Skip to main content
Log in

The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies?

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cross-sectional study tested Danish students' mastery of links between grammar and spelling (cf. the English link between past tense verbs and the -ed spelling for a word final /t/, e.g., miss ed vs. mis t). One hundred and forty-two students aged 10–17 spelled pseudo-word items with ambiguous phonemes, where the choice between a 'conditional' spelling (cf. English ed for /t/) and a simple spelling (cf. t for /t/) was predictable from the grammatical context but not from the sound. Overgeneralisations (conditional spellings used where simple spellings were appropriate) were controlled to obtain pure measures of grammatical spelling competence. The oldest group of participants performed near ceiling on four of five spelling problems studied while three younger groups in the experiment never did. The nature of the apparent grammatical hurdle in Danish spelling acquisition is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowerman, M. (1982). Starting to talk worse. Clues to language acquisition from children's late speech errors. In S. Strauss (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth (pp. 101–145). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.D.A. & Ellis, N.C. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of Spelling. Theory, Process and Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Devine, M., Ledward, A. & Nunes, T. (1997). Spelling with apostrophes and understanding possession. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T. & Aidinis, A. (1999). Different morphemes, same spelling problems: cross-linguistic developmental studies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write. A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T. & Bindman, M. (1997). Children's understanding of the connection between grammar and spelling. In B.A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T. & Bindman, M. (1999). Morphemes and spelling. In T. Nunes (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 15–41). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P., Nunes, T. & Bindman, M. (2000). The relations between children's linguistic awareness and spelling: The case of the apostrophe. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 253–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L.B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J.F. (1996). An exploratory study of morphological errors in children's written stories. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, E. (1994). A survey of english spelling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S. & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. (1990). Differences in dyslexia. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C. & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, M., Thevenin, M.G., Jarousse, J.P. & Totereau, C. (1999). From learning to teaching to learning French written morphology. In T. Nunes (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 43–63). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F.W., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I.Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisson, S. & Sandra, D. (2002). Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors. Brain and Language, 81, 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. & Giannouli, V. (1999). Learning to read and spell in Greek: The importance of letter knowledge and morphological awareness. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write. A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 51–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual. Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, V.M. & Castles, A.E. (2001). Unexpectedly poor spelling in university students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 319–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juul, H. (in press). Grammatical awareness and the spelling of inflectional morphemes in Danish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.

  • Kemp, N. & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural-s. Child Development, 74, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, B. & Treiman, R. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 267–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J.R., Bell, M. & Deacon, H. (2003). Grammatical awareness and the spelling of grammatical morphemes. Poster presented at the SSSR conference in Boulder, Colorado, June 2003.

  • Leong, C.K. (1998). Strategies used by 9-to 12-year-old children in written spelling. In C. Hulme & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 421–432). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., Ravid, D. & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, S.-A. (1997). Spelling development and metalinguistic training before school entrance: The effects of different metalinguistic training on spelling development in first grade. In C.K. Leong & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell (pp. 305–330). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V. & Desberg, P. (1980). The development of strategies in spelling. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 339–353). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Bindman, M. (1997a). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 94, 27–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Bindman, M. (1997b). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C., Ziegler, J.C. & Coltheart, M. (2002). How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 897–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D.D. & Siegler, R.S. (1982). U-shaped behavioral curves: It's not whether you're right or wrong, it's why. In S. Strauss (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth (pp. 37–61). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31, 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L.G. & Dickinson, C.C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Søegård, A. & Petersen, P.B. (1968). OS 400 Ordstillelæsningssprøve [OS 400 Silent word reading test]. København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totereau, C., Thevenin, M.-G. & Fayol, M. (1997). The development of the understanding of number morphology in written French. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 97–114). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. (1997). How learning to spell German differs from learning to spell English. In C.A. Perfetti, L. Rieben & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell. research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 81–96). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J.C., Jacobs, A.M. & Stone, G.O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 504–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J.C., Stone, G.O. & Jacobs, A.M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for – ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 600–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutell, J.(1980). Children's spelling strategies and their cognitive development. In E.H. Henderson & J.W. Beers (Eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learn-ing to spell: A reflection of word knowledge (pp. 52-73). Newark, Delaware, International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juul, H., Elbro, C. The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies?. Reading and Writing 17, 915–942 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2109-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2109-7

Navigation