Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Turkish Students' Conceptions about the Simple Electric Circuits

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the Turkish students' understanding level of electric circuits consisting of two bulbs and one battery was investigated by using open-ended questions. Two-hundred fifty students, whose ages range from 11 to 22, were chosen from five different groups at primary, secondary and university levels in Trabzon in Turkey. In analyzing students' drawings and explanations, both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were exploited. The unipolar model (Model A), the clashing currents model (Model B), the current consumed model (Model C) and the scientist model with current conserved (Model D) determined from the related literature were used to categorize the students' answers. The results showed that the Turkish students have many misconceptions about electric circuits. Also, it is found out that especially Model A was widespread accepted among the students in group 1 (5th grade) and half of the students in group 3 (9th grade) has an understanding of electric circuits as it is in Model C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J.W. & Marek, E.A. (1991). Understanding and misunderstanding of eight graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M. & Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akdeniz, A.R., Bektaş, U. & Yiğit, N. (2000). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin temel fizik kavramlarını anlama düzeyi (The 8th grade students' levels of understanding of the introductory physics concepts). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asami, N., King, J. & Monk, M. (2000). Tuition and memory: Mental models and cognitive processing in Japanese children's work on d.c. electrical circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 18(2), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asoko, H. (2002). Developing conceptual understanding in primary science. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayas, A. (1993). A study of teachers' and students' view of the upper secondary curriculum and students' understanding of introductory chemistry concepts in the east black-sea region of Turkey. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. UK: University of Southampton.

  • Ayas, A. & Demirbaş, A. (1997). Turkish secondary students' conceptions of introductory chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5).

  • Ayas, A., Çepni, S. & Akdeniz, A.R. (1993). Development of the Turkish secondary science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 77(4), 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & Genç, H. (2001). Chemistry teaching in Turkey. Energy Education Science & Technology, 7(2), 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aycan, Ş., Aycan, N., Arý, E. & Türkoðuz, S. (2000). An investigation about “The effects of chemistry laboratory practices to the success of chemistry lesson in Manisa-Demirci High School”. IV. The Congress of Science Education (pp. 486–489). Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, A. (2001). The analyses of misconceptions of university students about electricity. The Science Education Symposium at the beginning of New Era in Turkey (pp. 345–350). İstanbul, Turkey: Maltepe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Başaran, İ.E. (1993). Türkiye Eğitim Sistemi. Ankara: Kadıoğlu Matbaası.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K.W. (2004). Conducting longitudinal studies. New Directions for Institutional Research, 121, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges, A.T. & Gilbert, J.K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyükkasap, E., Samancı, O. & Dikel, S. (2002). Farklı öğretim düzeyinde okuyan öğrencilerin “basit elektrik devresi” ile ilgili düşünceleri (Different grade level students' ideas about simple electric circuits). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(4), 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillot, M. & Nguyen-Xuan, A. (1995). Adults' understanding of electricity. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, K. (1999). Teaching electric current and electrical potential. Physics Education, 34(6), 341–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carre, C. & Ovens, C. (1994). Science 7–11 developing primary teaching skills. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çepni, S. (2005). Araştırma ve Proje Çalışmalarına Giriş, 2nd edn. Trabzon: Üçyol Kültür Merkezi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çepni, S., Akdeniz, A.R. & Ayas, A. (1995). Fen bilimleri eğitiminde laboratuarın yeri ve önemi (III): Ülkemizde laboratuarın kullanımı ve bazı öneriler (Laboratory place and importance in science education (III): Using laboratory in our country and some suggestions). Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 206, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çepni, S., Aydın, A. & Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2000a). Students' understanding level of physics concepts in science program in grades 4 and 5. IV. The Congress of Science Education (pp. 135–140). Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çepni, S., Ayvacı, H.Ş. & Keleş, E. (2000b). Understanding level of certificate students about physics concepts. X. The Congress of National Educational Sciences (pp. 1335–1342). Bolu, Turkey: Abant İzzet Baysal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çepni, S., Bacanak, A. & Gökdere, M. (2001). A model: Science classrooms of future. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 1(2), 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çepni S., Özsevgeç T. & Cerrah L. Turkish middle school students' cognitive development levels in science. Asia–Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 2004; 5(1), Article 1.

  • Çepni S., Taş E. & Köse S. (in press). The Effect of computer-assisted material on students' cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers and Education.

  • Clement, J.J. & Steinberg, M.S. (2002). Step-wise evolution of mental models of electric circuits: A “learning-aloud” case study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 389–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education, 4th edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R.K. & Treagust, D.F. (2003). Learners' mental models of metallic bonding: A cross-age study. Science Education, 87, 685–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, M. (1995). A Study of science-in-the-making as students an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D., Osborne, R.J. & Carr, M. (1985). Children's intuitive ideas on electric current and the modification of those ideas. In Duit, R. et al. (Eds.), Aspect of understanding electricity (pp. 247–256). Kiel: Vertrieb Schmidt and Klaunig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P. & Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. & Rhöneck, C. (1998). Learning and understanding key concepts of electricity. Retrieved from http://www.amasci.com/miscon/electref.html.

  • Eşme, İ. (2004). Fen öğretiminde sorunlar (The problems in science instruction). Özelokullar Birliği Bülteni.

  • Fleer, M. Determining children's understanding of electricity. Journal of Educational Research, 84(4), 248–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen J.R. & White B.Y. Sources of difficulty in students' understanding causal models for physical systems, symposium on complex causality and conceptual change. Annual meeting of the educational research association. New Orleans, 2000.

  • Furio, C. & Guisasola, J. (1998). Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field. Instructional Science Education, 82, 511–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, P.J. & Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior school students of electrochemistry: Electric circuits and oxidation-reduction equatios. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C.F. (1988). The cognitive context of pupil's alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gezer, K., Köse, S. & Sürücü, A. (1998). The situation of science education and the role of laboratory in this process. III. National Science Education Symposium (pp. 215–218). Trabzon, Turkey: Karadeniz Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greca, I.M. & Moreira, M.A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisasola, J., Zubimendi, J.L., Almudi, J.M. & Ceberio, M. (2002). The evolution of the concept of capacitance throughout the development of the electric theory and the understanding of its meaning by university students. Science & Education, 11, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürdal, A. (1991). Ýlkokul fen eğitiminde laboratuar ve araç kullanımı (The usage of laboratory and tools in primary science education). Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3, 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwill, J.P., Frederiksen, J.R. & White, B.Y. (1999). Making their own connections: Students' understanding of multiple models in basic electricity. Cognition and Instruction, 17(3), 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, D. (2002). The place of analogies in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanim, S. (2001). Research-based modification to instruction in physics courses for engineers. Retrieved from http://spacegrant.nmsu.edu/conference/2001/Papers/S Kanim.PDF.

  • Karamustafaoğlu, S., Sevim, S. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2001). The teaching methods used by science teachers: Trabzon Sample. X. The Congress of National Educational Sciences (pp. 1067–1077). Bolu, Turkey: Abant İzzet Baysal University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamustafaoğlu, S., Sevim, S., Karamustafaoğlu, O. & Çepni, S. (2003). Analysis of Turkish high school chemistry-examination questions according to bloom's taxonomy. Chemistry Education. Research and Practice, 4(1), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keser, Ö.F. & Akdeniz, A.R. (2002). Investigating the factors effecting the traditional learning environments. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibble, B. (1999). How do you picture electricity? Physics Education, 34(4), 226–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küçüközer, H. (2004). The influence of teaching method which was designed according to constructivist learning theory for first year high school students' on simple electric circuits. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Balıkesir, Turkey: Balıkesir University.

  • Lawrenz, F. (1986). Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 86(8), 654–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. & Law, N. (2001). Explorations in promoting conceptual change in electrical concepts via ontological category shift. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 111–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liegeois, L. & Mullet, E. (2002). High school students' understanding of resistance in simple series electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liegeois, L., Chasseigne, G. & Papin, S. (2003). Improving high school students' understanding of potential difference in simple electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1129–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart J. Student misconceptions in the understanding of electricity and methods and suggestions to improve teaching, 2000. Retrieved from http://ddhs.ddouglas.k12.or.us/staff/science/lockhart/professional/electricity_misconceptions.pdf.

  • Mclldowie, E. (1998). Teaching voltage–current relationships without Ohm's law. Physics Education, 33(5), 292–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.E.B. Yılı Başında Milli Eğitim (National education at the beginning of 2001). Araştırma Planlama Ve Koordinasyon Kurulu Başkanlığı, 2000.

  • Monk, M. (1990). A genetic epistemological analysis of data on children's ideas about dc electrical circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 8(2), 133, 11p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, P., MicKittrick, B. & Gunstone, R. (2001). A perspective on the resolution of confusions in the teaching of electricity. Research in Science Education, 31, 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakiboğlu, C. & İşbilir, A. (2001). The evaluation of teachers' using laboratory in biology courses in secondary schools. The Science Education Symposium at the Beginning of New Era in Turkey (pp. 521–527). İstanbul, Turkey: Maltepe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedderer, H. & Goldberg, F. (1994). An individual student's learning process in electric circuits. Retrieved from http://www.physik.uni_bremen.de/physics.education/niedderer/personal.pages/niedderer/pubsfiles/1994 NARST L S.pdf.

  • Orbay, M., Özdoğan, T., Öner, F., Kara, M. & Gümüş, S. (2003). “Fen bilgisi laboratuar uygulamaları I–II” dersinde karşılaşılan güçlükler ve çözüm önerileri (The difficulties facing at “Science laboratory practice I–II” lesson and solution suggestions). Milli Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi, 157.

  • Osborne, R. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science. Hong Kong: Heinemann Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardhan, H. & Yasmeen, B. (2001). Science teachers' alternate conceptions about direct-currents. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Kim, I., Kim, M. & Lee, M. (2001). Analysis of students' processes of confirmation and falsification of their prior ideas about electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1219–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posada, J.M. (1997). Conceptions of high school students concerning the internal structure of metals and their electric conduction: structure and evolution. Instructional Science Education, 81, 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualter, A. (1995). A Source of power: young children's understanding of where electricity comes from. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13(2), 177, 10 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riche, R.D. (2000). Strategies for assisting students overcome their misconceptions in high school physics. Retrieved from http://www.bishops.ntc.nf.ca/rriche/ed6390/paper.html.

  • Ronen, M. & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation – a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sencar, S. & Eryılmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth-grade Turkish students' misconceptions concerning electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sencar, S., Yılmaz, E.E. & Eryılmaz, A. (2001). Lise öğrencilerinin basit elektrik devreleri ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları (High school students' misconceptions about simple electric circuits). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D.P. & Moje, E.B. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D. (1998). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Physics Education, 23, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D. (1998). Electricity in simple circuits. In Driver R., Guesne E. & Tiberghien A. (eds) Children's Ideas in Science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D. & Cheng, H. (2001). Electric circuits: A new approach – Part 1. School Science Review, 83(303), 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D.M. & Gunstone, R.F. (1985). Teaching children to discriminate between current and energy. In Duit, R. et al. (Eds.), Aspect of understanding electricity (pp. 287–297). Kiel: Vertrieb Schmidt and Klaunig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipstone, D.M., Jung, W. & Dupin, J.J. (1988). A study of students' understanding of electricity in five European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.J.A. & Nel, S.J. (1997). Perceptions of models of electric current held by physical science teachers in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 93(5), 2002, 5 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezcan, H. & Günay, S. (2003). Lise kimya öğretiminde laboratuar kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (The teachers' opinion about the usage of laboratory in secondary chemistry instruction). Milli Eşitim Vakfı Dergisi, 159, 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tveita, J. (1999). Untraditional learning methods helping students to develop the electron model for simple circuits. 9th Symposium of International Organization of Science and Technology Education, 2 (pp. 703–710). Durban, South Africa: University of Durban-Westville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viard, J. & Langlois, F.K. (2001). The concept of electrical resistance: How Cassirer's philosophy, and the early developments of electric circuit theory, allow a better understanding of students' learning difficulties. Science & Education, 10, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel, S. (2003). Türkiye'de program geliştirme çalışmaları ve sorunları (Curriculum development studies and problems in Turkey). Milli Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi, 159, 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sogutlu, Trabzon, 61335, Turkey

    Salih Çepni & Esra Keleş

Authors
  1. Salih Çepni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esra Keleş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra Keleş.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çepni, S., Keleş, E. Turkish Students' Conceptions about the Simple Electric Circuits. Int J Sci Math Educ 4, 269–291 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9001-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9001-z

Key words

Search

Navigation