Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

University Science Teachers as Researchers: Blurring the Scholarship Boundaries

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I examine the phenomenon of university teachers as researchers in their own classrooms. I use examples of three research teams in which we studied: (1) student response to a science and society course; (2) teacher and student perceptions of inquiry in a physics course; and (3) teaching and learning about the nature of science in an elementary science pedagogy course. In addition to describing each study, I compare their purposes, researcher roles, and actions taken. I use these comparisons to address the ideological clashes and dilemmas of ownership, action, and quality that arise in this kind of research. Finally, I comment upon the significance of university teachers as researchers for themselves, their institutions, and the research community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., George, M. D., & Martini, M. (2002). Instructional strategies for teaching phases of the moon in elementary methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., Martini, M., & George, M. D. (2001). “That's what scientists have to do”: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1095–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. P., & Slater, T. F. (2002). Using action research to bring the large class down to size. In Innovative techniques for large-group instruction (An NSTA Press Journals Collection) (pp. 54–57). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H. (1993). The concept of quality in action research: Giving practitioners a voice in educational research. In M. Schratz (Ed.), Qualitative voices in educational research (pp. 40–55). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). (2000). SENCER: Science Education for New Civic Engagements and Responsibilities (Request for Proposals). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Physics Teachers. (1996). Powerful ideas in the physical science. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1997). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. (1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 124–137). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes: Teachers stories-stories of teachers-school stories-stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2002, November). Bringing evidence-driven progress to education: A recommended strategy for the US Department of Education. (Available: http://www.excelgov.org/displayContent.asp)

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999a). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249–305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999b). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggin, J. R. (2002). Biology 108: Report and analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri-Columbia, Southwestern Bell Science Education Center, Columbia, MO.

  • Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, E. (1987). Teaching as research. In E. Duckworth, “The Having of Wonderful Ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (pp. 122–140). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebest, S. B. (2003, February). Researching your teaching, Teaching Renewal Conference. University of Missouri-Columbia.

  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 20, pp. 3–56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, M. (2001). Defining teacher research. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University.

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L. (Ed.). (1998). Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, J. E. (2001). Gauging students' learning in the classroom: An assessment tool to help refine instructors' teaching techniques. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31, 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (2002). A teacher's guide to classroom research (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (2002). Improving teacher education practices through self-study. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazario, G. M., Burrowes, P. A., & Rodriguez, J. (2001). Persisting misconceptions: Using pre- and post-tests to identify biological misconceptions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31, 292–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (Ed.). (1991). The reflective turn. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education (Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, M. J. (2002, January). Instructional challenges in modeling scientific inquiry: The case of physics for elementary education. Charlotte, NC: Association for the Education of Teachers of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, M. J., Abell, S. K., & Zgagacz, M. (2002, July). Teaching physics to preservice teachers: The challenges of inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

  • Volkmann, M. J., & Zgagacz, M. (2004). Learning to teach physics through inquiry: The lived experience of the graduate teaching assistant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 584–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra K. Abell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abell, S.K. University Science Teachers as Researchers: Blurring the Scholarship Boundaries. Res Sci Educ 35, 281–298 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-5600-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-5600-x

Keywords

Navigation