Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of environmental regulation and the 2011 earthquake on the Japanese electricity industry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental regulations may erode competition owing to additional costs of compliance. To investigate the impact of such regulations in the Japanese electricity market, we analyze the effects of the environmental quality threshold set for public sector procurement. Using data on electricity procurement auctions from 2005 to 2012, we employ an endogenous switching regression model. We show that the environmental quality threshold lowers the participation of new power suppliers in auctions but does not increase their winning bids as long as competition is maintained. In fact, compliance with the quality threshold has made new power suppliers competitive in green auctions. By contrast, electricity utilities have suffered increased compliance costs since the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011 owing to the shutdown of nuclear power plants and increased reliance on fossil fuels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A load factor here is defined as the ratio between the projected amount of consumption (average usage) and the contract demand (maximum usage), and is calculated as \(\frac{\hbox {Projected amount of consumption}\,\left( {\hbox {kWh}/\hbox {year}} \right) }{\hbox {Contract demand}\, \left( {\hbox {kW}} \right) \times 24 \left( {\hbox {hours}} \right) \times 365 \left( {\hbox {days}} \right) }\). A load factor shows the anticipated consistency of electricity usage.

  2. Currently, the Japan Atomic Power Company and J-POWER are the only wholesale electricity companies.

  3. As of April 30, 2015, 654 companies were registered as PPSs, of which 71 have past records of sales (Teikoku Databank 2015). Approximately one third of PPSs are in Tokyo and the remainder is spread across Japan.

  4. Deregulation in Okinawa region was limited to customers using 20,000 kW or more of extra-high voltage power in 1999, which was reduced to 2000 kW thereafter.

  5. The data do not include the Long Island Power Authority, small regulated utilities, or those municipalities or other entities that are supplied power through long-term contracts with the New York Power Authority (New York State Public Service Commission 2013).

  6. For example, the fees were 2.03 yen/kilowatt hour (kWh) for extra-high voltage service and 4.15 yen/kWh for high voltage service in 2012 (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry 2012).

  7. If an entrant fails to balance supply and demand every 30 mins, an incumbent steps in to fix the imbalance. For example, if a shortage exceeds 3 %, an entrant must pay 51.73 yen/kWh in summer and 45.73 yen/kWh in other seasons. On the contrary, if supply exceeds demand by more than 3 %, the excess electricity is obtained by an incumbent for free. Penalties are relatively low if an imbalance is within \(\pm 3\,\%\): an entrant pays 15.02 yen/kWh for shortages and can sell excess electricity at 10.48 yen/kWh. These fees are for the Tokyo Electric Power Company in 2012, and fees vary among incumbents.

  8. A comparison of the two population means of the original and our datasets shows statistically significant differences for Green and Extrahigh at the 5 % level, but the differences are very small (0.025–0.073 and 0.023–0.067, respectively). No statistically significant differences are detected for any other variable. Therefore, it is unlikely that these exclusions significantly bias our dataset.

  9. To derive E(y|x), we need the following fact about the normal distribution: if \(z\sim Normal\left( {0,1} \right) \), then, for any constant c, \(E\left( {z| z >c} \right) =\frac{\phi \left( c \right) }{1-{\Phi }\left( c \right) }\).

  10. Okinawa, one of the ten regions, is excluded from our analysis because electricity procurement auctions have not been introduced in the region.

  11. The standard error is 361.486. The coefficient is statistically significant at the 5 % level.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeharu Okajima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okajima, S., Okajima, H. Impact of environmental regulation and the 2011 earthquake on the Japanese electricity industry. J Regul Econ 49, 223–249 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-016-9294-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-016-9294-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation