Acs, Z. J. (2002). Innovations and the growth of cities. Edward Elgar.
Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
GC Alvarez, RM Jara, JRR Julián, JIG Bielsa (2009) Study of the effects on employment of public aid to renewable energy sources Universidad Rey Juan Carlos https://wwwsolaripediacom/files/844pdf
Amezcua AS (2010) Boon or boondoggle? Business incubation as entrepreneurship policy vol http://surface.syr.edu/ppa_etd/80/. Doctoral thesis in Public Administration. Syracuse University. http://surface.syr.edu/ppa_etd/80/,
K Arrow (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Princeton University press, pp 609-626
Audretsch, D. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. MIT press. Cambridge, Mass. ; London.
Audretsch, D. (2008). The entrepreneurial society. Oxford: Oxford Uiversity Press.
Google Scholar
Audretsch, D., & Baumol, W. (2001). Burke a. Competition policy in dynamic markets International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 613–634.
Article
Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.
Article
Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (2002). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University press.
Book
Google Scholar
Bennett, R. (2008). SME policy support in Britain since the 1990s: What have we learnt? Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 26, 375–397.
Article
Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2004). Liberalism, socialism, and robust political economy. Journal of Markets and Morality, 7, 99–111.
Google Scholar
Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. (2002). The case against intellectual property American economic review., 92, 209–212.
S Box (2009) OECD work on innovation–a stocktaking of existing work
Brown, J. D., & Earle, J. S. (2017). Finance and growth at the firm level: Evidence from SBA loans the journal of finance., 72, 1039–1080.
Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations Technovation, 32, 110–121.
Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., & Tollison, R. (2009). The theory of public choice – II. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
V Bush (1945) Science the endless frontier: A report to the president on a program for postwar scientific research
Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2011). Murtinu S. R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups Economics Letters, 112, 97–99.
Google Scholar
Commission E (2020) Financing the green transition: The European Green Deal Investment Plan and Just Transition Mechanism https://eceuropaeu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2020/01/14-01-2020-financing-the-green-transition-the-european-green-deal-investment-plan-and-just-transition-mechanism
Cumming, D., & Groh, A. P. (2018). Entrepreneurial finance: Unifying themes and future directions Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 538–555.
Google Scholar
Davidson, S., & Potts, J. (2016). A new institutional approach to innovation policy Australian Economic Review, 49, 200–207.
Google Scholar
Delmar, F., Wennberg, K., & Hellerstedt, K. (2011). Endogenous growth through knowledge spillovers in entrepreneurship: An empirical test. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 199–226.
Article
Google Scholar
Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature research policy., 45, 797–815.
Djankov S, LaPorta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) The regulation of entry quarterly journal of economics 117:1–37
O Ejermo (2018) Does incubation lead to innovation? Evidence from the Swedish incubation program. https://www.tillvaxtanalys.se/download/18.347b5cf7166740f99f173c83/1542627788370/pm%202018_20_Does%20incubation%20lead%20to%20innovation.pdf
Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (2014). Governing knowledge commons. Oxford University Press.
Fu, K., & Larsson, A.-S. (2018). Wennberg K, Habitual entrepreneurs in the making: How labour market rigidity and employment affects entrepreneurial re-entry small business economics., 51, 465–482.
García-Quevedo, J. (2004). Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence Kyklos, 57, 87–102.
Google Scholar
Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (1999). The venture capital cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A., Stephan, A., Hallman, A., & Karlsson, N. (2016). The “sugar rush” from innovation subsidies: A robust political economy perspective. Empirica, 43, 729–756.
Article
Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A., Tingvall, P.G. & Halvarsson, D. (2019) Subsidy Entrepreneurs: an Inquiry into Firms Seeking Public Grants. J Ind Compet Trade. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00317-0.
Haselmann, R., Schoenherr, D., & Vig, V. (2018). Rent seeking in elite networks journal of political economy., 126, 1638–1690.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
Google Scholar
Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance the journal of finance., 62, 251–301.
Howell, S. T. (2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants American economic review., 107, 1136–1164.
Hussinger, K. (2008). R&D and subsidies at the firm level: An application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models journal of applied econometrics., 23, 729–747.
Karlson, N. (1993). The state of state. In An inquiry concerning the role of invisible hands in politics and civil society (1993). Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.
Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition & entrepreneurship. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar
Klette, T. J., Møen, J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies Research policy, 29, 471–495.
Google Scholar
Klofsten, M., Lundmark, E., Wennberg, K., & Bank N. (2020). Incubator specialization and size: Divergent paths towards operational scale technological forecasting and social change., 151, 119821.
Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel The journal of industrial economics, 50, 369–390.
Article
Google Scholar
Leeson, P. T., & Subrick, J. R. (2006). Robust political economy The Review of Austrian Economics, 19, 107–111.
Google Scholar
Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: Why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed--and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
Lukeš, M., Longo, M. C., & Zouhar, J. (2019). Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups Technovation, 82, 25–34.
Google Scholar
Marx, M. (2011). The firm strikes back non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. American Sociological Review, 76, 695–712.
Article
Google Scholar
Marx, M., Singh, J., & Fleming, L. (2015). Regional disadvantage? Employee non-compete agreements and brain drain Research Policy, 44, 394–404.
Google Scholar
M Mazzucato (2015) The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem press,
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. The Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 617–643.
Article
Google Scholar
Pennington, M. (2011). Robust political economy Policy: A Journal of Public Policy and Ideas, 27, 8.
Google Scholar
Potts J, Allen DW, MacDonald T (2016) keep your friends close, your enemies closer: The case for inclusive innovation policy your enemies closer: The case for inclusive innovation policy (September 7, 2016)
Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth the. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Sandström, C. (2015) Book review: the entrepreneurial state (Anthem Press, 2013), Ekonomisk Debatt, No 3, p. 92–94.
Sandström, C., Wennberg, K., Wallin, M. W., & Zherlygina, Y. (2016). Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: A review and critical discussion. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1232–1256.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. (2013). A control group study of incubators’ impact to promote firm survival. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 302–331.
Article
Google Scholar
Shapiro, C. (2001). Navigating the patent thicket: Cross Licences, patent pools, and standard-setting. In A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy, vol 1. Boston: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Book
Google Scholar
SJ Wallsten (2000) The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program.RAND Journal of Economics:82–100
Wennberg, K. (2009). Knowledge combinations and the survival of financial services ventures. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 259–276.
Article
Google Scholar
Wennberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2011). Wright M. The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs Research Policy, 40, 1128–1143.
Google Scholar
B Widerstedt, J Månsson (2015) Can business counselling help SMEs grow?: evidence from the Swedish business development grant programme Journal of small business and enterprise development 22:652–665
Wiggins, S. N. (1995). Entrepreneurial enterprises, endogenous ownership, and the limits to firm size. Economic Inquiry, 33, 54–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán, J. I. (2014). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey journal of economic surveys., 28, 36–67.