Skip to main content
Log in

Searching for an effective accounting-based score of firm performance: a comparative study between different synthesis techniques

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The need for an effective comprehensive financial performance score of the firm derived from accounting-based variables is increasingly felt in the stream of empirical research on relationships between financial performance and other dimensions of corporate performance. The solution to this problem must be pursued in literature on statistical-mathematical techniques to synthesize financial performance through financial ratios derived from financial statements. Until now, however, studies have mainly focused on mathematical modeling and ranking of companies, without using appropriate benchmarks to verify the relevance of the scores obtained and to establish, from a comparative perspective between different techniques, which one provides the assessment that best summarizes financial performance. To make a contribution to this research gap, using a sample of 845 companies observed from 2014 to 2020, we compared Data Envelopment Analysis and Principal Component Analysis with two other applications based on new methodologies derived from the Multi-Criteria Decision Methods: The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Grey Relational Analysis. We developed the 4 techniques on a set of 9 financial ratios expressive of profitability and operating efficiency, solvency, and liquidity, and Tobin's q was used as a benchmark to compare the results provided by the 4 techniques and identify the best performing one. We found that TOPSIS is the most effective methodology for synthesizing an effective accounting-based score of the firm’s financial performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some authors (Jessop 2004; Xu 2004; Ma et al. 1999) emphasized the process of determining the weights of the financial ratios involved in the analysis. Identification of the weights is a prerogative of the scholar and it seems obvious that it should not be subjective. In this regard, Zou et al. (2006) proposed to use entropy (Shannon 1948), considered as a measure of the degree of disorder in the evaluation system.

  2. The degree of concordance between the rankings obtained from the calculation of FPS and Tobin's q (benchmark variable) can be assessed using one of the non-parametric statistic measures of rank correlation (Spearman 1904). In our case, to measure the degree of similarity between rankings, we used Spearman's ρ. Coefficient ρ is appropriate for both continuous and discrete ordinal variables and allows us to evaluate the relationship between two variables using a monotone function. Spearman’s correlation coefficient is given by \({\rho }=1-\frac{6{\sum }_{{i}}{l{d}}_{{i}}^{2}}{{n}({{n}}^{2}-1)}\), where: d is the difference between paired ranks; n is the number of paired items; ρ ranges from –1 to 1.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Bruno Ricca. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Bruno Ricca and Salvatore Loprevite. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Loprevite.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 53 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

See Appendix Tables

Table 9 "Training Set” descriptive statistics

9,

Table 10 "Test Set” descriptive statistics

10,

Table 11 Objective weights calculated with equal, grey entropy and CRITIC

11 and

Table 12 Tobin’s q of the two-sample (“Training Set” & “Test Set”) Kolmogorov–Smirnov test

12.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricca, B., Ferrara, M. & Loprevite, S. Searching for an effective accounting-based score of firm performance: a comparative study between different synthesis techniques. Qual Quant 57, 3575–3602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01522-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01522-6

Keywords

Navigation