Abstract
In catalytic processes with catalyst deactivation, there is a big problem in estimating the remaining catalyst lifetime since industrial operating conditions are quite uncertain and consequently the non-uniform catalyst activity profile developed in the reactor during operation is unknown. In this article, a simple method for calculating the remaining catalyst lifetime from present operating data is reported. The spatial average catalyst activity, which indicates how much the catalyst has been deactivated, is proposed to denote the present catalyst activity in the reactor. For an isothermal plug flow reactor packed with non-porous catalyst, any catalyst activity profile determines the same reactant conversion if the spatial average activity related to this profile is the same. As a result, the average activity is easily calculated from present operating data without the information of the catalyst deactivation rate. The determined present average activity is used as an initial condition to estimate the remaining catalyst lifetime providing superbly accurate calculation results when the kinetic deactivation expression is characterized by the first order in the catalyst activity. The developed procedure is demonstrated using the water–gas shift reaction and methane steam reforming processes as examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
Catalyst activity
- a avg :
-
Spatial average activity
- F i :
-
Mole flow rate of component i (mol/s)
- F total :
-
Total mole flow rate defined by \(F_{\text{total}} { = }\mathop \sum \nolimits F_{i}\) (mol/s)
- k :
-
Rate constant of the water–gas shift reaction (mol/gcat s)
- k d :
-
Rate constant of the deactivation reaction (1/Pa s)
- k p :
-
Poisoning rate constant (mol/gcat Pa s)
- K eq :
-
Equilibrium constant
- P :
-
Pressure (Pa)
- P p :
-
Partial pressure of the poison compound (Pa)
- r i :
-
Reaction rate for component i (mol/gcat s)
- −r CO :
-
Rate of disappearance of CO (mol/gcat s)
- −r p :
-
Poisoning reaction rate (mol/gcat s)
- t :
-
Time (s)
- T :
-
Temperature (K)
- W cat :
-
Catalyst weight (g)
- X :
-
Conversion
- y i :
-
Mole fraction of component i
- ξ :
-
Dimensionless reactor axial coordinate defined by \(\xi = z /L\)
- φ :
-
Pressure factor defined by Eq. (5); P in the expression has a unit of atm
- 0:
-
Initial
- In:
-
Inlet
- Out:
-
Outlet
References
Argyle MD, Bartholomew CH (2015) Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: a review. Catalysts 5:145–269
Bartholomew CH, Argyle MD (2015) Advances in catalyst deactivation and regeneration. Catalysts 5:949–954
Mohaddecy SRS, Sadighi S (2013) Predicting catalyst lifetime. Petroleum Technol Q 14:85
Moulijn JA, Diepen AE, Kapteijn F (2001) Catalyst deactivation: is it predictable? What to do? Appl Catal A 212:3–16
Dunleavy JK (2006) Improving useful service life of catalysts. Platinum Metals Rev 50:52
Delmon B, Yates JT (1997) Studies in surface science and catalysis: catalyst deactivation. In: Bartholomew CH, Fuentes GA (Eds.) Proceeding of the 7th International Symposium-Cancun-Mexico, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Ostrovskii NM (2006) General equation for linear mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Chem Eng J 120:73–82
Levenspiel O (1999) Chemical reaction engineering, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Fogler HS (2016) Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Indiana
Tijm PJA, Waller FJ, Brown DM (2001) Methanol technology developments for the new millennium. Appl Catal A 221:275–282
Shokry F, El-Tawil YA, Shehata AS, Ossman M, El-Fatah M (2015) Modeling and simulation of low temperature water gas shift reactor. 2nd International Conference on Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Paris
Lima DFB, Zanella FA, Lenzi MK, Ndiaye PM (2012) Modeling and simulation of water gas shift reactor: An industrial case. In: Patel V (ed) Petrochemicals. InTech, Rijeka
Moe JM (1962) Design of water–gas shift reactors. Chem Eng Prog 580:33–36
Adams TA, Barton PI (2009) A dynamic two-dimensional heterogeneous model for water gas shift reactors. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:8877–8891
Rase HF (1977) Chemical reactor design for process plants: case studies and design data, vol 2. Wiley, New York
González-Velasco JR, Gutiérrez-Ortiz MA, González-Marcos JA, Amadeo N, Laborde MA, Paz M (1992) Optimal inlet temperature trajectories for adiabatic packed reactors with catalyst decay. Chem Eng Sci 47:1495–1501
Ladebeck JR, Wagner JP (2003) Catalyst development for water-gas-shift. In: Vielstich W, Lamm A, Gasteiger HA (eds) Handbook of fuel cells: fundamentals, technology and applications, vol 3. Wiley, Chichester
Amadeo NE, Laborde MA (1995) Hydrogen production from the low-temperature water gas shift reaction: kinetics and simulation of the industrial reactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 20:949–956
Chen WH, Lin MR, Jiang TL, Chen MH (2008) Modeling and simulation of hydrogen generation from high temperature and low-temperature water gas shift reactions. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:6644–6656
Choi Y, Stenger HG (2003) Water gas shift reaction kinetics and reactor modeling for fuel cell grade hydrogen. J Power Source 124:432–439
Smith RJB, Loganathan M, Shantha MS (2010) A review of the water gas shift reaction kinetics. Int J Chem React Eng 8:1–32
Reddy GK, Smirniotis PG (2015) Water gas shift reaction: research developments and applications. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam
Chocrón M, Calderón MCR, Amadeo NE, Laborde MA (1996) Effect of intraparticle diffusion on catalyst decay. Chem Eng Sci 51:683–688
Schaidle JA, Lausche AC, Thompson LT (2010) Effects of sulfur on Mo2C and Pt/Mo2C catalysts: water gas shift reaction. J Catal 272:235–245
Young PW, Clark CB (1973) Why shift catalysts deactivate. Chem Eng Prog 69:69–74
Ayastuy JL, Gutiérrez-Ortiz MA, González-Marcos JA, Aranzabal A, González-Velasco JR (2005) Optimization of inlet temperature for deactivating LTWGS reactor performance. AIChE J 51:2016–2023
Hou K, Hughes R (2001) The kinetics of methane steam reforming over a Ni/α-Al2O catalyst. Chem Eng J 82:311–328
Rostrup-Nielsen JR (1984) Catalytic steam reforming. Catalysis 5:1–117
Ridler DE, Twigg MV (1989) Steam reforming in catalyst handbook, 2nd edn. Wolff, London
Trimm DL (1999) Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming. Catal Today 49:3–10
Froment GF, Bischoff KB (1990) Chemical reactor analysis and design, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester
Hughes R (1984) Deactivation of catalysts. Academic Press, London
Acknowledgement
The financial support provided by the graduate scholarship program of Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, and the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute is gratefully acknowledged. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Figshare repository, https://figshare.com/s/10f50d8b41bcf3577c43.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phanawadee, P., Laipraseard, K., Yablonsky, G.S. et al. Estimation of the remaining lifetime of deactivated catalyst via the spatial average catalyst activity illustrated by the water–gas shift and steam methane reforming processes. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 121, 371–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1170-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-017-1170-6