A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values

  • Delores Conway
  • Christina Q. Li
  • Jennifer Wolch
  • Christopher Kahle
  • Michael Jerrett


This paper presents spatially explicit analyses of the greenspace contribution to residential property values in a hedonic model. The paper utilizes data from the housing market near downtown Los Angeles. We first used a standard hedonic model to estimate greenspace effects. Because the residuals were spatially autocorrelated, we implemented a spatial lag model as indicated by specification tests. Our results show that neighborhood greenspace at the immediate vicinity of houses has a significant impact on house prices even after controlling for spatial autocorrelation. The different estimation results from non-spatial and spatial models provide useful bounds for the greenspace effect. Greening of inner city areas may provide a valuable policy instrument for elevating depressed housing markets in those areas.


Housing value Urban greenspace Hedonic pricing model Spatial dependence 



We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped improve the paper. All omissions or errors remain our own.


  1. Acharya, G., Bennett, L. L. (2001). Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AkbariH., Pomerantz, M., Taha, H. (2001). Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy, 70, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. M., Cordell, H. K. (1985). Residential property values improved by landscaping with trees. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 9, 162–166.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, L. M., Cordell, H. K. (1988). Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (USA): a survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 12, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, S. T., West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin, L. (1988a). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Aceademic.Google Scholar
  7. Anselin, L. (1988b). Lagrange Multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis, 20, 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Anselin, L. (2001). Rao’s score test in spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 97, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anselin L., Rey, S. J. (1991). Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis, 23, 110–131.Google Scholar
  10. Anselin, L., Bera, A. K., Florax, R. J. G., Yoon, M. J. (1996). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bailey, T. C., Gatrell, A. C. (1995). Interactive spatial data analysis. Harlow Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Bastian, C. T., McLeod, D. M., Germino, M. J., Reiners, W. A., Blasko, B. J. (2002). Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecological Economics, 40, 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Basu, S., Thibodeau, T. G. (1998). Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bell, K. P., Bockstael, N. E. (2000). Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bera, A. K., Yoon, M. (1993). Specification testing with locally misspecified alternatives. Econometric Theory, 9, 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beron, K. J., Hanson, Y., Murdoch, J. C., Thayer, M. A. (2004). Hedonic price function and spatial dependence: Implications for the demand for urban air quality. In L. Anselin, R. J. G. M. Florax, S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools and application (pp. 267–281). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Bin, O., & Polasky, S. (2003). Valuing inland and coastal wetlands in a rural setting using parametric and semi-parametric hedonic models. Department of Economics, East Carolina University. Accessed March 15, 2008.
  18. Blomquist, G., Worley, L. (1981). Hedonic prices, demand for urban housing amenities, and benefit estimates. Journal of Urban Economics, 9, 212–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bockstael, N., Bell, K. (1998). Land-use patterns and water quality: The effect of differential land management controls. In R. Just, S. Netanyahu (Eds.), Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources (pp. 169–192). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Can, A. (1990). The measurement of neighborhood dynamics in urban house prices. Economic Geography, 66, 254–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Can, A. (1992). Specification and estimation of hedonic housing price models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cliff, A., Ord, J. (1973). Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  23. Crompton, J. L. (2001). The impact of parks on property values: a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 1–31.Google Scholar
  24. Crompton, J. L. (2004). The proximate principle: The impact of parks and open space on property values and the property tax base. Ashburn, Virginia: National Recreation and Park Association.Google Scholar
  25. Des Rosiers, F., Thériault, M., Kestens, Y., Villeneuve, P. (2002). Landscaping and house values: an empirical investigation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 23, 139–161.Google Scholar
  26. Diamond, N. K., Standiford, R. B., Passof, P. C., LeBlanc, J. (1987). Oak trees have varied effect on land values. California Agriculture, 41, 4–6.Google Scholar
  27. Dombrow, J., Rodriguez, M., Sirmans, C. F. (2000). The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. The Appraisal Journal, 68, 39–43.Google Scholar
  28. Dubin, R. A., Sung, C. H. (1990). Specification of hedonic regressions: non-nested tests on measures of neighborhood quality. Journal of Urban Economics, 27, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dwyer, J. F., McPherson, E. G., Schroeder, H. W., Rowntree, R. W. (1992). Assessing benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18, 227–234.Google Scholar
  30. Florax, R. J. G. M., de Graaff, T. (2004). The performance of diagnostic tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models: A meta-analysis of simulation studies. In L. Anselin, R. J. G. M. Florax, S. J. Rey (Eds.), Advances in spatial econometrics: Methodology, tools, and applications (pp. 29–65). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Gabriel, S., Wolch, J. (1984). Spillover effects of human service facilities in a racially segmented housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 111, –12.Google Scholar
  32. Gawande, K., Jenkins-Smith, H. (2001). Nuclear waste transport and residential property values: estimating the effects of perceived risks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gelfand, A. E., Ecker, M. D., Knight, J. R., Sirmans, C. F. (2004). The dynamics of location in home price. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geoghegan, J. (2002). The value of open space in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Geoghegan, J., Wainger, L. A., Bockstael, N. E. (1997). Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 232, 51–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Geoghegan, J., Lynch, L., Bucholtz, S. (2003). Capitalization of open space into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 32, 33–45.Google Scholar
  37. Gordon-Larsen, P., McMurray, R. G., Popkin, B. M. (2000). Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics, 105, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harnik, P. (2000). Inside city parks. Washington, D. C.: Trust for Public Land and the Urban Land Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Herrick, C. (1939). The effects of parks upon land real estate values. The Planning Journal, 5, 89–94.Google Scholar
  40. Irwin, E. G., Bockstael, N. E. (2001). The problem of identifying land use spillovers: measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 698–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jim, C., Chen, W. Y. (2006). Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaufman, D. A., Cloutier, N. R. (2006). The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kestens, Y., Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F. (2004). The impact of surrounding land use and vegetation on single-family house prices. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 539–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim, C. W., Philipps, T. T., Anselin, L. (2003). Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leggett, C. G., Bockstael, N. E. (2000). Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li, M. M., Brown, H. J. (1980). Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Economics, 56, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindsey, G., Man, J., Payton, S., Dickson, K. (2004). Property values, recreation values and urban greenways. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 22, 69–90.Google Scholar
  48. Longcore, T., Li, C., & Wilson, J. (2003). Nature’s services in a dense urban neighborhood. Working Paper. University of Southern California, Center for Sustainable Cities.Google Scholar
  49. Longcore, T., Li, C. Q., & Wilson, J. P. (2004). Application of CITYgreen urban ecosystem analysis software to a densely built urban neighborhood. Urban Geography, 25, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luley, C. J. (1998). The greening of urban air. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 13, 33–35.Google Scholar
  51. Luttik, J. (2000). The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lutzenhiser, M., Netusil, N. R. (2001). The effect of open space on a home’s sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mahan, B. L., Polasky, S., Adams, R. M. (2000) Valuing urban wetlands: a property pricing approach. Land Economics, 76, 100–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McPherson, E. G. (1992). Accounting for benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 22, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Miron, J. (1984). Spatial autocorrelation in regression analysis: A beginner’s guide. In G. L. Gaile, C. J. Willmott (Eds.), Spatial statistics and models (pp. 201–222). Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  56. Morales, D., Micha, F. R., Weber, R. C. (1983). Two methods of evaluating trees on residential site. Journal of Arboriculture, 9, 21–24.Google Scholar
  57. Morancho, A. B. (2003). A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 66, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nicholls, S. (2002). Does open space pay? Measuring the impacts of green spaces on property values and the property tax base Ph.D. dissertation. College Station, Texas: Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Sciences.Google Scholar
  59. Nicholls, S. (2004). Measuring the impacts of parks on property values. Parks & Recreation Magazine, March.Google Scholar
  60. Nowak, D. J., Civerolo, K. L., Rao, S. T., Sistla, G., Luley, C. J., Crane, D. E. (2000). A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1601–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Odland, J. (1988). Spatial autocorrelation. Newbury Park, California: SAGE.Google Scholar
  62. Orford, S. (2002). Valuing locational externalities: a GIS and multilevel modeling approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pace, R. K., Gilley, O. W. (1997). Using the spatial configuration of the data to improve estimation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pace, R. K., Barry, R. F., Clapp, J. M., Rodriquez, M. (1998). Spatiotemporal autoregressive models of neighborhood effects. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paterson, R. W., Boyle, K. J. (2002). Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models. Land Economics, 78, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Patton, M., McErlean, S. (2003). Spatial effects within the agricultural land market in northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pogodzinski, J. M., Sass, T. R. (1991). Measuring the effects of municipal zoning regulations: a survey. Urban Studies, 28, 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ready, R., & Abdalla, C. (2003). The Impact of open space and potential local disamenities on residential property values in Berks County, Pennsylvania. University Park, PA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University. Accessed March 15, 2008.
  69. Ridker, R. G., Henning, J. A. (1967). The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic price and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scott, K. I., Simpson, J. R., McPherson, E. G. (1999). Effects of tree cover on parking lot microclimate and vehicle emissions. Journal of Arboriculture, 25, 129–142.Google Scholar
  72. Shultz, S. D., King, D. A. (2001). The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open space amenities and land use. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Standiford, R. B., Vreeland, J., & Tietje, B. (2001). California’s hardwood rangelands: Production and conservation values. Berkley, California: University of California Integrated Hardwood Range Management Program, UC Berkley. Accessed March 15, 2008.
  74. Theebe, M. A. J. (2004). Planes, trains, and automobiles: the impact of traffic noise on house prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 28, 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Troy, A., Grove, J. M. (2008). Property values, parks, and crime: a hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tyrväinen, L. (1997). The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic price method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tyrväinen, L., Miettinen, A. (2000). Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Voicu, I., Been, V. (2008). The effect of community gardens on neighboring property values. Real Estate Economics, 36, 241–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wolch, J., Gabriel, S. (1981). Local land development policies and urban housing prices. Environment and Planning A, 13, 1253–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wolch, J., Wilson, J., & Fehrenbach, J. (2002). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity mapping analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Center for Sustainable Cities. Accessed March 15, 2008.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Delores Conway
    • 1
  • Christina Q. Li
    • 2
  • Jennifer Wolch
    • 2
  • Christopher Kahle
    • 2
  • Michael Jerrett
    • 3
  1. 1.Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography, College of Letters, Arts and SciencesUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.School of Public healthUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations