Skip to main content
Log in

The Dependency of Rent-to-Price Ratio on Appreciation Expectations: An Empirical Approach

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using two unique datasets from different neighborhoods in Houston, TX, which provide us data for houses with similar structure (or even same house), we test the standard model of housing values to determine how the formation of households’ expectations regarding price appreciations affects housing market prices. Using these datasets we are able to address previously encountered problems in the literature such as the lack of adjustment for quality differences, the connection between prices and rents for the different type of housing, and the spatial distribution of housing. We test whether consumer behavior leads to potentially unstable market conditions with price bubbles. Our results suggest that appreciation expectations are based on past price appreciation but at the same time they depend on the fundamental factors such as, locational and structural. These findings show a hybrid consumer behavior of rational and adaptive expectations. Finally, we show how these expectations could sometimes lead to unstable price levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Stiglitz (1990) explains in detail how changes in expectations of future price of assets could lead to bubbles.

  2. Price instability refers to a process in which, after experiencing a shock, house prices never return to the long run equilibrium value. Alternatively, house prices change erratically as time passes. In this case, one can assess whether there is any evidence for potential housing bubble pressures across different locations within a single metro area.

  3. Dusansky and Koc (2007) show that housing is an investment asset with the potential of capital gains.

  4. The sum of the all costs such as maintenance, repair etc. may not be exactly proportional to value, but most authors make this assumption for convenience and ease of exposition.

  5. See Capozza and Seguin (1996) and Case and Shiller (1989).

  6. Himmelberg et al. (2005), Mankiw and Weil (1989), McCarthy and Peach (2004), etc…

  7. Since the second micro dataset contains observations for list prices and rents of the same houses, the hedonic price method is not applied.

  8. The issue of multicollinearity is less severe when there are a large number of observations. However, the issue of multicollinearity becomes more severe when there are a small number of observations. Therefore, to circumvent the problem of multicollinearity, we use rents estimated only as a function of square feet of the house (SF).

  9. For more details on similarity with stock market check refer to Shiller (1981) and Campbell and Shiller (2005).

References

  • Campbell, J. Y., & Shiller, R. J. (2005). Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook: An update. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (Vol. II, pp. 173–201). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1996). Expectations, efficiency, and euphoria in the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(3–4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, K., & Shiller, R. J. (1989). The efficiency of the market for single-family homes. American Economic Review, 79, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusansky, R., & Koc, C. (2007). The capital gains effect in the demand for housing. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(2), 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusansky, R., Koc, C., & Onur, I. (2012). Household housing demand: empirical analysis and theoretical reconciliation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 44, 429–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011). The financial crisis inquiry report. Washington, DC.

  • Hattapoglu, M., & Hoxha, I. (2013). Modeling the role of appreciation expectations to rent-to-price ratio. Global Journal of Finance and Economics, 10(1), 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg, C., Mayer, C., & Sinai, T. (2005). Assessing high house prices: bubbles, fundamentals, and misperceptions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, M. (2013). The role of people’s expectation in the recent US housing boom and bust. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 46(3), 452–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). Capital theory and investment behavior. American Economic Review, 53(2), 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, G., & Weil, D. N. (1989). The baby boom, the baby bust, and the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Peach, R. W. (2004). Are home prices the next bubble? Economic Policy Review, 10(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, E. S. (1972). Urban economics. Chicago, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. (1984). Tax subsidies to owner-occupied housing: an asset market approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99(4), 729–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review, 71, 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Symposium on bubbles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mustafa Hattapoglu or Indrit Hoxha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hattapoglu, M., Hoxha, I. The Dependency of Rent-to-Price Ratio on Appreciation Expectations: An Empirical Approach. J Real Estate Finan Econ 49, 185–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-013-9423-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-013-9423-2

Keywords

Navigation