Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Lepora and Goodin offer a typology of eight practices that can be understood as forms of complicity: connivance, contiguity, collusion, collaboration, condoning, consorting, conspiring, and full joint wrongdoing. For our discussion of cover ups we are concerned with what they call ‘complicity simpliciter’—that is, the forms of complicity that are not themselves constitutive of the principal’s wrongdoing (Lepora and Goodin 2013, pp. 5, 41–51). It is worth noting that there is no entry for ‘cover ups’ in the index of their book.

  2. Others have argued that forms of accountability which focus on incentives can crowd out trust (Baier 1986; Borowiak 2011; Mansbridge 2003). They point to contexts in which we would want a relationship of accountability to allow for greater discretion in the use of power. In such cases, accountability may be best served by focusing on mechanisms other than reward or punishment (Mansbridge 2014; Warren 2014).

  3. Sometimes, there is no identifiable ‘perpetrator’. Consider, for example, the brain damage caused by repetitive concussions in football. The NFL attempted to cover up this threat to safety.

  4. Compare the seven types of accountability mechanisms in international politics identified by Grant and Keohane (2005).

  5. State prosecutors charged 15 state and local officials with crimes related to the water crisis, but most charges were eventually dropped. Rick Snyder, the former Governor of Michigan, has recently been indicted on two misdemeanor counts of willful neglect of duty (Bosman 2021).

  6. Minutes recorded at a meeting noted that ‘legal and medical will likely take the position of total elimination’ of the chemical pollution, but executives at the meeting concluded that the available methods for cutting pollution were not ‘economically attractive’, after which the company increased its production of the chemical and continued its practices of dumping in landfills near the Ohio River (Kelly 2016).

  7. Various industries have worked from the same playbook, using a common set of strategies to downplay wrongdoing or obscure harms to public health, from industrial chemicals to climate change to tobacco smoke (Oreskes and Conway 2010).

  8. For a more nuanced view of the complex factors involved in complicity, see Mihai (2019).

  9. The obedience studies of Stanley Milgram, famous for demonstrating that everyday Americans were essentially capable of the sort of blind obedience that made the Holocaust possible, highlight the malleability of human behavior (Milgram 1963). Milgram ran many variations of the experiment which asked research subjects to administer electric shocks to a ‘learner’ whenever he made mistakes, changing just one variable at a time (Milgram 1965). He showed that while alarmingly high rates of obedience are found under certain circumstances, almost everyone is also capable of resisting authority. Depending on situational variables, compliance rates with the highest levels of electrical shocks could be as high as 90% or less than 10%.

  10. Follow-up studies showed that the pressure to conform starts to become significant in groups of four or more, and that providing an ally whose views support those of the participant will greatly diminish the pressure to conform to majority opinion even after the ally leaves the group (Deutsch and Gerard 1955; Kiesler et al. 1966).

  11. The original story of Kitty Genovese’s murder published by The New York Times was inaccurate in many ways, including its claim that 38 strangers witnessed the attack and did nothing. In fact, it is likely that only two people were fully aware of what was happening—one of whom did nothing. The other witness, we now know from more recent investigation, knew Genovese personally but fled from the scene and only later called the police (Cook 2014; Johnston 2014).

  12. Note the use of this same term in passive bystander studies.

  13. Another comments that the corporate and business environment are potentially ‘criminogenic’ (Punch 1996: 2).

References

  • Adorno, T. W., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, et al. 1950. The authoritarian personality. Social Studies Series (American Jewish Committee). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. 1956. Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70(9): 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. 1987. The transformation of man in society. In Social psychology, ed. S. E. Asch, 117–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, A. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96(2): 231–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baynes, L. M. 2002. Just pucker and blow: An analysis of corporate whistleblowers, the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. St. John’s Law Review 76: 875–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, T. D. 2002. Silent spill: The organization of an industrial crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, H. 2012. Remembering Roger Boisjoly: He tried to stop shuttle Challenger launch. NPR, 6 February. Available at: www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/02/06/146490064/remembering-roger-boisjoly-he-tried-to-stop-shuttle-challenger-launch. Accessed 7 October 2019.

  • Borowiak, C. T. 2011. Accountability and democracy: The pitfalls and promise of popular control. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, J. 2021. Ex-governor of Michigan charged with neglect in Flint Water crisis. The New York Times, January 14.

  • Buchanan, A., and R. O. Keohane. 2004. The preventive use of force: A cosmopolitan institutional proposal. Ethics and International Affairs 1(18): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. S., and T. M. Dworkin. 2000. The state of state whistleblower protection. American Business Law Journal 38(1): 99–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreyrou, J. 2018. Bad blood: Secrets and lies in a Silicon Valley startup. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. 2014. Kitty Genovese: The murder, the bystanders, the crime that changed America. London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., and B. Latane. 1968. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8(4): 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., and H. B. Gerard. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3): 629–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, M. 1977. Pinto madness. Mother Jones, October.

  • Effron, D. A. 2016. Beyond ‘Being good frees us to be bad’: Moral self-licensing and the fabrication of moral credentials. In Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty, ed. J.-W. van Prooijen and P. A. M. van Lange, 33–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenwald, K. 2001. The informant: A true story. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermann, M. D., and R. J. Lundman. 1987. Corporate and governmental deviance: Origins, patterns, and reactions. In Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society, ed. M. D. Ermann and R. J. Lundman, 3–49. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euben, P. J. 2006. The butler did it. In Naming evil, judging evil, ed. R. W. Grant, 103–120. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainaru-Wada, M., and S. Fainaru. 2014. League of denial: The NFL, concussions, and the battle for truth. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. 1999. Accountability and authority: Toward a theory of political accountability. In Democracy, accountability and representation, ed. A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, and B. Manin. Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Fischer, P., J. I. Krueger, T. Greitemeyer, et al. 2011. The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin 137(4): 517–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flitter, E., and S. Cowley. 2019. Wells Fargo says its culture has changed. Some employees disagree. The New York Times, March 9. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2019/03/09/business/wells-fargo-sales-culture.html. Accessed 11 February 2021.

  • FRONTLINE. 2013. League of denial: The NFL’s concussion crisis. PBS.

  • Gibney, A. 2005. Enron: The smartest guys in the room. New York: Magnolia Home Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. 2015. The engineer’s lament. The New Yorker, April 27.

  • Goodhart, M. 2011. Democratic accountability in global politics: Norms, not agents. The Journal of Politics 73(1): 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorner, J. 2019. Four Chicago cops fighting dismissals in alleged cover-up of Laquan McDonald shooting. Chicago Tribune, April 10.

  • Gorner, J., A. Sweeney, and J. Meisner. 2015. Cop in dash-cam video to face murder charge. Chicago Tribune, November 23.

  • Grant, R. W., and R. O. Keohane. 2005. Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, E., R. Fonger, and J. Glenza. 2019. Revealed: Water company and city officials KNEW ABOUT FLINT POISON RISK. The Guardian, December 10. Available at: www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/dec/10/water-company-city-officials-knew-flint-lead-risk-emails-michigan-tap-water. Accessed 12 February 2021.

  • Holland, M. 2012. Leak: Why Mark Felt became deep throat. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. 2014. Don’t look now. The New Inquiry, March 27. Available at: https://thenewinquiry.com/dont-look-now. Accessed 28 June 2022.

  • Kalven, J. 2015. Sixteen shots. Slate Magazine, February 11.

  • Kantor, J., and M. Twohey. 2019. She said: Breaking the sexual harassment story that helped ignite a movement. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. 1979. Concerted ignorance: The social construction of cover-up. Urban Life 8(3): 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. 2016. DuPont’s deadly deceit: The decades-long cover-up behind the ‘World’s most slippery material’. Salon, January 4. Available at: www.salon.com/2016/01/04/teflons_toxic_legacy_partner. Accessed 4 October 2019.

  • Keohane, R. O. 2003. The concept of accountability in world politics and the use of force. Michigan Journal of International Law 24(4): 1121–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, C. A., M. Zanna, and J. Desalvo. 1966. Deviation and conformity: Opinion change as a function of commitment, attraction, and presence of a deviate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3(4): 458–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, C. 2000. Complicity: Ethics and law for a collective age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutz, C. 2011. The philosophical foundations of complicity law. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of criminal law, ed. John Deigh and David Dolinko. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskas, J. M. 2009. Game brain: Football players and concussions. GQ, September 15.

  • Lee, M. T., and M. D. Ermann. 2002. Pinto madness: Flaws in the generally accepted landmark narrative. In Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society, ed. M. D. Ermann and R .J. Lundman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepora, C., and R. E. Goodin. 2013. On complicity and compromise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. 1689. An essay concerning human understanding, ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.

  • Mansbridge, J. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Association 97(4): 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. 2014. What is political science for? Perspectives on Politics 12(1): 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, J. P. 2006. Contain the wealthy and patrol the magistrates: Restoring elite accountability to popular government. American Political Science Review 100(2): 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A. J., and J. R. Hansen. 2009. Truth, lies, and O-rings: Inside the space shuttle Challenger disaster. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellema, G. 2016. Complicity and moral accountability. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihai, M. 2019. Understanding complicity: Memory, hope and the imagination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22(5): 504–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(4): 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. 1965. Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations 18(1): 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. 2016. Always the hero to ourselves: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. In Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty, ed. J.-W. van Prooijen and P. A. M. van Lange, 98–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauer-Studer, H. 2018. Complicity and conditions of agency. Journal of Applied Philosophy 35(4): 643–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffer, S. L., A. Bocheko, R. E. Del Valle, et al. 2015. Whistle where you work? The ineffectiveness of the Federal Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 and the promise of the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012. Review of Public Personnel Administration 35(1): 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Diocese Victims Report. 2018. Report I of the 40th statewide investigating Grand Jury, 27 July. Office of the Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Available at: www.attorneygeneral.gov/report/.

  • Perrow, C. 1984. Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, E. 2016. Madness. The New Yorker, April 25.

  • Punch, M. 1996. Dirty business: Exploring corporate misconduct: Analysis and cases. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, R. C., and T. Hsu. 2018. Johnson and Johnson feared baby powder’s possible asbestos link for years. The New York Times, December 14.

  • Reckard, E. S. 2013. Wells Fargo’s pressure-cooker sales culture comes at a cost. Los Angeles Times, December 21.

  • Rich, N. 2016. The lawyer who became DuPont’s worst nightmare. The New York Times Magazine, January 6.

  • Rodrick, S. 2016. Who poisoned Flint, Michigan? Rolling Stone, January 22.

  • Rubenstein, J. 2007. Accountability in an unequal world. The Journal of Politics 69(3): 616–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, S. 1993. The limits to safety: Organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. T. 1990. The myth of the Ford Pinto case. Rutgers Law Review 43: 1013–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, A., W. Bogdanich, and J. Williams. 2016. N.F.L.’s Flawed concussion research and ties to tobacco industry. The New York Times, March 24.

  • Shapiro, C., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1984. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. The American Economic Review 74(3): 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1759. The theory of moral sentiments, eds A. L. Macfie and D. D. Raphael. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1976.

  • Smith, L. 2015. After blowing the whistle on Flint’s Water, EPA ‘Rogue employee’ has been silent. Until now. Michigan Radio, January 21. Available at: www.michiganradio.org/post/after-blowing-whistle-flints-water-epa-rogue-employee-has-been-silent-until-now. Accessed 18 February 2021.

  • Sorkin, A. D. 2016. The contempt that poisoned Flint’s Water. The New Yorker, January 22.

  • Stack, L. 2016. Michigan gave state employees purified water as it denied crisis, emails show. The New York Times, January 29.

  • Thompson, D. F. 1980. Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. American Political Science Review 74 (4): 905–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twohey, M., J. Kantor, S. Dominus, et al. 2017. Weinstein’s complicity machine. The New York Times, December 5.

  • Union of Concerned Scientists. 2017. The NFL tried to intimidate scientists studying the link between pro football and traumatic brain injury. 11 October. Available at: www.ucsusa.org/intimidating-scientists-documenting-link-between-pro-football-and-traumatic-brain-injury. Accessed 4 October 2019.

  • Van Prooijen, J.-W., and P. A. M. Van Lange, eds. 2016. Cheating, corruption, and concealment: The roots of dishonesty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Vaughan, D. 1999. The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 271–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. 2002. The Challenger space shuttle disaster: Conventional wisdom and a revisionist account. In Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society, ed. M. D. Ermann and R. J. Lundman, 306–333. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. 2011. Voting with your feet: Exit-based empowerment in democratic theory. American Political Science Review 105(4): 683–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. E. 2014. Accountability and democracy. In The Oxford handbook of public accountability, 39–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. D. 2019. The social creation of morality and complicity in collective harms: A Kantian account. Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (3): 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. 2004. Responsibility and global labor justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4): 365–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. 2007. The Lucifer effect: How good people turn evil. London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the members of the Coverups and Exposés Faculty Working Group at the Kenan Institute for Ethics at Duke University who contributed to our understanding of this subject over the course of several years. Jamie Kalven’s insights on the cover up of the murder of LaQuan McDonald greatly influenced the development of our thinking. We also thank Robert O. Keohane and Alexandra Oprea for their feedback on earlier drafts, and Stephen Grant for helping us think through these issues countless times.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Kennedy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest or funding to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 1 and 2.

Appendix 1

Table 1 Accountability failures

Appendix 2

Table 2 Cover up strategies

DuPont: Chemical/PFOA Dumping

NFL: Concussion and Brain Injury

  • Belson K. (2013) N.F.L. Agrees to Settle Concussion Suit for $765 Million. The New York Times, 29 August.

  • Branch J. (2016) N.F.L. Tried to Influence Concussion Research, Congressional Study Finds. The New York Times, 23 May.

  • Engber D. (2015) Concussion Gets Basic Facts Wrong and Feeds Myths About the N.F.L. and Head Trauma. Slate Magazine, 21 December.

  • Fainaru-Wada M. and Fainaru S. (2014) League of Denial: The N.F.L., Concussions, and the Battle for Truth. New York: Three Rivers Press.

  • FRONTLINE (2013) League of Denial: The N.F.L.’s Concussion Crisis. PBS.

  • Hohler B. (2018) Billion-dollar N.F.L. concussion settlement ‘on the brink of collapse’. The Boston Globe, 30 May.

  • Laskas J. M. (2009) Game Brain: Football Players and Concussions. GQ, 15 September.

  • Schwarz A. (2009) N.F.L. Acknowledges Long-Term Concussion Effects. The New York Times, 21 December.

  • Schwarz A., Bogdanich W. and Williams J. (2016) N.F.L.’s Flawed Concussion Research and Ties to Tobacco Industry. The New York Times, 24 March.

  • Union of Concerned Scientists (2017) The N.F.L. Tried to Intimidate Scientists Studying the Link between Pro Football and Traumatic Brain Injury. 11 October. Available at: www.ucsusa.org/intimidating-scientists-documenting-link-between-pro-football-and-traumatic-brain-injury (accessed 4 October 2019).

  • Vasilogambros M. (2016) Do You No Longer Watch the N.F.L. Because of Concussions? The Atlantic, 13 September. Available at: www.theatlantic.com/notes/2016/09/nfl-concussions/499841/ (accessed 7 October 2019).

  • White B. (2021) N.F.L. Concussion Settlement Approved Over $827 M in Claims. Available at: www.topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/money/1006818-nfl-concussion-settlement-approved-over-827m-in-claims (accessed 30 April 2021).

Johnson and Johnson: Talc Baby Powder’s Link to Cancer

Catholic Church: Sexual Abuse in Pennsylvania

  • Carroll M., Pfeiffer S. and Rezendes M. (2002a) Church allowed abuse by priest for years. The Boston Globe, 6 January.

  • Carroll M., Pfeiffer S. and Rezendes M. (2002b) Geoghan preferred preying on poorer children: To therapist, priest cited sexual revolution. The Boston Globe, 7 January.

  • Matranga A. (2019) Vatican court rejects laws obligating priests to report sexual abuse revealed in confessions. CBS News, 1 July. Available at: www.cbsnews.com/news/catholic-church-vatican-rejects-laws-priests-report-sexual-abuse-confession-box-unacceptable-2010-07-01/ (accessed 7 October 2019).

  • McCarthy T. (2015) Spotlight. Open Road Films.

  • Pennsylvania Diocese Victims Report (2018) Report I of the 40th Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 27 July. Office of the Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Available at: www.attorneygeneral.gov/report/.

NASA: Challenger Explosion

  • Berkes H. (2012) Remembering Roger Boisjoly: He Tried to Stop Shuttle Challenger Launch. NPR, 6 February. Available at: www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/02/06/146490064/remembering-roger-boisjoly-he-tried-to-stop-shuttle-challenger-launch (accessed 7 October 2019).

  • Cook R. C. (1986) Why I Blew the Whistle on NASA’s O-Ring Woes. Washington Post, 16 March.

  • Dunar A. J. and Waring S. P. (1999) Power to Explore: A History of Marshall Space Flight Center, 1960–1990. NASA historical series. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

  • Isikoff M. (1988) Challenger Settlement Disclosed. Washington Post, 8 March.

  • McDonald A. J. and Hansen J. R. (2009) Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

Flint, Michigan Government: Water Poisoning

Chicago Police: LaQuan McDonald Murder

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, R.W., Katzenstein, S. & Kennedy, C. How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability. Res Publica 30, 361–400 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w

Keywords

Navigation