The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 53–73 | Cite as

Monetary equilibrium

  • Joshua R. Hendrickson


One implication of the concept of monetary equilibrium is that the money supply should vary with money demand. In a recent paper, Bagus and Howden (Rev Austrian Econ 24:383–402, 2011) argue that this conclusion is predicated on the assumption of price stickiness. The purpose of this paper is to suggest that the foundation of monetary equilibrium is the role of money as a medium of exchange. As such, changes in the demand for money result in changes in both nominal and real spending that are welfare-reducing. This proposition is then used to examine whether a monetary policy in which the central bank varies the money supply in response to money demand can be considered optimal. In addition, the paper considers how a free banking system with competitive note issuance would vary the money supply in response to changes in money demand. In both cases, the results are consistent with the concept of monetary equilibrium. In addition, these results can be obtained even when prices are perfectly flexible if trade is decentralized (i.e. not conducted in Walrasian markets). Price stickiness is therefore not a necessary condition to suggest that the money supply should vary with money demand.


Free banking Nominal income targeting Monetary equilibrium 

JEL Classification

E41 E42 E51 E52 



The author would like to thank Nick Rowe and David Andolfatto for comments on an earlier draft as well as an anonymous referee for thoughtful comments.


  1. Andolfatto, D. (2010). Essential interest bearing money. Journal of Economic Theory, 145, 1495–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2011). Monetary equilibrium and price stickiness: causes, consequences, and remedies. Review of Austrian Economics, 24, 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagus, P., & Howden, D. (2012). Monetary equilibrium and price stickiness: a rejoinder. Review of Austrian Economics, 25(3), 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltensperger, E. (1972). Economies of scale, firm size, and concentration in banking. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 4(3), 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltensperger, E. (1980). Alternative approaches to the theory of the banking firm. Journal of Monetary Economics, 6(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clower, R. (1965). The Keynesian counter-revolution: a theoretical appraisal. In D Walker (ed.), Money and markets: Essays by Robert Clower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clower, R. (1969). Introduction to monetary theory: selected readings. In D. Walker (ed.), Money and markets: Essays by Robert Clower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clower, R. (1975). The Keynesian perplex. In D. Walker (ed.), Money and markets: Essays by Robert Clower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Edgeworth, F.Y. (1888). The mathematical theory of banking. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 51, 113–127.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, M. (1974). A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. In R.J. Gordon (ed.), Milton Friedmans monetary framework: A debate with his critics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A. (1963a). A monetary history of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A. (1963b). Money and business cycles. Review of Economics and Statistics, 45(1), 32–64. Reprinted in Milton Friedman, The Optimal Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago: Aldine (1969).Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A. (1982). Monetary trends in the United States and the United Kingdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horwitz, S. (2000). Microfoundations and macroeconomics: an Austrian perspective. London:Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howitt, P. (1990). The Keynesian recovery and other essays. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  16. Howitt, P., & McAfee, P. (1987). Costly search and recruiting. International Economic Review, 28, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kocherlakota, N. (1998). Money is memory. Journal of Economic Theory, 81, 232–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lagos, R., & Wright, R. (2005). A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 113(3), 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leijonhufvud, A. (1968). On Keynesian economics and the economics of keynes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Niehans, J. (1978). The theory of money. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nosal, E., & Rocheteau, G. (2011). Money, payments, and liquidity. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostroy, J. (1973). The informational efficiency of monetary exchange. American Economic Review, 63(4), 597–610.Google Scholar
  23. Rocheteau, G., & Wright, R. (2005). Money in search equilibrium, in competitive equilibrium, and in competitive search equilibrium. Econometrica, 73(1), 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rotemberg, J., & Woodford, M. (1999). Interest rate rules in an estimated sticky price model. In J.B. Taylor (ed.), Monetary policy rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Selgin, G. (1988). The theory of free banking. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Selgin, G. (1994). Free banking and monetary control. The Economic Journal, 104(427), 1449–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Warburton, C. (1950). The monetary disequilibrium hypothesis. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 10(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. White, L.H. (1987). Accounting for non-interest-bearing currency: a critique of the legal restrictions theory of money. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 19(4), 448–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White, L.H. (1999). Hayek’s monetary theory and policy: a critical reconstruction. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 31(1), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wicksell, K. (1934). Lectures on political economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Yeager, L. (1986). The significance of monetary disequilibrium. Cato Journal, 3(1), 369–399.Google Scholar
  32. Yeager, L. (1994). Tautologies in economics and the natural sciences. Eastern Economic Journal, 20(2), 157–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations