Abstract
Tag-recapture programs to monitor the movements of fish populations are among some of the longest-running citizen-science datasets to date. Here, using half a century of yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi, Carangidae) tag-recapture data collected through citizen-science projects, we report novel insights into population connectivity in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). Despite the importance of kingfish in commercial and recreational fisheries, substantial knowledge gaps about their stock structure and connectivity between jurisdictions hinder current management efforts. Between 1974 and 2022, 63,432 releases and 4636 recaptures (7.3%) of tagged kingfish were collected in Australia and NZ. Most tagged individuals (51.4%) were recaptured within 10 km of their original release location up to 14 years post-release (mean: 225 days), indicating some degree of site fidelity. However, 656 (14.2%) kingfish were recaptured over 100 km from their release location, with one fish travelling at least 2834 km in 702 days. Seasonal variability was evident for releases and recaptures, with more releases occurring in summer and autumn in most jurisdictions. Network analysis of recaptures revealed no connectivity between tagged kingfish from western and eastern Australia, supporting genetic delineation. By contrast, extensive connectivity exists across eastern Australia and NZ, with 87 kingfish moving between five Australian state jurisdictions, 316 individuals travelling across 15 bioregions and six kingfish moving between Australia and NZ. Our findings provide important new insights into the structure and connectivity of the eastern Australia kingfish stock and suggest increased collaboration between state and international fisheries jurisdictions may support improved stock assessment and management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Managing marine fish species for sustainability requires knowledge of life histories and ecology, particularly population dynamics (movement, connectivity), biological characteristics, and key habitat use (Fogarty & Botsford 2007). The generation of this knowledge is comparatively easier for species that undergo smaller movements, and use small spatial scales or less diverse habitats for the completion of their life histories. Conversely, highly mobile pelagic fish species can travel 1,000s of kilometres and use a broad range of habitats across their life history (Altenritter et al. 2017; Baker et al. 2019; Rooker et al. 2007; Zeller et al. 1996). These species are often difficult to track due to the scale of their movements and their use of poorly observed offshore habitats (Hazen et al. 2012). Such habitats often encompass multiple fisheries jurisdictions (Begg et al. 1999; Huveneers et al. 2021; Lédée et al. 2021), presenting additional challenges to management (Pinsky et al. 2018). Differing exploitation rates, fishery regulations, and monitoring efforts among jurisdictional units can also confound individual assessments of stock health and sustainability.
Citizen-science programs have become particularly useful and instrumental in ecology, with increased stakeholder engagement allowing for cost-effective, wide-spread data collection (Brodie et al. 2018b; Hughes et al. 2022; Jaine et al. 2012). These programs, managed and designed by scientists, can provide information over large spatio-temporal scales (Brodie et al. 2018b; Fowler et al. 2018; Hughes et al. 2022; Stewart et al. 2019). Mark-recapture methods have been used extensively to uncover many aspects of the life history of fish species. Genetic mark-recapture approaches can help estimate effective population size, structure and evolutionary connectivity (Andreotti et al. 2016; Bravington et al. 2016), while conventional investigations using physical tagging or marking can generate insights into species distributions, movements, growth, mortality, estimated population size and seasonal migrations (Brodie et al. 2018b; Couturier et al. 2014; Eveson et al. 2015; Henderson & Fabrizio 2014). The collection of tag-recapture data gained popularity in the mid-1900s as a means to understand fish movements, growth, survival and abundance (Jacobson et al. 2020; Paloheimo 1958; Schweigert & Schwarz 1993), and have been used to support the management of game fish species over the period since (Pepperell 2007). Although tag-recapture studies may yield low recapture rates (Gillanders et al. 2001), strong engagement and collaboration with recreational angler communities can yield higher recaptures or even, given appropriate training, higher tagging effort (Lucy & Davy 2000). Recreational angler tagging programs offer opportunities for scientists to gain broad-scale, long-term insights into the movement patterns of important fish species and help design more targeted studies for given species. Tag-recapture studies have many logistical challenges such as access to fishing facilities and remote areas, alongside associated costs such as the expertise required to capture the fish, in addition to the temporal and geographical scales required to effectively answer ecologically relevant questions to the species. These citizen-science programs help overcome the logistical challenges and costs associated with operating over large-scale oceanic environments, lowering the costs of such research in the process (Begg et al. 1997; Morton et al. 1993).
Yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi, Carangidae, hereafter ‘kingfish’) are a large, pelagic, predatory fish with a circumglobal distribution in temperate and subtropical waters (Gillanders et al. 2001; Nugroho et al. 2001; Poortenaar et al. 2001; Sepúlveda & González 2017). In Australia, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite markers revealed two genetically distinct kingfish populations, or stocks (Green 2020; Miller et al. 2011); the Western Australian stock (restricted to the Australian west coast), and the Eastern Australian stock that encompasses the states of Queensland (QLD), New South Wales (NSW), Victoria (VIC), South Australia (SA), Tasmania (TAS), offshore seamounts and islands across the Tasman Sea (e.g. Lord Howe Island), and New Zealand (NZ) (Fig. 1). Within the Eastern Australian kingfish stock, evolutionary connectivity has been identified (Green 2020; Miller et al. 2011), but the extent of this connectivity between and within the various fisheries management jurisdictions in this region, and at a demographic rather than evolutionary level, is uncertain. Early tag-recapture studies in SA and NSW identified a degree of site affinity, with most tagged kingfish recaptured < 5 km from release locations in SA (Gillanders et al. 2001; Hutson et al. 2007), and < 50 km from release location in NSW (Gillanders et al. 2001). However, movements of up to 140 km and > 2000 km in the SA and NSW studies, respectively, were recorded. Recent acoustic tracking studies in NSW and SA also identified a similar degree of site affinity and individual variability in behaviour, with < 15% of tagged kingfish displaying broader-scale movements > 60 km from the release location (Brodie 2016). However, two kingfish acoustically tagged by Clarke et al. (2023) were observed to travel ~ 1800 km across four state jurisdictions in 191 days, highlighting the potential scale of movements across this region. The analyses reported in these studies, however, did not capture the full degree of mixing between the Western and Eastern Australian genetic stocks.
The range of the Eastern Australian kingfish stock encompasses two of the world’s longest running recreational saltwater fish tagging programs, both established in the 1970s; the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) Game Fish Tagging Program (NSW GFTP) (Pepperell 2007) and the NZ Gamefish Tagging Programme (NZ GFTP) (Saul & Holdsworth 1992). Kingfish are the second-most tagged species in both programs, with comparatively high recapture rates (NSW = 7.8%; NZ = 6.4%) (Holdsworth 2021; Pepperell et al. 2021). The high recapture rate of kingfish across both programs affords the opportunity to investigate long-term distribution patterns, movements, and connectivity of kingfish across an area of more than ~ 6 million km2 spanning the entire range of the Eastern Australian biological stock. Recent stock assessments and workshops on kingfish in eastern Australia have identified a number of uncertainties and knowledge gaps, with further research on the distribution and movements of the spawning stock being a key research priority (Hughes et al. 2021; Hughes & Stewart 2020; Stewart et al. 2021).
In this study, we analysed half a century of tag and recapture records from the NSW GFTP and the NZ GFTP to analyse kingfish movements, delineate the Eastern and Western Australia kingfish stocks, and quantify the degree of cross-jurisdictional connectivity across Australia and NZ waters, to better inform the appropriate spatial scale of management. We conducted several analyses on the tag-recapture data to ascertain the patterns in movement and connectivity across the entire Eastern and Western Australia kingfish stocks. First, we considered the tagging effort for kingfish versus all other species in the tag-recapture dataset. Second, we explored the seasonality of releases and recaptures, and assessed potential environmental and ontogenetic drivers on catch. Third, we assessed population connectivity using network analyses at broad- and fine- scales (bioregional and 1-degree grid, respectively). Finally, we examined patterns in individual behaviour to evaluate the variability within the population. By investigating multiple spatial and temporal scales of inference we aimed to provide a comprehensive trans-Tasman assessment of kingfish population structure and connectivity.
Materials and methods
Kingfish tag-recapture datasets
The NSW GFTP targets 60 species and over 500,000 tags have been deployed since 1973 by over 60,000 recreational anglers (Pepperell et al. 2021). The NZ GFTP is a cooperative effort between Fisheries NZ and the NZ Sport Fishing Council and anglers that began in 1975 and was initially focused on billfish species, but later expanded to other gamefish, including kingfish (Saul & Holdsworth 1992).
The NSW GFTP dataset consists of continuous tag and recaptures of kingfish between 1974 and 2022, while data from the NZ GFTP spanned 1978–2022. In both programs, suitable kingfish (i.e., > 70 cm total length (TL) in the NSW GFTP and > 65 cm fork length (FL) from 1978 to 2003, then > 75 cm FL from 2004—present in the NZ GFTP, in accordance with minimum legal length) were tagged with conventional pelagic streamer tags (Hallprint, Australia) inserted in the dorsal musculature and secured between the pterygiophores. Each released kingfish was assigned a unique ID, and the release location, date, length, and name of the angler releasing the fish were recorded. Length measurements provided by anglers include a combination of fork and total length (in cm), although measurement type was not always reported. When missing, we assumed a measurement to reflect fork length, which avoided misclassifying immature kingfish as mature. When a kingfish was recaptured, its tag ID, recapture date, length, location, and angler name was recorded. Any records with the essential information missing were removed from the analyses.
To quantify possible biases in the dataset driven by tagging effort, records of all species released throughout the entire history of the program were obtained from the NSW GFTP. The release locations were averaged to the nearest degree of latitude and longitude to create a 1-degree network grid (as described in 3.3). The number of releases within each grid cell was then divided by the total number of releases to reveal the proportion of all releases that fell within that 1-degree cell. This was similarly conducted on the kingfish data so that the proportional kingfish tagging effort could be visually compared to total tagging effort for all other species. To further assess the potential impact of tagging effort on patterns observed in the dataset, a histogram of distance travelled was created for the recaptures of kingfish and non-kingfish species to identify potential trends in peaks of distances travelled by kingfish compared to overall effort in the tagging program.
Data cleaning and preparation
Kingfish release and recapture records were restricted to the combined Australian and NZ known range, with records < 10°S or beyond the Australian and NZ kingfish known longitudinal range removed (Hughes & Stewart 2020; Stuart-Smith et al. 2018). Across all records, 3079 releases did not include a date or accurate release locations and were removed from the analyses. Records that fell on land were removed, allowing for a 1 km buffer in the case of imprecise GPS coordinates (i.e., GPS rounding, locations inside estuaries or from land-based fishers). Records with biologically improbable length measurements for the species, i.e. > 190 cm FL (Stewart et al. 2001), and recapture dates earlier than release dates, were removed. Recaptures were filtered to only include fish that had an average speed between release and recapture location of < 7 km/hr, which was informed by diffusion rates used for track processing of pop-up satellite archival tagged kingfish (Goddard, unpubl. data). Finally, we calculated the minimum distances travelled by each recaptured fish around land, taking into account the shape of the coastline as opposed to straight line distances crossing over land, using the RSP (Refined Shortest Paths) package in R (Niella et al. 2020).
All Australian kingfish tag-recaptures were allocated to Integrated Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia (IMCRA) v4.0 Provincial Bioregions, hereafter referred to as ‘bioregions’, which are defined by the isobath, oceanographic habitat, and demersal fish assemblages (IMCRA, 2006). These bioregions range in size from 18,209 to 485,348 km2, with potential movements across bioregions reflecting broad-scale movements across diverse habitats. Additionally, crossing of multiple bioregions generally resulted in traversing multiple fisheries jurisdictions, and therefore exposure to varying recreational and commercial management regulations. All coastal NZ releases and recaptures were allocated to a single bioregion for ease of interpretation of broad-scale trans-Tasman movements.
All analyses were performed using the statistical software R, version 4.2.1 (R Core Team 2021).
Seasonality of kingfish tagging
To assess potential variation in the seasonality of kingfish release and recaptures, density histograms were created for each jurisdiction (QLD, NSW, SA, VIC, Western Australia (WA), NZ), with release and recapture dates converted to Julian days, i.e. the corresponding numerical day of the year (e.g., January 1st = day 1). Temporal trends were explored visually for three size categories (at time of release), to evaluate the potential interaction between fish size and release/recapture patterns for each month of the year. These three size classes encompassed juveniles (< 50 cm FL), adults (> 83 cm FL), and an interim class of individuals undergoing maturation, that accounts for sex-specific differences in size at maturity (50–83 cm FL) (Gillanders et al. 1999).
Sea surface temperature (SST) for all kingfish catch records (i.e. releases and recaptures) was examined since it is a known driver of kingfish activity in the study region (Clarke et al. 2023). We extracted SST data at the time and location of release and recapture of all kingfish from the topmost layer in the Bluelink ReANalysis (BRAN2020) global reanalysis (Chamberlain et al. 2021b). Sea surface temperature measurements were extracted using the raster package (Hijmans 2022) with a 10 km buffer around each of the reported locations to account for records that were in close proximity to land, or too shallow (i.e., estuaries). The BRAN2020 ocean model is data-assimilative with a 0.1° spatial cell resolution (Chamberlain et al. 2021a). Sea surface temperature from this model has been shown to be consistent with observations globally (Chamberlain et al. 2021b) and in the east Australian region (Schilling et al. 2022). Only kingfish catches occurring after 1993 (n = 49,450) were considered for this seasonal analysis to match SST data availability.
Dispersal and connectivity
We plotted the relationships between time at liberty and the minimum distance travelled by tagged kingfish between their release and recapture locations to determine whether longer time at liberty promoted a larger minimum distance travelled. Trends in release jurisdiction and kingfish size were also examined, alongside temporal trends by grouping recaptures into yearly bins to further identify whether longer times at liberty promoted a larger minimum distance travelled.
To explore broad-scale movements and connectivity patterns of kingfish across the study region, a network analysis of the recapture data was performed. Each movement network consisted of nodes representing the bioregions of release or recapture, and edges denoting the number of observed movements between each pair of nodes. The resulting networks were constructed and visualised using the igraph R package (Csárdi & Nepusz 2006). We plotted the networks using two different visualisation layouts. A multidimensional scale layout helped examine the centrality patterns (i.e. which nodes or bioregions were more important for kingfish moving through the region), node density (i.e. the number of movements or edges existing between nodes or bioregions), and the bioregions that lacked high connectivity with others. In addition, a spatial layout provided insights into the spatial patterns of connectivity among all bioregions.
Five network level metrics were calculated to quantify the extent of overlap between each tagging program and connectivity patterns between all nodes and edges in the overall network: (1) the number of incoming movements to a node, (2) the number of outgoing movements from a node, (3) the total number of unique movements between nodes (both incoming and outgoing), (4) the betweenness of each node (i.e. how likely a node is to be passed through when a kingfish moves from one node to every other node in the network), and (5) the closeness of the node to the other nodes in the network (i.e. how close a node is to others in the network based on shortest path distances of each movement to or from that node) (Table S1).
To identify finer-scale movements within and between state fisheries management jurisdictions, release and recapture locations were binned to the nearest degree of latitude and longitude to create a 1° network grid. Each 1° grid cell containing data was a node within the resulting network. Separate networks were created for the six fishery jurisdictions of kingfish releases (NSW, QLD, SA, VIC, WA and NZ) based on tag releases. The edges represented movements to other grid cells or nodes within the same jurisdiction, or outside the jurisdiction of release. The igraph R package (Csárdi & Nepusz 2006) was used to visualise the spatial connectivity of nodes within each of the six (state-based) networks.
Individual behavioural differences
We conducted a cluster analysis to assess variability in the behaviour of tagged Australian and NZ kingfish. Four input variables were used: release length, release month, minimum distance travelled, and time at liberty. Data were first normalised to remove any biases caused by outliers, specifically in the maximum distances travelled and time at liberty (n = 552 recaptures removed). Hierarchical clusters were used to determine the appropriate number of clusters to inform k-means calculations (MacQueen 1967), with six clusters used for this analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was then conducted on the data using the vegan package in R (Oksanen et al. 2015). Principle component analyses were conducted on fish that were at liberty for at least 30 days (n = 2799) before eventual recapture. We produced paired scatterplots for all input variable combinations to identify the key factors defining each cluster.
Results
A total of 63,432 kingfish were tagged and released across both programs and were assessed as part of this study. From April 1974 to February 2022, 39,755 kingfish were tagged and released by recreational anglers as part of the NSW GFTP, and 23,677 kingfish were tagged and released between May 1976 and June 2021 as part of the NZ GFTP. Kingfish had the highest recorded recapture rates of all teleost species in both the Australian (7.8%; n = 3116) and NZ (6.4% n = 1525) GFTPs, with tagging effort occurring throughout most of the species’ range (Sup. Fig. 1).
Seasonality in kingfish tagging
Releases and recaptures of kingfish varied throughout the year and between fisheries management jurisdictions (Fig. 2). In all jurisdictions, most kingfish were captured throughout the Austral spring–autumn months (September–May), with an observed decrease in kingfish captures in both programs during the winter months. In contrast, mature-sized kingfish (> 83 cm FL) in NSW appeared to be consistently available to the fishery throughout the year (Sup. Fig. 2), while highly seasonal in other jurisdictions, such as SA and NZ.
Proportion of kingfish releases and recaptures throughout the year as part of the NSW and NZ game fish tagging programs. Releases in Tasmania and other jurisdictions are not displayed because of the low number of records, or no recaptures. Light grey sectioning within each figure depicts the Austral winter months (June–August)
Overall, kingfish were released or recaptured across their range when SST ranged between 10.7 and 28.9°C (median 20.2°C and 20.7°C for Australia and NZ respectively, overall median = 20.3°C). Approximately half (50.8%, n = 23,260) of the releases and recaptures occurred when SST were between 18.7 and 21.5°C (1st to 3rd quartile range) (Sup. Fig. 3). However, SST upon release or recapture varied by state, with TAS recording the coolest median temperature (17.6°C) and QLD the highest (22.6°C) (Table S2). This was likely an artefact of the different oceanographic and climatic habitats encompassed by those jurisdictions.
Dispersal
The 4636 kingfish recaptured over the study period showed variability in dispersal throughout Australian and NZ waters. Overall, tagged kingfish travelled a minimum distance of 0–2834 km (median ± std dev: 9 ± 189.2 km) between release and recapture. Time at liberty also varied greatly, with tagged fish being recaptured between 0 and 7222 days (47 ± 471 days) after release. Around half of the kingfish (n = 1568, 50.3%) tagged through the NSW GFTP were recaptured within two months of release (median ± std dev: 60 ± 297 days; Fig. 3A), while kingfish from the NZ GFTP remained at liberty for longer (266 ± 871 days). In both programs, around half of tagged kingfish (n = 2385; 51.4%) were recaptured within 10 km of their release site (NSW GFTP: 11.4 ± 250.0 km; NZ GFTP: 7.8 ± 151.7 km).
Minimum distances travelled (i.e. distance between release and recapture) and time at liberty (i.e. days elapsed between release and recapture) for each tagged and recaptured kingfish in the NSW and NZ tagging programs. Minimum distance travelled (A) is limited to 750 km between release and recapture locations for ease of visualisation, with distances grouped into 25 km bins. Time at liberty (B) is limited to 2,000 days for ease of visualisation, with dashed vertical lines every 365 days to highlight annual trends. Stacked histograms are coloured according to the size of the tagged kingfish at the time of release, with grey indicating fish where length was not recorded. Note the varying scales on the y-axes
Annual periodicity in kingfish recaptures was evident for SA and to a lesser extent for NZ (Fig. 3B). Notably, these two regions had the greatest proportion of adult kingfish tagged (> 83 cm). Kingfish in SA were generally recaptured at or near their release location, with a median distance between release and recapture of 0 km (1st quartile = 0 km; 3rd quartile = 322 km). Similarly, kingfish released in NZ were generally recaptured at or near their release location (median = 9.8 km; 1st quartile = 0 km; 3rd quartile = 61.2 km). By contrast, some kingfish (n = 29) released from SA also travelled considerable distances, being eventually recaptured in NSW or even QLD, with a maximum distance between release and recapture locations of 2,834 km in 702 days. There was a marked difference in movement behaviours between SA kingfish that displayed residency or high site fidelity (recaptured close to the site of release), and others that were more migratory (recaptured further away; Fig. 3). In other jurisdictions, kingfish recaptures exponentially decreased with time, with no evident relationship between time at liberty and minimum distance travelled (Fig. 3).
Connectivity
Network analysis revealed extensive connectivity of kingfish between 15 provincial bioregions across the study region (Fig. 4), indicating that kingfish can travel vast distances across varied habitats. The Southeast Shelf Transition and Central Eastern Shelf Province bioregions, encompassing shelf waters off most of NSW and northern VIC, recorded the highest centrality measures across nodes, and highest degree of connectivity to other nodes (bioregions) in the network (Table S1). Bidirectional movements were recorded between NZ and multiple bioregions across the Tasman Sea and off eastern Australia (Fig. 4). Despite observed connectivity across QLD, NSW, VIC, SA (hereafter referred to south-eastern Australia) and NZ, no connectivity was recorded between western and south-eastern Australia (Figs. 4 and 5). Offshore bioregions had the highest proportion of recaptures of tagged kingfish in a bioregion other than that of their release (Sup. Fig. 4). Over 88% of kingfish tagged in the Central Eastern Province and the Southeast Transition bioregions, offshore of NSW and northern VIC were recaptured in a different bioregion. The remaining bioregions recorded less than 15% of tagged kingfish recaptured in a different bioregion, except for the Bass Strait Shelf Province, where the two kingfish tagged in that bioregion were subsequently recaptured in a different bioregion.
Geospatial (a) and multidimensional (b) movement networks showing connectivity patterns of tagged kingfish between provincial bioregions. Australian kingfish releases and recaptures were allocated a corresponding bioregion according to the Integrated Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia v4.0—Provincial Bioregions (IMCRA, 2006) and New Zealand records were all grouped to the one point in the North Island for ease of visualisation (despite some releases occurring in the northern parts of the South Island)
Geospatial movement networks showing connectivity patterns of kingfish tagged and released in each fisheries management jurisdiction as part of the NSW and NZ tagging programs. Kingfish releases and recaptures are averaged to the nearest whole latitude and longitude. Tasmania is not shown as no kingfish were recaptured within the state through either tagging program, despite having records of release
Network analysis of kingfish recaptures across fisheries management jurisdictions showed clear delineation between kingfish tagged in WA and those tagged in the other jurisdictions, with no observed movements between these regions (Fig. 5). In contrast, extensive connectivity was detected within and between south-eastern Australian jurisdictions and NZ (Fig. 5), with 87 cross-jurisdictional movements recorded. Most observed cross-jurisdictional movements originated from kingfish originally tagged and released in NSW and recaptured in QLD (n = 31), followed closely by those released in SA and recaptured in NSW (n = 26), and observed equal bidirectional movements between NSW and VIC (n = 7 in each direction). No fish released outside of SA were recaptured in SA (Sup. Fig. 5). The observed cross-jurisdictional connectivity was minimally influenced by size class, with both juvenile and adults exhibiting movements between fisheries jurisdictions (Sup. Figs. 6 and 7).
Cluster analysis
Analysis of patterns in behaviour for tagged kingfish via PCA indicated that the relationship between kingfish recaptures was mostly similar, except for two clusters, defined by long times at liberty, or large minimum distances travelled (Fig. 6a). Release jurisdiction did not predict whether fish were more likely to be at liberty for longer or travel a larger minimum distance (Fig. 6b). Release length also did not have a significant relationship with release month, time at liberty, or distance travelled.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of recaptured kingfish that were at liberty for at least 30 days. PCA (a) is coloured according to the cluster that kingfish were grouped into based on having similar traits (i.e. time at liberty, minimum distance travelled, release length) and PCA (b) is coloured by the jurisdiction that each kingfish was released in
Discussion
Our study is the first effort to combine nearly half a century of tag-recapture data from cooperative tagging programs across Australia and NZ to analyse movements and connectivity across the entire distributional range of the Eastern Australian kingfish biological stock. Our results support previous work on kingfish genetic stock structure in this region, with connectivity recorded among bioregions and jurisdictions within the Eastern Australian stock (Green 2020; Miller et al. 2011). Additionally, no kingfish tagged through the NSW or NZ GFTPs connected the Eastern and Western Australian stocks, supporting the genetic separation of the two (Miller et al. 2011). By contrast, the extensive trans-Tasman movements and cross-jurisdictional connectivity recorded between the south-eastern Australian states confirms that the Eastern Australian kingfish stock is likely to be a single stock throughout south-eastern Australia and NZ. Cross-jurisdictional movements were observed across all life stages (i.e., juvenile, sub-adult, and mature-sized kingfish). Together, these findings suggest that assessment and management of kingfish across the Eastern Australian stock at the jurisdictional level may be enhanced by a multi-jurisdictional approach, with similar management objectives across jurisdictions.
Recreational and commercial kingfish fisheries are managed separately by each jurisdiction in Australia, with Australian and NZ fisheries also managed independently. The Eastern Australian kingfish stock was most recently classified as sustainable (Hughes & Stewart 2020), however this classification was largely based on data from the NSW component of the stock, with information from the other jurisdictions lacking. Legal minimum length for kingfish varies considerably between Australian states and NZ, from 45 cm TL in TAS to 75 cm FL in NZ (~ 85 cm TL), alongside bag limits which vary between one to five fish across the Australian states and NZ. Attitudes towards the tagging programs also vary by state and between individual anglers. The observed releases and recaptures of kingfish through both the NSW and NZ GFTPs are influenced by angler attitudes, with only a snapshot of the overall kingfish distributions and movements likely to have been captured in this study. For example, engagement in the program is far higher in NSW and SA than in VIC, which may have influenced the reported recaptures in this region. Where there was effort to tag kingfish across all size classes (i.e. NSW), it appears that the magnitude of kingfish dispersal movements, or affinity to the region of release, is independent of size (and age). The actual size of kingfish when broad-scale movements were initiated remains unknown, as kingfish may have been at liberty for many years, with the timing of broad-scale movements difficult to pinpoint from tag-recapture datasets.
Much of the information on kingfish connectivity among south-eastern Australian states has only been documented recently as a result of the increasing popularity of the NSW GFTP in SA, advances in electronic fish tagging technology (Hussey et al. 2015), and the ensuing development of Australia’s continental acoustic telemetry network coordinated by the Integrated Marine Observing System’s Animal Tracking Facility (Brodie et al. 2018a; Hoenner et al. 2018; Lédée et al. 2021). Additionally, the range extension of this species associated with climate change has increased recreational fishing opportunities in TAS (Champion et al. 2018), and therefore led to increased tagging efforts in the region. Interestingly, the dataset analysed here and in Clarke et al. (2023), revealed unidirectional movements between SA and the eastern jurisdictions. However, very recent data from the NSW GFTP, occurring outside the main data collection period analysed here, includes the first recorded observation of a kingfish released in NSW (November 2021) being recaptured in SA (September 2023) (NSW DPI, unpubl. data). This recent recapture highlights the potential for more cross-jurisdictional movements and connectivity to be identified in the future through increased participation in recreational tagging programs and additional kingfish tagged with electronic transmitters.
The connectivity observed in this study, in conjunction with the minimum dispersal distances and time at liberty, suggest that kingfish exhibit a range of distinct movement patterns within the Eastern Australian stock. While most kingfish were recaptured close to their release site (51.4% recaptured within 10 km), there was also frequent cross-jurisdiction movements (14.5% recaptured over 100 km from release site). This is consistent with observations derived from acoustic telemetry in south-eastern Australia, where kingfish were typically site-attached with occasional broad-scale movements (Brodie et al. 2018a; Clarke et al. 2023). The concepts of metapopulation and partial migration are increasingly used to describe stocks where both residential and migratory individuals are present as ‘contingents’ within the overall population and display differing movement patterns (Chapman et al. 2012; Espinoza et al. 2016; Secor 1999; Setyawan et al. 2024; Thorrold et al. 2001). The Eastern Australian kingfish stock may therefore provide yet another compelling example of a metapopulation with partial migration, encompassing both resident and migratory contingents within the stock. For example, kingfish captures in SA most commonly occurred during the Austral spring (October–November). Most of these fish were captured at the top of the Spencer Gulf, in Port Augusta, with anecdotal reports from anglers suggesting that these fish appear once SST exceeds 20°C. Some of the tagged kingfish were recaptured at this same site annually, suggesting a temporal affinity to the region. Despite being released at the same site, other fish were recaptured in NSW and QLD (over 1,000 km distant). South Australia-released fish that were eventually recaptured in NSW or QLD (n = 29) were recaptured during Austral spring–autumn, with the majority of fish recaptured in November (n = 9) or October (n = 8). Individual context, such as body condition, health, energetic state and genetic make-up have all been attributed as factors that may influence individual migratory behaviour (Lubitz et al. 2022) and may explain the variability in movement strategies observed here. Future research efforts using acoustic and satellite telemetry methods should also focus on defining environmental factors that influence kingfish movements and habitat usage.
Annual periodicity in recaptures was evident in both SA and NZ, where the release of kingfish was dominated by the adult size class. This annual signal in recaptures was not evident in any other jurisdiction where less adults were tagged. While the periodicity for NZ recaptures is likely driven by the increase in tagging effort during each February (coinciding with NZ Sport Fishing Council Nationals Tournament), questions remain for the SA recaptured kingfish. It is possible that this annual periodicity may have a biological driver, with sexually mature individuals returning to the same location to spawn. Conversely, this may be an artefact of the data, with the tagging effort in these jurisdictions being skewed towards adults, with the periodicity observed being biased by fisher behaviour in locations with typically cooler ocean temperatures. Further research is needed to ascertain the drivers of this apparent periodicity, as it could also be indicative of the formation of spawning aggregations for the species.
Despite the considerable insights generated by these extensive citizen science datasets, some aspects of the spatial ecology of kingfish remain unresolved. For example, kingfish released in SA have been recaptured in NSW and QLD waters but, to date, none have been recaptured in VIC or TAS waters, thus separating the two regions. This may be due to the broader, shallow shelf in the Bass Strait region that enables kingfish to transit further away from the coast, and therefore reduce their vulnerability to capture, given that most fishing efforts are concentrated in nearshore areas. Northern TAS has a lower human population density, with lesser tagging effort, reducing the likelihood of an angler encountering a tagged kingfish moving through the Bass Strait region. South Australia-released kingfish that are recaptured in NSW and QLD may also be exhibiting “leapfrog” migration. This migration strategy has been described in birds and sharks, where animals from distributional limits bypass conspecifics in the centre of the species distribution (Lubitz et al. 2023; Ramos et al. 2015). This is driven by the timing of optimal breeding conditions, with offset breeding timing allowing for conspecifics to take advantage in surges of food availability in more distant locations (Bell 1996; Lubitz et al. 2022). The NSW GFTP has only recently expanded its tagging effort in other jurisdictions such as SA and VIC, and so more movements and cross-jurisdictional connectivity may therefore be captured in the future.
Kingfish have been observed to be available to Australian and NZ recreational anglers year-round, with releases and recaptures occurring throughout the entire year. However, both releases and recaptures of kingfish varied seasonally, with most occurring in the Austral spring–autumn months when SSTs ranged between 18 and 22°C. These SSTs encompass the thermal range for optimal kingfish growth and metabolic rate in aquaculture (Ilham & Fotedar 2016; Pirozzi & Booth 2009), but are marginally lower than the optimal temperatures predicted in kingfish distribution models which predict 22–22.5°C waters to be optimal habitats (Brodie et al. 2015; Champion et al. 2018). It is worth noting that the seasonal availability of kingfish is likely to have changed considerably since the commencement of the NSW and NZ GFTPs as the ocean off eastern Australia has warmed at over twice the global average rate in the past 50 years (Hobday & Pecl 2014; Malan et al. 2021). Southward distributional shifts have already increased availability to recreational and commercial fisheries in areas where the species has historically not been present (Champion et al. 2018). Verified citizen-science observations through the Range Extension Database and Mapping Project (Redmap; www.redmap.org.au) have recently recorded the occurrence of kingfish as far south as 43.5°S latitude off TAS (Stuart-Smith et al. 2018), extending their previously known range southwards by approximately 200 km. These observations are consistent with predictive models of kingfish distributions in the region, which suggest a poleward shift for this stock due to changing spatial habitat suitability (Champion et al. 2018, 2023). Additionally, fishing practices and equipment (i.e., sounders, gear-type, electric reels) have changed considerably since the program’s inception, which may have supported an expansion of fishing into additional regions. Together with the cross-jurisdictional connectivity observed in this study, shifting distributions of kingfish add a further layer of complexity for the management of this species.
Conclusions
Analysis of half a century of kingfish tag-recapture data collected by long-term citizen-science tagging programs provided highly valuable insights regarding the spatial ecology of the species across an area spanning ~ 6 million km2 in Australian and NZ waters. Our results support the previous stock structure delineation between Western and Eastern Australia and reveal complex connectivity patterns within the Eastern Australian kingfish stock. Kingfish tagged as part of the Eastern Australian stock displayed both resident and broad-scale movement behaviours across multiple management jurisdictions and habitat bioregions. The movement patterns and cross-jurisdictional connectivity identified in this study confirm that the kingfish stock in this region is a single interconnected stock throughout south-eastern Australia and NZ. These cross-jurisdictional movements were observed across all size classes, suggesting that the spawning stock is shared among the entire range of the Eastern Australian biological stock. Together, our findings indicate that there may be advantages in moving towards multi-jurisdictional management strategies for the species. Further research should focus on examining environmental or biological triggers for kingfish migrations, specifically among mature individuals, and identifying key spawning areas, to further support management of the species. Finally, our multi-analysis approach presents a framework that is broadly applicable for analysing tag-recapture datasets derived from cooperative tagging programs to address questions about fish population structure, movement variability and cross-jurisdictional connectivity to inform fisheries management.
Data availability
The data used in this study are the property of the NSW Game Fish Tagging Program and the NZ Gamefish Tagging Programme. A copy of the dataset used in this study can be made available upon reasonable request and authorisation from the data owners.
References
Altenritter MN, Zydlewski GB, Kinnison MT, Wippelhauser GS (2017) Atlantic sturgeon use of the penobscot river and marine movements within and beyond the Gulf of Maine. Mar Coast Fish 9(1):216–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2017.1282898
Andreotti S, Rutzen M, van der Walt S, von der Heyden S, Henriques R, Meyer M, Oosthuizen H, Matthee C (2016) An integrated mark-recapture and genetic approach to estimate the population size of white shark in South Africa. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11744
Baker R, Barnett A, Bradley M, Abrantes K, Sheaves M (2019) Contrasting seascape use by a coastal fish assemblage: a multi-methods approach. Estuar Coasts 42(1):292–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0455-y
Begg GA, Cameron DS, Sawynok W (1997) Movements and stock structure of school mackerel (Scomberomorus queenslandicus) and spotted mackerel (S-munroi) in Australian east-coast waters. Mar Freshw Res 48(4):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf97006
Begg GA, Friedland KD, Pearce JB (1999) Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fish Res 43(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00062-4
Bell CP (1996) Seasonality and time allocation as causes of leap-frog migration in the Yellow Wagtail Motacilla flava. J Avian Biol 334–342.
Bravington MV, Grewe PM, Davies CR (2016) Absolute abundance of southern bluefin tuna estimated by close-kin mark-recapture. Nat Commun 7(1):13162. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13162
Brodie S (2016) The ecology and distribution of two pelagic fish: yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi and dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus UNSW Sydney].
Brodie S, Hobday AJ, Smith JA, Everett JD, Taylor MD, Gray CA, Suthers IM (2015) Modelling the oceanic habitats of two pelagic species using recreational fisheries data. Fish Oceanogr 24(5):463–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12122
Brodie S, Lédée EJI, Heupel MR, Babcock RC, Campbell HA, Gledhill DC, Hoenner X, Huveneers C, Jaine FRA, Simpfendorfer CA, Taylor MD, Udyawer V, Harcourt RG (2018) Continental-scale animal tracking reveals functional movement classes across marine taxa. Sci Rep 8:3717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21988-5
Brodie S, Litherland L, Stewart J, Schilling HT, Pepperell JG, Suthers IM (2018b) Citizen science records describe the distribution and migratory behaviour of a piscivorous predator, Pomatomus saltatrix. ICES J Mar Sci 75(5):1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy057
Chamberlain MA, Oke PR, Brassington GB, Sandery P, Divakaran P, Fiedler RAS (2021a) Multiscale data assimilation in the Bluelink ocean reanalysis (BRAN). Ocean Model 166:101849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101849
Chamberlain MA, Oke PR, Fiedler RAS, Beggs HM, Brassington GB, Divakaran P (2021b) Next generation of Bluelink ocean reanalysis with multiscale data assimilation: BRAN2020. Earth Syst Sci Data 13(12):5663–5688. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5663-2021
Champion C, Hobday AJ, Zhang X, Pecl GT, Tracey SR (2018) Changing windows of opportunity: past and future climate-driven shifts in temporal persistence of kingfish (Seriola lalandi) oceanographic habitat within south-eastern Australian bioregions. Mar Freshw Res 70(1):33–42. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17387
Champion C, Lawson JR, Pardoe J, Cruz DO, Fowler AM, Jaine F, Schilling HT, Coleman MA (2023) Multi-criteria analysis for rapid vulnerability assessment of marine species to climate change. Clim Change 176(8):99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03577-2
Chapman BB, Skov C, Hulthén K, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson LA, Brönmark C (2012) Partial migration in fishes: definitions, methodologies and taxonomic distribution. J Fish Biol 81(2):479–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03349.x
Clarke TM, Whitmarsh SK, Jaine FRA, Taylor MD, Brodie S, Payne NL, Butcher PA, Broadhurst MK, Davey J, Huveneers C (2023) Environmental drivers of yellowtail kingfish, Seriola lalandi, activity inferred through a continental acoustic tracking network. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 34(1):e4019. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4019
Couturier LIE, Dudgeon CL, Pollock KH, Jaine FRA, Bennett MB, Townsend KA, Weeks SJ, Richardson AJ (2014) Population dynamics of the reef manta ray Manta alfredi in eastern Australia. Coral Reefs 33(2):329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-014-1126-5
Csárdi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. Inter J Complex Syst 1695. https://igraph.org
Espinoza M, Heupel MR, Tobin AJ, Simpfendorfer CA (2016) Evidence of partial migration in a large coastal predator: opportunistic foraging and reproduction as key drivers? PLoS ONE 11(2):e0147608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147608
Eveson JP, Million J, Sardenne F, Le Croizier G (2015) Estimating growth of tropical tunas in the Indian Ocean using tag-recapture data and otolith-based age estimates. Fish Res 163:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.05.016
Fogarty MJ, Botsford LW (2007) Population connectivity and spatial management of marine fisheries. Oceanography, 20(3), 112–123. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24860101
Fowler AM, Chick RC, Stewart J (2018) Patterns and drivers of movement for a coastal benthopelagic fish, Pseudocaranx georgianus, on Australia’s southeast coast. Sci Rep 8(1):16738
Gillanders BM, Ferrell DJ, Andrew NL (1999) Size at maturity and seasonal changes in gonad activity of yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi; Carangidae) in New South Wales, Australia. NZ J Mar Freshwat Res 33(3):457–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1999.9516891
Gillanders BM, Ferrell DJ, Andrew NL (2001) Estimates of movement and life-history parameters of yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi): how useful are data from a cooperative tagging programme? Mar Freshw Res 52(2):179–192. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF99153
Green C, Victorian Fisheries Authority, isuing body (2020) Increasing knowledge of Victoria's growing recreational yellowtail kingfish fishery. (9781760901486). Melbourne: Victorian Fisheries Authority Retrieved from http://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-2442054663
Hazen EL, Maxwell SM, Bailey H, Bograd SJ, Hamann M, Gaspar P, Godley BJ, Shillinger GL (2012) Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 457, 221–240. https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v457/p221-240/
Henderson MJ, Fabrizio MC (2014) Estimation of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) mortality rates using mark-recapture data from a recreational angler-tagging program. Fish Res 159:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.05.003
Hijmans R (2022) Raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.5–15, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster .
Hobday AJ, Pecl GT (2014) Identification of global marine hotspots: sentinels for change and vanguards for adaptation action. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24(2):415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-013-9326-6
Hoenner X, Huveneers C, Steckenreuter A, Simpfendorfer C, Tattersall K, Jaine F, Atkins N, Babcock R, Brodie S, Burgess J, Campbell H, Heupel M, Pasquer B, Proctor R, Taylor MD, Udyawer V, Harcourt R (2018) Australia’s continental-scale acoustic tracking database and its automated quality control process. Sci Data 5(1):170206. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.206
Holdsworth J (2021) New Zealand billfish and gamefish tagging, up to 2019–20. N Z Fish Assess Rep 2021(19):1–26
Hughes J, Roelofs A, Lewis P, Rogers P, Georgeson L, Authority VF, Tracey S (2021) Yellowtail Kingfish Seriola lalandi (in Toby Piddocke, Crispian Ashby, Klaas Hartmann, Alex Hesp, Patrick Hone, Joanne Klemke, Stephen Mayfield, Anthony Roelofs, Thor Saunders, John Stewart, Brent Wise and James Woodhams (eds) 2021, Status of Australian fish stocks reports 2020, Issue.
Hughes JM, Meadows NM, Stewart J, Booth DJ, Fowler AM (2022) Movement patterns of an iconic recreational fish species, mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), revealed by cooperative citizen-science tagging programs in coastal eastern Australia. Fish Res 247:106179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106179
Hughes JM, Stewart J (2020) Status of Australian Fish Stocks 2020—NSW Stock status summary—Yellowtail Kingfish (Seriola lalandi).
Hussey N, Kessel S, Aarestrup K, Cooke S, Cowley P, Fisk A, Harcourt R, Holland K, Iverson S, Kocik J, Mills J, Whoriskey F (2015) ECOLOGY. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348:1221. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255642
Hutson KS, Smith BP, Godfrey RT, Whittington ID, Chambers CB, Ernst I, Gillanders BM (2007) A tagging study on yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi) and Samson fish (S-hippos) in south Australian waters. Trans R Soc S Aust 131:128–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03721426.2007.10887075
Huveneers C, Niella Y, Drew M, McAuley R, Butcher P, Peddemors V, Waltrick D, Dowling C, Mountford S, Keay I, Braccini M (2021) Continental-scale network reveals cross-jurisdictional movements of sympatric sharks with implications for assessment and management. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.697175
Ilham I, Fotedar R (2016) Growth, antioxidant capacity and muscle histochemistry of yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi Valenciennes 1883): Selenium and temperature interaction. Anim Feed Sci Technol 217:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.04.009
Jacobson P, Gardmark A, Huss M (2020) Population and size-specific distribution of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in the Baltic Sea over five decades. J Fish Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14213
Jaine FRA, Couturier LIE, Weeks SJ, Townsend KA, Bennett MB, Fiora K, Richardson AJ (2012) When Giants Turn Up: Sighting Trends, Environmental Influences and Habitat Use of the Manta Ray Manta alfredi at a Coral Reef. PLoS ONE 7(10):e46170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046170
Lédée EJI, Heupel MR, Taylor MD, Harcourt RG, Jaine FRA, Huveneers C, Udyawer V, Campbell HA, Babcock RC, Hoenner X, Barnett A, Braccini M, Brodie S, Butcher PA, Cadiou G, Dwyer RG, Espinoza M, Ferreira LC, Fetterplace L, Simpfendorfer CA (2021) Continental-scale acoustic telemetry and network analysis reveal new insights into stock structure. Fish Fish 22(5):987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12565
Lubitz N, Bradley M, Sheaves M, Hammerschlag N, Daly R, Barnett A (2022) The role of context in elucidating drivers of animal movement. Ecol Evol 12(7):e9128. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9128
Lubitz N, Daly R, Filmalter JD, Sheaves M, Cowley PD, Naesje TF, Barnett A (2023) Context drives movement patterns in a mobile marine predator. Mov Ecol 11(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00390-5
Lucy J, Davy K (2000) Benefits of angler-assisted tag and release programs. Fisheries 25:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025%3c0018:BOATAR%3e2.0.CO;2
MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability
Malan N, Roughan M, Kerry C (2021) The rate of coastal temperature rise adjacent to a warming western boundary current is nonuniform with latitude. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090751
Miller PA, Fitch AJ, Gardner M, Hutson KS, Mair G (2011) Genetic population structure of Yellowtail Kingfish (Seriola lalandi) in temperate Australasian waters inferred from microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA. Aquaculture 319(3):328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.036
Morton RM, Halliday I, Cameron D (1993) Movement of tagged juvenile tailor (Pomatomus Saltatrix) In Moreton Bay, Queensland. Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 44(6):811–816
Niella Y, Flávio H, Smoothey AF, Aarestrup K, Taylor MD, Peddemors VM, Harcourt R (2020) Refined Shortest Paths (RSP): Incorporation of topography in space use estimation from node-based telemetry data. Methods Ecol Evol 11(12):1733–1742. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13484
Nugroho E, Ferrell SP, Taniguchi N (2001) Genetic divergence of kingfish from Japan Australia and New Zealand inferred by microsatellite DNA and mtDNA control region markers. Fish Sci. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2001.00331.x
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O'Hara B, Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens H, Wagner H (2015) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.2–1, 2, 1–2.
Paloheimo JE (1958) Determination of natural and fishing mortalities of cod and haddock from analysis of tag records off western Nova Scotia. Jour Fish Res Bd Canada 15(6):1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1139/f58-075
Pepperell JG (2007) NSW DPI Game Fish Tagging Program—Program Summary and Report to July 2005. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries.
Pepperell JG, Hilbert C, Simpson E, Bolton P (2021) NSW DPI game fish tagging program—report 2020–2021. NSW Department of Primary Industries.
Pinsky ML, Reygondeau G, Caddell R, Palacios-Abrantes J, Spijkers J, Cheung WWL (2018) Preparing ocean governance for species on the move. Science 360(6394):1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2360
Pirozzi I, Booth MA (2009) The routine metabolic rate of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus: Sciaenidae) and yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi: Carangidae) acclimated to six different temperatures. Comp Biochem Physiol A: Mol Integr Physiol 152(4):586–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.01.008
Poortenaar CW, Hooker SH, Sharp N (2001) Assessment of yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi lalandi) reproductive physiology, as a basis for aquaculture development. Aquaculture 201(3):271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00549-X
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In. Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ramos R, Sanz V, Militão T, Bried J, Neves VC, Biscoito M, Phillips RA, Zino F, González-Solís J (2015) Leapfrog migration and habitat preferences of a small oceanic seabird, Bulwer’s petrel (Bulweria bulwerii). J Biogeogr 42(9):1651–1664
Rooker JR, Bremer JRA, Block BA, Dewar H, De Metrio G, Corriero A, Kraus RT, Prince ED, Rodriguez-Marin E, Secor DH (2007) Life history and stock structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus). Rev Fish Sci 15(4):265–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260701484135
Saul P, Holdsworth J (1992) Cooperative gamefish tagging in New Zealand waters, 1975–90. N Z Fish Tech Rep 33:1–24
Schilling HT, Hewitt DE, Malan N, Taylor MD, Johnson DD (2022) Cross-jurisdictional larval supply essential for eastern Australian spanner crabs (Ranina ranina). Mar Freshw Res 73(11):1352–1367
Schweigert JF, Schwarz CJ (1993) Estimating migration rates for pacific herring (Clupea-Pallasi) using tag-recovery data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50(7):1530–1540. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-174
Secor DH (1999) Specifying divergent migrations in the concept of stock: the contingent hypothesis. Fish Res 43(1):13–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00064-8
Sepúlveda FA, González MT (2017) Spatio-temporal patterns of genetic variations in populations of yellowtail kingfish Seriola lalandi from the south-eastern Pacific Ocean and potential implications for its fishery management. J Fish Biol 90(1):249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13179
Setyawan E, Erdmann MV, Mambrasar R, Ambafen O, Hasan A, Izuan M, Mofu I, Putra MIH, Sianipar A, Constantine R, Stevenson B, Jaine F (2024) Spatial connectivity of reef manta rays across the Raja Ampat archipelago. Indones R Soc Open Sci 11:230895. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230895
Stewart J, Ferrell D, Van der Walt B, Johnson D, Lowry M (2001) Assessment of length and age composition of commercial kingfish landings, final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation.
Stewart J, Hughes J, Gunton H (2021) Strategic Planning Workshop for Yellowtail Kingfish Stock Assessment in South-Eastern Australia Yellowtail Kingfish Workshop (FRDC Project No 2019/103).
Stewart J, Pidd A, Fowler AM, Sumpton W (2019) Latitudinal variation in growth rates and limited movement patterns revealed for east-coast snapper Chrysophrys auratus through long-term cooperative-tagging programs. Mar Freshw Res 71(6):653–661
Stuart-Smith J, Pecl G, Pender A, Tracey S, Villanueva C, Smith-Vaniz WF (2018) Southernmost records of two Seriola species in an Australian ocean-warming hotspot. Mar Biodivers 48(3):1579–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-016-0580-4
Thorrold SR, Latkoczy C, Swart PK, Jones CM (2001) Natal homing in a marine fish metapopulation. Science 291(5502):297–299. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5502.297
Zeller B, Pollock B, Williams L (1996) Aspects of life history and management of tailor (Pomatomus saltatrix) in Queensland. Mar Freshw Res 47(2):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9960323
Acknowledgements
This study is part of Project Kingfish, enabled by funding from the New South Wales Recreational Fishing Trusts and the Victorian Recreational Fishing Grants Program. We express our utmost gratitude to the recreational anglers who have participated in the NSW DPI Game Fish Tagging Program and the New Zealand Gamefish Tagging Programme over the past five decades. This research would not have been possible without their enthusiasm to assist science and grow our understanding of recreationally important species. We also thank Fisheries New Zealand for providing data from the kingfish tagging program funded by the Ministry for Primary Industries. We are grateful to Yuri Niella for assistance in computing calculations of minimum distance travelled around land using the RSP package.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest with this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Goddard, B.K., Guillemin, T.A., Schilling, H.T. et al. Half a century of citizen science tag-recapture data reveals stock delineation and cross-jurisdictional connectivity of an iconic pelagic fish. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-024-09880-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-024-09880-0