Skip to main content
Log in

Children with dyslexia show an inhibition domain-specific deficit in reading

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children with dyslexia face persistent difficulties in acquiring reading skills, often making guessing errors characterized by the replacement of a word by an orthographic neighbour. These reading errors could be related to inhibition problems within the reading task. Previous studies examining inhibition skills in dyslexic children led to unclear results when inhibition in cognitive and non-reading tasks was evaluated. The present study aims to demonstrate whether dyslexic children have a specific reading inhibition deficit or if they have a general inhibition deficit. Eighteen dyslexic children (age range: 106–131 months, in Grade 4) were matched to typically developing children on both chronological age (age range: 109–128 months, in Grade 4), and on reading level (age range: 87–98 months, in Grade 2). All children were asked to perform (i) a cognitive inhibition task based on fruit colours; (ii) a reading inhibition task, consisting of reading sentences in which an expected word was replaced by a orthographic neighbour. Our results demonstrated that dyslexic children performed equally compared to the two control groups in the cognitive inhibition task, whilst they read the sentences less accurately than the two control groups in the reading inhibition task, and they were slower than children of the same age. Therefore, our results clearly demonstrate that dyslexic children have an inhibition deficit specific to the reading task. The study highlights the importance of better understanding the specific reading difficulties of dyslexic children, which in turn opens up interesting perspectives for treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adlard, A., & Hazan, V. (1998). Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia). The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology,51A, 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo, S., Pacheco, A., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2010). Visual rapid naming and phonological abilities: Different subtypes in dyslexic children. International Journal of Psychology,45, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.499949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, S. J., & Kerns, K. A. (1999). Identification and description of new tests of executive functioning in children. Child Neuropsychology,5, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.5.2.115.3167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrouillet, P., Billard, C., de Agostini, M., Démonet, J. F., & Fayol, M., et al. (2007). Dyslexie, dysorthographie, dyscalculie: bilan des données scientifiques. Paris: Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. N., Boyle, J. M. E., & Kelly, S. W. (2010). Do tasks make a difference? Accounting for heterogeneity of performance of children with reading difficulties on tasks of executive function: findings from a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology,28, 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X485432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borella, E., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences,34, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M., Demetre, J., Hammil, S., Robson, K., Shepherd, H., & Cody, G. (2002). Executive functioning in adults and children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia,40(12), 2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00046-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: a cognitive perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalard, M., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Boyer, B., & Fayol, M. (2003). Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 objects names in French: relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English date from Morrison et al. (1997) and naming latencies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,15, 209–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirino, P. T., Miciak, J., Ahmed, Y., Barnes, M. A., Taylor, W. P., & Gerst, E. H. (2018). Executive function: Association with multiple reading skills. Reading and Writing,32, 1819–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9923-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology,64, 135–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, G. F., Stein, J. F., Wood, M. H., & Wood, F. B. (1995). Verbal and visual problems in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities,28, 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949502800503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, M. Coltheart, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquier-Roux, M., Lequette, C., Guillemette, P., Valdois, S., & Zorman, M. (2010). BALE: Batterie Analytique du Langage Ecrit [BALE: Analytic Battery of Written Language]. Grenoble: UPMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., Flanagan, D. P., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2006). Test review: Wechsler intelligence scale for children. Fourth edition (WISC-IV). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906288389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khomsi, A. (2001). ELO Evaluation du Langage oral [ELO Assessment of Oral Language]. Paris: ECPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laasonen, M., Virsu, V., Oinonen, S., Sandbacka, M., Salakari, A., Service, E. (2012). Phonological and sensory short-term memory are correlates and both affected in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing,25, 2247–2273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9356-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). Manulex: A web-accessible lexical database from French primary school reading. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,36, 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobrot, M. (1967). Batterie pour mesurer la lecture et l’orthographe. ORLEC [Battery for assessment of reading and writing]. Beaumont/Oise: Bureau d’études et de recherches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia,53, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maïonchi-Pino, N., Magnan, A., & Écalle, J. (2010). The nature of the phonological processing in French dyslexic children: Evidence for the phonological syllable and linguistic features’ role in silent reading and speech discrimination. Annals of Dyslexia,60, 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Anderson, V., & Mimmo-Smith, I. (2006). TEA-CH - Test d’Evaluation de l’Attention chez l’enfant [TEA-CH: Test of assessment of attenion in children]. Paris: ECPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading,7, 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L. (1988). Connectionist models and psychological evidence. Journal of Memory and Language,27, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review,88, 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.88.5.375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meixner, J. M., Warner, G. J., Lensing, N., Schiefele, U., & Elsner, B. (2019). The relation between executive functions and reading comprehension in primary-school students: A cross-lagged-panel analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,46, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin,138, 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology,41, 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., & Frith, U. (1995). Causal modeling: structural appoaches to developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), developmental psychopathology (pp. 357–390). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Individual differences in contextual facilitation: Evidence from dyslexia and poor reading comprehension. Child Development,69, 996–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06157.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Dean, P. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: The cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends in Neurosciences,24, 508–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01896-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G. K., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis in greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities (Austin),42, 528–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulesu, E., Démonet, J. F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., et al. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science,291, 2165–2167. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protopapas, A., Archonti, A., & Skaloumbakas, C. (2007). Reading ability is negatively related to Stroop interference. Cognitive Psychology,54, 251–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain,126, 841–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,72, 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonart, G. (2008). ECHAS: Echelle d’apprentissages scolaires primaires [ECHAS: Primary school learning scale]. Paris: Eurotest Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Spark, J. H., & Fisk, J. E. (2007). Working memory functioning in developmental dyslexia. Memory,15, 34–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (1987). Dyslexia: A cognitive developmental perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities,21, 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schoot, M., Licht, R., Horsley, T. M., & Sergeant, J. A. (2000). Inhibitory deficits in reading disability depend on subtype: Guessers but not spellers. Child Neuropsychology,6, 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.6.4.297.3139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Stappen, C., & Van Reybroeck, M. (2018). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming are independent phonological competencies with specific impacts on word reading and spelling: An intervention study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reybroeck, M. (2003). Elaboration d’une batterie d’épreuves les compétences phonologiques. DEA’s thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.

  • Van Reybroeck, M., Cumbo, E. & Gosse, C. (in press). Effects of decoding intervention in persistently struggling readers: transfer on spelling and self-efficacy beliefs. In M. Joshi, T. Limpo, & R. Alves (Eds.). Reading-Writing connections.

  • Van Reybroeck, M., Schelstraete, M. A., Hupet, M., & Szmalec, A. (2014). Switching between noun and verb agreement rules comes at a cost: Cross-sectional and interventional studies in a developmental sample. Psychology of Language and Communication, 18, 226–250. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2014-0016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandierendonck, A. (2013). On the role of dissipating inhibition in task switching. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology,221, 61–62. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varvara, P., Varuzza, C., Sorrentino, A. C. P., Vicari, S., & Menghini, D. (2014). Executive functions in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,8, 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines,45, 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. C., Tasi, H. J., & Yang, H. M. (2012). Cognitive inhibition in students with and without dyslexia and dyscalculia. Research in Developmental Disabilities,33, 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2005). WISC-IV. Echelle d’intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants et adolescents - quatrième édition [Wechsler Scale of intelligence for children and adolescents – 4th edition]. Paris: ECPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2014). WPPSI-IV: Echelle d’Intelligence de Wechsler pour la période pré-scolaire et primaire [WPPSI-IV: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence ] (4th ed.). Montreuil: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 415–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank M. Ficheroulle, S. Petit and C. Vander Stappen for their contribution to the conception (M. Ficheroulle and S. Petit) and data collection and scoring of the tests, and E. Blampain for comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to the children, teacher and principals for their support and participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Van Reybroeck.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Reybroeck, M., De Rom, M. Children with dyslexia show an inhibition domain-specific deficit in reading. Read Writ 33, 907–933 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09986-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09986-z

Keywords

Navigation