Abstract
With the effects of globalisation, the number of people exposed to intercultural interaction has increased significantly. One of the most affected sectors is education. In parallel to the increase in numbers of students going abroad for tertiary education, primary and secondary education classes have also become culturally and religiously more diverse, mainly due to the effects of migration. With the increase in cultural diversity among their students, teachers find themselves facing new challenges. In order to be able to effectively encourage cultural exchange and intercultural dialogue, teachers need to cultivate their own intercultural competence. However, instead of directly jumping to the end result, this paper focuses on the very foundations of any intercultural interaction, namely self-awareness – of one’s own normative settings –, acceptance of the equality of different cultural approaches, and strategies for how these can be transformed into personal attributes. The author highlights the importance of the internalisation of a belief in order to be able to reflect it in one’s behaviour and convey to others the sense that they are genuinely accepted as they are. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) provides important insights into how and under which conditions internalisation can take place. Combining the insights gained from SDT with questioning techniques used by coaching experts, the author drafts a set of self-assessment questions which aim to help teachers reflect on the foundations of their intercultural interactions, gauge their level of internalisation and define the areas they have to focus on in order to cultivate their intercultural competence.
Résumé
Enseignants et fondements de l’interaction interculturelle – Avec les effets de la mondialisation, le nombre de personnes confrontées à l’interaction culturelle a sensiblement augmenté. L’un des secteurs les plus concernés est celui de l’éducation. Parallèlement au nombre croissant d’étudiants qui suivent un cursus à l’étranger, les classes de l’enseignement primaire et secondaire sont elles aussi devenues plus diversifiées sur le plan culturel et religieux, conséquence probable de la migration. Face à la diversité culturelle croissante des élèves, les enseignants sont confrontés à de nouveaux défis. Pour être en mesure de stimuler efficacement l’échange culturel et le dialogue interculturel, les enseignants doivent cultiver leur propre compétence interculturelle. Au lieu de se rendre directement au résultat final, l’auteure traite les fondements mêmes de toute interaction interculturelle, à savoir la conscience de soi – de ses propres paramètres normatifs -, l’acceptation de l’égalité des différentes approches, et les stratégies culturelles pour transformer celles-ci en attributs personnels. L’auteure signale l’importance pour une personne d’internaliser une conviction avant d’être capable de la refléter dans son comportement, et de transmettre aux autres le sentiment qu’ils sont réellement acceptés tels qu’ils sont. La théorie de l’auto-détermination (SDT) fournit des renseignements décisifs sur la façon dont l’internalisation peut avoir lieu et sous quelles conditions. En associant des éléments tirés de la SDT aux techniques de questionnement appliquées par les spécialistes de l’accompagnement, l’auteure élabore une série de questions d’auto-évaluation susceptibles d’aider les enseignants à réfléchir aux fondements de leurs interactions interculturelles, à évaluer leur niveau d’internalisation, et à définir les domaines sur lesquels se concentrer pour cultiver leur compétence interculturelle.
Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.
Nelson Mandela
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bennett, M. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the Intercultural Experience (pp. 21–71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Cushner, K., & Chang, S. C. (2015). Developing intercultural competence through overseas student teaching: Checking our assumptions. Intercultural Education, 26(3), 165–178.
DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behaviour. New York: Academic Press.
DeJaeghere, J. G., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Development of intercultural competence among US American teachers: professional development factors that enhance competence. Intercultural Education, 19(3), 255–268.
Frankl, E. V. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Penguin.
Garmston, R., Linder, C., & Whitaker, J. (1993). Reflections on Cognitive Coaching. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 57–61.
Gingerich, J. W., & Eisengart, S. (2000). Solution-focused brief therapy: A review of the outcome research. Family Process, 39, 477–498.
Glasser, W. (1998). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. New York: HarperCollins.
Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader. Harvard Business Review, OnPoint, 3790, 90–102.
Grant, M. A. (2012). Making positive change: A randomized study comparing solution-focused vs. problem-focused coaching questions. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 39(2), 21–35.
Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135–161). New York: Wiley.
Hammer, M. R. (2011). Additional cross-cultural validity testing of the Intercultural Development Inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 421–443.
Hammer, M. R. (2012). The intercultural development inventory: A new frontier in assessment and development of intercultural competence. In M. VandeBerg, R. M. Paige, & K. H. Lou (Eds.), Student learning abroad, what our students are learning, what they’re not, and what we can do about it (pp. 115–136). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Hammer, M. R. (2013). A resource guide for effectively using the intercultural development theory (IDI). Berlin: Intercultural Development Inventory LLC.
Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: Supervision and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hicks, M. D., & Peterson, D. B. (1999). Leaders coaching across borders. In W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. J. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in global leadership (Vol. 1). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
ICF (International Coach Federation) (2008). Professional coaching core competencies. Lexington, KY: ICF. http://www.co-active-coaching.de/uploads/media/CoreCompEnglish_01.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016.
Ives, Y. (2008). What is “coaching”? An exploration of conflicting paradigms. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 6(2), 100–113.
Jackson, J. (2015). Becoming interculturally competent: Theory to practice in intercultural education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48, 91–107.
Jackson, P. Z., & McKergow, M. (2002). The solutions focus: The simple way to positive change. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Jarvis, D. H. (2012). Teacher education for change: The theory behind the Council of Europe Pestalozzi Programme. Book review. International Review of Education, 58(5), 705–708.
Oddou, G., & Mendenhall, M. (1984). Person perception in cross-cultural settings: A review of cross-cultural and related cognitive literature. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 77–96.
Passmore, J. (2010). Excellence in coaching: The industry guide. London: Kogan Page.
Rosinski, P. (2003). Coaching across cultures: New tools for leveraging national, corporate & professional differences. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychological Association, 55(1), 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and methods (pp. 618–655). New York: Wiley.
Stein, I. F. (2004). Introduction: Beginning a promising conversation. In I. F. Stein & L. A. Belsten (eds), Proceedings of the first International Coach Federation Coaching Research Symposium (pp. viii–xii). Mooresville, NC: Paw Print Press.
Stober, D. R., & Grant, A. M. (2006). Evidence based coaching handbook. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
UIS (UNESCO Institute for Statistics) (2013). Global flow of tertiary-level students [online resource]. Montreal, QC: UIS. http://www.uis.unesco.org/EDUCATION/Pages/international-student-flow-viz.aspx. Accessed 11 May 2016.
Whitworth, L., Kimsey-House, K., Kimsey-House, H., & Sandahl, P. (2007). Co-active coaching: New skills for coaching people toward success in work and life. Nicholas Brealey: Boston & London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Günay, O. Teachers and the foundations of intercultural interaction. Int Rev Educ 62, 407–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9570-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9570-9