Abstract
Introduction
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) was designed to assess the impact of the adverse effects of heart failure (HF). Numerous reports suggest an additional third factor with the proposed third factor representing a social dimension. The purpose of this study was to use confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the factor structure of the MLWHFQ, and examine a proposed third factor structure.
Methods
Participants were 1290 individuals with open heart surgery for isolated valve repair or replacement between September 2005 and May 2016. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess both initial and proposed alternate factor structures.
Results
CFA indicated a poor fit for the original proposed 2-factor solution [root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.116], whereas separate proposed 3-factor solutions with varying item scoring fit marginally well (RMSEA = 0.080, 0.089). The CFA suggests the existence of a third dimension, social, beyond the established original two-factor solution. Results suggest in a direct comparison of proposed social dimensions, both Garin’s four item solution and Munyombwe’s six-item solution provide similar results.
Conclusions
Results suggest support for an additional third factor among patients undergoing isolated valve replacement surgery. We suggest given the inclusion of items important to our population, relatively strong fit indices, and correlation with the SF-12, the social dimension proposed by Munyombwe best fits our population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roberts, W. C., & Ko, J. M. (2005). Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation, 111, 920–925.
Rector, T. S., Kubo, S. H., & Cohn, J. N. (1987). Patients’ self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3, 198–209.
Rector, T. S., & Cohn, J. N. (1992). Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group. American Heart Journal, 124[4], 1017–1025.
Garin, O., Herdman, M., Vilagut, G., et al. (2014). Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: A systematic, standardized comparison of available measures. Heart Failure Reviews, 19(3), 359–367.
Middel, B., Bouma, J., de Jongste, M., et al. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q). Clinical Rehabilitation, 15(5), 489–500.
Naveiro-Rilo, J. C., Diez-Juárez, D. M., Romero, B. A., et al. (2010). Validation of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in primary care. Revista Espanola de Cardioloia, 63(12), 1419–1427.
Munyombwe, T., Hofer, S., Fitzsimons, D., et al. (2014). An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1753–1765.
Bennet, S. J., Oldridge, N. B., Eckert, G. J., et al. (2002). Discriminant properties of commonly used quality of life measures in heart failure. Quality of Life Research, 11[4], 349–359.
Supino, P. G., Borer, J. S., Franciosa, J. A., et al. (2009). Acceptability and psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire among patients undergoing heart valve surgery: Validation and comparison with SF-36. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 15(3), 267–277.
Garin, O., Ferrer, M., Pont, A., et al. (2013). Evidence on the global measurement model of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 22(10), 2675–2684.
Moon, J. R., Jung, Y. Y., Jeon, E. S., et al. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart and Lung, 41(1), 57–66.
Lambrinou, E., Kalogirou, F., Lamnisos, D., et al. (2013). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 33[4], 229–233.
Heo, S., Moser, D. K., Riegel, B., et al. (2005). Testing the psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. Nursing Research, 54[4], 265–272.
Bilbao, A., Escobar, A., Garcia_perez, L., Navarroa, G., & Quiros, R. (2016). The Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire: Comparison of different factor structures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 23.
Ware, J. Jr., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.
Ho, C. C., Clochesy, J. M., Madigan, E., & Liu, C. C. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Nursing Research, 56(6), 441–448.
King, K. B., & Reis, H. T. (2012 Jan). Marriage and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Health Psychology, 31(1), 55–62.
Idler, E. L., Boulifard, D. A., & Contrada, R. J. (2012 Mar). Mending broken hearts: Marriage and survival following cardiac surgery. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(1), 33–49.
Funding
No funding was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to report.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This survey was approved by the Inova Health System local Institutional Review Board.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnett, S.D., Sarin, E.L., Henry, L. et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire among patients following open heart surgery for valve dysfunction. Qual Life Res 28, 267–275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2022-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2022-1