Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers and the foundations of intercultural interaction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the effects of globalisation, the number of people exposed to intercultural interaction has increased significantly. One of the most affected sectors is education. In parallel to the increase in numbers of students going abroad for tertiary education, primary and secondary education classes have also become culturally and religiously more diverse, mainly due to the effects of migration. With the increase in cultural diversity among their students, teachers find themselves facing new challenges. In order to be able to effectively encourage cultural exchange and intercultural dialogue, teachers need to cultivate their own intercultural competence. However, instead of directly jumping to the end result, this paper focuses on the very foundations of any intercultural interaction, namely self-awareness – of one’s own normative settings –, acceptance of the equality of different cultural approaches, and strategies for how these can be transformed into personal attributes. The author highlights the importance of the internalisation of a belief in order to be able to reflect it in one’s behaviour and convey to others the sense that they are genuinely accepted as they are. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) provides important insights into how and under which conditions internalisation can take place. Combining the insights gained from SDT with questioning techniques used by coaching experts, the author drafts a set of self-assessment questions which aim to help teachers reflect on the foundations of their intercultural interactions, gauge their level of internalisation and define the areas they have to focus on in order to cultivate their intercultural competence.

Résumé

Enseignants et fondements de l’interaction interculturelle – Avec les effets de la mondialisation, le nombre de personnes confrontées à l’interaction culturelle a sensiblement augmenté. L’un des secteurs les plus concernés est celui de l’éducation. Parallèlement au nombre croissant d’étudiants qui suivent un cursus à l’étranger, les classes de l’enseignement primaire et secondaire sont elles aussi devenues plus diversifiées sur le plan culturel et religieux, conséquence probable de la migration. Face à la diversité culturelle croissante des élèves, les enseignants sont confrontés à de nouveaux défis. Pour être en mesure de stimuler efficacement l’échange culturel et le dialogue interculturel, les enseignants doivent cultiver leur propre compétence interculturelle. Au lieu de se rendre directement au résultat final, l’auteure traite les fondements mêmes de toute interaction interculturelle, à savoir la conscience de soi – de ses propres paramètres normatifs -, l’acceptation de l’égalité des différentes approches, et les stratégies culturelles pour transformer celles-ci en attributs personnels. L’auteure signale l’importance pour une personne d’internaliser une conviction avant d’être capable de la refléter dans son comportement, et de transmettre aux autres le sentiment qu’ils sont réellement acceptés tels qu’ils sont. La théorie de l’auto-détermination (SDT) fournit des renseignements décisifs sur la façon dont l’internalisation peut avoir lieu et sous quelles conditions. En associant des éléments tirés de la SDT aux techniques de questionnement appliquées par les spécialistes de l’accompagnement, l’auteure élabore une série de questions d’auto-évaluation susceptibles d’aider les enseignants à réfléchir aux fondements de leurs interactions interculturelles, à évaluer leur niveau d’internalisation, et à définir les domaines sur lesquels se concentrer pour cultiver leur compétence interculturelle.

Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.

Nelson Mandela

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the Intercultural Experience (pp. 21–71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushner, K., & Chang, S. C. (2015). Developing intercultural competence through overseas student teaching: Checking our assumptions. Intercultural Education, 26(3), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behaviour. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJaeghere, J. G., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Development of intercultural competence among US American teachers: professional development factors that enhance competence. Intercultural Education, 19(3), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, E. V. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garmston, R., Linder, C., & Whitaker, J. (1993). Reflections on Cognitive Coaching. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, J. W., & Eisengart, S. (2000). Solution-focused brief therapy: A review of the outcome research. Family Process, 39, 477–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, W. (1998). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader. Harvard Business Review, OnPoint, 3790, 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. A. (2012). Making positive change: A randomized study comparing solution-focused vs. problem-focused coaching questions. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 39(2), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135–161). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R. (2011). Additional cross-cultural validity testing of the Intercultural Development Inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(3), 421–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R. (2012). The intercultural development inventory: A new frontier in assessment and development of intercultural competence. In M. VandeBerg, R. M. Paige, & K. H. Lou (Eds.), Student learning abroad, what our students are learning, what they’re not, and what we can do about it (pp. 115–136). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R. (2013). A resource guide for effectively using the intercultural development theory (IDI). Berlin: Intercultural Development Inventory LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, P., & Smith, N. (2006). Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: Supervision and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. D., & Peterson, D. B. (1999). Leaders coaching across borders. In W. H. Mobley, M. J. Gessner, & V. J. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in global leadership (Vol. 1). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF (International Coach Federation) (2008). Professional coaching core competencies. Lexington, KY: ICF. http://www.co-active-coaching.de/uploads/media/CoreCompEnglish_01.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016.

  • Ives, Y. (2008). What is “coaching”? An exploration of conflicting paradigms. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 6(2), 100–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2015). Becoming interculturally competent: Theory to practice in intercultural education. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 48, 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. Z., & McKergow, M. (2002). The solutions focus: The simple way to positive change. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D. H. (2012). Teacher education for change: The theory behind the Council of Europe Pestalozzi Programme. Book review. International Review of Education, 58(5), 705–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddou, G., & Mendenhall, M. (1984). Person perception in cross-cultural settings: A review of cross-cultural and related cognitive literature. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (2010). Excellence in coaching: The industry guide. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosinski, P. (2003). Coaching across cultures: New tools for leveraging national, corporate & professional differences. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychological Association, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and methods (pp. 618–655). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, I. F. (2004). Introduction: Beginning a promising conversation. In I. F. Stein & L. A. Belsten (eds), Proceedings of the first International Coach Federation Coaching Research Symposium (pp. viii–xii). Mooresville, NC: Paw Print Press.

  • Stober, D. R., & Grant, A. M. (2006). Evidence based coaching handbook. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • UIS (UNESCO Institute for Statistics) (2013). Global flow of tertiary-level students [online resource]. Montreal, QC: UIS. http://www.uis.unesco.org/EDUCATION/Pages/international-student-flow-viz.aspx. Accessed 11 May 2016.

  • Whitworth, L., Kimsey-House, K., Kimsey-House, H., & Sandahl, P. (2007). Co-active coaching: New skills for coaching people toward success in work and life. Nicholas Brealey: Boston & London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oya Günay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Günay, O. Teachers and the foundations of intercultural interaction. Int Rev Educ 62, 407–421 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9570-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9570-9

Keywords

Navigation