Abstract
Internet penetration (NET) brings new opportunities as well as challenges to countries all over the world. It can narrow the rural–urban income inequality (RUI), because it increases the connections of rural areas to the urban areas from both the production side and consumption side. It can also enlarge the RUI, because the internet may be skill-biased. Meanwhile, income level and the RUI may lead to different local internet development. However, the relationship between NET and RUI remains unclarified. This study applies the method of bootstrap panel Granger causality to explore the causal relationship between NET and RUI. The estimation results show that the causal relationship between NET and RUI varies across different provinces and regions, which is in line with the hypothesis of the inverted U-shaped technological Kuznets curve (TKC). Specifically, the NET does Granger-cause RUI in two-fifths of China’s provinces, primarily in North China and East China, while RUI does not Granger-cause NET in China since the NET itself is largely dependent on government policies. Therefore, policymakers should develop fair internet development policies targeting the improvement of rural and urban income distribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., Mogstad, M.: The skill complementarity of broadband internet. Q. J. Econ. 130(4), 1781–1824 (2015)
Bauer, J.M.: The internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society. Telecom. Policy 42(4), 333–343 (2018)
Breitung, J.: A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data. Econom. Rev. 24(2), 151–173 (2005)
Breusch, T.S., Pagan, A.R.: The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Studies 47(1), 239–253 (1980)
Briglauer, W., Durr, N.S., Falck, O., Huschelrath, K.: Does state aid for broadband deployment in rural areas close the digital and economic divide? Inf. Econ. Policy 46, 68–85 (2019)
Cheng, M., Zhang, J.: Internet popularization and urban-rural income gap: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Chin. Rur. Econ. 410(02), 19–41 (2019)
Chinn, M.D., Fairlie, R.W.: The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Econ. Pap. 59(1), 16–44 (2007)
Deursen, A., Dijk, J.: The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media Soc. 21(2), 354–375 (2019)
Dijk, J., Hacker, K.: The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inform. Soc. 19(4), 315–326 (2003)
Dumitrescu, E.I., Hurlin, C.: Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model. 29(4), 1450–1460 (2012)
Fang, X.D., Pan, K.W., Li, Z.M., Zhang, J.: China’s internet development of 20 years: three waves and three innovations. J Rev. 4, 3–14 (2014)
Fong, M.: Digital divide between urban and rural regions in China. Elect. J. Inf. Sys. Dev. Coun. 36(1), 1–12 (2009)
Forman, C., Goldfarb, A., Greenstein, S.: The internet and local wages: a puzzle. Am. Econ. Rev. 102(1), 556–575 (2012)
Gao, Y., Zang, L., Sun, J.: Does computer penetration increase farmers’ income? an empirical study from China. Telecom. Policy 42(5), 345–360 (2018)
Ghosh, S.: Impact of economic growth volatility on income inequality: ASEAN experience. Qual. Quant. 54, 807–850 (2020)
Gourieroux, C., Holly, A., Monfort, A.J.: Likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and Kuhn-Tucker test in linear models with inequality constraints on the regression parameters. Econometrica 50(1), 63–80 (1982)
Granger, C.W.J.: Commentary-some aspects of causal relationships. J. Econom 112(1), 69–71 (2003)
Han, X., Song, W., Li, B.: Can the Internet become a new momentum to improve the efficiency of regional innovation in China. China Ind. Econ. 7, 119–136 (2019)
Hindman, D.B.: The rural-urban digital divide. J Mass Commun. Q. 77(3), 549–560 (2000)
Houngbonon GV, Liang J.: Broadband Internet and Income Inequality. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2963860 (2019). Accessed 10 May 2019
Ivus, O., Boland, M.: The employment and wage impact of broadband deployment in Canada. Can. J. Econ. 48(5), 1803–1830 (2015)
Kim, S.: Technological kuznets curve? technology, income inequality, and government policy. Asia Res Policy 3, 33–49 (2012)
Kónya, L.: Exports and growth: granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Econ. Model. 23(6), 978–992 (2006)
Kuznets, S.: Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45(1), 1–28 (1955)
Li, R., Shiu, A.: Internet diffusion in China: a dynamic panel data analysis. Telecom. Policy 36(10), 872–887 (2012)
Liu, C., Jayakar, K.: The evolution of telecommunications policy-making: comparative analysis of China and India. Telecom. Policy 36(1), 13–28 (2012)
Liu, X., Han, Q.: The influence of Internet usage of rural residents on income and its mechanism: based on China family panel studies (CFPS) data. J. Agr. Econ. 9, 124–134 (2018)
Lu, M., Chen, Z.: Urbanization, urban-biased economic policies and urban-rural inequality. Econ. Stud. 6(5), 50–58 (2004)
Mark, N.C., Ogaki, M., Sul, D.J.: Dynamic seemingly unrelated cointegrating regressions. Rev. Econ. Studies. 72(3), 797–820 (2005)
McLachlan, G.J.: On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test stastistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Appl. Stat. 36(3), 318–324 (1987)
Pradhan, R.P., Bele, S., Pandey, S.: Internet-growth nexus: evidence from cross-country panel data. Appl. Econ. Lett. 20(16), 1511–1515 (2013)
Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B., Norman, N.R., Bennett, S.E.: Financial depth, internet penetration rates and economic growth: country-panel evidence. Appl. Econ. 48(4), 331–343 (2016)
Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B., Nair, M., Bennett, S.E., Hall, J.H.: The information revolution, innovation diffusion and economic growth: an examination of causal links in European countries. Qual. Quant. 53(3), 1529–1563 (2019)
Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in Panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
Pesaran, M.H.: Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4), 967–1012 (2006)
Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A., Yamagata, T.: A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Economet. J. 11(1), 105–127 (2008)
Qiang, L., Zou, L., Yang, X., Kong, B.: Research on mechanism of government support on inclusive entrepreneurship: case study of Jieyang Junpu rural e-commerce entrepreneurial cluster. South Econ. 1, 42–56 (2016)
Qiu, L., Zhao, D.: Urban inclusiveness and income inequality in China. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 74(1), 57–64 (2019)
Qiu, Z., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Li, G.: From the digital divide to the connectivity dividend difference: a connectivity capital perspective. Social Sci. in China 40(1), 63–81 (2019)
Romer, P.M.J.: Increasing returns and long-run growth. Q. J. Econ. 94(5), 1002–1037 (1986)
Sarafidis, V., Robertson, D.: On the impact of error cross-sectional dependence in short dynamic panel estimation. Economet. J. 12(1), 62–81 (2009)
Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., van Dijk, J.: Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. a systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telemat Inform 34(8), 1607–1624 (2017)
Su, C.W., Li, Z., Tao, R.: Can economic development boost the active female labor force? Qual. Quant. 53, 1021–1036 (2019a)
Su, C.W., Song, Y., Ma, Y.T., Tao, R.: Is financial development narrowing the urban–rural income gap? a cross-regional study of China. Pap. Reg. Sci. 98(4), 1779–1800 (2019b)
Swamy, P.A.V.B.: Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38(2), 311–323 (1970)
Wei, L., Hindman, D.B.: Does the digital divide matter more? Comparing the effects of new media and old media use on the education-based knowledge gap. Mass Commun. Soc. 14(2), 216–235 (2011)
Xu, Z., Zheng, F., Chen, J.: Digital divided or digital provided? The effective supply of information and the farm-gate price: an empirical study from micro-level. China Econ. Q. 12(4), 1513–1536 (2013)
Zhang, X.Q.: Income disparity and digital divide: the internet consumption model and cross-country empirical research. Telecom. Policy 37(6), 515–529 (2013)
Zuo, P., Jiang, Q., Chen, J.: Internet development, urbanization and the upgrading of China’s industrial structure. J. Quant. Tech. Econ. 7, 71–91 (2020)
Funding
The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC71804206), and the Beijing Social Science Foundation Research Base Project (17JDYJB018), the National Social Science Fund of China (18AZD007), the Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910034034), the 111 Project (B20094), the Young Teachers Development Fund of Central University of Finance and Economics (QJJ1826), and the Program for Innovation Research in Central University of Finance and Economics. However, opinions expressed here do not reflect the funding agencies’ view. The authors thank the Editors and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Not applicable to this study.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, LJ., Zhong, SB., Sun, BW. et al. Is internet penetration narrowing the rural–urban income inequality? A cross-regional study of China. Qual Quant 55, 1795–1814 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01081-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01081-8
Keywords
- Internet penetration
- Rural–urban income inequality
- Technological kuznets curve
- Bootstrap panel granger causality