Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Review of Nunes, T., and Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), Serial # 238.

  • Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 229–251. doi:10.1080/00313830050154485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, J. F., Edwards, E. C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame’enui, E. J., & Olejnik, S. F. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150–176. doi:10.1598/RRQ.37.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2002). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. doi:10.1023/A:1008131926604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J. E. (1993). Metalinguistic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. K. (1989). Children’s word structure and knowledge: Implications for decoding and spelling instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 135–152. doi:10.1007/BF00377467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-linguistic studies (pp. 1–25). NY: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word-experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219–237. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan, Michigan, USA

    Joanne F. Carlisle

Authors
  1. Joanne F. Carlisle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne F. Carlisle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlisle, J.F. Review of Nunes, T., and Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge. Read Writ 23, 257–262 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9151-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9151-9

Search

Navigation