Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Core Competencies: The Challenge For Graduate Peace and Conflict Studies Education

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article uses a case study of the assessment of a graduate program in negotiations and conflict management as a springboard for discussing several critical, but unanswered questions in our field. It raises questions regarding the lack of clear core competencies and expectations regarding curricula at the graduate-level of peace and conflict studies programs, as well as concerns over how educators in this field can or should assess their own work and train students for practice. It also addresses, via a comparative case analysis in Tajikistan, the degree to which the competencies and pedagogical approaches in this field are culturally bound. The picture that emerges from these case studies suggests that there have been important omissions in the way that the varied educational programs and the larger peace and conflict studies field itself have developed thus far.

Résumé

COMPÉTENCES FONDAMENTALES : LE DÉFI D’UN ENSEIGNEMENT POUR DIPLÔMÉS DES ÉTUDES DE LA PAIX ET DU CONFLIT  – Cet article utilise une Étude de cas de l’Évaluation d’un programme pour diplÔmÉs de nÉgociations et de gestion de conflits comme un tremplin pour discuter de plusieurs questions critiques mais restÉes sans rÉponse dans notre domaine. Il soulève des questions concernant aussi bien le manque de compÉtences fondamentales claires et les attentes concernant les programmes d’Études au niveau diplÔmÉ des Études de la paix et du conflit, que les prÉoccupations quant à la façon dont les Éducateurs peuvent ou devraient Évaluer leur propre travail dans ce domaine et former des Étudiants pour la pratique. Il aborde Également, par l’intermÉdiaire d’une Étude de cas comparative au Tadjikistan, le degrÉ auquel les compÉtences et les approches pÉdagogiques dans ce domaine sont culturellement liÉes. L’image qui Émerge de ces Études de cas suggère qu’il y a eu d’importantes omissions dans la manière dont les programmes Éducatifs divers et le champ plus large des Études de la paix et du conflit lui-même se sont dÉveloppÉs jusqu’à prÉsent.

Zusammenfassung

KERNKOMPETENZEN: ANFORDERUNGEN AN AUFBAUSTUDIEN IM BEREICH FRIEDENS- UND KONFLIKTFORSCHUNG – In diesem Artikel dient eine Fallstudie zur Beurteilung eines Graduiertenstudiengangs in Verhandlungs- und Konfliktmanagement als Ausgangspunkt, um verschiedene maßgebliche, bisher nicht gelöste Fragen auf diesem Gebiet zu behandeln. Es geht darum, dass klar definierte Kernkompetenzen und Anforderungen im Hinblick auf die Lehrpläne für Graduiertenstudiengänge der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung fehlen. Außerdem wird kritisch angesprochen, wie Lehrende in diesem Bereich ihre Studenten für die Praxis ausbilden sowie die eigene Arbeit bewerten können bzw. sollten. Auch wird mittels einer in Tadschikistan durchgeführten vergleichenden Fallanalyse behandelt, inwiefern die Kompetenzen und pädagogischen Ansätze auf diesem Gebiet kulturell beinflusst werden. Das Bild, das sich aus den Fallstudien ergibt, legt nahe, dass es bei der bisherigen Entwicklung der verschiedenen Ausbildungsprogramme und des weiter gefassten Gebietes der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung erhebliche Versäumnisse gegeben hat.

Resumen

COMPETENCIAS CENTRALES: UN RETO PARA LOS ESTUDIOS ACADÉMICOS DE PAZ Y CONFLICTOS – Este artículo toma un caso práctico de evaluación de un programa acadÉmico en negociaciones y gestión de conflictos como punto de partida para discutir diferentes cuestiones críticas que aún no encontraron respuesta en este campo. Plantea interrogantes sobre la falta de claras competencias centrales y expectativas referentes a planes de estudio y el nivel acadÉmico de los programas de paz y conflictos, y sobre cómo los educadores en esta área pueden o deben evaluar su propio trabajo y capacitar a los estudiantes para la práctica. TambiÉn reflexiona, a travÉs del análisis comparativo de un caso de Tajiquistán, el grado de limitaciones culturales que presentan en esta área las competencias y los enfoques pedagógicos. El cuadro resultante de estos casos prácticos sugiere que existen importantes omisiones en vista del desarrollo que han tomado hasta ahora los diferentes programas de educación y el campo de los estudios de paz y conflictos en general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adkison, Judith. 1979. The Structure of Knowledge and Departmental Social Organization. Higher Education 8: 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, Kevin. 1998. Culture & Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordone, Robert, Michael Moffitt, and Frank Sander. The Next Thirty Years: Directions and Challenges in Dispute Resolution. In: The Handbook of Dispute Resolution, ed. by Michael Moffitt and Robert Bordone, 507–519. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  • Botes, Johannes. 2004. Graduate Peace and Conflict Studies: Reconsidering Their Problems and Prospects. Conflict Management in Higher Education Report, 5(1).

  • Brock-Utne, Birgit. 2002. Education and Development: A Developing Theme. International Review of Education 48(1/2): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking in the Educative Process. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, Maire. 1989. Peace Studies at the Graduate Level. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 504: 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzduff, Mari. 2006. Core Competencies for Graduate Programs in Coexistence and Conflict Work: Can We Agree? In: Leadership Notes Series 1. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center

  • Galtung, Johan. 1996. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1975. Educating For and with Peace: Is it Possible? In: Peace: Research, Education, Action. Essays in Peace Research (Vol. 1), ed. by Johan Galtung. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers.

  • Katz, Neil. 1989. Conflict Resolution and Peace Studies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 504: 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas. 1964. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, Janice Beyer and Gerald Gordon. 1972. The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. American Sociological Review 37: 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, George. 1985. A University Peace Studies Curriculum for the 1990s. Journal of Peace Research 22(2): 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorn, Brian, and Ron Chenail. 2000. Current Trends in Graduate ADR Programs: Preliminary Findings. Conflict Management in Higher Education Report 1(2).

  • Rubinstein, Richard. 1992. Dispute Resolution on the Eastern Frontier: Some Questions for Modern Missionaries. Negotiation Journal, 205–213.

  • Schön, Donald. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskie, Linda. 2004. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David J. 2007. A Map of Peace and Conflict Studies in USA Undergraduate Colleges and Universities. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 25(1): 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warters, William C. 2000. Collaboration and Conflict Resolution Skills: A Core Academic Competency? Conflict Management in Higher Education Report 1(4).

  • Warters, William C. 1999. Graduate Studies in Dispute Resolution: A Delphi Study of the Field’s Present and Future. Online Journal of Peace and Conflict Resolution 2(2).

  • Wehr, Paul. 1986. Conflict Resolution Studies: What Do We Know? NIDR Dispute Resolution Forum

  • Windmueller, John. 2001. Choosing a Conflict Resolution Program. In Mediation Career Guide, edited by Forrest Mosten, 58–61. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windmueller, John. 2007. Report: External Evaluation of the Tajikistan Religion and Education: Toward Tolerant Civil Society Project. Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, Craig and Linda Johnston. 2005. Report: Skills, Networks, and Knowledge: Developing a Career in International Peace and Conflict Resolution. Alliance for Conflict Transformation: Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes (Jannie) Botes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Windmueller, J., Wayne, E.K. & Botes, J.(. Core Competencies: The Challenge For Graduate Peace and Conflict Studies Education. Int Rev Educ 55, 285–301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9127-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9127-7

Navigation