Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Testing the script-relativity hypothesis: expertise in reading Chinese versus English is associated with better arithmetic skills

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The script relativity hypothesis proposes that the scripts we read and write affect our cognition. The current study tested this hypothesis by comparing Chinese and English cognitive-linguistic skills and three cognitive abilities, including verbal working memory capacity, nonverbal IQ, and arithmetic calculation, across groups of children with different Chinese and English word reading performances. Using the untimed word reading performances as the criterion, four groups of children were identified from a sample of 662 Hong Kong grade 1 Chinse children, including 49 children who were “good” at both Chinese and English word reading (the GB group), 30 children who were “poor” in Chinese word reading only (the PC group), 40 children who were “poor” in English word reading only (the PE group), and 65 children who were “poor” in both (the PB group). Significant group differences were found on almost all the cognitive-linguistic skills, including phonological awareness, morphological awareness, vocabulary knowledge, and rapid digit naming, and the three cognitive abilities, with the GB group performing the best and the PB group performing the most poorly, suggesting a general positive association between script and cognition. Pairwise comparisons showed that the PC group performed better than the PE group in the English cognitive-linguistic tasks and the PE group performed better than the PC group in the Chinese cognitive-linguistic tasks, as expected. More importantly, the PC group showed poorer arithmetic calculation performance when compared to the PE group, suggesting a stronger association between Chinese word reading and arithmetic calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/gquwe/.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Collaborative Research Fund from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Research Grants Council (CUHK8/CRF/13G, and C4054-17WF) awarded to C. McBride.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KL developed the study concept and designed the study. All authors collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. KL drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine McBride.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors hereby declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lui, K.F.H., Cheah, Z.R.E., McBride, C. et al. Testing the script-relativity hypothesis: expertise in reading Chinese versus English is associated with better arithmetic skills. Read Writ 35, 1359–1379 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10227-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10227-5

Keywords

Navigation