Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Contextualising credit transactions in artisanal marine fishing: insights from Kerala, India

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper investigates the nature of credit transactions in artisanal marine fishing in a developing economy by analysing the case of Kerala, a south Indian state of India. The study examined the structure of credit in marine fishing and its composition; interlocked credit-market and credit-labour transactions; segmentation of credit market; interest rate variations, and the potential reasons for high penetration of informal credit in marine fisheries in the background of a relatively better developed formal financing system in sectors outside fishing. The study concludes that the risk-sharing role of the informal credit in addressing the high variability of the income stream in marine fishing and the failure of the formal system to develop credit products internalising the risk element perpetuates the informal credit dominated by output-credit interlocking between fishers and auctioneer-creditors. While the fishers share the risk of high variability in income stream through the sharing arrangement, the auctioneer-creditors are assuring the flow of fish to be auctioned. However, the system is not without “exploitative elements” triggered by the monopoly power of stakeholders, particularly auctioneer-lenders. The traditional “triadic system” involving fishers, auctioneer-lenders and the society as regulators of trust that sustained the informal credit system is weakening due to extraneous forces. The study highlights the need to have credit products that bundle insurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data is available on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. 1 US $ = INR 73.92 in 2021 (RBI 2022).

  2. The commission for the auctioneer-lender was about 10% in Chellanam and about 7% in Kalamukku.

  3. For example, in Kalamukku harbour, when a fisher who has availed loan from Matsyafed through FDWCS sells fish through the designated auctioneers, the total commission charged is 5.48% of the value of fish. Out of this, 0.48% accrues towards the lease charges of the harbour, 1% to the auctioneer and the remaining 4% to the FDWCS. Of this 4%, 1.5% is paid back to the crew during the festivals. The remaining 2.5% is bifurcated in such a way that 1.5% is paid to the FDWCS, and 1.0% goes to Matsyafed. In case the vessel owners have not availed credit from the society or auctioneer, an auction charge of 1% is levied.

  4. Matsyafed was established with the aim of freeing the fisher members from middlemen and merchants by providing credit at liberalised terms and carrying out auctions on behalf of the small-scale member fishers.

References

  • Allen DW, Lueck D (1999) The role of risk in contract choice. J Law Econ Organ 15(3):704–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston L, Datta SK, Nugent J (1984) Tenancy choice in a competitive framework with transaction costs. J Polit Econ 92(6):1121–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran G, Francis CA (2002) Role of commission agents in the development of traditional marine fisheries of Kerala with special reference to financing (Doctoral dissertation, Cochin University of Science and Technology)

  • Bardhan P (1984) Land, labour and rural poverty essays in development economics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhalla GS, Singh G (2012) Economic liberalisation and Indian agriculture: a district level study. Sage Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu K (1984) Implicit interest rates, usury and isolation in backward agriculture. Camb J Econ 8(2):145–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné C (2003) When fishery rhymes with poverty: a first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Dev 36(1):945–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP, Khandker S (1992) The impact of formal finance on rural economy of India, World Bank, working paper no. 949

  • Binswanger H, Rosenzweig MR (1986) Behavioural and material determinants of production relations in agriculture. J Dev Stud 22(3):503–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388608421994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri S, Dwibedi JK (2002) Horizontal and vertical linkages between formal and informal credit markets in backward agriculture: a theoretical analysis. Indian J Soc Dev 2(1). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=310439. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.310439

  • CMFRI (2012) Marine fishery census 2010, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin, India

  • Crona BI, Nyström M, Folke C, Jiddawi N (2010) Middlemen, a critical social-ecological link in coastal communities of Kenya and Zanzibar. Mar Policy 34(4):761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Senapati M, John J (2009) Impact of agricultural credit on agriculture production: an empirical analysis in India. Reserve Bank India Occas Pap 30(2)

  • Dev SM (2006) Financial inclusion: issues and challenges. Eco Pol Week 41(41):4310–4313

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze J, Sen A (eds) (1996) Indian development: selected regional perspectives. Oxford University Press, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois P (2008). Sharecropping. In: The New Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1441-2

  • Eswaran M, Kotwal A (1985) A theory of contractual structure in agriculture. Am Econ Rev 75(3):352–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Gideon CP (2007) Contractual Arrangements in Philippine Fisheries, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2007-22, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Makati City

  • Government of India (2020) Statewise and item-wise estimates of value of output from agriculture and allied Sectors. Central Statistical Office. New Delhi

  • Government of Kerala (2015) Fisheries statistics. Department of Fisheries

  • Government of Kerala (2021) Economic review. Planning Board. Thiruvananthapuram

  • Islam MM (2011) Living on the Margin: the poverty-vulnerability nexus in the small-scale fisheries of Bangladesh. In: Jentoft S, Eide A (eds) Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Springer, Netherlands, pp 71–95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee DM, Russell T (1976) Imperfect information, uncertainty and credit rationing. Q J Econ 90(4):651–666. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey R (1992) Politics, women and well-being: how Kerala became ‘a model.’ Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DS (2010) Institutional adaptation as a governability problem in fisheries: patron–client relations in the Junagadh fishery, India. Fish Fish 11:264–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00376.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan FN, Andrea MC, Nayak PK, Derek A (2018) Women’s perspectives of small-scale fisheries and environmental change in Chilika Lagoon, India. Marit Stud 17(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan AR (2021) Risks and Uncertainties in Fishing Operations. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KSPB (2022) Report of the working group on social protection for fish workers: an assessment and suggestions for reform (Coordinator: Kurien, J). Kerala State Planning Board

