Skip to main content
Log in

Australia’s equity home bias and real exchange rate volatility

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to consider the effect of real exchange rate volatility on equity investment by Australian investors. Equity investment is of major importance to savers and investors in Australia. Also real exchange rate volatility is an important influence on Australia’s financial integration in the global economy. Analysis of the effect of real exchange rate volatility on Australia’s equity home bias is important since Australian dollar is a commodity currency. There is a close relationship between Australia’s terms of trade and real exchange rate volatility. Home bias is measured on the basis of free float-adjusted market capitalization in recognition of the fact that closely held shares are not available to ordinary investors. Real exchange rate volatility is measured by deviations from purchasing power parity on a bilateral basis between Australia and 35 countries. The cross-border equity investment data over the period 2001–2007 are from International Monetary Fund’s Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey. Australian investors are found to invest significantly less in a country if the real exchange rate volatility of that country is relatively high (results that are robust to standard control measures and generalized method of moments).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Australia is not an outlier in regard to significant home bias. Cooper and Kaplanis (1994) list the domestic ownership shares of the world’s eight major stock markets: US (98%), Japan (86.7%), UK (78.5%), Germany (75.4%), France (64.4%), Italy (91.0%), Spain (94.2%) and Sweden (100.0%). The share of domestic equities in the world market portfolio for these eight stock markets is: US (36.4%), Japan (43.7%), UK (10.3%), Germany (3.2%), France (2.6%), Italy (1.9%), Spain (1.1%) and Sweden (0.8%).

  2. Chuhan et al. (1998) investigate the factors motivating large capital flows to a number of developing countries in recent years. Bekaert and Harvey (2000) employ US Treasury Bulletin’s capital flows data to emerging markets.

  3. In Australia, see Mishra (2007, 2008), Mishra and Daly (2006a, b); in the US, Ahearne et al. (2004), Cai and Warnock (2004), in Japan, Kang and Stulz (1997); in Sweden, Dahlquist and Robertsson (2001), Karlsson and Norden (2007), in Finland, Grinblatt and Keloharju (2000), in Korea, Kim and Wei (2002) Choe et al. (2001); in Taiwan, Lin and Shiu (2003).

  4. Readers may refer to Mishra (2008) (Appendix B, pp. 71) for the number of firms with free float market value.

  5. The reader is referred to Fidora et al. (2007) for details of the derivation.

References

  • Ahearne AG, Griever WL, Warnock FE (2004) Information costs and home bias: an analysis of US holdings of foreign equities. J Int Econ 62:313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Devleeschauwer A, Easterly W, Kurlat S, Wacziarg R (2003) Fractionalization. J Econ Growth 8:155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) International trade in goods and services (catalogue no. 5368.0)

  • Bae KH, Stulz RM, Tan H (2008) Do local analysts know more? A cross country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts. J Financ Econ 88:581–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baele L, Pungulescu C, Horst JT (2007) Model uncertainty, financial market integration and the home bias puzzle. J Int Mon Finance 26:606–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter M, Jermann UJ (1997) The international diversification puzzle is worse than you think. Am Econ Rev 87:170–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar S (2009) The impact of exchange rate risk on international asset pricing under various market structures. Rev Quant Financ Acc 32:169–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert G, Harvey C (2000) Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. J Finance 55:565–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F (1974) International capital market equilibrium with investment barriers. J Financ Econ 1:337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M, Aranda C (1999) What makes hot money hot? The relative volatility of international flows of debt and equity capital. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 2(4):427–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M, Cao H (1997) International portfolios investment flows. J Finance 52(2):1851–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai F, Warnock FE (2004) International diversification at home and abroad. Board of governors international finance discussion paper no. 793

  • Campbell RA, Kraussl R (2007) Revisiting the home bias puzzle: downside equity risk. J Int Mon Finance 26:1239–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappiello L, De Santis RA (2005) Explaining exchange rate dynamics: the uncovered equity return parity condition. European Central Bank working paper no. 529

  • Chan K, Covrig V, Ng L (2005) What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual fund equity allocations world wide. J Finance LX 3(June): 1495–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng LTW, Fung HG, Tse Y (2008) China’s exchange traded fund: is there a trading place bias? Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 11(1):61–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung CS, Kwan CCY, Lee J (1995) The pricing of exchange rate risk and stock market segmentation: the Canadian case. Rev Quant Financ Acc 5:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou WJP (2008) Who benefits more from international diversification? Int Financ Markets Inst Money 18:466–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou WJP, Lee AC, Chang CCA (2008) Do investors still benefit from international diversification with investment constraints? Q Rev Econ Financ 49:448–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe H, Kho B, Stulz RM (2001) Do domestic investors have more valuable information about individual stocks than foreign investors? NBER working paper 8073. NBER, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuhan P, Claessens S, Mamingi N (1998) Equity and bond flows to Latin America and Asia: the role of global and country factors. J Dev Econ 55:439–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIA (2000) World Factbook

  • Coen A (2001) Home bias and international capital asset pricing model with human capital. J Multinatl Financ Manage 11:497–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper I, Kaplanis E (1994) What explains the home bias in portfolio investment? Rev Financ Stud 7:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coval J, Moskowitz T (1999) Home bias at home: local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J Finance 54:2045–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coval J, Moskowitz T (2001) The geography of investment: informed trading and asset prices. J Polit Econ 109:811–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlquist M, Robertsson G (2001) Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. J Financ Econ 59:413–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlquist M, Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, Williamson R (2003) Corporate governance and home bias. J Financ Quant Anal 38(1):135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak T (2005) Do domestic investors have an information advantage? Evidence from Indonesia. J Finance 60(2):817–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldor R, Pines D, Schwartz A (1988) Home asset preference and productivity shocks. J Int Econ 25:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica (2000) Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica

  • Errunza V, Hogan K, Hung MW (1999) Can the gains from international diversification be achieved without trading abroad? J Finance 54(6):2075–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira M, Matos P (2008) The colors of investors’ money: the role of institutional investors around the world. J Financ Econ 88:499–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidora M, Fratzscher M, Thimann C (2007) Home bias in global bond and equity markets: the role of real exchange rate volatility. J Int Mon Finance 26:631–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French K, Poterba J (1991) Investor diversification and international equity markets. Am Econ Rev, papers and proceedings of the hundred and third annual meeting of the American Economic Association 2: 222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrig T (1993) An information based explanation of the domestic bias in international equity investment. Scandinavian J Econ 95(1):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2000) The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: a study of Finland’s unique data set. J Financ Econ 55:43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2001) How distance, language and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J Finance 56:1053–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hau H (2001) Location matters. J Finance 56:1959–1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hau H, Rey H (2008) Home bias at the fund level. Am Econ Rev 98(2):333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman G (2001) Familiarity breeds investment. Rev Financ Stud 14(3):659–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (1992) Report on the measurement of international capital flows. IMF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2008a) Direction of trade statistics. IMF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2008b) Portfolio investment: coordinated portfolio investment survey (CPIS): metadata. IMF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivkovic Z, Weisbenner S (2005) Local does as local is: information content of the geography of individual investors’ common stock investments. J Finance LX(1):267–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeske K (2001) Equity home bias: can information cost explain the puzzle? Federal Reserve Bank Atlanta Econ Rev Third Quarter 86(3):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang JK, Stulz R (1997) Why is there home bias? An analysis of foreign equity ownership in Japan. J Financ Econ 46(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson A, Norden L (2007) Home sweet home: home bias and international diversification among individual investors. J Bank Financ 31:317–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karolyi GA, Stulz RM (2003) Are financial assets priced locally or globally? In: Constantinidies GM, Harris M, Stulz R (eds) The handbook of the economics of finance, North Holland, New York, pp 975–1020

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Zoido-Lobaton P (2008) Governance matters vii: governance indicators for 1996–2007. World Bank policy research working paper series no. 4654

  • Kho BC, Stulz RM, Warnock FE (2009) Financial globalization, governance and the evolution of the home bias. J Account Res 47.2:597–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim W, Wei SJ (2002) Foreign portfolio investors before and during a crisis. J Int Econ 56:77–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishney RW (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106(6):1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson D (1998) Ethnic groups worldwide: a ready reference handbook. Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K (1999) Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. J Econ Lit 37(2):571–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Hamid F, Isabel KY (2004) The determinants of international portfolio holdings and geographical bias, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=767664

  • Lin CH, Shiu CY (2003) Foreign ownership in the Taiwan stock market—an empirical analysis. J Multinational Financ Manage 13:19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolio and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47:103–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maghrebi N, Holmes M, Pentecost E (2006) Are there asymmetries in the relationship between exchange rate fluctuations and stock market volatility in Pacific Basin countries? Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 9(2):229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J Finance 42:483–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minority Rights Group International (1997) World directory of minorities. Minority Rights Group International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AV (2007) International investment patterns: evidence using a new dataset. Res Int Bus Financ 21(2):342–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AV (2008) Australia’s equity home bias. Australian Econ Papers 47(1):53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Daly K (2006a) Where do Australians invest? Australian Econ Rev 39(1):47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Daly K (2006b) Multicountry empirical investigation into international financial integration. J Asia Pac Econ 11(4):444–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A, Daly K (2007) Effect of quality of institutions on outward foreign direct investment. J Int Trade Econ Dev 16(2):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan P (1992) Investment barriers and international asset pricing. Rev Quant Financ Acc 2:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor L (2000) Portfolio selection and asset pricing models. J Finance LV(1):179–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen TA (2005) Exchange rate regimes and equity returns in emerging markets, mimeo, Eur Cent Bank

  • Pesenti P, Van Wincoop E (2002) Can nontradables generate substantial home bias? J Money Credit Bank 34:26–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes R, Rey H (2005) The determinants of cross-border equity flows. J Int Econ 65(2):269–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes R, Rey H, Oh Y (2001) Information and capital flows: the determinants of transactions in financial assets. Eur Econ Rev 45(4–6):783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose AK (2005) Which international institutions promote trade? Rev Int Econ 13(4):682–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz EE (1996) Workers put too much in their employer’s stock. Wall Str J September 13

  • Sercu P, Vanpee R (2007) Home bias in international equity portfolios: a review, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1025806

  • Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under the condition of risk. J Finance 19:425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standard and Poor’s (2008) Standard and Poor’s Stock Market Factbook, NY

  • Stockman A, Dellas H (1989) International portfolio non diversification and exchange rate volatility. J Int Econ 26:271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong NC, Xu X (2003) Understanding the equity home bias: evidence from survey data. Rev Econ Stat 85:307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz R (1981) On the effects of barriers to international investment. J Finance 36:923–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh J (2005) Home bias among institutional investors: a study of the economist quarterly portfolio poll. J Jpn Int Econ 19:72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesar L, Werner IM (1995) Home bias and high turnover. J Int Mon Finance 14:467–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnock F (2002) Home bias and high turnover reconsidered. J Int Mon Finance 21(6):795–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnock F, Cleaver C (2003) Financial centers and the geography of capital flows. Int Finance 6(1):27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Development Indicators (2008) CD-ROM. World Bank, Washington, DC

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the two anonymous referees and Ronald Ratti for their helpful comments and suggestions. The author would also like to thank C.F Lee, editor of RQFA, and the participants of the 16th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting and Management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil V. Mishra.

Appendix: Tax

Appendix: Tax

The model takes the perspective of an Australian investor who can freely invest in host countries, and in both mature and emerging markets. There are no international barriers other than domestic and foreign taxation of returns on international equity investments. The Australian investor’s foreign equity returns are first taxed abroad. Host country j taxes the Australian investor’s dividends at a rate \( t_{j}^{d} \), while capital gains are taxed at a rate \( t_{j}^{c} \). The Australian investor is also subject to Australia’s corporate income tax at a rate of t aus .

The foreign country’s capital gains tax base represents real capital gains tax (TAXR j ) and purely inflationary gains tax (TAXN j ).

$$ TAXR_{j} = t_{j}^{c} \left( {{\frac{{\left( {{\frac{{FE_{t} }}{{FP_{t} }}} - {\frac{{FE_{t - 1} }}{{FP_{t - 1} }}}} \right)}}{{{\frac{{FE_{t - 1} }}{{FP_{t - 1} }}}}}}} \right)\left( {{\frac{{Ex_{t} }}{{Ex_{t - 1} }}}} \right) $$
(A.1)

where TAXR j  = Real capital gains tax per Australian dollar invested in the equity market of country j; \( t_{j}^{c} \) = Withholding tax on the Australian investor’s foreign capital gains in country j; FE t  = The foreign currency equity market index at the end of period t; FE t−1 = The foreign currency equity market index at the end of period t − 1;FP t  = The foreign price index at the end of period t; FP t−1 = The foreign price index at the end of period t − 1; Ex t  = The exchange rate expressed in Australian $ per unit of foreign currency at the end of period t; Ex t−1 = The exchange rate expressed in Australian $ per unit of foreign currency at the end of period t − 1.

$$ TAXN_{j} = t_{j}^{c} \left( {{\frac{{FP_{t} - FP_{t - 1} }}{{FP_{t - 1} }}}} \right)\left( {{\frac{{Ex_{t} }}{{Ex_{t - 1} }}}} \right) $$
(A.2)

where TAXN j  = The nominal capital gains tax per Australian dollar invested in the equity market of country j; \( t_{j}^{c} \) = Withholding tax on the Australian investor’s foreign capital gains in country j.

$$ TAXD_{j} = t_{j}^{d} \left( {{\frac{{D_{i} Ex_{t} }}{{FE_{t - 1} Ex_{t - 1} }}}} \right) $$
(A.3)

where TAXD j  = The dividend tax per Australian dollar invested in country j; D i  = The foreign currency dividend return per Australian dollar invested in country j; \( t_{j}^{d} \) = Withholding tax on the Australian investor’s foreign dividend in country j.\( \overline{\lambda }_{r} \) is the incidence of the foreign capital gains (real gains) tax applied to the Australian investor.

$$ \overline{\lambda }_{r} = {\frac{{\lambda_{r} }}{{1 - t_{aus} }}} $$
(A.4)
$$ \lambda_{r} = 1 - \omega_{r} \, $$
(A.5)

ω r is the share of foreign capital gains (real gains) of the Australian investor. \( \overline{\lambda }_{n} \) is the incidence of the foreign capital gains (inflationary gains) tax applied to the Australian investor.

$$ \overline{\lambda }_{n} = {\frac{{\lambda_{n} }}{{1 - t_{aus} }}} $$
(A.6)
$$ \lambda_{n} = 1 - \omega_{n} $$
(A.7)

ω n is the share of foreign capital gains (inflationary gains) of the Australian investor.

$$ \overline{\lambda }_{d} = {\frac{{\lambda_{d} }}{{1 - t_{aus} }}} $$
(A.8)

The Australian imputation tax system was introduced in 1987, and allows companies to distribute franking credits to dividends paid. Franking credits are the tax already paid by a company; and therefore the eligible shareholders are taxed only once at their individual tax rate.

$$ \lambda_{d} = 1 - \omega_{d} $$
(A.9)

ω d is the share of dividend taxes paid that are eligible for an Australian credit.

$$ TAX = \overline{\lambda }_{r} TAXR_{i} + \overline{\lambda }_{n} TAXN_{i} + \overline{{\lambda_{d} }} TAXD_{i} $$
(A.10)

The data on withholding capital gains tax, withholding dividend tax, dividend yield, foreign price index and foreign currency equity market index is from Standard and Poor’s Stock Market Factbook (2008). The data on exchange rates is from Data Stream.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mishra, A.V. Australia’s equity home bias and real exchange rate volatility. Rev Quant Finan Acc 37, 223–244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-010-0202-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-010-0202-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation