Skip to main content

Quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace treatment: a brief communication of literature review

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the life domains that are most frequently reported to be affected in scoliosis patients undergoing brace treatment.

Methods

A search within the PubMed database was conducted and a total of 60 publications were selected. We classified the studies based on the methods used to measure patients’ quality of life (QoL) and categorized the life domains reported to be affected.

Results

Self-image/body configuration was the most reported affected domain of patients’ QoL, identified in 32 papers, whilst mental health/stress was the second most reported affected domain. Mental health was identified in 11 papers, and 11 papers using the BSSQ questionnaire reported medium stress amongst their participants. Vitality was the third most reported affected domain, identified in 12 papers.

Conclusions

Our review indicates that scoliotic adolescents treated with bracing suffer in their quality of life most from psychological burdens. To improve these patients’ life quality, more attention should be focussed on supporting their mental health.

Introduction

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is defined as a three-dimensional spinal deformity with a twisting curvature that happens in juveniles of the age from 10 to 20 with no known specific aetiology. Treatment and classification guidelines have been established by the International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation (SOSORT) [1,2,3]. The SOSORT guidelines recommend observation, exercise, brace treatment or surgical treatment based on the severity of curvature.

The efficacy of brace treatment depends on both the quantity (compliance), which is defined as the percentage of actual brace-wearing time relative to the prescribed bracing time [4], and the quality (strap tightness) of brace usage [5]. The quantity of brace usage depends on patients’ own initiative in wearing the brace, where patients tend to be non-complaint reducing wearing time because of physical and psychological issues [4, 6]. This is important because the risk for curve progression and surgery are reduced in patients with good brace compliance [7].

Many factors have been reported to impact the QoL of AIS brace wearers, e.g. back pain, appearance configuration, and mental health [8, 9]. Improving QoL might increase treatment compliance amongst scoliotic brace wearers, positively impacting the treatment quantity. However, in order to effectively improve the QoL of scoliotic brace wearers, we need to know which factors most prominently impact their QoL. Different methods have been applied in measuring the QoL of AIS patients, including standardized (self-assessment) questionnaires and interviews. This paper aims to answer the question: What are the most frequently reported affected domains of QoL of AIS patients under brace treatment?

We answer this question by reviewing the literature on the QoL of AIS patients during brace treatment, and by classifying the literature into 5 groups based on the methods they use to measure patients’ QoL. Based on the reported results, and by comparing the results from papers using similar methods, we identify the most affected domains for AIS brace wearers’ QoL.

Methods

Search strategy and study selection

A search within the PubMed database was conducted on June 6, 2019, with the query: “adolescent idiopathic scoliosis AND brace treatment AND quality of life”. Results were not limited by publication date. Studies were excluded if they A) are review papers, B) involved AIS patients under surgical treatment and assessed their QoL, C) were published not as full-text in English.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data were extracted from the included publications using a standardized form recording title, authors, sample size, methods, outcome measures and results.

The results of all the reviewed papers were analysed and grouped per patient reported outcome measurement questionnaire. Finally, the most affected domains were identified either based on the authors’ self-report, or if the authors did not explicitly identify the most affected domains, by selecting those domains with QoL results below a threshold value. These threshold values were selected based on the threshold values used by the authors who self-reported on most affected domains. For publications in which the authors concluded that no significant differences were found, neither within different domains of one questionnaire nor within different cohorts using the same questionnaire, we used the classification “No Significance”.

Results

The PubMed search returned 122 papers. Publications were imported from Pubmed into ZoteroFootnote 1 and checked for duplicates. Then, titles and abstracts and potentially eligible publications were screened based on the exclusion criteria by the first author (HW). Candidates were discussed with the second author (DT) and included in the review upon mutual agreement. The articles selection process is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The selection flowchart of the results from the literature search

Table 1 lists the outcomes of all reviewed publications. Overall, self-image/body configuration was the most affected domain of patients’ QoL, mentioned in 32 out of 48 papers measuring self-image. Mental health was the second most affected domain mentioned in 11 out of 49 papers measuring mental health and in 11 out of 11 papers measuring psychological stress. Vitality was the third most affected domain mentioned in 12 out of 21 papers measuring vitality.

Table 1 An overview of the papers using different methods to measure QoL, indicating the QoL domains that were reportedly most affected by brace wearing

Discussion

This review classifies the literature based on the method used to measure the QoL and we found that the main affected life domains were self-image, mental health and vitality, which were separately discussed as below.

Self-image

Law et al. [70] found that an aesthetically pleasing brace and the involvement of patients in the design process of the brace were important for increasing user compliance and also addressing psychological issues during treatment. Moreover, patients’ concerns on self-appearance inspired researchers to design flexible braces consisting of elastic straps and a soft shell, which allows more freedom of movement, less physical restrictions, and more importantly, allows to be hidden under clothes. To date, the most widely discussed flexible brace is SpineCor, which was proposed by the Sainte-Justine Hospital [71]. However, the effectiveness of SpineCor remains controversial. Guo et al. [72], Coillard et al. [73] and Wong et al. [74]. found significant differences between SpineCor and rigid brace group in terms of effectiveness. Whilst Gammon et al. [75] reported no significant difference in the treatment outcomes comparing thoraco-lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) and SpineCor-treated patients and Coillard et al. [76] demonstrated that SpineCor brace reduced the probability of the progression of early idiopathic scoliosis (15°–30°) after at least 5 years follow-up. However, patients’ acceptance and compliance (which have been shown to have a close correlation with the treatment efficacy [7, 77, 78]) to the SpineCor were comparable to rigid spinal orthoses. The SpineCor brace was also found to be better than TLSO at improving QoL, reported by Ersen et al. [37], patients treated with SpineCor brace have a better self-image, feel more active in daily life and experience less pain according to SRS-22 results. Whilst Misterska et al. [79] found that there was no significant difference in most of the analyzed domains of QoL between patients with the SpineCor brace and the Cheneau brace. Given the currently mixed outcomes of studies on flexible braces, we can conclude that even flexible braces, like SpineCor, has no comparable effectiveness as rigid brace, the merits of improving QoL are promising. A further challenge is in weighing potentially improved QoL against reduced effectiveness.

Mental health

Mental health/psychological stress is defined as the distress AIS patients have because of their deformity or brace. Moreover, the impact of the brace to the self and body image of adolescent is reported as a contributing factor for stress production [80, 81]. This review has found that distress associated with bracing is significantly worse than distress associated with spinal deformity, based on the reviewed literature measuring psychological stress using BSSQ. Andersen et al. [82] found that uncertainty regarding the duration of the brace treatment is one of the reasons causing psychological sequela and they suggested a flexible bracing strategy, such as part-time bracing schemes where patients were urged to participate in sports and social activities without their braces, to avoid social isolation. Lin et al. [83] compared the stress levels of juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with brace treatment and found that female adolescents were more vulnerable to depressive psychological status. Higher levels of cognitive function and independence and negative parental attitudes resulted in a greater incidence of depression.

Vitality

Vitality is evaluated by patients’ feelings of energetic and enthusiastic attitudes to daily activities [19], which directly correlates to physical performance. Our findings that show a brace’s impact on vitality corroborate with Daryabor et al. [84], who reported a review on gait and energy consumption of AIS patients treated with orthoses. They found that after 6 months of treatment, excessive oxygen consumption was observed, and results of an endurance test also show a diminished exercise capacity caused by the brace. Moreover, a significant decrease in walking speed and more excessive energy cost were found from the subjects with AIS treated with orthoses versus those without orthoses. They suggested that it could be helpful to intensively train patients with endurance exercises to improve physical performance in AIS.

Limitations

There are three limitations to this review: firstly, the methodology followed in this literature review treats all papers alike, regardless of potential quality differences, since this review aimed to capture the breadth of affected domains of QoL and to provide the results for informing future brace designs. Secondly, a risk of selection bias emerged since the results for RCTs (Randomized Controlled Trial) and non-RCTs are not separately presented to obtain more comprehensive results. RCTs would involve a direct comparison between braced and non-braced patients to provide more robust findings that non-RCTs. Thirdly, the most affected domains of QoL of patients with different severities of scoliosis have not been separated, and more specific details on the affected domains of QoL of patients wearing different braces and under different treatment stages also need to be evaluated.

Conclusion

This paper presented a literature review on the impact of bracing on the Quality of Life of scoliotic adolescents. The results indicate that self-image, mental health, and vitality are the three most frequently reported affected domains. In order to improve the QoL of scoliotic brace wearers, these three domains should be prioritized in researching and designing new bracing treatment options.

Notes

  1. https://www.zotero.org/

References

  1. SOSORT guideline committee, Weiss, H. R., Negrini, S., et al. (2006). Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines). Scoliosis, 1(1), 5.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Negrini, S., Donzelli, S., Aulisa, A. G., et al. (2018). 2016 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorder, 13(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Negrini, S., Aulisa, A. G., Aulisa, L., et al. (2012). 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis., 7, 3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz, D. E., & Durrani, A. A. (2001). Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 26(21), 2354–2361.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lou, E. H. M., Hill, D. L., Raso, J. V., et al. (2016). How quantity and quality of brace wear affect the brace treatment outcomes for AIS. European Spine Journal, 25(2), 495–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karol, L., Virostek, D., Felton, K., et al. (2016). Effect of compliance counseling on brace use and success in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 98(1), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brox, J. I., Lange, J. E., Gunderson, R. B., & Steen, H. (2012). Good brace compliance reduced curve progression and surgical rates in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal, 21(10), 1957–1963.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein, S. L., Dolan, L. A., Cheng, J. C. Y., et al. (2008). Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet, 371(9623), 1527–1537.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomaszewski, R., Janowska M. (2012). Psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment in children, recent advances in scoliosis, Dr Theodoros Grivas (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0595-4, InTech, Retrieved from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advances-in-scoliosis/psychological-aspects-of-scoliosis-treatment-in-children.

  10. Vasiliadis, E., Grivas, T. B., & Gkoltsiou, K. (2006). Development and preliminary validation of Brace Questionnaire (BrQ): A new instrument for measuring quality of life of brace treated scoliotics. Scoliosis, 1(1), 7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kinel, E., Kotwicki, T., Podolska, A., et al. (2012). Polish validation of Brace Questionnaire. European Spine Journal, 21(8), 1603–1608.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aulisa, A. G., Guzzanti, V., Galli, M., et al. (2013). Validation of Italian version of brace questionnaire (BrQ). Scoliosis, 8(1), 13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Deceuninck, J., Tirat-Herbert, A., Rodriguez Martinez, N., et al. (2017). French validation of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ). Scoliosis Spinal Disord., 12(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gur, G., Yakut, Y., & Grivas, T. (2018). The Turkish version of the Brace Questionnaire in brace-treated adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 42(2), 129–135.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan, S. L., Cheung, K. M., Luk, K. D., et al. (2014). A correlation study between in-brace correction, compliance to spinal orthosis and health-related quality of life of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Scoliosis., 9(1), 1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim, J. M., Goh, T. S., Shin, J. K., et al. (2018). Validation of the Korean version of the Brace Questionnaire. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 32(6), 678–681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aulisa, A. G. (2010). Determination of quality of life in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis subjected to conservative treatment. Scoliosis, 5, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vasiliadis, E., & Grivas, T. B. (2008). Quality of life after conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 135, 409–413.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rivett, L., Rothberg, A., Stewart, A., et al. (2009). The relationship between quality of life and compliance to a brace protocol in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 10(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vasiliadis, E., Grivas, T. B., & Savvidou, O. (2006). The influence of brace on quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 123, 352–356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Piantoni, L., Tello, C. A., Remondino, R. G., et al. (2018). Quality of life and patient satisfaction in bracing treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, 13(1), 26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimon, M., Matusik, E., Kapustka, B., et al. (2018). Conservative management strategies and stress level in children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Psychiatria Polska, 52(2), 355–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kinel, E., Kotwicki, T., Podolska, A., et al. (2013). Quality of life and stress level in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis subjected to conservative treatment. Scoliosis, 8(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kotwicki, T., Kinel, E., Stryła, W., et al. (2007). Estimation of the stress related to conservative scoliosis therapy: An analysis based on BSSQ questionnaires. Scoliosis, 2(1), 1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Misterska, E., Głowacki, M., & Harasymczuk, J. (2009). Polish adaptation of Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire-Brace and Bad Sobernheim Stress Questionnaire-Deformity. European Spine Journal, 18(12), 1911–1919.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Misterska, E., Głowacki, M., Ignys-O’Byrne, A., et al. (2011). Differences in deformity and bracing-related stress between rural and urban area patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a Cheneau brace. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 18(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leszczewska, J., Czaprowski, D., Pawłowska, P., et al. (2012). Evaluation of the stress level of children with idiopathic scoliosis in relation to the method of treatment and parameters of the deformity. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Misterska, E., Glowacki, M., & Latuszewska, J. (2012). Female patients’ and parents’ assessment of deformity- and brace- related stress in the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 37(14), 1218–1223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Misterska, E., Glowacki, M., Latuszewska, J., et al. (2013). Perception of stress level, trunk appearance, body function and mental health in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively: A longitudinal analysis. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1633–1645.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, X., Wang, F., Yang, M., et al. (2015). Chinese adaptation of the bad sobernheim stress questionnaire for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis under brace treatment. Medicine, 94(31), e1236.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rezaei Motlagh, F., Pejam, H., Babaee, T., et al. (2018). Persian adaptation of the Bad Sobernheim stress questionnaire for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42, 562–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheung, K. M. C., Cheng, E. Y. L., Chan, S. C. W., et al. (2007). Outcome assessment of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by the use of the SRS-22 questionnaire. International Orthopaedics, 31(4), 507–511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schreiber, S., Parent, E. C., Moez, E. K., et al. (2015). The effect of Schroth exercises added to the standard of care on the quality of life and muscle endurance in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis—An assessor and statistician blinded randomized controlled trial: “SOSORT 2015 Award Winner”. Scoliosis, 10(1), 24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mousavi, S. J., Mobini, B., Mehdian, H., et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of the persian version of the scoliosis research society-22r questionnaire. Spine, 35(7), 784–789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Danielsson, A. J., Hasserius, R., Ohlin, A., et al. (2012). Body appearance and quality of life in adult patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a brace or under observation alone during adolescence. Spine, 37(9), 755–762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Qiu, G., Qiu, Y., Zhu, Z., et al. (2011). Re-evaluation of reliability and validity of simplified chinese version of SRS-22 patient questionnaire: A multicenter study of 333 cases. Spine, 36(8), E545–E550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ersen, O., Bilgic, S., Koca, K., et al. (2016). Difference between Spinecor brace and Thoracolumbosacral orthosis for deformity correction and quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 82(4), 710–714.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lange, J. E., Steen, H., Gunderson, R., et al. (2011). Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in late-onset juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis, 6(1), 18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Deceuninck, J., & Bernard, J. C. (2012). Quality of life and brace-treated idiopathic scoliosis: A cross-sectional study performed at the Centre des Massues on a population of 120 children and adolescents. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(2), 93–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Simony, A., Hansen, E. J., Carreon, L. Y., et al. (2015). Health-related quality-of-life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 25 years after treatment. Scoliosis, 10(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yagci, G., Ayhan, C., & Yakut, Y. (2018). Effectiveness of basic body awareness therapy in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled study1. Journal of back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yagci, G., & Yakut, Y. (2019). Core stabilization exercises versus scoliosis-specific exercises in moderate idiopathic scoliosis treatment. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 43, 301–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheung, P. W. H., Wong, C. K. H., & Cheung, J. P. Y. (2019). An insight into the health-related quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who are braced, observed, and previously braced. Spine, 44(10), E596–E605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Larson, A. N., Baky, F., Ashraf, A., et al. (2019). Minimum 20-year health-related quality of life and surgical rates after the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deformity, 7(3), 417–427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cheung, P. W. H., Wong, C. K. H., Samartzis, D., et al. (2016). Psychometric validation of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ- 5D–5L) in Chinese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, 11(1), 19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Danielsson, A. J., & Hallerman, K. L. (2015). Quality of life in middle-aged patients with idiopathic scoliosis with onset before the age of 10 years. Spine Deformity, 3(5), 440–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Muller, C., Fuchs, K., Winter, C., et al. (2011). Prospective evaluation of physical activity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis or kyphosis receiving brace treatment. European Spine Journal, 20(7), 1127–1136.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Diarbakerli, E., Grauers, A., Danielsson, A., et al. (2018). Health-related quality of life in adulthood in untreated and treated individuals with adolescent or juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 100(10), 811–817.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Paolucci, T., Piccinini, G., Iosa, M., et al. (2017). The importance of trunk perception during brace treatment in moderate juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: What is the impact on self-image? Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 30(2), 203–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Danielsson, A. J., Hasserius, R., Ohlin, A., et al. (2010). Health-related quality of life in untreated versus brace-treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A long-term follow- up. Spine, 35(2), 199–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bunge, E. M., Juttmann, R. E., et al. (2007). Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: Short-term effects after brace or surgical treatment. European Spine Journal, 16(1), 83–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Danielsson, A. J., & Romberg, K. (2013). Reliability and validity of the swedish version of the scoliosis research society–22 (SRS-22r) patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 38(21), 1875–1884.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Danielsson, A. J., Wiklund, I., Pehrsson, K., et al. (2001). Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. European Spine Journal, 10(4), 278–288.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Danielsson, A. J., & Nachemson, A. L. (2003). Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control study—Part I. Spine, 28(18), 2078–2085.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Freidel, K., Petermann, F., Reichel, D., et al. (2002). Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 27(4), E87–E91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Andersen, M. O., Christensen, S. B., & Thomsen, K. (2006). Outcome at 10 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 31(3), 350–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Danielsson, A. J., Romberg, K., & Nachemson, A. L. (2006). Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case-control study. Spine, 31(3), 275–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Carreon, L. Y., Sanders, J. O., Polly, D. W., et al. (2011). Spinal appearance questionnaire: Factor analysis, scoring, reliability, and validity testing. Spine, 36(18), E1240–E1244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schwieger, T., Campo, S., Weinstein, S. L., et al. (2016). Body image and quality-of-life in untreated versus brace-treated females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 41(4), 311–319.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Schwieger, T., Campo, S., Weinstein, S. L., et al. (2017). Body image and quality of life and brace wear adherence in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 37(8), e519–e523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Korovessis, P., Zacharatos, S., Koureas, G., et al. (2007). Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace. European Spine Journal, 16(4), 537–546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pham, V., Houlliez, A., Carpentier, A., et al. (2008). Determination of the influence of the Cheneau brace on quality of life for adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis. Annales de Readaptation et de Mdecine Physique, 51(1), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Weigert, K. P., Nygaard, L. M., Christensen, F. B., et al. (2006). Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24. European Spine Journal, 15(7), 1108–1117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wibmer, C., Trotsenko, P., Gilg, M. M., et al. (2019). Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE). European Spine Journal, 28(3), 611–618.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ugwonali, O. F., Lomas, G., Choe, J. C., et al. (2004). Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. The Spine Journal, 4(3), 254–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang, J., He, D., Gao, J., et al. (2011). Changes in life satisfaction and self-esteem in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without surgical intervention. Spine, 36(9), 741–745.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Caronni, A., Sciume, L., Donzelli, S., et al. (2017). ISYQOL: A Rasch-consistent questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life in adolescents with spinal deformities. The Spine Journal, 17(9), 1364–1372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Topalis, C., Grauers, A., Diarbakerli, E., et al. (2017). Neck and back problems in adults with idiopathic scoliosis diagnosed in youth: An observational study of prevalence, change over a mean four year time period and comparison with a control group. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, 12(1), 20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Muller, C., Winter, C., Klein, D., et al. (2010). Objective assessment of brace wear times and physical activities in two patients with scoliosis. Biomedizinische Technik, 55(2), 117–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Law, D., Cheung, M.-C., Yip, J., et al. (2017). Scoliosis brace design: Influence of visual aesthetics on user acceptance and compliance. Ergonomics, 60(6), 876–886.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Coillard, C., Leroux, M. A., Badeaux, J., et al. (2002). SPINECOR: A new therapeutic approach for idiopathic scoliosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 88, 215–217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Guo, J., Lam, T. P., Wong, M. S., et al. (2014). A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria. European Spine Journal, 23(12), 2650–2657.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Coillard, C., Leroux, M., Zabjek, K., et al. (2003). SpineCor—A non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Post-treatment results. European Spine Journal, 12(2), 141–148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Wong, M. S., Cheng, J. C. Y., Lam, T. P., et al. (2008). The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 33(12), 1360–1365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gammon, S. R., Mehlman, C. T., Chan, W., et al. (2010). A comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthoses and SpineCor treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the scoliosis research society standardized criteria. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 30(6), 531–538.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Coillard, C., Circo, A. B., & Rivard, C. H. (2014). A prospective randomized controlled trial of the natural history of idiopathic scoliosis versus treatment with the SpineCor brace. SOSORT Award 2011 winner. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(5), 479–487.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Lou, E., Raso, J. V., Hill, D. L., et al. (2004). Correlation between quantity and quality of orthosis wear and treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 28, 49–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Rahman, T., Bowen, J. R., Takemitsu, M., et al. (2005). The association between brace compliance and outcome for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 25, 420–422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Misterska, E., Glowacki, J., Kołban, M., et al. (2018). Does rigid spinal orthosis carry more psychosocial implications than the flexible brace in AIS patients? A cross-sectional study. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 32, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Sapountzi-Krepia, D., Peterson, D., Zafiri, V., Iordanopoulou, F., et al. (2006). The experience of brace treatment in children/adolescents with scoliosis. Scoliosis, 1, 8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Sapountzi-Krepia, D., Valavanis, J., Panteleakis, G. P., et al. (2001). Perceptions of body image, happiness and satisfaction in adolescents wearing a Boston brace for scoliosis treatment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(5), 683–690.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Andersen, M. Ø., & Thomsen, K. (2002). Early weaning might reduce the psychological strain of boston bracing: A study of 136 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at 35 years after termination of brace treatment. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B, 11(2), 96–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Lin, T., Meng, Y., Ji, Z., et al. (2019). Extent of depression in juvenile and adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis during treatment with braces. World Neurosurgery, 125, e326–e335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Daryabor, A., Arazpour, M., Samadian, M., et al. (2017). Efficacy of corrective spinal orthoses on gait and energy consumption in scoliosis subjects: A literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(4), 324–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Tetteroo, D., Arts, J.J.C. et al. Quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace treatment: a brief communication of literature review. Qual Life Res 30, 703–711 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02671-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02671-7

Keywords

  • Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • Brace treatment
  • Quality of life
  • Self-image