Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual orientation and the ‘cohabitation gap’ in life satisfaction in Canada

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘cohabitation gap’ refers to the generally higher life satisfaction of married spouses compared with those who cohabit without being married. The effects of sexual orientation on the cohabitation gap has thus far received no scholarly attention. Exploiting the unique opportunity offered by the Canadian General Social Surveys, the present paper examines how sexual orientation relates to the cohabitation gap for the first time. The data used in this study covers 2010 to 2015, and the life satisfaction gaps are both cardinally and ordinally measured. Regardless of the measurement approach, the cohabitation gap is found to be the largest for gay males and non-existent for lesbians. There is a cohabitation gap for heterosexuals, which is somewhat larger for females. Various explanations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, A. M., Andersson, L., & Hammarstedt, M. (2011). Inter-and intra-household earnings differentials among homosexual and heterosexual couples. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(2), 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldén, L., Edlund, L., Hammarstedt, M., & Mueller-Smith, M. (2015). Effect of registered partnership on labor earnings and fertility for same-sex couples: evidence from Swedish register data. Demography, 52(4), 1243–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antecol, H., Jong, A., & Steinberger, M. (2008). The sexual orientation wage gap: the role of occupational sorting and human capital. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61(4), 518–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antecol, H., & Steinberger, M. D. (2013). Labor supply differences between married heterosexual women and partnered lesbians: a semi-parametric decomposition approach. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 726–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. V. (2011). Social inclusion and the value of marriage equality in Massachusetts and the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 316–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, L. & Frank, J. (Eds.) (2007). Sexual orientation discrimination: an international perspective. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, S. (2014). Career lesbians. Getting hired for not having kids? Industrial Relations Journal, 45(6), 543–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, K. F., Beauchaine, T. P., Rothblum, E. D., & Solomon, S. E. (2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardasi, E., & Taylor, M. (2008). Marriage and wages: a test of the specialization hypothesis. Economica, 75(299), 569–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1/2), S33–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978). Homosexualities: a study of diversity among men and women. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereznai, S. (2006). Gay and single… forever?: 10 things every gay guy looking for love (and not finding it) needs to know. Boston, Massachusetts: Da Capo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N., & Lien, D. (2002). Measuring the effect of sexual orientation on income: evidence of discrimination? Contemporary economic Policy, 20(4), 394–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N., & Lien, D. (2009). Sexual orientation and self-reported lying. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2011). From average Joe’s happiness to Miserable Jane and Cheerful John: using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79(3), 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, M., & Freytag, A. (2013). Volunteering, subjective well-being and public policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. J. (2002). Why do gay men live in San Francisco? Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7), 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blandford, J. M. (2003). The nexus of sexual orientation and gender in the determination of earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(4), 622–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blekesaune, M. (2016). Is cohabitation as good as marriage for people’s subjective well-being? longitudinal evidence on happiness and life satisfaction in the British household panel survey. Journal of Happiness Studies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9834-x

  • Botha, F., & Booysen, F. (2013). The gold of one’s ring is not far more precious than the gold of one’s heart: reported life satisfaction among married and cohabiting South African adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 433–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: a comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Manning, W. D., and Payne, K. K. (2015). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236

  • Byrne, A., & Carr, D. (2005). Caught in the cultural lag: the stigma of singlehood. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. S. (2008). Sexual orientation, work, and income in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1239–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. S., & Eppink, S. T. (2017). Does it get better? recent estimates of sexual orientation and earnings in the United States. Southern Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12233

  • Catania, J. A., Osmond, D., Stall, R. D., Pollack, L., Paul, J. P., & Blower, S. et al. (2001). The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 91(6), 907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, A., McManus, S., Brugha, T. S., Bebbington, P., & King, M. (2011). Mental health of the non-heterosexual population of England. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 198(2), 143–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Kamesaka, A., & Tamura, T. (2015). Rising aspirations dampen satisfaction. Education Economics, 23(5), 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74(2), 609–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G., & Sevak, P. (2013). The disappearing gay income penalty. Economics Letters, 121(3), 542–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989). Analysis of binary data (Vol. 32). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. N., Greenstein, T. N., & Gerteisen Marks, J. P. (2007). Effects of union type on division of household labor: do cohabiting men really perform more housework? Journal of Family Issues, 28(9), 1246–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In Culture and well-being. Netherlands: Springer 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilmaghani, M. (2016). Religiosity and subjective well-being in Canada. Journal of Happiness Studies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9837-7

  • Dilmaghani, M. (2017). Sexual orientation, labour earnings, and household income in Canada. Journal of Labor Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-017-9249-4

  • Dilmaghani, M. (2018). Sexual orientation, labour supply, and occupational sorting in Canada. Industrial Relations Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, E. M., & Stum, M. S. (1998). Economic security and financial management issues facing same-sex couples. Journal of family and economic issues, 19(4), 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggebeen, D. J. (2005). Cohabitation and exchanges of support. Social forces, 83(3), 1097–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmslie, B., & Tebaldi, E. (2007). Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. Journal of Labor Research, 28(3), 436–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante, F. (2009). Education, aspirations and life satisfaction. Kyklos, 62(4), 542–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, L., & Webb, A. (2006). Determinants and consequences of bargaining power in households (No. w12367). National Bureau of Economic Research. Availbale at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12367

