Abstract
Background
The present study evaluated the distributional and structural characteristics and explanatory power of the 23-item Brief Appraisal Inventory (BAI), a more practical appraisal measure for use in clinical research and practice.
Methods
A heterogeneous, online cohort of chronic disease patients and caregivers completed the BAI, along with demographics, comorbidities, PROMIS-10, and the Brief NEO Personality Inventory. Principal components, bivariate, and linear and logistic regression analyses addressed BAI item distributions, structure, and construct validity.
Results
The study sample (n = 592) had a mean age of 43.8 (SD = 18.5), and was 79% female. The BAI items exhibited good distributions, and principal component analysis yielded five composite scores: (1) Health Worries; (2) Interpersonal and Independence concerns; (3) Accomplishing Goals and Problem-Solving; (4) Calm, Peaceful, and Active; (5) Spiritual Growth and Altruism. The construct validity of appraisal factors is supported by their zero-order correlations with demographic, health, personality, and health-related QOL measures. Comparisons of appraisal-correlates among comorbidity-burden subgroups shed light on the mediating role that appraisal may play in adapting to chronic illness. Appraisal moderated the influence of comorbidities on emotional but not physical functioning. The performance of the BAI in explaining unique variance in physical and emotional functioning is comparable to results obtained with earlier measures.
Conclusions
The BAI provides a practical, short tool for evaluating appraisal in a wide range of assessment situations. Future research might utilize the BAI in longitudinal research aimed at detecting response-shift effects over time, and in clinical settings to improve patient-provider communication about concerns related to health, health care, or QOL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1531–1548.
Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2004). Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 14.
Schwartz, C. E., & Rapkin, B. D. (2004). Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 16.
Li, Y., & Rapkin, B. D. (2009). Classification and regression tree analysis to identify complex cognitive paths underlying quality of life response shifts: A study of individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1138–1147.
Morganstern, B. A., Bernard, B., Dalbagni, G., Shabsigh, A., & Rapkin, B. D. (2011). The psychological context of quality of life: a psychometric analysis of a novel idiographic measure of bladder cancer patients’ personal goals and concerns prior to surgery. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-10.
Rapkin, B. D., Weiss, E., Chhabra, R., Ryniker, L., Patel, S., Carness, J., et al. (2008). Beyond satisfaction: Using the dynamics of care assessment to better understand patients’ experiences in care. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6(1), 20.
Schwartz, C. E., Finkelstein, J. A., & Rapkin, B. D. (2017). Appraisal assessment in patient-reported outcome research: Methods for uncovering the personal context and meaning of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 26(26), 545–554. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1476-2.
Schwartz, C. E., Michael, W., & Rapkin, B. D. (2017). Resilience to health challenges is related to different ways of thinking: Mediators of quality of life in a heterogeneous rare-disease cohort. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1633-2.
Schwartz, C. E., Powell, V. E., & Rapkin, B. D. (2017). When global rating of change contradicts observed change: Examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time. Quality of Life Research, 26, 847–857. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1414-3.
Schwartz, C. E., Quaranto, B. R., Rapkin, B. D., Healy, B. C., Vollmer, T., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2014). Fluctuations in appraisal over time in the context of stable and non-stable health. Quality of Life Research, 23(1), 9–19. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0471-0.
Schwartz, C. E., & Rapkin, B. D. (2012). Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: A mixed methods investigation. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 381–388. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0023-4.
Schwartz, C. E., Snook, E., Quaranto, B., Benedict, R. H., Rapkin, B. D., & Vollmer, T. (2013). Cognitive reserve and appraisal in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 2(1), 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2012.07.006.
Nevadunsky, N. S., Brodt, Z., Eti, S., Selwyn, P., Rapkin, B., Einstein, M., et al. (2011). Utilization of palliative medicine in a racially and ethnically diverse population of women with gynecologic malignancies. Cancer Research, 71(8 Supplement), 5026–5026.
Nevadunsky, N. S., Gordon, S., Spoozak, L., Van Arsdale, A., Hou, Y., Klobocista, M., et al. (2014). The role and timing of palliative medicine consultation for women with gynecologic malignancies: Association with end of life interventions and direct hospital costs. Gynecologic Oncology, 132(1), 3–7.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571–579. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.571.
Major, B., Richards, C., Cooper, M. L., Cozzarelli, C., & Zubek, J. (1998). Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: an integrative model of adjustment to abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 735–752.
Rapkin, B. D., Garcia, I., Michael, W., Zhang, J., & Schwartz, C. E. (2017). Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: Introducing the Quality-of-Life Appraisal Profile version 2. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2815–2829. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1600-y.
Williams, L. A., & DeSteno, D. (2008). Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 1007–1017. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1007.
Van Gelderen, M. (2012). Perseverance strategies of enterprising individuals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(6), 630–648.
Decker, S. D., & Schulz, R. (1985). Correlates of life satisfaction and depression in middle-aged and elderly spinal cord-injured persons. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39(11), 740–745.
Finch, J. F., Okun, M. A., Barrera, M. Jr., Zautra, A. J., & Reich, J. W. (1989). Positive and negative social ties among older adults: Measurement models and the prediction of psychological distress and well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17(5), 585–605.
Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social Epidemiology, 1, 137–173.
Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2016). Distilling the essence of appraisal: A mixed methods study of people with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 793–805.
Finkelstein, J., Kallen, M. A., Quaranto, B., Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2012). Appraisal processes in people awaiting spine surgery: Investigating quality of life using mixed methods [Abstract]. Quality of Life Research, 20, 106.
Schwartz, C. E., Li, J., & Rapkin, B. D. (2016). Refining a web-based goal assessment interview: Item reduction based on reliability and predictive validity. Quality of Life Research, 25(9), 2201–2212, doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1258-x.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th edn.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 873–880.
Sangha, O., Stucki, G., Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Katz, J. N. (2003). The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Care & Research, 49(2), 156–163.
Hanmer, J., & Cherepanov, D. (2016). A single question about a respondent’s perceived financial ability to pay monthly bills explains more variance in health utility scores than absolute income and assets questions. Quality of Life Research, 25(9), 2233–2237.
Schwartz, C. E., Michael, W., Zhang, J., Rapkin, B. D., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2017). Assessing reserve-building pursuits and person characteristics: Psychometric validation of the reserve-building measure. Quality of Life Research. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1694-2.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. (24 edn.). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
StataCorp (2015). Stata: Release 14. In S. Software (Ed.), (Vol. 14). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287–311.
Jääskeläinen, R. (2010). Think-aloud protocol. Handbook of Translation Studies, 1, 371–373.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part by a grant from the Patient-Centered Outcome Research Institute (PCORI #ME-1306-00781) to Dr. Rapkin. We are grateful to Victoria Powell, M.P.H., for assistance with data management.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Rapkin declares that he is the author of the QOL Appraisal Profile, but has no conflict of interest. Ms. Garcia, Mr. Michael, and Dr. Schwartz declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rapkin, B.D., Garcia, I., Michael, W. et al. Development of a practical outcome measure to account for individual differences in quality-of-life appraisal: the Brief Appraisal Inventory. Qual Life Res 27, 823–833 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1722-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1722-2