Abstract
Research examining the relationship between science and religion has often painted a narrative of conflict for students with various religious beliefs. The purpose of this paper is to present a counter-narrative based on a study carried out in Singapore, which provides a unique multi-ethnic and multi-religious environment and geopolitical context to study the phenomenon. Informed by the theories of collateral learning, situated cognition and agency, the study examined how a group of high school biology students viewed and negotiated the relationship between biological evolution and their beliefs in Christianity. Case study methodology and semi-structured interviews were used to generate thick descriptions of their views. Findings from the study illustrate how the students exhibited agency in deliberately creating multiple resolution mechanisms as they recognised and negotiated the conceptual and social tensions between the worldviews of evolution and creationism. The findings suggest that the students exhibited more agency in resolving the perceived conflict between science and religion than we tend to ascribe based on previous interpretative accounts that emphasised confrontation, alienation and marginalisation. The implication is that students’ agency in negotiating the differing worldviews between science and religion should be seen as a resource for the learning of evolution, rather than a hindrance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: a cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.
Astley, J., & Francis, L. J. (2010). Promoting positive attitudes towards science and religion among sixth-form pupils: dealing with scientism and creationism. British Journal of Religious Education, 32(3), 189–200.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bell, B. (1995). Interviewing: a technique for assessing science knowledge. Learning science in the schools: research reforming practice, 347–364.
Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2011). Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science, 331, 404–405.
Billingsley, B. (2013). Students’ perceptions of apparent contradictions between science and religion: creation is only the beginning. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: theory and practice (pp. 329–338). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Billingsley, B., Taber, K. S., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2012). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion—a preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 43, 1715–1732.
BouJaoude, S., Wiles, J. R., Asghar, A., & Alters, B. (2011). Muslim Egyptian and Lebanese students’ conceptions of biological evolution. Science & Education, 20(9), 895–915.
Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 23–35.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: University Press.
Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (1997). Of revelation and revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443.
Denzin, N. K. (2002). Interpretive interactionism (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Department of Statistics. (2010). Census of population 2010. Singapore Retrieved from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/cop2010/census10_stat_release1.
El-Hani, C. N., & Sepulveda, C. (2010). The relationship between science and religion in the education of protestant biology preservice teachers in a Brazilian university. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 103–125.
Francis, L. J., & Greer, J. E. (2001). Shaping adolescents’ attitudes towards science and religion in Northern Ireland: the role of scientism, creationism and denominational schools. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 39–53.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (p. 1071). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85.
Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: a review of instructional approaches. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 1011–1032.
Heron, A. H. (2003). A study of agency: multiple constructions of choice and decision-making in an inquiry-based summer school program for struggling school readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(7), 568–579.
Hinchman, K. A., Alvermann, D. E., Boyd, F. B., Brozo, W. G., & Vacca, R. T. (2004). Supporting older students’ in- and out-of-school literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47, 304–310.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. London: Harvard University Press.
Hung, D., Looi, C.-K., & Koh, T.-S. (2004). Situated cognition and communities of practice: first-person ‘lived experiences’ vs. third-person perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 193–200.
Jegede, O. J. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 97–137.
Langen, A. v., & Dekkers, H. (2005). Cross-national differences in participating in tertiary science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Comparative Education, 41(3), 329–350.
Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 143–166.
Lee, H. (2006). How to stay an oasis in a troubled world. The Straits Times.
Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2008). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science Education, 17, 317–357.
McCrory, C., & Murphy, C. (2009). The growing visibility of creationism in Northern Ireland: are new science teachers equipped to deal with the issues? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 372–385.
Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution & religion. The American Biology Teacher, 62(2), 102–107.
Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Biology GCE ordinary level 2017 (Syllabus 5158) Retrieved from http://www.seab.gov.sg/content/syllabus/olevel/2017Syllabus/5158_2017.pdf.
Ministry of Education. (2016). Biology syllabus pre-university higher 2 syllabus 9744. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/pre-university-h2-biology---2016.pdf.
Moje, E. B., & Lewis, C. (2007). Examining opportunities to learn literacy: the role of critical sociocultural literacy research. In E. B. Moje, C. Lewis, & P. Enciso (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy; identity, agency, and power (pp. 15–48). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moore, R. (2007). The history of the creationism/evolution controversy and likely future developments. In L. Jones & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching about scientific origins: taking account of creationism (pp. 11–29). New York: Peter Lang.
Murphy, C., Hickey, I., & Beggs, J. (2010). All Christians? Experiences of science educators in northern Ireland. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 79–89.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections: London: The Nuffield Foundation. Vol. 13.
Pazza, R., Penteado, P. R., & Kavalco, K. F. (2010). Misconceptions about evolution in Brazilian freshmen students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(1), 107–113.
Perry, K. (2007). Sharing stories, linking lives: literacy practices among Sudanese refugees. I. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 169–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Routledge.
Rappa, N. A., & Tang, K. S. (2017). Student agency: An analysis of students’ networked relations across the informal and formal learning domains. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 673–684.
Reiss, M. J. (2008). Creationism, Darwinism and ID: what are biology teachers supposed to do? Biologist, 55, 28–32.
Reiss, M. J. (2009). Imagining the world: the significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science and Education, 18, 783–796.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (Vol. 15).
Taber, K. S. (2008). Exploring conceptual integration in student thinking: evidence from a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1915–1943.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science Springer Science & Business Media. Vol. 37.
Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025.
Tan, C. (2008). The teaching of religious knowledge in a plural society: the case for Singapore. International Review of Education, 54(2), 175–191.
Tang, K. S. (2011). Hybridizing cultural understandings of the natural world to foster critical science literacy. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3476796).
Vadeboncoeur, J. A., Kostogriz, A., & Hirst, E. (2006). Spatializing sociocultural research: a reading of mediation and meaning as third spaces: a reading of mediation and meaning as third spaces. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(3), 163–175.
Wallace, C. S. (2004). Framing new research in science literacy and language use: authenticity, multiple discourses, and the Third Space. Science Education, 88(6).
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Washington D.C.: Sage.
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our gratitude to the students and teachers who participated in this study as well as Aik-Ling Tan and Yew-Jin Lee for their useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. The views expressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not represent the views of their affiliations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, KS., Yang, X. Student Agency in Negotiating the Relationship Between Science and Religion. Res Sci Educ 49, 1301–1317 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9655-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9655-x