  • Fussell, E., Gauthier, A. H., & Evans, A. (2007). Heterogeneity in the transition to adulthood: the cases of Australia, Canada, and the United States. European Journal of Population, 23(3/4), 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. J., & Ost, J. (2004). The gay and lesbian atlas. Washington, D.C: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, L., Nunley, J. M., Schneebaum, A., & Zietz, J. (2014). Birth cohort and the specialization gap between same-sex and different-sex couples. Demography, 51(2), 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grignon, M., Perronnin, M., & Lavis, J. N. (2008). Does free complementary health insurance help the poor to access health care? Evidence from France. Health Economics, 17(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard, S., & Jepsen, L. K. (2008). The economics of gay and lesbian couples: introduction to a special issue on gay and lesbian households. Review of Economics of the Household, 6(4), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, S. M., & Whitton, S. W. (2015). The significance of living together and importance of marriage in same-sex couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(9), 1241–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, H. J., & Lucas, A. (2010). Economic factors and relationship quality among young couples: comparing cohabitation and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1141–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamplová, D., Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. (2014). Is the cohabitation–marriage gap in money pooling universal? Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 983–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T., Moum, T., & Shapiro, A. (2007). Relational and individual well-being among cohabitors and married individuals in midlife: recent trends from Norway. Journal of Family Issues, 28(7), 910–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective. American Psychologist, 61(6), 607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J. (2009). Home production and wages: evidence from the American time use survey. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (2002). Housework and wages. Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holländer, H. (2001). On the validity of utility statements: standard theory versus Duesenberry’s. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, A. J. (2009). Single by choice? Assessing and understanding voluntary singlehood among mature gay men. Journal of homosexuality, 56(4), 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P. M., Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Bergstrom-Lynch, C. A. (2011). He says, she says: gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 876–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, K. (2006). Same-sex marriage: the cultural politics of love and law. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, C. A., & Jepsen, L. K. (2006). The sexual division of labor within households: comparisons of couples to roommates. Eastern Economic Journal, 32(2), 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, C., and L. K. Jepsen. (2016). Self-employment, earnings, and sexual orientation. Review of Economics of the Household, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-016-9351-z

  • Kalenkoski, C. M., Ribar, D. C., & Stratton, L. S. (2005). Parental child care in single-parent, cohabiting, and married-couple families: Time-diary evidence from the United Kingdom. American Economic Review, 95(2), 194–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalenkoski, C. M., Ribar, D. C., & Stratton, L. S. (2007). The effect of family structure on parents’ child care time in the United States and the United Kingdom. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(4), 353–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klawitter, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of the effects of sexual orientation on earnings. Industrial Relations, 54(1), 4–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg, A. (2012). Reassessing differences in work and income in cohabitation and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(4), 688–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1987). Sex role self-schema and psychological adjustment in coupled homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Sex Roles, 17(9-10), 549–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2000). Attractions and constraints as determinants of relationship commitment: longitudinal evidence from gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples. Personal relationships, 7(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. A. (2007). The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. Journal of Family Issues, 28(1), 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwang, T., Crockett, E. E., Sanchez, D. T., & Swann, Jr, W. B. (2013). Men seek social standing, women seek companionship: sex differences in deriving self-worth from relationships. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1142–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafrance, A., Warman, C., & Woolley, F. (2009). Sexual identity and the marriage premium (No. 1219). Queen’s Economics Department Working Paper.

  • Lannutti, P. J. (2011). Security, recognition, and misgivings: exploring older same-sex couples’ experiences of legally recognized same-sex marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(1), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, É. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 929–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. S., & Ono, H. (2012). Marriage, cohabitation, and happiness: a cross-national analysis of 27 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 953–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppel, K. (2016). The incidence of self-employment by sexual orientation. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43(2), 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikucka, M. (2016). The life satisfaction advantage of being married and gender specialization. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 759–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, Y. (2016). Does the gender composition in couples matter for the division of labor after childbirth? Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A941724&dswid=-9421.

  • Morris, B. (2004). The age of dissonance; gay marriage? How straight. The New York Times Sunday, March 7, 2004, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/07/style/the-ageof-dissonance-gay-marriage-how-straight.html.

  • Mueller, R. (2014). Wage differentials of males and females in same-sex and different-sex couples in Canada, 2006-2010. Canadian Studies in Population, 41(3/4), 105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2012). Reexamining the case for marriage: union formation and changes in well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazio, T., & Blossfeld, H. P. (2003). The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy. European Journal of Population, 19(1), 47–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y. K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1848–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y. K. (1992). Utilitarianism and interpersonal comparison. Social Choice and Welfare, 9(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreffice, S. (2011). Sexual orientation and household decision making. Same-sex couples’ balance of power and labor supply choices. Labour Economics, 18(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: the contextual theory and its applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc: Mahwah, New Jersey, USA.

  • Phelps, C. D. (2001). A clue to the paradox of happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirani, E., & Vignoli, D. (2016). Changes in the satisfaction of cohabitors relative to spouses over time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plug, E., Webbink, D., & Martin, N. (2014). Sexual orientation, prejudice, and segregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(1), 123–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (2005). Bargaining power in marriage: earnings, wage rates and household production (No. w11239). National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11239.

  • Porche, M. V., & Purvin, D. M. (2008). “Never in our lifetime”: legal marriage for same-sex couples in long-term relationships. Family Relations, 57(2), 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdthavee, N., & Wooden, M. (2015). Life satisfaction and sexual minorities: evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1975). Age differences between spouses: trends, patterns, and social implications. American Behavioral Scientist, 19(2), 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, C., Goldberg, N. G., & Badgett, M. V. (2009). The effects of marriage equality in Massachusetts: a survey of the experiences and impact of marriage on same-sex couples. The Williams Institute: Los Angeles, California, USA.

  • Rao, K. V. (1989). What is happening to cohabitation in Canada?. Available at: https://www.popline.org/node/365982.

  • Rao, K. V., & Balakrishnan, T. R. (1989). Timing of first birth and second birth spacing in Canada. Journal of Biosocial Science, 21(3), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Race, K. (2015). ‘Party and play’: online hook-up devices and the emergence of PNP practices among gay men. Sexualities, 18(3), 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, K. D. (2013). License to wed: what legal marriage means to same-sex couples.. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2016). Same-sex couples’ decisions and experiences of marriage in the context of minority stress: Interviews from a population-based longitudinal study. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(8), 1019–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottnek, M. (Ed.) (1999). Sissies and tomboys: gender nonconformity and homosexual childhood. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecter, E., Tracy, A. J., Page, K. V., & Luong, G. (2008). Shall we marry? Legal marriage as a commitment event in same-sex relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 54(4), 400–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N. (1995). What respondents learn from questionnaires: The survey interview and the logic of conversation. International Statistical Review, 63(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2005). Money, housework, sex, and conflict: same-sex couples in civil unions, those not in civil unions, and heterosexual married siblings. Sex Roles, 52(9/10), 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons, J. P., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A. L. (2013). Declining segregation of same-sex partners: evidence from census 2000 and 2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(5), 687–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(2), 527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Maybe I do: interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25(4), 496–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2015). Same-sex couples across Canada. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/dai/smr08/2015/smr08_203_2015#a1.

  • Statistics Canada, (2017a). The general social survey: an Overview. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89f0115x/89f0115x2013001-eng.htm.

  • Statistics Canada (2017b), CANSIM data series. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/econ46a-eng.htm.

  • Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2012). Cohabitation, gender, and happiness: a cross-cultural study in thirty countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(7), 1063–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrova, O., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). Married and cohabiting parents’ well-being: the effects of a cultural normative context across countries. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(5), 601–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi, E., & Elmslie, B. (2006). Sexual orientation and labour supply. Applied Economics, 38(5), 549–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toomey, R. B., Ryan, C., Diaz, R. M., Card, N. A., & Russell, S. T. (2010). Gender-nonconforming lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth: school victimization and young adult psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. (1991). Ordinal and cardinal utility: an integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1-2), 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2006). The anatomy of subjective well-being’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-national differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbakel, E. (2012). Subjective well-being by partnership status and its dependence on the normative climate. European Journal of Population, 28(2), 205–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vespa, J. (2014). Historical trends in the marital intentions of one-time and serial cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignoli, D., & Salvini, S. (2014). Religion and union formation in Italy: Catholic precepts, social pressure, and tradition. Demographic Research, 31, 1079–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, C. (2005). Cohabiting couples: rethinking money in the household at the beginning of the twenty first century. The Sociological Review, 53(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, S., & Denier, N. (2016). Self-employment among same-sex and opposite-sex couples in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology, 53(2), 143–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J. M. (1992). Marital status and well-being in Canada: an analysis of age group variations. Journal of Family Issues, 13(3), 390–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., & Noack, T. (2009). A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 465–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiik, K. A., Keizer, R., & Lappegård, T. (2012). Relationship quality in marital and cohabiting unions across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23(2), 230–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, N. H., & Wilcox, W. B. (2008). Happily ever after? Religion, marital status, gender and relationship quality in urban families. Social Forces, 86(3), 1311–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavodny, M. (2008). Is there a ‘marriage premium’ for gay men? Review of Economics of the Household, 6(4), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Sobey School of Business, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Canada

    Maryam Dilmaghani

Authors
  1. Maryam Dilmaghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Dilmaghani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dilmaghani, M. Sexual orientation and the ‘cohabitation gap’ in life satisfaction in Canada. Rev Econ Household 17, 1163–1189 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-018-9433-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-018-9433-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation