balance: Rediscovering Our Place in Nature. Greystone Books, Nature, pp. 304.

  • Švandová, K. (2004). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about photosynthesis and plant respiration: Preliminary results. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1018a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K.-S. (2023). The characteristics of diagrams in scientific explanations: Multimodal integration of written and visual modes of representation in junior high school textbooks. Science Education, 107(3), 741–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21787

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, C. J., Bissinger, K., Thorn, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). “Trees live on soil and sunshine!” - Coexistence of scientific and alternative conception of tree assimilation. PLoS ONE, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Haslam, F. (1986). Evaluating secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (ED283713).

  • Uke, I. (2022). Enacting a Photosynthesis and Cellular Learning Sequence in a Seventh Grade Classroom: Research into A Relational Conceptual Change Inquiry. Wayne State University. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Wayne State University.

  • Vosniadou, S. (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Educational Psychology Handbook Series (1st Ed.), 768 pages, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

  • Vosniadou, S. (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Educational Psychology Handbook Series (2nd Ed.), 656 pages, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

  • Waheed, T., & Lucas, A. M. (1992). Understanding interrelated topics: Photosynthesis at age14+. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H. (1983) Students' misconceptions about photosynthesis: A cross age study. Paper presented at the international seminar on misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

  • Wierdsma, M. D., Knippels, M. P., van Oers, B., & Boersma, K. (2016). Recontextualising cellular respiration in upper secondary biology education. Characteristics and practicability of a learning and teaching strategy. Journal of Biological Education50(3),239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1058842

  • Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2021). Multimodal interaction analysis: A powerful tool for examining plurilingual students’ engagement in science practices. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L., Ebenezer, J., & Boone, R. (2013). Effects of an intellectually caring model on urban African American alternative high school students’ conceptual change and achievement. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00021D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Robinson, C. (1991). Young people’s ideas about plants. Studies in Science Education, 19(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269108559995

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Eryilmaz, A. (2021). Promoting conceptual understanding with explicit epistemic intervention in metacognitive instruction: Interaction between the treatment and epistemic cognition. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 547–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9807-7

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jazlin Ebenezer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There is no potential monetary conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A Some items of both achievement tests

Appendix A Some items of both achievement tests

Lights supplies the energy for photosynthesis. What is the overall chemical reaction?

  1. A)

    Oxygen and water are converted into glucose sugar and carbon dioxide.

  2. B)

    Carbon dioxide and water are converted into glucose sugar and oxygen.

  3. C)

    Sugar is broken into water and oxygen.

  4. D)

    Carbon dioxide and oxygen are converted into glucose sugar and water.

Which of the following organisms can perform photosynthesis?

  1. A)

    Animals only

  2. B)

    Plants only

  3. C)

    Plants, algae, some bacteria, some protists

  4. D)

    Only plants and animals

Cellular respiration’s goal is

  1. A)

    Make water

  2. B)

    Make ATP

  3. C)

    Make glucose

  4. D)

    Make oxygen

What is the correct equation for cellular respiration?

  1. A)

    6O2 + C6H12O6- > 6CO2 + 6H2O + energy

  2. B)

    6O2 + C6H12O6 + energy—> 6CO2 + 6H2O

  3. C)

    6CO2 + 6H2O—> 6O2 + C6H12O6 + energy

  4. D)

    6CO2 + 6H2O + energy—> 6O2 + C6H12O6

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uke, I., Ebenezer, J. & Kaya, O.N. Seventh-Grade Students’ Relational Conceptual Change and Science Achievement: Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration Duo. Res Sci Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10156-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10156-7

Keywords

Navigation