Abstract
This paper examines how information acquisition through social media affects venture capital (VC) investments into entrepreneurial startup firms. We collect a unique data set from Twitter API to measure the impact of owned social media (OSM) and earned social media (ESM) of portfolio companies on the structure of VC investments they receive. We find evidence consistent with the hypothesis that startup firms’ social media engagement affects the staging of VC financing, the VC syndicate structure, and the probability of a successful exit. When a portfolio company’s social media accounts are more active and the company has a higher engagement volume with its followers, VC firms reduce the extent of stage financing and are less likely to syndicate with each other in financing such a portfolio company. Overall, our results demonstrate that entrepreneurial firms with higher OSM and ESM engagement volume have fewer VC financing rounds, a smaller number of VCs in their VC syndicates, a lower probability of VC syndication, a higher successful exit probability, and a higher amount total funding across all rounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Colicev et al. (2018) state that firm-generated contents on social media are termed as “owned social media” (OSM). In addition to OSM, users can generate contents (e.g., retweets, likes, mentions) to promote their recommendations, propagates their brand awareness, purchase intent, and customer satisfaction. Such user-generated contents are commonly termed as “earned social media” (ESM). See also Stephen and Galak (2012).
Tumasjan et al. (2021) argue that Twitter sentiment as a weak signal does not correlate with actual long-term investment success, whereas patents (which are considered a stronger signal of intrinsic company value) do.
Baker and Wurgler (2006), Baker, Wurgler, and Yuan (2012), and Huang et al. (2015) provide evidence of return predictability using stock market-based investor sentiment measures. Baker and Wurgler (2006) suggest that stocks that are difficult to value and costly to arbitrage are more sensitive to manager sentiment-driven mispricing. Tetlock (2007) quantitatively measures the nature of the media’s interactions with the stock market using daily content from a popular Wall Street Journal column. He finds that high media pessimism predicts downward pressure on market prices followed by a reversion to fundamentals, and unusually high or low pessimism predicts high market trading volume. Loughran and McDonald (2011) develop a negative word list used in a financial context and find a positive relation between firm-level manager sentiment and four-day event period return in the cross-section. Similarly, Jiang et al. (2019) construct a new manager sentiment index and find that manager sentiment negatively predicts cross-sectional stock returns. See also Tumasjan et al. (2021) who analyze the effect of Twitter sentiment on venture valuations.
We use the Harvard-IV-4 category of the Harvard Psychological Dictionary to construct sentiment measures as perceived by human readers by counting “power” words. Power sentiment is measured using the “strong words” category of Harvard psychosocial dictionary (Stone 2002) indicating power, control, authority, and success (e.g., superior, accomplishment, amazing, award, astound, etc.).
Wang (2016) analyzes how social networks influence both a start-up’s likelihood of being screened for evaluation and its likelihood of being funded. Bernstein, Korteweg, and Laws (2017) conduct a randomized field experiment on AngelList and find that information about human assets (e.g., founding team) is causally important for the funding of early-stage start-up firms. Gompers et al. (2020) find that VCs see the management team as somewhat more important than business-related characteristics. Similarly, Cao (2019) investigates frictions in the process of VC information acquisition and uses “Product Hunt” website, which ranks popular new products using VCs and developers’ votes. She finds a significant and positive association between product rankings and early-stage funding.
While the sample of Tumasjan et al. (2021) consists of technology-based VC-backed startups only, our sample consists of all VC-backed startups which received their first round of financing between 2010 and 2018. Different from Tumasjan et al. (2021), who consider the Twitter sentiment of portfolio company tweets preceding all rounds of VC financing, we focus on the social media content prior to the first round of VC financing only to mitigate reverse causality concerns in our empirical analysis. Finally, while Tumasjan et al. (2021) measure the sentiment of portfolio company tweets only, our paper measures the effect of both the social media content of company tweets (owned social media) and the reactions of Twitter users to these tweets (earned social media).
Cornelli et al. (2006) examine retail investor sentiment in European pre-IPO markets. They find that high pre-IPO markets driven by the overoptimism of retail investors are a good predictor of first-day aftermarket prices.
More recently, Bayar, Chemmanur, and Tian (2019) study a new rationale for VC syndication: peer monitoring among VCs. They show that syndicates mitigate VCs’ moral hazard problem in value addition. Additionally, the second-opinion hypothesis (Lerner 1994; Tian 2012) conveys the argument that VCs collect information from their peers in the syndicate to resolve asymmetric information and decide whether to invest in risky startups.
Lerner (1994) provides evidence consistent with the view that syndication enables VCs to collect information about potential deals, mitigating asymmetric information between entrepreneurs and VCs when VC firms choose their investments in portfolio companies. Tian (2012) shows that VC syndication can create product market value for startups because it facilitates nurturing portfolio companies’ innovation capacity and increasing post-IPO operating performance.
Tian (2011) notes that stage financing may be costly for three reasons: (1) every stage incurs negotiation and contracting costs before capital infusion to venture capital, (2) staging could induce entrepreneurs to aim short-term performance rather than long-term success (termed as “window dressing”), (3) staging may also lead to an underinvestment problem.
Bernstein et al. (2016) empirically analyze the introduction of new airline routes that reduce the travel time between VCs and their portfolio companies to address similar concerns about asymmetric information between VCs and portfolio companies and the cost of monitoring. Their results are consistent with the idea that if the cost of monitoring is smaller, the number of VC financing rounds (stages) should decrease.
Tetlock (2007), Tetlock, Saar-Tsechanksy, and Macskassy (2008), and Hanley and Hoberg (2010) pioneered the application of psychological dictionaries in measuring the sentiment of financial texts. Loughran and Macdonald (2011) developed capital-market specific dictionaries which have since been applied to large-scale computation of tones and sentiment in financial texts, e.g., Dow Jones newswires (Da, Engelberg, and Gao 2011), New York Times financial articles (Garcia, 2013), 10-K and IPO prospectuses (Jegadeesh and Wu 2013), corporate press releases (Ahern and Sosyura 2014), earnings conference calls (Jiang, Lee, Martin, and Zhou 2019), and all wired news from Factiva (Huang et al. 2020). See also the survey article Loughran and McDonald (2016). Recent studies analyzing downloads of SEC filings include Bernard et al. (2020), Cao, Du, Yang, and Zhang (2020), Chen, Cohen, Gurun, Lou, and Malloy (2020), and Crane, Crotty, and Umar (2020).
Cao et al. (2020) analyze how corporate disclosure has been reshaped by machine processors, employed by algorithmic traders, robot investment advisors, and quantitative analysts. They find that increasing machine and AI readership, proxied by machine downloads, motivates firms to prepare filings that are friendlier to machine parsing and processing. Furthermore, firms with high expected machine downloads manage textual sentiment and audio emotion by differentially avoiding words that are perceived as negative by computational algorithms as compared to those by human readers, and by exhibiting speech emotion favored by machine learning software processors.
Tian (2011) notes that VC funds are required to be liquidated within ten years from the inception. Hence, we assume that startup firms are written off if they fail to receive investments within ten years after the last round.
If there are fewer than four public firms in the four-digit SIC industry, we use three-digit SIC industry codes, and if there are fewer than three public firms in the three-digit SIC industry, we use two-digit SIC industry codes.
The relevant information is accessible from this source: “How Twitter is fighting spam and malicious automation” retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/how-twitter-is-fighting-spam-and-malicious-automation.
In a large sample of 10-Ks during 1994 to 2008, Loughran and McDonald (2011) argue that almost three-fourths of the words identified as negative by the Harvard Dictionary are words typically not considered negative in financial contexts. Therefore, they develop an alternative negative word list, along with five other word lists, that better reflect tone in financial text. Based on prior theoretical and empirical research from psychology and linguistics on deception detection, Larcker and Zakolyukina (2012) select the word categories that theoretically should be able to detect deceptive behavior by executives. They use these linguistic features to develop classification models for a large sample of quarterly conference call transcripts.
Bollen, Mao, and Zheng (2011) argue that Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Tirunillai and Trellis (2012) examine whether user-generated content (UGC) is related to stock market performance and conclude that idiosyncratic risk increases significantly with negative information in UGC. Luo et al. (2013) examine the relationship between social media and firm equity value, and they conclude that social media-based metrics (web blogs and consumer ratings) are significant leading indicators of firm equity value.
Mumi, Obal, and Yang (2019) investigate social media as a firm's signaling strategy through an IPO and find a positive association between social media presence and firms’ IPO valuations. Bianchi, Kind, and Kung (2019) find some market-based evidence that President Trump influences monetary policy expectations of market participants through his tweets that criticize the conduct of monetary policy.
References
Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2011) The geography of crowdfunding (No. w16820). National bureau of economic research
Ahern KR, Sosyura D (2014) Who writes the news? Corporate press releases during merger negotiations. J Financ 69(1):241–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12109
Baker M, Wurgler J (2006) Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J Finance 61(4):1645–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x
Baker M, Ruback RS, Wurgler J (2007) Behavioral corporate finance. Handb Empir Corp Finance SET 2:145–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50018-4
Baker M, Wurgler J, Yuan Y (2012) Global, local, and contagious investor sentiment. J Financ Econ 104(2):272–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.11.002
Bayar O, Chemmanur TJ, Tian X (2020) Peer monitoring, syndication, and the dynamics of venture capital interactions: Theory and evidence. J Financ Quant Anal 55(6):1875–1914. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109019000218
Bergemann D, Hege U (1998) Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning. J Bank Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00017-X
Bernard D, Blackburne T, Thornock J (2020) Information flows among rivals and corporate investment. J Financ Econ 136(3):760–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.11.008
Bernstein S, Giroud X, Townsend RR (2016) The impact of venture capital monitoring. J Finance 71(4):1591–1622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12370
Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K (2017) Attracting early-stage investors: evidence from a randomized field experiment. J Finance 72(2):509–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12470
Bianchi F, Kind T, Kung H (2019) Threats to Central Bank Independence: High-Frequency Identification with Twitter. NBER Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26308
Bollen J, Mao H, Zeng X (2011) Twitter mood predicts the stock market. J Comput Sci 2(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007
Busso M, DiNardo J, McCrary J (2014) New evidence on the finite sample properties of propensity score reweighting and matching estimators. Rev Econ Stat. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00431
Cao R (2019) Information Frictions in New Venture Finance: Evidence from Product Hunt Rankings. Working Paper
Cao S, Jiang W, Yang B, Zhang AL (2020) How to talk when a machine is listening? Corporate disclosure in the age of AI (No. w27950). National Bureau of Economic Research
Certo ST (2003) Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: signaling with board structures. Acad Manag Rev 28(3):432–446. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196754
Chemmanur TJ, Yan A (2019) Advertising, Attention, and Stock Returns. Q J Financ 09(03):1950009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010139219500095
Chemmanur TJ, Krishnan K, Nandy DK (2011) How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A Look beneath the surface. Rev Financ Stud 24(12):4037–4090. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr096
Chemmanur TJ, Loutskina E, Tian X (2014) Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. Rev Financ Stud 27(8):2434–2473. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu033
Chen H, Cohen L, Gurun U, Lou D, Malloy C (2020) IQ from IP: Simplifying search in portfolio choice. J Financ Econ 138(1):118–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.04.014
Chen H, De P, Hu Y, Hwang BH (2014) Wisdom of crowds: the value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Rev Financ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu001
CMO Survey (2018) CMO Survey 2018. https://cmosurvey.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2018/02/The_CMO_Survey-Highights_and_Insights_Report-Feb-2018.pdf
Colicev A, Malshe A, Pauwels K, O’Connor P (2018) Improving consumer mindset metrics and shareholder value through social media: the different roles of owned and earned media. J Mark 82(1):37–56. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.16.0055
Cornelli F, Goldreich D, Ljungqvist A (2006) Investor sentiment and pre-IPO markets. J Financ 61(3):1187–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00870.x
Crane AD, Crotty K, Umar T (2020) Public and private information: complements or substitutes. Available at SSRN, 3127825
Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J Financ 66(5):1461–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x
Fama EF, French KR (1988) Permanent and temporary components of stock prices. J Polit Econ. https://doi.org/10.1086/261535
Fluck Z, Garrison KR, Myers SC (2011) Venture capital: an experiment in computational corporate finance. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.642143
Garcia D (2013) Sentiment during recessions. J Financ 68(3):1267–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12027
Gompers PA (1995) Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. J Financ 50(5):1461–1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05185.x
Gompers PA, Gornall W, Kaplan SN, Strebulaev IA (2020) How do venture capitalists make decisions? J Financ Econ 135(1):169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.011
Hall BH, Lerner J (2010) The financing of R&D and innovation. Handb Econ Innov. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
Hanley KW, Hoberg G (2010) The information content of IPO prospectuses. Rev Financ Stud 23(7):2821–2864. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq024
Harris RS, Jenkinson T, Kaplan SN, Stucke R (2023) Has persistence persisted in private equity? Evidence from buyout and venture capital funds. J Corp Finance 102361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102361
Heggestuen J, Danova T (2013) Brand presence: how to choose where to be on social media. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/social-media-strategy-for-brands-2013-8
Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance. J Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01207.x
Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Vissing-Jørgensen A (2014) Informational holdup and performance persistence in venture capital. Rev Financ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht046
Huang AG, Tan H, Wermers R (2020) Institutional trading around corporate news: Evidence from textual analysis. Rev Financ Stud 33(10):4627–4675. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz136
Huang D, Jiang F, Tu J, Zhou G (2015) Investor sentiment aligned: A powerful predictor of stock returns. Rev Financ Stud. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu080
Hu A, Ma S (2021) Persuading investors: a video-based study. NBER Working Paper No. w29048. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3889155
Ivanov VI, Knyazeva A (2017) Soft and hard information and signal extraction in securities crowdfunding. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3051380
Jegadeesh N, Wu D (2013) Word power: A new approach for content analysis. J Financ Econ 110(3):712–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.018
Jiang F, Lee J, Martin X, Zhou G (2019) Manager sentiment and stock returns. J Financ Econ 132(1):126–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.10.001
Jung MJ, Naughton JP, Tahoun A, Wang C (2018) Do firms strategically disseminate? Evidence from corporate use of social media. Account Rev 93(4):225–252. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51906
Kaplan SN, Schoar A (2005) Private equity performance: Returns, persistence, and capital flows. J Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00780.x
Korteweg A, Sorensen M (2017) Skill and luck in private equity performance. J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.03.006
Larcker DF, Zakolyukina AA (2012) Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. J Account Res 50(2):495–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00450.x
Lerner J (1994) The syndication of venture capital investments. Financ Manage. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665618
Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Manage Sci 59(1):17–35. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560
Liu B, Tian X (2016) Is the stock market just a side show? Evidence form venture capital. SSRN Electr J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780890
Liu LX, Sherman AE, Zhang Y (2014) The long-run role of the media: evidence from initial public offerings. Manage Sci 60(8):1945–1964. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1851
Loughran T, Mcdonald B (2011) When Is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance 66:35–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
Loughran T, McDonald B (2016) Textual analysis in accounting and finance: a survey. J Account Res 54(4):1187–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12123
Luo X, Zhang J, Duan W (2013) Social media and firm equity value. Inf Syst Res. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0462
Mayew WJ, Venkatachalam M (2012) The power of voice: managerial affective states and future firm performance. J Finance 67(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01705.x
Merton RC (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J Finance 42(3):483–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x
Mumi A, Obal M, Yang Y (2019) Investigating social media as a firm’s signaling strategy through an IPO. Small Bus Econ 53(3):631–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0066-9
Nahata R (2008) Venture capital reputation and investment performance. J Financ Econ 88(1):127–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.11.008
Que J, Zhang X (2021) Money chasing hot industries? Investor attention and valuation of venture capital backed firms. J Corp Finance 101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101949
Sahlman WA (1990) The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. J Financ Econ 27(2):473–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90065-8
Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171753
Statista (2018) Active Twitter users in the US
Stephen AT, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: a study of a microlending marketplace. J Mark Res. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.09.0401
Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in Linear Iv regression. In: Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of thomas rothenberg. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614491.006
Stone P (2002) Harvard IV-4 dictionary. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~inquirer/homecat.htm
Tetlock PC (2007) Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. J Finance 62(3):1139–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x
Tetlock PC (2010) Does public financial news resolve asymmetric information? Rev Financ Stud 23(9):3520–3557. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq052
Tetlock PC, Saar-Tsechansky M, Macskassy S (2008) More than words: quantifying language to measure firms’ fundamentals. J Financ 63(3):1437–1467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01362.x
Tian X (2011) The causes and consequences of venture capital stage financing. J Financ Econ 101(1):132–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.011
Tian X (2012) The role of venture capital syndication in value creation for entrepreneurial firms. Rev Finance 16(1):245–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfr019
Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2012) Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Mark Sci 31(2):198–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0682
Tumasjan A, Braun R, Stolz B (2021) Twitter sentiment as a weak signal in venture capital financing. J Bus Ventur 36(2):106062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106062
Twitter Inc (2016) Twitter Customer Insights. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/50a45eabe4b000dda4d93c3c/t/599cc5add2b857ace545b63d/1503446446374/Customer_insights_2016.pdf
Twitter Inc (2020) Twitter Data Rate Limitation. https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/rate-limits
Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2009) Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. J Finance 64(3):1187–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01462.x
Vismara S (2022) Expanding corporate finance perspectives to equity crowdfunding. J Technol Transf 47(6):1629–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09903-z
Wang Y (2016) Bringing the stages back in social network ties and start-up firms access to venture capital in china. Strateg Entrep J 10(3):300–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1229
Williams DR, Duncan WJ, Ginter PM (2010) Testing a model of signals in the IPO offer process. Small Bus Econ 34:445–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9130-1
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank participants at the 2019 Financial Management Association meeting and seminar participants at the University of Texas at San Antonio for their helpful comments and suggestions. We remain responsible for all errors and omissions.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received for conducting this study. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix 1: Definitions of variables and descriptions of data sets
Appendix 1: Definitions of variables and descriptions of data sets
Classifications | Data sets | Variable names | Definitions |
---|---|---|---|
Staging variables | Thomson Reuters SDC VentureXpert | Number of rounds | The number of VC financing rounds that a portfolio company receives |
Syndication variables | Thomson Reuters SDC VentureXpert | Proxies for VC syndication (Dichotomous 0 or 1) | A syndication dummy that equals 1 if the portfolio company is backed a syndicate of multiple VC firm members and 0 otherwise |
Thomson Reuters SDC VentureXpert | Number of VCs (total for all rounds) | It measures the size of VC syndicate, i.e., the number of VCs in a syndicate co-investing in a start-up venture across all rounds | |
Independent variables | Twitter API, PrivCO, Crunchbase, Bloomberg Terminals | Number of tweets | Total number of tweets for portfolio company i at year t |
Number of retweets | Total number of retweets for portfolio company i at year t | ||
Number of favorites | Total number of favorites for portfolio company i at year t | ||
Owned social media (number of tweets) | Colicev et al. (2018) and Heggestuen and Danova (2013) define the term of owned social media, which is the social media activity that is generated by the brand owner (or his/her agents) in social networking services (e.g., Twitter) | ||
Earned social media (number of retweets and likes) | Social media activities that a company does not directly generate, or control are commonly termed “earned social media” (ESM) (Stephen and Galak 2012) | ||
Control variables | SDC VentureXpert | Investment duration (duration) | Duration is in months between last funding date and first funding date. Specifically, duration is measured by subtracting "Date Company Received First Investment" from "Date Company Received Last Investment". Duration of funding is the length of the relationship between the entrepreneur and the VCs until the exit of the start‐up |
Number of investors | The number of VCs in a syndicate co-investing in a start-up venture | ||
Startup age | Number of years between the venture’s inception and date of the last investment | ||
First round investment | First round investment amount | ||
Early-stage dummy | It equals 1 if the venture is in its seed/startup or early stage and 0 if the venture is in expansion, late or buyout/acquisition stage as recorded in the VentureXpert database | ||
IPO dummy | It equals one if the venture goes public through an IPO and zero otherwise | ||
Year dummy | Venture capital investment year indicator | ||
Industry dummy | Portfolio firm industry indicator | ||
Acquisition dummy | It equals one if venture is acquired by another firm and zero otherwise | ||
Compustat | Market to book ratio | We follow Gompers (1995) and Tian (2011). Industry average of Tobin’s Q, Market Value of Equity to Book Value. To control for the potential valuation effect on VC staging and syndication Industry market-to-book ratio is the average industry ratio of the market value of equity (Compustat at item 199 multiplied by item 25) to book value of equity (item216). (Please see the link: http://www.crsp.com/products/documentation/annual-data-industrial) | |
Industry R&D ratio | We follow Gompers (1995) and Tian (2011). Please see the link: http://www.crsp.com/products/documentation/annual-data-industrial | ||
Industry tangibility ratio | We follow Gompers (1995) and Tian (2011). Please see the link: http://www.crsp.com/products/documentation/annual-data-industrial | ||
SDC VentureXpert | VC Reputation Variables | We construct three different reputation measures based on Hochberg et al. (2007), Nahata (2008), and Chemmanur et al. (2014): (a) Age of the VC firm; (b) Number of rounds the VC firm participated in since 1965; and (c) Total dollar amount the VC firm invested since 1965 |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bayar, O., Kesici, E. The impact of social media on venture capital financing: evidence from Twitter interactions. Rev Quant Finan Acc 62, 195–224 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01199-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01199-4
Keywords
- Venture capital
- Stage financing
- Syndication
- Signaling
- Information acquisition
- Screening
- Electronic word of mouth
- Learning
- Social media
- Twitter API