  • Kurien J (1995) The Kerala model: its central tendency and the outlier. Soc Sci 23(1/3):70–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan R (2006) Agricultural credit in India status: issues and future agenda. Eco Pol Week 41(11):1013–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Murickan SJJ (1983) Interlinkages of credit, labour and marketing relations in traditional fishing: the case of Purakkad. In: Srivastava, Reddy (eds) Fisheries development in India: some aspects of policy management. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 175–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Myint H (1964) An interpretation of economic backwardness. Oxf Econ Pap New Ser 6:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan S (2016) The productivity of agricultural credit in India. Agric Econ 47:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olomola AS, Gyimah-Brempong K (2014) Loan demand and rationing among small-scale farmers in Nigeria, Discussion Paper 01403, IFPRI, Washington

  • Otsuka K, Chuma H, Hayami Y (1992) Land and labor contracts in agrarian economies: theories and facts. J Econ Lit 30(4):1965–2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal S (1994) Choice of casual and regular labour contracts in Indian agriculture: a theoretical and empirical analysis. University of London, London School of Economics (United Kingdom)

  • Parappurathu S, Ramachandran C, Baiju KK, Xavier AK (2019) Formal versus informal: insights into the credit transactions of small scale fishers along South West Coast of India. Mar Policy 103:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parappurathu S, Ramachandran C, Gopalakrishnan A, Kumar D, Poddar MK, Choudhury M, Geetha R, Koya KM, Kumar RN, Salini KP et al (2017) What ails fisheries insurance in India? An assessment of issues, challenges and future potential. Mar Policy 86:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau JP (1984) The drive towards mechanization of smallscale fisheries in Kerala: a study of the transformation process of traditional village societies. Dev Change 15(1):65–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau JP, Abraham A (1987) An inquiry into quasi-credit contracts: the role of reciprocal credit and interlinked deals in small-scale fishing communities. J Dev Stud 23(1987):461–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau JP, Nugent J (1992) Share contracts and their rationale: lessons from marine fishing. J Dev Stud 28(3):386–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platteau JP, Murickan J, Palatty A, Delbar E (1980) Rural credit market in a backward area: a Kerala fishing village. Eco Pol Week 15(41–43):1765–1780

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau JP, Murickan J, Delbar E (1985) Technology, credit and indebtedness in marine fishing: a case study of three villages in South Kerala. Hindustan Publishing Co, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy R, Arango C, Lomboy CG, Box S (2020) Financial inclusion to build economic resilience in small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 118:103982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajakumar DJ, Mani G, Shetty SL, Karmarkar MV (2019) Trends and patterns of household indebtedness. Eco Pol Week 54(9):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran VK (1996) On Kerala’s development achievements. In: Drèze J, Sen A (eds) Indian development: selected regional perspectives. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 205–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakumar R, Chavan P (2014) Bank credit to agriculture in India in the 2000s: dissecting the revival. Rev Agrarian Stud 4(1):50–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami B, Ravi S, Chopra S (2003) Risk management in agriculture, Discussion Paper 03-08, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi

  • Ray D (1999) Development economics. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of India (2022) Handbook of statistics of Indian economy. https://dbie.rbi.org.in/DBIE/dbie.rbi?site=publications#!2

  • Riekhof M (2019) The insurance premium in the interest rates of interlinked loans in a small-scale fishery. Environ Dev Econ 24(1):87–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1800031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle K (2011) “Informal” credit systems in fishing communities: issues and examples from Vietnam. Hum Organ 70:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sappington DEM (1991) Incentives in principal-agent relationships. J Econ Perspect 5(2):45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathiadhas R, Venkataraman G (1983) Indebtedness and utilisation of fisheries credit in Sakthikulangara and Neendakara, Kerala a case study. Mar Fish Inf Serv Tech Ext Ser 54:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaban RA (1987) Testing between competing model of sharecropping. J Polit Econ 95:893–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shetty SL (2004) Distributional issues in bank credit: multi-pronged strategy for correcting past neglect. Eco Pol Week 39(29):3265–3269

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon P (2023) Can cooperatives be a tool for poverty reduction? Social capital perspectives of fisher’s cooperatives in India. Mar Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1974) Incentives and risk sharing in sharecropping. Rev Econ Stud 41(2):219–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1987) Sharecropping. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, pp 320–323

  • Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am Econ Rev 71(3):393–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao D (2012) Agricultural credit—accomplishments and challenges, speech delivered at NABARD, July 12, 2012

  • Suresh A, Sajesh VK, Mohanty AK, Ravishankar CN, Mohanan MP, Joshy CD (2018) Safety of fisherfolk at seas: points for critical intervention. Eco Pol Week 53(3):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • TISS (2020) Study to formulate a conceptual framework for drawing a comprehensive Special Package for the Development of Ockhi Affected Fisherfolk in Kerala, Tata Institute of Social Sciences

  • Van Anrooy R, Espinoza Córdova F, Japp D, Valderrama D, Gopal Karmakar K, Lengyel P, Parappurathu S, Upare S, Tietze U, Costelloe T, Zhang Z (2022) World review of capture fisheries and aquaculture insurance 2022. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 682. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9491en

  • Vercruijsse E (1984) the penetration of capitalism: a West African case study. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank the two reviewers of the manuscript for their critical comments and suggestions which have helped to improve the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Cochin, Kerala, India

    A. Suresh

Authors
  1. A. Suresh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Suresh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suresh, A. Contextualising credit transactions in artisanal marine fishing: insights from Kerala, India. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 33, 699–715 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-023-09782-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-023-09782-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation