Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring misleading information in IPO prospectuses

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Newly public firms may provide misleading information about their business plans in their initial public offering (IPO) prospectuses. Using textual analysis, we develop a simple measure of such misleading information based on the difference between the emphasis placed on business lines in the main textual description and the corresponding information from the accounting tables. We examine our measure of misleading information using a sample of 1878 IPOs in China from 2010 to 2019. We find that the degree of misleading information is greater when firms find it more difficult to get regulatory approval for an IPO. Furthermore, the amount of misleading information is greater for firms with higher leverage and more segmented businesses. We also find some evidence that the stock returns of firms which present a greater amount of misleading information are lower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Growth Enterprise Board is a special set of IPO requirements for the firms that do not meet IPO requirements of the Main Board. Most of firms listed on the Growth Enterprise Board have great growth potentials and innovation capability. The Growth Enterprise Board can be roughly viewed as the Nasdaq for China.

  2. The Sci-Tech Innovation Board is also a special set of IPO requirements for firms that do not meet IPO requirements of the Main Board. There are many policy innovations in the Sci-Tech Innovation Board, including the registration-based initial public offering (IPO) system, price limitation cancelation in IPO day, the stricter Delisting System and mainly for high-tech firms.

  3. We use a webcrawler to download all prospectuses from http://www.cninfo.com.cn.

  4. CSRC suspended all IPOs in 2013.

  5. The suspension was due to poor stock market returns in 2012 and too much volatility in the market. Furthermore, the turnovers in the top officials of CSRC also contributed to the suspension.

References

  • Antweiler W, Frank MZ (2004) Is all that talk just noise? the information content of internet stock message boards. J Financ 59(3):1259–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold T, Fishe RPH, North D (2010) The effects of ambiguous information on initial and subsequent IPO returns. Financ Manage 39(4):1497–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall IV, Samuel B, Leone AJ, Miller BP, Rennekamp K (2017) A plain English measure of financial reporting readability. J Account Econ 63(2–3):329–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley DJ, Gonas JS, Highfield MJ, Roskelley KD (2009) An examination of IPO secondary market returns. J Corp Finance 15(3):1–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemmanur TJ, Hu G, Huang J (2010) The role of institutional investors in initial public offerings. Rev Financ Stud 23(12):4496–4540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Wu L, Jin C, Wang S (2020) Unintended investor sentiment on bank financial products: evidence from China. Emerg Mark Rev 100760

  • Dong Z, Qiang D (2003) HowNet—a hybrid language and knowledge resource. In: Natural language processing and knowledge engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 International conference on IEEE

  • Engelberg J (2008) Costly information processing: evidence from earnings announcements. Working paper

  • Ferguson NJ, Philip D, Lam HYT, Guo JM (2015) Media content and stock returns: the predictive power of press. Multinatl Financ J 19(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris SP, Hao Q, Liao M-Y (2013) The effect of issuer conservatism on IPO pricing and performance. Rev Finance 17(3):993–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann WN, Ravid SA, Sverdlove R, Pons-Sanz V (2007) The role of soft and hard information in the pricing of assets and contract design-evidence from screenplay sales. In: EFA 2008 Athens meetings paper

  • Hanley KW, Hoberg G (2012) Litigation risk, strategic disclosure and the underpricing of initial public offerings. J Financ Econ 103(2):235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang F, Lee J, Martin X, Zhou G (2019) Manager sentiment and stock returns. J Financ Econ 132(1):126–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari SP, Shu S, Wysocki PD (2009) Do managers withhold bad news? J Accoun Res 47(1):241–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran T, McDonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-ks. J Finance 66(1):35–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran T, Mcdonald B (2013) IPO first-day returns, offer price revisions, volatility, and form s-1 language. J Financ Econ 109(2):307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran T, McDonald B (2014) Measuring readability in financial disclosures. J Finance 69(4):1643–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran T, Ritter JR (2002) Why don’t issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? Rev Financ Stud 15(2):413–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry M, Officer MS, Schwert GW (2010) The variability of IPO initial returns. J Finance 65(2):425–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGurk Z, Nowak A, Hall JC (2020) Stock returns and investor sentiment: textual analysis and social media. J Econ Finance 44:458–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. J Finance 57(6):2533–2570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein JC (2002) Information production and capital allocation: decentralized versus hierarchical firms. J Finance 57(5):1891–1921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan CF (2013) The Chinese microblog emotional tendency analysis based on sentiment dictionary. Appl Mech Mater 333–335(1):795–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock PC (2007) Giving content to investor sentiment: the role of media in the stock market. J Financ 62(3):1139–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Y, Xiong X, Meng JG, Zou G (2019) Uncertainty and IPO initial returns: evidence from the tone analysis of China’s IPO prospectuses. Pac-Basin Finance J 57:101075

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the valuable comments from the editor, Cheng-Few Lee, two anonymous referees, and participants at the 28th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting and Management and the 14th NCTU International Finance Conference. Xinjie Wang acknowledges financial support from the Southern University of Science and Technology (Grant Nos. Y01246210, Y01246110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinjie Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Tables 9 and 10.

Table 9 Examples of adjunct words in prospectuses
Table 10 Top five key words by year

Appendix 2

To better understand the semantic emphasis difference among words in the Extreme, Very, More and Negative groups, we list some examples in the Table 11 in this appendix. Admittedly, even with the most precise translation, readers in the different language systems (who are not familiar with the institutional details in the IPO process in China) may not be able to fully capture the semantic differences for the words in different groups. The semantic emphasis of words or phrases, such as “Core”, “Efficient”, “Vigorous”, “First class” could be easily understood by direct translation. However, words, such as “Consistently”, “Plenty of”, “Firstly”, may not be straightforward to be understand as easy as the Extreme emphasis words, and also for the words, “Steadily”, “Progressively”, “Smoothly”, “Favourable”, “Ameliorate”, and “Widely”. We manually read the IPO prospectuses and find that words like “Consistently” described the main business usually deliver the strong positive sentiments. For example, although word “Firstly” means that “used to refer to the first thing in a list” in the dictionary, in IPO prospectuses, it is usually used to express that the business firstly made certain achievements compared with other national or globally competitors. In English dictionary, “Consistently” means “in a way that does not change”, but in prospectuses, it is usually used to express that the demands for the business is consistently growing or the production capability is consistently increasing, delivering strong positive sentiment. Alternatively, literally the word may not directly express the sentimental emphasis, but empirically the word in prospectus contains the strong sentiments. Indeed, it may say that words, such as “Consistently”, “Extremely”, or “Substantially”, also could be used to describe negative sentimental words. However, to get IPO approval from CSRC, firms typically use strong sentimental adjunct words to describe their main business in their IPO prospectuses. In addition, to ensure the precision of machine reading, we use Jieba, the Chinese text segmentation module, to cut text and count the main business words and emphasis adjunct words in the four groups. With input of the all business and adjunct words, the module could preciously identify the target words.

Table 11 Examples of adjunct words in prospectuses

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y. et al. Measuring misleading information in IPO prospectuses. Rev Quant Finan Acc 57, 819–843 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-00964-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-00964-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation