Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: a “theoretical toolbox” approach

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This manuscript provides a foundation for future research on strategic entrepreneurship (SE) through the application of nine prominent organizational theories. Specifically, we apply a “theoretical toolbox” approach to examine SE through the lens of general systems, institutional, organizational ecology, strategic choice, upper echelons, real options, agency, network, and social identity theories. We consider the implications for SE offered by these perspectives and, using insights from each organizational theory, reflect on the nature of the challenges faced by firms when attempting the simultaneous exploration and exploitation required by SE. More broadly, the application of diverse theoretical perspectives is encouraged individually and in combination within future SE research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. (2010). Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 263–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2000). Entrepreneurial capabilities: a resource-based view. In G. D. Meyer & K. Heppard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as strategy: competing on the entrepreneurial edge (pp. 63–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 815–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Plummer, L. A. (2009). Agency and governance in strategic entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. (2015). Here's how Zen meditation changed Steve Jobs' life and sparked a design revolution. http://www.businessinsider.com/steve-jobs-zen-meditation-buddhism-2015-1. Accessed 24 July 2015.

  • Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1998). Koch industries: organizational identity as moral philosophy. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: developing theory through conversations (pp. 106–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory: the skeleton of science. Management Science, 2(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Wenpin, T. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A., & Grove, A. S. (2007). Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—repeatedly: managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 965–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment, and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations, and environment: retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, T., Bluedorn, A., & Gupta, V. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: a radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(4), 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, T. S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2006). Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: the case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. (2011). Toward a "theoretical toolbox" for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J. E., Deeds, D. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2009). Placing the choice between exploration and exploitation in context: a study of geography and new product development. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(3), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., Harquail, C., Pratt, M., Glynn, M. A., Fiol, C. M., & Hatch, M. J. (2006). Guiding organizational identity through aged adolescence. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(2), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2002). The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic leadership. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset (pp. 309–327). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D., & Heller, T. (1994). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards (strategic management series). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M. (2001). Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6), 691–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folta, T. B. (2005). Are real options "real?". In D. J. Ketchen & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 2, pp. 93–109). New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Folta, T. B., & Miller, K. D. (2002). Real options in equity partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, T. (2014). Kevin Plank's formula for Under Armour's innovative design. .http://www.inc.com/magazine/201407/tom-foster/kevin-planks-formula-for-under-armours-innovative-design.html. Accessed 1 September 2016

  • Foster, T. (2016). Kevin Plank is betting almost $1 billion that Under Armour can beat Nike. http://www.inc.com/magazine/201602/tom-foster/kevin-plank-under-armour-spending-1-billion-to-beat-nike.html. Accessed 1 September 2016.

  • Gartner, W. B. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google (2015). https://www.google.com/intl/en/about/. Accessed 20 July 2015.

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Tesluk, P. E., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science, 18(6), 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustin, S. (2013). Two years after Steve Jobs’ death, is Apple a different company? http://business.time.com/2013/10/04/two-years-after-steve-jobs-death-is-apple-a-different-company/. Accessed 24 July 2015.

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: an update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 369–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55(8), 989–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J., Schultz, M., & Skov, A. M. (2015). Organizational identity and culture in the context of managed change: transformation in the Carlsberg group, 2009–2013. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(1), 58–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2002). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Sirmon, D. G., & Trahms, C. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations and society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (1993). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: from attraction to social identity. London, U.K.: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Florence, KY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers' corporate entrepreneurial actions: examining perception and position. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J. S. (2013). Competing for advantage (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2009). Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship: transitioning between exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 52(5), 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2002). A framework for entrepreneurial strategy. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset (pp. 66–86). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & Butler, J. E. (1992). Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: an agency theory perspective. Journal of Management, 18(4), 733–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: the case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 573–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2014). Toward a research agenda for the informal economy: a survey of the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal's editorial board. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(1), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. (2015). Wall Street believes Amazon has a $160 billion business under its roof. http://www.businessinsider.com/aws-estimated-to-be-worth-160-billion-2015-11. Accessed 10 August 2016.

  • Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2013). Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 70–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingebiel, R. (2012). Options in the implementation plan of entrepreneurial initiatives: examining firms' attainment of flexibility benefit. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(4), 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia's corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyrgidou, L. P., & Hughes, M. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship: origins, core elements and research directions. European Business Review, 22(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. S. K., Morse, E. A., Mitchell, R. K., & Seawright, K. K. (2010). Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions: a comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, Y. A. N., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Yan, L., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckerson, V. (2015). Netflix accounts for more than a third of all internet traffic. http://time.com/3901378/netflix-internet-traffic/. Accessed 28 July 2015.

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. (2008). The effect of CEOs on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1357–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masnick, M. (2011). Jeff Bezos on innovation: Stubborn on vision, flexible on details. https://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110608/23514814631/jeff-bezos-innovation-stubborn-vision-flexible-details.shtml. Accessed 12 June 2015.

  • Mayer, K. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2013). Integrating theories in AMJ articles. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 917–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 707–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, S. C., Storey, D., & Thomas, H. (2002). Discovery and coordination in strategic management and entrepreneurship. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset (pp. 45–65). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: a moderated mediation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(2), 128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011). Miller (1983) revisited: a reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. I. (2012). The mortality problem of learning and mimetic practice in emerging industries: dying to be legitimate. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(1), 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsen, E., & Boss, R. W. (2009). The impact of strategic entrepreneurship inside the organization: examining job stress and employee retention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosakowski, E. (2002). Overcoming resource disadvantages in entrepreneurial firms: when less is more. In M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, S. M. Camp, & D. L. Sexton (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset (pp. 106–126). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2009). An assessment of the small business innovation research program (policy and global affairs; Committee for Capitalizing on science technology and innovation). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peery, N. S. (1972). General systems theory: an inquiry into its social philosophy. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, C. R., & Combs, J. G. (2013). Insights from family science: the case of innovation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1421–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm (4th ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, I. (2002). Ford's suppliers encouraged to park nearby. http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/09/23/1032734113690.html. Accessed 10 August 2016.

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (1992). CFOs and strategists: forging a common framework. Harvard Business Review, 70(3), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R. D. (1999). Developing a process model of intrapreneurial systems: a cognitive mapping approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindehutte, M., & Morris, M. H. (2009). Advancing strategic entrepreneurship research: the role of complexity science in shifting the paradigm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 241–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic devlopment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shook, C. L., Adams, G. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Craighead, C. (2009). Towards a "theoretical toolbox" for strategic sourcing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J., & Poliquin, C. (2012). Yum! Brands (HBS 9–712-422). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotte-Kock, S., & Coviello, N. (2010). Entrepreneurship research on network processes: a review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, P. H., Mahmood, I. P., & Mitchell, W. (2004). Dynamic inducements in R&D investment: market signals and network locations. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 907–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, A. (2015). Ford opens new Silicon Valley research center led by former Apple engineer. http://www.forbes.com/sites/aarontilley/2015/01/22/ford-silicon-valley-research-center/ - 49f0bbca96ec. Accessed 3 September 2016.

  • Tolman, E. C. (1943). Identification and the postwar world. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(2), 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M. (2012). Is Nike's Flyknit the swoosh of the future? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-03-15/is-nikes-flyknit-the-swoosh-of-the-future. Accessed 10 August 2016.

  • Trevis Team (2013). Where is Netflix's DVD business headed? http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2013/04/16/where-is-netflixs-dvd-business-headed/. Accessed 10 April 2015.

  • Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, W., Monsen, E., & McKelvie, A. (2011). The organizational pervasiveness of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 895–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, S. E. (2014). Existing and emerging methods for integrating theories within and between disciplines. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 11(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brock School of Business, Samford University, 800 Lakeshore Drive, Birmingham, AL, 35229, UK

    Matthew J. Mazzei

  2. Harbert College of Business, Auburn University, 405 W. Magnolia Ave., Auburn, AL, 36849, USA

    David J. Ketchen Jr.

  3. School of Business Adminstration, University of Montana, 32 Campus Dr., Missoula, MT, 59812, USA

    Christopher L. Shook

Authors
  1. Matthew J. Mazzei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J. Ketchen Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher L. Shook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Mazzei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzei, M.J., Ketchen, D.J. & Shook, C.L. Understanding strategic entrepreneurship: a “theoretical toolbox” approach. Int Entrep Manag J 13, 631–663 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0419-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0419-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation