Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the role of blockchain technology in value creation: a multiple case study approach

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The value creation potentials of blockchain technology have attracted significant attention from academia and industry. To address how blockchain technology could impact value creation at the business level, this study adopted an inductive multiple case study approach. As part of this focus, fifty-five (55) cases were selected based on maximum-variation and theoretical sampling methods. Selected cases were investigated by conducting with-in case analysis, constant comparative analysis, cross-case analysis, and synthesis and thematic analysis methods. Initially, potential sources of value creation were explored and then the business model innovations were examined to exploit pre-identified value drivers. The findings revealed that blockchain has five potential sources of value creation, including access domain extension, cost reduction, reinforcement and enrichment, new business practices, and social base enrichment. Further, several business model innovations were proposed based on the data-driven exploration to help practitioners exploit identified opportunities or value drivers. This study not only applies the current body of strategic, economics and entrepreneurship knowledge in a new field, but it also adds conceptually and empirically to the current body of blockchain literature. Furthermore, business practitioners could increase their understanding of blockchain’s opportunities to address current business challenges, make operations more efficient, foster innovation, and co-create value with stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Value Chain.

  2. Value System.

  3. Strategic Networks.

  4. Schumpeterian Innovation.

  5. Institutional Entrepreneurship.

  6. Business Model.

  7. Unit of Analysis.

  8. www.crunchbase.com.

  9. www.coindesk.com.

References

  • x. (2020). About 0x. Retrieved from https://0x.org/about/mission [accessed on 13 December 2020]

  • Abra. (2020). About Abra. Retrieved from https://www.abra.com/cryptocurrency/investing-guide/ [accessed on 26 October 2020]

  • Adner, R., Kapoor, R.: Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strateg. Manag. J. 31(3), 306–333 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A.: Business models: A strategic management approach. McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2004)

  • Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R.V., Guerrero, M.: Blockchain technology and startup financing: A transaction cost economics perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 151, 119854 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S., Wang, G., White, B., Fatima, K.: (2019). Libra Critique Towards Global Decentralized Financial System. Paper presented at the International Conference on Smart City and Informatization

  • Amit, R., Zott, C.: Value creation in e-business. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(6‐7), 493–520 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, P.: (2018). What is DigixDAO? Retrieved from https://coincentral.com/digixdao-beginners-guide/ [accessed on 30 October 2020]

  • Angelis, J., da Silva, E.R.: Blockchain adoption: A value driver perspective. Bus. Horiz. 62(3), 307–314 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajwa, N., Prewett, K., Shavers, C.L.: (2010). Is your supply chain ready to embrace blockchain? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance

  • Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Leca, B., Boxenbaum, E.: 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Manag. Ann. 3(1), 65–107 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, B., Gupta, R.: Analysis of barriers to implement blockchain in industry and service sectors. Comput. Ind. Eng. 136, 225–241 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BitPesa. (2020). About BitPesa. Retrieved from https://www.bitpesa.co/ [accessed on 14 December 2020]

  • Blocklancer. (2018). Blocklancer Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://blocklancer.net/docs/ [accessed on 27 October 2020]

  • Bocken, N.M., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S.: A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 42–56 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., Foster, P.C.: The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Manag. 29(6), 991–1013 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casino, F., Dasaklis, T.K., Patsakis, C.: A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telematics Inform. 36, 55–81 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, S., Prasad, K.: (2016). A QFD-based expert system for industrial truck selection in manufacturing organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 27(6)

  • Charg. (2020a). About Charg. Retrieved from https://chgcoin.org/ [accessed on 27 October 2020]

  • Charg. (2020b). CHARG EV CHARGING STATION WHITE PAPER. Retrieved from https://chgcoin.org/white-paper/ [accessed on 27 October 2020]

  • Chen, Y.: Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation. Bus. Horiz. 61(4), 567–575 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A.Y.L., Lim, E.T., Hua, X., Zheng, S., Tan, C.-W.: Business on chain: A comparative case study of five blockchain-inspired business models. J. Association Inform. Syst. 20(9), 9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M., Rosenbloom, R.S.: Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Res. Policy 24(2), 233–257 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N.: Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications (2016)

  • D.tube. (2019). D.tube Whitepaper. [accessed on 27 October 2020]

  • DaSilva, C.M., Trkman, P.: Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Plann. 47(6), 379–389 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D.L.: To be different, or to be the same? It’sa question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(2), 147–166 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2020). Deloitte’s 2020 global blockchain survey

  • Demil, B., Lecocq, X.: Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plann. 43(2–3), 227–246 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digix. (2020). About Digix. Retrieved from https://digix.global/#/ [accessed on 30 October 2020]

  • DiMaggio, P.: (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional patterns and organizations culture and environment, 3–21

  • Elliptic. (2020). About Elliptic Retrieved from https://www.elliptic.co/our-story [accessed on 13 December 2020]

  • Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E.A., Barlow, C.Y.: Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Bus. Strategy Environ. 26(5), 597–608 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everledger. (2020). About Everledger. Retrieved from https://www.everledger.io/about/ [accessed on 30 October 2020]

  • Forbes. (2018). Scaling AR With Blockchain Technology. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/alicebonasio/2018/07/18/scaling-ar-with-blockchain-technology/#4e9e7bf41ecc [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • Foss, N.J.: The strategic management and transaction cost nexus: past debates, central questions, and future research possibilities. Strategic Organ. 1(2), 139–169 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galunic, D.C., Rodan, S.: Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(12), 1193–1201 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser Barney, G., Strauss Anselm, L.: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York, Adline de Gruyter (1967)

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., Zaheer, A.: Strategic networks. Strateg. Manag. J. 21(3), 203–215 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., Teubner, T.: The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 29, 50–63 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y.K., Misra, S.K., Rana, N.P., Raghavan, V., Akella, V.: Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49, 114–129 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyperledger. (2018). An Introduction to Hyperledger. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/HL_Whitepaper_IntroductiontoHyperledger.pdf [accessed on 2 November 2020]

  • Hyperledger. (2020). About Hyperledger. Retrieved from https://www.hyperledger.org/about [accessed on 2 November 2020]

  • imusify. (2020). imusify Whitepaper. [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G.: A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. J. Manag. 29(6), 963–989 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R.D., Webb, J.W.: Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Bus. Horiz. 50(1), 49–59 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarillo, J.C.: On strategic networks. Strateg. Manag. J. 9(1), 31–41 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Van de Ven, A.H.: (2017). A framework for entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset, 66–85

  • Jones, G.R., Hill, C.W.: Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strateg. Manag. J. 9(2), 159–172 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandaswamy, R., Furlonger, D., Stevens, A.: Digital disruption profile: Blockchain’s radical promise spans business and society. Gartner. In (2019)

  • Kazan, E., Tan, C.-W., Lim, E.T.: (2015). Value Creation in Cryptocurrency Networks: Towards A Taxonomy of Digital Business Models for Bitcoin Companies. Paper presented at the PACIS

  • Kshetri, N.: 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 39, 80–89 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.B., Montgomery, D.B.: First-mover advantages. Strateg. Manag. J. 9(S1), 41–58 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G., Lipparini, A.: The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(4), 317–338 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, H., Yan, D.: (2021). Blockchain architecture and its applications in a bank risk mitigation framework. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–19

  • Mazzei, M.J., Ketchen, D.J., Shook, C.L.: Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: a “theoretical toolbox” approach. Int. Entrepreneurship Manage. J. 13(2), 631–663 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage (1994)

  • modum. (2017). modum Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://modum.io/sites/default/files/documents/2018-05/modum-whitepaper-v.-1.0.pdf?utm_source=icogrind [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • modum. (2020). About modum. Retrieved from https://modum.io/company/aboutus [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • Morabito, V.: Business innovation through blockchain. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morkunas, V.J., Paschen, J., Boon, E.: How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Bus. Horiz. 62(3), 295–306 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mybit. (2020). About Mybit. Retrieved from https://mybit.io/howitworks [accessed on 31 October 2020]

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons (2010)

  • PeerNova. (2020). Abot PeerNova. Retrieved from https://peernova.com/ [accessed on 13 December 2020]

  • Pokitdok. (2020). About Pokitdok. Retrieved from https://pokitdok.com/ [accessed on 14 December 2020]

  • Porter, M.E.: Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press: New York (1985a)

  • Porter, M.E.: Technology and competitive advantage. J. Bus. Strategy 5(3), 60 (1985b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E.: (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring business excellence

  • Porter, M.E., Millar, V.E.: How information gives you competitive advantage. In: Harvard Business Review Reprint Service (1985)

  • Qiu, T., Zhang, R., Gao, Y.: Ripple vs. SWIFT: Transforming Cross Border Remittance Using Blockchain Technology. Procedia Comput. Sci. 147, 428–434 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayport, J.F., Sviokla, J.J.: Exploiting the virtual value chain. Harvard Business Rev. 73(6), 75–75& (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejeb, A., Keogh, J.G., Simske, S.J., Stafford, T., Treiblmaier, H.: (2021). Potentials of blockchain technologies for supply chain collaboration: a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Logistics Management. Volume 32, Issue 3

  • Ripe.io. (2020). About ripe.io. Retrieved from https://www.ripe.io/about [accessed on 13 December 2020]

  • Ripple. (2020). About Ripple. Retrieved from www.ripple.com [accessed on 31 October 2020]

  • RNDR. (2020a). About Render Token. Retrieved from https://rendertoken.com/index#about [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • RNDR. (2020b). About, R.N.D.R. Retrieved from https://rendertoken.com/faqs [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • Schlecht, L., Schneider, S., Buchwald, A.: The prospective value creation potential of Blockchain in business models: A delphi study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 166, 120601 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, C.G., Wagner, S.M.: Blockchain and supply chain relations: A transaction cost theory perspective. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 25(4), 100552 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

  • Shamma, H., Hassan, S.: (2013). Customer-driven benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal

  • Simon, H.A.: Bounded Rationality. Utility and Probability. Palgrave Macmillan, London (1987)

  • Śledzik, K.: (2013). Schumpeter’s view on innovation and entrepreneurship. Management Trends in Theory and Practice,(ed.) Stefan Hittmar, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics, University of Zilina & Institute of Management by University of Zilina

  • Spanò, R., Massaro, M., Iacuzzi, S.: (2021). Blockchain for value creation in the healthcare sector. Technovation, 102440

  • Stabell, C.B., Fjeldstad, ØD.: Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strateg. Manag. J. 19(5), 413–437 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • starbase. (2020). About starbase. Retrieved from https://starbase.co/launch [accessed on 1 November 2020]

  • Status. (2017). The Status Network. Retrieved from https://status.im/files/whitepaper.pdf [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • Status. (2020). About Status. Retrieved from https://status.im/faq/ [accessed on 28 October 2020]

  • Suncontract. (2017). Suncontract Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://suncontract.org/tokensale/res/whitepaper.pdf [accessed on 29 October 2020]

  • Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A.: How blockchain will change organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review 58(2), 10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.L.: (1999). A strategic perspective of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research

  • Tönnissen, S., Teuteberg, F.: Analysing the impact of blockchain-technology for operations and supply chain management: An explanatory model drawn from multiple case studies. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 52, 101953 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travizano, M., Sarraute, C., Dolata, M., French, A.M., Treiblmaier, H.: Wibson: A Case Study of a Decentralized, Privacy-Preserving Data Marketplace. In: Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases, pp. 149–170. Springer (2020)

  • Underwood, S.: Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Commun. ACM 59(11), 15–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtanen, K., Backman, J., Yrjölä, S.: Blockchain-powered value creation in the 5G and smart grid use cases. IEEE Access. 7, 25690–25707 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weking, J., Mandalenakis, M., Hein, A., Hermes, S., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: (2019). The impact of blockchain technology on business models–a taxonomy and archetypal patterns. Electronic Markets, 30, 1–21

  • Wernerfelt, B.: A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5(2), 171–180 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G.R.: Future applications of blockchain in business and management: A Delphi study. Strategic change 26(5), 439–451 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibson. (2020). About Wibson. Retrieved from https://wibson.io/#/faq [accessed on 30 October 2020]

  • Will Warren, Bandeali, A.: (2017). 0x: An open protocol for decentralized exchange onthe Ethereum blockchain. Retrieved from https://0x.org/pdfs/0x_white_paper.pdf

  • Williamson, O.E.: Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Ind. Corp. Change 2(2), 107–156 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed. De Econ. 146(1), 23–58 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B.W., Schilke, O., Ullrich, S.: Strategic development of business models: implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Plann. 43(2–3), 272–290 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeadally, S., Abdo, J.B.: Blockchain: Trends and future opportunities. Internet Technol. Lett. 2(6), e130 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plann. 43(2–3), 216–226 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37(4), 1019–1042 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Abdollahi & Faraz Sadeghvaziri

  2. Doctoral School of Regional Sciences and Business Administration, Széchenyi István University, 9026, Győr, Hungary

    Abderahman Rejeb

Authors
  1. Alireza Abdollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faraz Sadeghvaziri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abderahman Rejeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faraz Sadeghvaziri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdollahi, A., Sadeghvaziri, F. & Rejeb, A. Exploring the role of blockchain technology in value creation: a multiple case study approach. Qual Quant 57, 427–451 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01348-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01348-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation