Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 209–220 | Cite as

Challenges for Empirical Research on RPM

Article
  • 313 Downloads

Abstract

This article discusses the empirical challenges that researchers face when demonstrating the existence and effects of resale price maintenance (RPM). We outline three approaches for finding price effects of RPM and the corresponding hurdles in data and methodology. We show that the quantity test that was suggested by Posner (Univ Chic Law Rev 45(1):1–20, 1977; Univ Chic Law Rev 48:6–26, 1981) does not identify the change to welfare when demand-enhancing effects are considered generally. Finally, we present some solutions to the challenge of identifying welfare effects, and we suggest guidelines for future research.

Keywords

Antitrust issues and policies Antitrust law Firm behavior: empirical analysis Resale price maintenance Welfare economics 

References

  1. Aviv, Y., Bazhanov, A., Levin, Y., & Nediak, M. (2016). Quantity competition under resale price maintenance when most favored customers are strategic. MPRA working paper 72011.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, E. M., & Leonard, G. K. (2010). Minimum resale price maintenance: Some empirical evidence from Maryland. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, J. B. (2015). Taking the error out of ‘error cost’ analysis: What’s wrong with antitrust’s right. Antitrust Law Journal, 80(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, J. C., Froeb, L. M., O’Brien, D., & Vita, M. G. (2005). Vertical antitrust policy as a problem of inference. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(7), 639–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elzinga, K. G., & Mills, D. E. (2008). The economics of resale price maintenance. In K. G. Elzinga & D. E. Mills (Eds.), Issues in competition law and policy (Vol. 3, pp. 1841–1858). Chicago: ABA Section of Antitrust Law.Google Scholar
  6. Elzinga, K. G., & Mills, D. E. (2010). Leegin and procompetitive resale price maintenance. The Antitrust Bulletin, 55(2), 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gundlach, G. T. (2014). Resale price maintenance: A review and call for research. American Antitrust Institute working paper 14-03.Google Scholar
  8. Ippolito, P. M. (1991). Resale price maintenance: Empirical evidence from litigation. Journal of Law and Economics, 34(2), 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ippolito, P. M., & Overstreet, T. R. (1996). Resale price maintenance: An economic assessment of the Federal Trade Commission’s case against the corning glass works. Journal of Law and Economics, 39(1), 285–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein, B., & Murphy, K. M. (1997). Vertical integration as a self-enforcing contractual arrangement. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 415–420.Google Scholar
  11. Korvorst, M., & Damian, M. F. (2008). The differential influence of decades and units on multidigit number comparison. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(8), 1250–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lacetera, N., Pope, D. G., & Sydnor, J. R. (2012). Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. The American Economic Review, 102(5), 2206–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lach, S., & Tsiddon, D. (1992). The behavior of prices and inflation: An empirical analysis of disaggregated price data. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 349–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lafontaine, F., & Slade, M. (2013). Inter-firm contracts. In R. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The handbook of organizational economics (pp. 958–1013). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lyons, B. R. (1996). Empirical relevance of efficient contract theory: Inter-firm contracts. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(4), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacKay, A. & Smith, D. A. (2014). The empirical effects of minimum resale price maintenance. Available at SSRN 2513533.Google Scholar
  17. Marvel, H. P., & McCafferty, S. (1984). Resale price maintenance and quality certification. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15, 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathewson, F., & Winter, R. (1998). The law and economics of resale price maintenance. Review of Industrial Organization, 13(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Overstreet, T. R. (1983). Resale price maintenance: Economic theories and empirical evidence. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Pitofsky, R. (1982). In defense of discounters: The no-frills case for a per se rule against vertical price fixing. Georgetown Law Review, 71, 1487–1635.Google Scholar
  21. Poltrock, S. E., & Schwartz, D. R. (1984). Comparative judgments of multidigit numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 32–35.Google Scholar
  22. Posner, R. A. (1977). The rule of reason and the economic approach: Reflections on the Sylvania decision. The University of Chicago Law Review, 45(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Posner, R. A. (1981). The next step in the antitrust treatment of restricted distribution: Per se legality. University of Chicago Law Review, 48, 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rátfai, A. (2007). The frequency and size of price adjustment: Microeconomic evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(7), 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.John F. Kennedy School of GovernmentCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Analysis Group, Inc.ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations