Abstract
In this study, we examine the volatility of exchange rates to exogenous monetary shocks by dividing the volatility into subsections of “interdependence” and “contagion” during FED’s easing for the period from 2010:11 to 2018:7. Conventional methods are neither suitable to differentiate those components nor to identify the co-movements concerning time and frequency analysis, which are critical for timing in asset management and policymaking. Therefore, wavelet analysis is introduced to differentiate such components.
The contribution of the study is threefold: First, this study compensates for the lack of research capturing the volatility structure of exchange rates during exogenous shocks. Second, we show both the long-term and short-term impact with associated frequency ranges. Third, we show that identifying the impact of a shock in different components and frequency ranges can provide valuable insights for the timing of market preventions and asset allocation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The colour code bar next to Fig. 6, shows the range from blue colour (weak consistency) to red colour (strong consistency).
The results of the robustness checks of the paper are included in the appendix section.
References
Addo, P.M., M. Billio, Guégan, D.: Nonlinear dynamics and wavelets for business cycle analysis, (Dynamic modeling and econometrics in economics and finance). By editors Marco Gallegati and Willi Semmler, Springer (2014)
Aguiar-Conraria, L., Soares, M.: Business cycle synchronization and the Euro: a wavelet analysis. J. Macroecon. 33(3), 477–489 (2011)
Aguiar-Conraria, L., Magalhães, P.C., Soares, M.J.: The nationalization of electoral cycles in the United States: a wavelet analysis. Public Choice 156(3–4), 387–408 (2013)
Ahmad, W., Sehgal, S., Bhanumurthy, N.R.: Eurozone crisis and BRIICKS stock markets: contagion or market interdependence? Econ. Model. 33, 209–225 (2013)
Aloui, C., Hkiri, B.: Co-movements of GCC emerging stock markets: new evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Econ. Model. 36, 421–431 (2014)
Antonakakis, N.: Exchange return co-movements and volatility spillovers before and after the introduction of Euro. J. Int. Finance Markets. Inst. Money 22(5), 1091–1109 (2012)
Beirne, J., Gieck, J.: Interdependence and contagion in global asset markets. Rev. Int. Econ. 22(4), 639–659 (2014)
Bekiros, S., Marcellino, M.: The multiscale causal dynamics of foreign exchange markets. J. Int. Money Finance 33, 282–305 (2013)
Bilgili, F.: Business cycle co-movements between renewables consumption and industrial production: a continuous wavelet coherence approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52, 325–332 (2015)
Bilgili, F., Ozturk, I., Kocak, E., Bulut, U., Pamuk, Y., Muğaloğlu, E., Bağlıtaş, H.H.: The influence of biomass energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a wavelet coherence approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 19043–19061 (2016)
Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S., Toğuç, N., Muğaloğlu, E., Koçak, E., Bulut, Ü., Bağlıtaş, H.H.: A revisited renewable consumption-growth nexus: a continuous wavelet approach through disaggregated data. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 107, 1–19 (2019)
Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S., Ünlü, F., Gençoğlu, P.: Does waste energy usage mitigate the CO2 emissions? A time-frequency domain analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 5056–5073 (2020a)
Bilgili, F., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Kuşkaya, S., Ünlü, F., Gençoğlu, P., Rosha, P.: The role of hydropower energy in the level of CO2 emissions: an application of continuous wavelet transform. Renew Energy 178, 283–294 (2021a)
Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., Kuşkaya, S., Bulut, Ü.: Estimation of the co-movements between biofuel production and food prices: a wavelet-based analysis. Energy. 213, 118777 (2020b).
Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S., Gençoğlu, P. Kassouri, Y., Majok Garang, A.P.: The co-movements between geothermal energy usage and CO2 emissions through high and low frequency cycles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 63723–63738 (2021b).
Bodart, V., Candelon, B.: Evidence of interdependence and contagion using a frequency domain framework. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 10, 140–150 (2009)
Boubaker, B., Zorgati, M.B.S., Bannour, N.: Interdependence between exchange rates: evidence from multivariate analysis since the financial crisis to the COVID-19 crisis. Econ. Anal. Policy 71, 592–608 (2021)
Breitung, J., Candelon, B.: Testing for short- and long-run causality: a frequency domain approach. J. Econ. 12, 363–378 (2006)
Chen, W.Y., Wen, M.J., Lin, Y.H., et al.: On the relationship between healthcare expenditure and longevity: evidence from the continuous wavelet analyses. Qual. Quant. 53(50), 1041–1057 (2016)
Crowley, P.: An intuitive guide to wavelets for economists. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers (2005).
Dajcman, S., Festic, M., Kavkler, A.: European stock market comovement dynamics during some major financial market turmoils in the period 1997 to 2010 – a comparative DCC-GARCH and wavelet correlation analysis. Appl. Econ. Lett. 19 (13), 1249–1256 (2012)
Daubechies, I.: The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Transact. Inform. Theory 36 (5), 961–1005 (1990)
Dias, A., Embrechts, P.: Modeling exchange rate dependence dynamics at different time horizons. J. Int. Money Finance 29, 1687–1705 (2010)
Engle, R.F., Ito, T., Lin, W.L.: Meteor showers or heat waves? Heteroskedastic intra-daily volatility in the foreign exchange market. Econometrica 58(3), 525–542 (1990)
Flavin, T.J., Sheenan, L.: The role of US subprime mortgage-backed assets in propagating the crisis: contagion or interdependence? North. Am. J. Econ. Finance 34, 167–186 (2015)
Gallegati, M.: A wavelet-based approach to test for financial market contagion. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 3491–3497 (2012)
Gomez-Gonzalez, J.E., Rojas-Espinosa, W.: Detecting contagion in Asian exchange rate markets using asymmetric DCC-GARCH and R-vine copulas. Econ. Syst. 43, 100717 (2019)
Jung, R.C., Maderitsch, R.: Structural breaks in volatility spillovers between international financial markets: contagion or mere interdependence? J. Bank. Finance. 47, 331–342 (2014)
Kassouri, Y., Bilgili, F., Kuşkaya, S.: A wavelet-based model of world oil shocks interaction with CO2 emissions in the US. Environ. Sci. Policy 127, 280–292 (2022)
Kenourgios, D., Dimitriou, D.: Contagion of the global financial crisis and the real economy: a regional analysis. Econ. Model. 44, 283–293 (2015)
Kuşkaya, S., Bilgili, F.: The wind energy-greenhouse gas nexus: the wavelet-partial wavelet coherence model approach. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 1–14 (2020)
Loaiza-Maya, R.A., Gómez-González, J.E., Melo-Velandia, L.F.: Exchange rate contagion in Latin America. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 34, 355–367 (2015)
Morlet, J., Grossmann, A.: Decomposition of hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15(4), 723–736 (1984)
Nekhili, R., Salih, S.A., Gençay, R.: Exploring exchange rate returns at different time horizons. Physica A 313, 671–682 (2002)
Nikkinen, J., Sahlström, P., Vähämaa, S.: Implied volatility linkages among major European currencies. J. Int. Finan. Markets. Inst. Money 16(2), 87–103 (2006)
Nikkinen, J., Seppo, P., Mikko, R., Vähämaa, S.: Cross-dynamics of exchange rate expectations: a wavelet analysis. Int. J. Financ. Econ. 16(3), 205–217 (2011)
Perez-Rodriguez, J.V.: The Euro and other major currencies floating against the US dollar. Atl. Econ. J. 34(4), 367–384 (2006)
Ranta, M.: Contagion among major world markets: a wavelet approach. Int. J. Manag. Finance 9, 133–149 (2013)
Rua, A.: A Wavelet Approach for Factor-Augmented Forecasting. Working Papers w201007, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department (2010)
Rua, A., Nunes, L.C.: International comovement of stock market returns: a wavelet analysis. J. Empir. Financ. 16, 632–639 (2009)
Scippacercola, S., Petrillo, Z., Mangiacapra, A., et al.: Multivariate approach to evaluate the relationship among geophysical and geochemical variables during an unrest period at Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy). Qual. Quant. 53, 2473–2489 (2019)
Shehzad, K., Bilgili, F., Zaman, U., Kocak, E., Kuskaya, S.: Is gold favourable than bitcoin during the COVID-19 outbreak? Comparative analysis through wavelet approach. Resour. Policy 73, 102163 (2021)
Tamakoshi, G., Hamori, S.: Co-movements among major European exchange rates: a multivariate time-varying asymmetric approach. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 31, 105–113 (2014)
Toğuç, N.: Dolar arzi ile dolar kuru ve tahvil faizleri arasindaki koentegrasyon İlişkisi: ARDL sinir testi yaklaşımı. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 60, 711–733 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.863912
Torrence, C., Compo, G.P.: A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 79(1), 61–78 (1998)
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no confict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
As robustness checks, this work followed first cointegration analyses through VAR with lag = 2. Johansen cointegration model estimation indicates that there exists a long-run cointegration equilibrium between USDTRY and DXY. Following the cointegration equilibrium given below, one might indicate that DXY has a significant positive impact on USDTRY.
This work launched later Markov Regime Switching model (MRSM) estimations. The below MRSM outputs reveal that DXY has a significant positive effect on USDTRY during both Regime 0 and Regime 1 while one lagged DXY has a significant negative impact on USDTRY during both regimes. Regime 0 denotes high volatile periods as Regime 1 refers to less volatile periods. Regime 0 periods include 794 days (39.70%) of the total sample with an average duration of 61.08 days while Regime 1 periods include 1206 days (60.30%) of the total sample with an average duration of 92.77 days. The top figure reveals fitted USDTRY through MRSM. The green area refers to Regime 0 data points while the white area denotes the Regime 1 data points. The middle figure and the figure at the bottom exhibit the probability of smoothed Regime 0 (green area) and probability of smoothed Regime 1 (gray area), respectively. Both analyzes give results that support wavelet analysis observing significant co-movements between the variables.
Coefficient | Std.Error | t-value | t-prob | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Constant(0) | −0.0176051 | 0.009001 | −1.96 | 0.051 |
Constant(1) | 0.0179128 | 0.002038 | 8.79 | 0.000 |
USDTRY_1(0) | 0.993207 | 0.002089 | 476 | 0.000 |
USDTRY_1(1) | 0.989534 | 0.001368 | 724 | 0.000 |
DXY(0) | 0.0186713 | 0.002450 | 7.62 | 0.000 |
DXY(1) | 0.0160715 | 0.001337 | 12.0 | 0.000 |
DXY_1(0) | −0.0185133 | 0.002466 | −7.51 | 0.000 |
DXY_1(1) | −0.0160839 | 0.001337 | −12.0 | 0.000 |
Trend(0) | 1.85572e-005 | 9.155e-006 | 2.03 | 0.043 |
Trend(1) | 7.42172e-006 | 6.345e-006 | 1.17 | 0.242 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuşkaya, S., Toğuç, N. & Bilgili, F. Wavelet coherence analysis and exchange rate movements. Qual Quant 56, 4675–4692 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01327-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01327-7