Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health Science Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electricity: Misconception or Lack of Knowledge?

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many university health science programs include physics courses to raise knowledge and understanding of physical science concepts, they are still far from addressing the needs of that science health profession. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an introductory physics course on first-year physiotherapy and rehabilitation (PR) students’ conceptual understanding of simple electric circuits. The study participants were students enrolled in the Physics II course. Eighty-two students registered for the course. Sixty students (73%) took the pretest, and 67 (81%) completed the posttest. 53 students (64%) took the pretest and posttest. This study adopts an exploratory research methodology that includes a one-group pretest-posttest design. The Simple Electric Circuits Diagnostic Test (SECDT) was used to assess students’ conceptual understanding. The prevalence of misconceptions was relatively low (before and after instruction), and very few students developed sound conceptual understanding after instruction. The local reasoning model was the most frequent misconception PR students held. After instruction, students’ overall confidence in their SECDT responses increased significantly. Interestingly, when the students were grouped into three achievement groups, the medium-achievement group fell into more misconceptions as their achievement increased compared to low- and high-achievement groups. These findings suggested that students’ low SECDT scores were due to a lack of knowledge rather than misconceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Argos, P. (1973). General physics course for pre-medical students. American Journal of Physics, 41, 1224–1229. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1987533

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological-Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blüh, O. (1961). Physics for the biologist. American Journal of Physics, 29, 771–776. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937593

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do students know what they know and what they don’t know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40, 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, C. J., Padovani R., & Christofides S. (2008). Physics and society: the medical physics profession and its contribution to healthcare. GIREP Conference on Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation, Nicosia, Cyprus. (pp. 1-7) Retrieved from: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/18023/1/Physics%20and%20society%20the%20medical%20physics%20profession%20and%20its%20contribution%20to%20healthcare.pdf

  • Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13226

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. H., & Heller, K. (2014). Introductory physics in biological context: An approach to improve introductory physics for life science students. American Journal of Physics, 82(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4870079

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. H., Wisittanawat, P., Cai, M., & Renninger, K. A. (2018). Life science students’ attitudes, interest, and performance in introductory physics for life sciences: An exploratory study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010111.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Çepni, S., & Keleş, E. (2006). Turkish students’ conceptions about the simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 269–291.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Descamps, I., Moore, T., & Pollard, B. (2020). Views from students and professors in a nonmajor introductory physics course: What is interdisciplinarity? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020118.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenkraft, A. (2023). The yellow light problem in a biological context. The Physics Teacher, 61(4), 253–253. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0084232

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 99–115.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A., Lemmer, M., & Gunstone, R. (2019). Alternative conceptions: Turning adversity into advantage. Research in Science Education, 49, 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9638-y

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Finnerty, E. P., Chauvin, S., Bonaminio, G., Andrews, M., Carroll, R. G., & Pangaro, L. N. (2010). Flexner revisited: The role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Academic Medicine, 85(2), 349–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fragkiadaki, G., Fleer, M., & Rai, P. (2023). Science concept formation during infancy, toddlerhood, and early childhood: Developing a scientific motive over time. Research in Science Education, 53(2), 275–294.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316–1325.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hesti, R. (2022). Identifying students’ conceptual profile on science through series electrical circuits conceptual survey with four-tier diagnostic test. In International Conference on Madrasah Reform 2021 (ICMR 2021) (pp. 125–130). Atlantis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R. C., & Friedlander, M. J. (2013). Biology and physics competencies for pre-health and other life sciences students. CBE – Life. Science Education, 12, 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-10-0184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanjek, L., Morris, L., Schubatzky, T., Hopf, M., Burde, J. P., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., et al. (2021). Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020123

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivowi, U. M. O. (1986). Students’ misconceptions about conservation principles and fields. Research in Science & Technological Education, 4(2), 127–137.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20386

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, P. (2012). Misunderstanding misconceptions. Science Scope, 35(8), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortemeyer, G. (2007). The challenge of teaching introductory physics to premedical students. The Physics Teacher, 45, 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2809149

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W. (2016). Do skilled elementary teachers hold scientific conceptions and can they accurately predict the type and source of students’ preconceptions of electric circuits? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(Suppl 2), S287–S307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9635-4

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, R. D., & Venz, M. I. (1978). Misconceptions in physical science among non-science background students. Research in Science Education, 8(1), 183–193.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2021). The effects of enhanced hands-on experimentation on correcting student misconceptions about work and energy in engineering mechanics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1909555

  • Liu, Z., Pan, S., Zhang, X., & Bao, L. (2022). Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020102

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, D. C., & Bolker, J. A. (2012). Rounding off the cow: Challenges and successes in an interdisciplinary physics course for life science students. American Journal of Physics, 80(10), 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4733357

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. C., & Rubbo, L. J. (2012). Scientific reasoning abilities of nonscience majors in physics-based courses. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010106

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2019). Students’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism and its implications: A review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i2.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahum, T. L., Mamlook-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Taber, K. S. (2010). Teaching and learning the concept of chemical bonding. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504548

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Neidorf, T., Arora, A., Erberber, E., Tsokodayi, Y., & Mai, T. (2020). Review of research into misconceptions and misunderstandings in physics and mathematics. In Student Misconceptions and Errors in Physics and Mathematics (IEA Research for Education) (Vol. 9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30188-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Önder, F., Şenyigit, Ç., & Sılay, I. (2017). The effects of misconceptions on pre-service teachers’ ability to constructing simple electric circuits. European Journal of Physics Education, 8(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Önder-Çelikkanlı, N., & Kızılcık, H. Ş. (2022). A review of studies about four-tier diagnostic tests in physics education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özmen, K. (2023). Designing introductory physics courses for life science majors. In S. Uçar (Ed.), Education and Science 2023-I (pp. 99–108). Efe Academy Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peşman, H. (2005). Development of a three-tier test to assess ninth grade students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Middle East Technical University.

  • Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, P., Nenciovici, L., Malenfant-Robichaud, G., Thibault, F., Sy, O., Mahhou, M. A., et al. (2020). Models of conceptual change in science learning: Establishing an exhaustive inventory based on support given by articles published in major journals. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 157–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1744796

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, G. (2022). A practical approach to physics for non-scientists. The Physics Teacher, 60(5), 344–347. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0043083

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel, F. A. H., Cruz, T. G., & Arias, A. G. (2014). Physics courses for non-physicists; what should (and should not) be done. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 8(1), 75–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, A. (2005). Reflections on context-based science teaching: A case study of physics for students of physiotherapy. In Proceedings of the Blended Learning in Science Teaching and Learning Symposium, Sydney, Australia. (pp.169-172). Retrieved from: https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/IISME/article/view/6476/7123

  • Redish, E. F., Bauer, C., Carleton, K. L., Cooke, T. J., Cooper, M., Crouch, C. H., et al. (2014). NEXUS/Physics: An interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists. American Journal of Physics, 82(5), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4870386

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto. (2022). A review of misconception in physics: The diagnosis, causes, and remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D. M. (1985). Electricity in simple circuits. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 32–50). Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, I. A., Singer, K. P., Treagust, D., & Zadnik, M. G. (1990). Evaluation of a course designed to teach physics to students of physiotherapy. Research in Science Education, 20(1), 316–323.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Taşlıdere, E. (2013). Effect of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and decreasing their misconceptions in DC electric circuits. Creative Education, 4(4), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Taslidere, E., & Yıldırım, B. (2022). Effect of conceptual change–oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes towards simple electricity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1567–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10319-w

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. L., & Kirby, L. A. (2020). Situational interest helps correct misconceptions: An investigation of conceptual change in university students. Instructional Science, 48, 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09509-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turgut, Ü., Gürbüz, F., & Turgut, G. (2011). An investigation 10th grade students’ misconceptions about electric current. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1965–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, H. (2017). Sequential reasoning in electricity: Developing and using a three-tier multiple choice test. Scientia in Educatione, 8(Special Issue), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, J. P., Chastain, R. J., DeCaro, D. A., & DeCaro, M. S. (2018). Reverse the routine: Problem solving before instruction improves conceptual knowledge in undergraduate physics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, M., Thomas, L., Bromley, M., Buna, T., Tonekaboni, B., & von Witt, W. (2016). Communicating physics with physio students. In Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (p. 140), Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from: https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/IISME/article/view/10820/11358

  • Yang, D.-C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2020). Sixth grade students’ performance, misconception, and confidence on a three-tier number sense test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10051-3

  • YÖK Lisans Atlası (n.d.). Fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon (fakülte) programı bulunan tüm üniversiteler [All universities with physiotheraphy and rehabilitation (faculty) program]. Higher Educational Council, Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved February 05, 2020 from https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=11016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Başkent University, Room No: F-208, Bağlıca Kampüsü Fatih Sultan Mahallesi, Eskişehir Yolu 18.km, 06790, Etimesgut, Ankara, Turkey

    Kübra Özmen

Authors
  1. Kübra Özmen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kübra Özmen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 The results of students' response behavior in each misconception category
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özmen, K. Health Science Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electricity: Misconception or Lack of Knowledge?. Res Sci Educ 54, 225–243 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10136-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10136-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation