Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Planning Theory of Law

Scott Shapiro: Legality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2011, 472 pp

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. In making this claim I draw on Stavropoulos (2007, 2009) and Greenberg (2004, 2011).

References

  • Austin, John. 1998. The province of jurisprudence determined. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, Michael. 1987. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, Michael. 1999. Faces of intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, John. 1980. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Lon. 1964. The inner morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Mark. 2004. How facts make law. Legal Theory 10: 157–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Mark. 2011. The standard picture and its discontents. In Oxford studies in philosophy of law, vol. 1, ed. Leslie Green, and Brian Leiter, 39–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. 1994. The concept of law, 2nd ed. In Eds. Penelope Bulloch and Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Shapiro, Scott. 1998. Hart’s way out. Legal Theory 4: 469–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Scott. 2002. Law, plans, and practical reason. Legal Theory 8: 387–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Scott. 2007. The Hart-Dworkin debate: A short guide for the perplexed. In Ronald Dworkin, ed. Arthur Ripstein, 22–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Scott. 2009. Was inclusive positivism founded on a mistake? Ratio Juris 22: 326–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dale. 2010. Theoretical disagreement and the semantic sting. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30: 635–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavropoulos, Nicos. 2007. Why principles? Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper. Available at SSRN. http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1023758. Accessed 1 October 2010.

  • Stavropoulos, Nicos. 2009. The relevance of coercion: Some preliminaries. Ratio Juris 22: 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to George Letsas for comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College London, London, UK

    Miguel-Jose Lopez-Lorenzo

Authors
  1. Miguel-Jose Lopez-Lorenzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel-Jose Lopez-Lorenzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopez-Lorenzo, MJ. The Planning Theory of Law. Res Publica 18, 201–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9172-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9172-0

Search

Navigation