Abstract
Purpose
To compare responses to two global health VAS of patients with rheumatoid arthritis at the same assessment within the same questionnaire.
Methods
Secondary analysis of randomised controlled trial data. Patients completed the patient global assessment VAS (PG-VAS) (horizontal 10 cm scale, left (0), right (100), no incremental markers) and EQ-5D-VAS (EQ-VAS) (vertical 20 cm scale, 100 at the top, markers at each increment of 10). Both asked “how good or bad is your health today, in your opinion, from 100 ‘Best imaginable health state’ to 0 ‘Worst imaginable health state’.” Agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation co-efficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots.
Results
Four hundred and forty-eight patients reported median PG-VAS 66 (IQR 51, 77) and EQ-VAS 65 (IQR 50, 80) scores. Correlation of the VAS scales was moderate at baseline (ICC 0.564) and longitudinally (ICC 0.503). Bland–Altman plots suggested poor concordance of the PG-VAS and EQ-VAS; the limits of agreement were ±32.3 on a 0–100 scale. PG-VAS scores were evenly distributed; EQ-VAS scores clustered at increments of 10; rounding did not improve agreement.
Conclusions
The EQ-VAS and PG-VAS scores are not interchangeable at the individual level. The EQ-VAS correlated more strongly with disease-specific and health-related quality of life measures, therefore, appears preferable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- VAS:
-
Visual analogue scales
- EQ-VAS:
-
EuroQol visual analogue scales
- PG-VAS:
-
Patient global assessment visual analogue scale
- ICC:
-
Intra-class correlation co-efficients
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- OMERACT:
-
Outcome measures for rheumatology
- QALYs:
-
Quality-adjusted life years
- RA:
-
Rheumatoid arthritis
- BROSG:
-
British rheumatoid outcome study group
- RCT:
-
Randomised controlled trial
- ACR:
-
American College of Rheumatology
- HAQ:
-
Health assessment questionnaire
- DAS28:
-
Disease activity score based on 28 swollen joint counts
- ESR:
-
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
References
Bellamy, N. (2002). WOMAC: A 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. Journal of Rheumatology, 29(12), 2473–2476.
Li, K. K., Riley, R. W., Powell, N. B., Gervacio, L., Troell, R. J., & Guilleminault, C. (2000). Obstructive sleep apnea surgery: Patient perspective and polysomnographic results. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 123(5), 572–575.
McCabe C, Stevens K. (2004). Visual analogue scales: Do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states. Health Economics and Decision Science Discussion Paper Series 2004, [cited 2008 Nov 17];04/6. Available from: URL: http://www.shef.ac.uk/content/1/c6/01/87/47/04_6FT.pdf.
Brazier, J., & McCabe, C. (2007). Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in CUA’ by Parkin and Devlin. A response: ‘Yes there is a case, but what does it add to ordinal data? Health Economics, 16(6), 645–647.
Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D., & Furlong, W. (2001). Visual analog scales: Do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Medical Decision Making, 21(4), 329–334.
Parkin, D., & Devlin, N. (2006). Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis? Health Economics, 15(7), 653–664.
Boonen, A., Maetzel, A., Drummond, M., Suarez-Almazor, M., Harrison, M. J., Welch, V., et al. (2009) The OMERACT initiative towards a reference approach to derive QALYs for economic evaluations in rheumatology. The Journal of Rheumatology, 36(9), 2045–2049.
Brazier, J., Akehurst, R., Brennan, A., Dolan, P., Claxton, K., McCabe, C., et al. (2005). Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Applied Health Economics & Health Policy, 4(4), 201–208.
Pasero, C., & McCaffery, M. (2003). Accountability for pain relief: Use of comfort-function goals. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 18(1), 50–52.
McCaffery, M., & Pasero, C. (1999). Assessment: Underlying complexities, misconceptions, and practical tools. In M. McCaffery & C. Pasero (Eds.), Pain: Clinical manual (2nd ed., pp. 35–102). St Louis: Mosby.
Stephenson, N. L., & Herman, J. A. (2000). Pain measurement: A comparison using horizontal and vertical visual analogue scales. Applied Nursing Research, 13(3), 157–158.
Huskisson, E. C. (2008). Visual analog scales. In A. J. Rush, M. B. First, & D. Blacker (Eds.), Handbook of psychiatric measures (2nd ed., pp. 570–573). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric PublishingInc.
Greiner, W. (2003). A European EQ-5D valuation set. In R. Brooks, R. Rabin, & F. de Charro (Eds.), The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: A European perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Symmons, D., Tricker, K., Harrison, M., Roberts, C., Davis, M., Dawes, P., et al. (2006). Patients with stable long-standing rheumatoid arthritis continue to deteriorate despite intensified treatment with traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs - results of the British Rheumatoid Outcome Study Group randomized controlled clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford), 45, 558–565.
OMERACT. (1993). OMERACT, Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. In Proceedings. Maastricht, The Netherlands, April 29–May 3, 1992. Journal of Rheumatology, 20(3):527–591.
Kirwan, J. R., & Reeback, J. S. (1986). Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Rheumatology, 25(2), 206–209.
DAS-SCORE.NL. (2009) DAS-3(crp). Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Cente, Nijmegen, Netherlands [cited 2009 Oct 3]. Available from: URL: http://www.das-score.nl/www.das-score.nl/index.html.
Ware, J. E., Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.
The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.
Harrison, M. J., Davies, L. M., Bansback, N. J., Ingram, M., Anis, A. H., & Symmons, D. P. (2008). The validity and responsiveness of generic utility measures in rheumatoid arthritis: A review. Journal of Rheumatology, 35(4), 592–602.
MVH Group. (1995). The measurement and valuation of health: Final report on the modelling of valuation tariffs. University of York: Centre for Health Economics.
Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.
de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1033–1039.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310.
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for Comparing Elements of A Correlation Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251.
Meng, X. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing Correlated Correlation-Coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172–175.
Harrison, M. J., Hassell, A., Dawes, P. T., Scott, D. L., Knight, S. M., Davis, M. J., et al. (2007). The overall status in rheumatoid arthritis (OSRA) measure–further evidence to support its use in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford), 46(5), 849–855.
Wells, G. A., Tugwell, P., Kraag, G. R., Baker, P. R., Groh, J., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: The patient’s perspective. Journal of Rheumatology, 20(3), 557–560.
Dixon, J. S., & Bird, H. A. (1981). Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 40(1), 87–89.
Gudex, C., Dolan, P., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale. Quality of Life Research, 5(6), 521–531.
Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., Dziedzic, K., & Dawes, P. T. (2002). Generic measures of health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: Reliability, validity and responsiveness. Rheumatology (Oxford), 41(12), 1380–1387.
Dorman, P., Slattery, J., Farrell, B., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P. (1998). Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. Stroke, 29(1), 63–68.
Schweikert, B., Hahmann, H., & Leidl, R. (2006). Validation of the EuroQol questionnaire in cardiac rehabilitation. Heart, 92(1), 62–67.
Hurst, N. P., Kind, P., Ruta, D., Hunter, M., & Stubbings, A. (1997). Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). British Journal of Rheumatology, 36(5), 551–559.
Fries, J. F., & Ramey, D. R. (1997). ‘‘Arthritis specific’’ global health analog scales assess ‘‘generic’’ health related quality-of-life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 24(9), 1697–1702.
Muchinsky, P. M. (1996). The correction for attenuation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 63–75.
Archer, K. J., Dumur, C. I., Taylor, G. S., Chaplin, M. D., Guiseppi-Elie, A., Buck, G. A., et al. (2008). A disattenuated correlation estimate when variables are measured with error: Illustration estimating cross-platform correlations. Statistics in Medicine, 27(7), 1026–1039.
Acknowledgements
The BROSG project was funded by the NHS Executive, UK (NHS HTA project number 94/45/02). The views and opinions expressed within do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS Executive. The NHS Executive commissioned this work, but played no part in the design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, report writing or decision to publish this paper. The BROSG Study Group: Dr. D. Mulherin (Cannock), Dr. S. Knight (Macclesfield), Prof D. Scott (King’s College, London), Dr. P. Dawes (Stoke-on-Trent), Dr. M. Davis (Truro). All participants of the OMERACT QALY sub-group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrison, M.J., Boonen, A., Tugwell, P. et al. Same question, different answers: a comparison of global health assessments using visual analogue scales. Qual Life Res 18, 1285–1292 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9546-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9546-3