Abstract
The feedback-seeking behavior (FSB) framework offers a novel perspective for analyzing second language (L2) learners’ proactive agency in processing teacher feedback. While research has identified associations among language mindsets, goal orientations, and FSB in L2 speaking classes, this line of inquiry should be extended to L2 writing education where students’ responses to teacher feedback have received increasing attention. Particularly, the role of writing competence in this process needs to be examined. This study was conducted at a prestigious public high school in southwest mainland China, with a sample of 462 12th grade students. Our path model provided the following three major findings. First, growth mindset students may pursue learning or performance-approach goals. Regardless of writing competence, they would both inquire and monitor teacher feedback. Second, learning oriented growth mindset students preferred feedback monitoring, whereas performance-approach oriented growth mindset students preferred feedback inquiry. Third, only highly proficient fixed mindset students pursued performance-approach goals, which could lead to both feedback monitoring and inquiry, with a slight inclination toward the latter; meanwhile, less proficient fixed mindset students were unlikely to do so. Finally, we make pedagogical suggestions based on these findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management, 41(1), 318–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313484521
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/256219
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095056
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Bondarenko, A. V. (2020). Self-efficacy as a generative mechanism for future self-guides and feedback-seeking behavior in language learning (Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University)
Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(31), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606266
Crommelinck, M., & Anseel, F. (2013). Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour: A literature review. Medical Education, 47(3), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12075
Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783048
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In K. Hyland, & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed., pp. 206–224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Janssen, O., & Prins, J. (2007). Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X103410
Joughin, G., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Tai, J. (2021). What can higher education learn from feedback seeking behaviour in organisations? Implications for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1733491
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
Leenknecht, M., Hompus, P., & van der Schaaf, M. (2019). Feedback seeking behaviour in higher education: The association with students’ goal orientation and deep learning approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1571161
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.03.004
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 214–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12380
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020). Language mindset, meaning-making, and motivation. In M. Lamb, K. Csizer, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), Palgrave MacMillan handbook of motivation for language (pp. 537–559). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. SAGE
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus users’ guide: Eighth edition. Muthén & Muthén
Papi, M., Bondarenko, A. V., Wawire, B., Jiang, C., & Zhou, S. (2020). Feedback-seeking behavior in second language writing: Motivational mechanisms. Reading and Writing, 33, 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09971-6
Papi, M., Rios, A., Pelt, H., & Ozdemir, E. (2019). Feedback-seeking behavior in language learning: Basic components and motivational antecedents. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12538
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
Shi, B., Huang, L., & Lu, X. (2020). Effect of prompt type on test-takers’ writing strategy use in the continuation task. Language Testing, 37(3), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220911626
VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.004
Waller, L., & Papi, M. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004
Wong, M. Y. (2016). Teacher-student power relations as a reflection of multileveled intertwined interactions. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.916600
Xu, J. (2022). Incremental intelligence matters: How L2 writing mindsets impact feedback orientation and self-regulated learning. Assessing Writing, 51, 100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100593
Yao, Y., Guo, N. S., Li, C., & McCampbell, D. (2021a). How university EFL writers’ beliefs in writing ability impact their perceptions of peer assessment: perspectives from implicit theories of intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46 (1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1750559
Yao, Y., Guo, N. S., Wang, W., & Yu, J. (2021b). Measuring Chinese Junior high school students’ language mindsets: What can we learn from young EFL learners’ beliefs in their language ability? System. 101, 102577, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102577
Yao, Y., Wang, W., & Yang, X. (2021c). Perceptions of the inclusion of automatic writing evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study. Assessing Writing, 50, 100568, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100568
Ye, W., Ren, W., & Zheng, S. (2021). The construct of the story continuation writing task: Insights from the China’s standards of English language ability. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44(3), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2021-0024
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the participants involved. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Choo Mui Cheong, Miss Jianling Zhan, and Miss Jiahuan Zhang’s assistance in collecting data. We had insightful comments from the journal’s editor Professor R. Malatesha Joshi, and the anonymous reviewers, for which we are very grateful too.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statements and declarations
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Questionnaire
Fixed mindset items:
-
1.
You have a certain amount of English writing talent, but you can’t really do much to change it.
-
2.
Your English writing talent is something about you that you can’t change very much.
-
3.
You can learn new things, but you can’t really improve your English writing skills.
Growth mindset items:
-
1.
No matter who you are, you can significantly change your English writing skills.
-
2.
You can always greatly change how talented you are in English writing.
-
3.
No matter how talented you are in English writing, you can always improve your writing skills.
Performance-approach goal items:
-
1.
I am motivated by the thought of outperforming my peers in English writing class.
-
2.
I want to do well in English writing class to show my ability to my family, friends, advisors, or others.
-
3.
It is important to me to do well compared to others in English writing class.
Performance-avoidance goal items:
-
1.
I’m afraid that if I ask my teacher a “dumb” question, they might not think I’m very smart.
-
2.
My goal for English writing class is to avoid performing poorly.
-
3.
I worry about the possibility of getting a bad grade in English writing class.
Learning goal items:
-
1.
I want to learn as much as possible from English writing class.
-
2.
In English writing class, I prefer course material that really challenges me so I can learn new things.
-
3.
I desire to completely master the material presented in English writing class.
Feedback monitoring items:
-
1.
When I get my papers back, I read all of the comments carefully.
-
2.
I pay close attention when my teacher corrects my writing mistakes.
-
3.
When my teacher points out mistakes in my writing, I try not to make them again.
-
4.
I try to remember my teacher’s comments on my writing mistakes.
-
5.
I try to learn from my teacher’s comments on my writing problems.
Feedback inquiry items:
-
1.
When I do not understand my teacher’s comments on my writing, I ask her/him to clarify.
-
2.
I ask my teacher to tell me what I do wrong in my writing.
-
3.
I ask my teacher to tell me how I can improve my writing.
-
4.
I ask my teacher to point out my writing weaknesses.
-
5.
I ask my teacher to show me strategies to improve my writing.
Appendix B: Continuation writing task
Please write two paragraphs to form a short essay based on the following material and the beginning sentences of the two paragraphs.
I was in my room, unwilling to head to the community theatre with “my brother” Henry. He was just adopted by my parents recently. I was not in the mood for being onstage with him.
“Kirstie, come here,“ my mom called. Following her voice, I found her outside the bathroom, holding a wet book. She gave the book a shake. “Henry’s book was in the bathtub. Did you put it there?” She glared at me, something she never did before Henry came to our home. I didn’t wet his book on purpose. Tears of hurt clouded my eyes. Worse still, she promised to buy him a new copy. My heart ached. Henry was stealing my mother’s love. He was ruining my life.
Meanwhile, Henry was just nearby, absorbed in working on a complicated rope knot (绳结)as usual. Why did a boy like him do the girly work? Far from manly!
Soon, it was time to have to set off to the community theatre. As Henry walked ahead of us to the car, my mom took me aside and said in a low voice, “It’s the first time for Henry to be onstage. Be kind to him, Honey. I nodded but sighed. Being kind didn’t use to be hard. But after Henry moved in, everything felt different. The theatre used to be a special place for my parents and me. With Henry involved, it didn’t seem so special any more.
Finally, it was our stage time. My heart beat wildly. I forgot my annoyance at Henry for a while. As we kids lined up, ready to act out our short play, I realized how loosely I had tied the drawstring (束带)on my skirt. Sure enough, my skirt began to drop. Laughter from the audience could be heard, and even though I was wearing shorts under my skirt, I could feel my face burst into flames. However, my hands were full. If only someone could help me out!
Attention please:
-
1.
The number of words in the continuation writing should be about 150.
-
2.
Please write the two paragraphs on the answer sheet.
Paragraph 1:
Right then, Henry sensed my embarrassment.
Paragraph 2:
After the performance, I found Henry and tapped him on the arm gratefully.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, Y., Zhu, X. Modeling chinese high school EFL writers’ language mindsets, goal orientations, and feedback-seeking behavior: the interaction effect between language mindsets and writing competence. Read Writ 37, 539–561 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10339-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10339-6