Abstract
This study investigates the long-run co-movement between venture capital and technological innovation for 28 provinces (including autonomous regions) in China, using the panel cointegration and panel-based error correction model over the 2001–2012 period. Our results confirm that venture capital and innovation have long-run cointegrated relationships as well as bidirectional causality for the whole country. Analysis of sub-samples again discovers similar results in both the eastern and central regions, but not in the western region. The policy implication shows that China’s development of innovations should be based on more venture capital input and that the government should establish a long-run innovation policy to accelerate the development of venture capital. We also offer several constructive suggestions for governments in the western provinces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Heterogeneity reflects, for instance, the difference in living standards or economic development among the sample provinces; traditional works mainly use an estimation of instrumental variables (Kortum and Lerner 2000) or a quasi-natural experiment (Bertoni et al. 2010; Arque-Catells 2012) to control for endogeneity in regards to the influence of venture capital on innovation.
We consider the availability of data and the serious deficiencies of venture capital investment data and innovation for Hainan, Qinghai, and Tibet provinces.
We gather Applications, Asset, and Project from the China Statistical Yearbook: the Intellectual Property.
The critical values of panel cointegration tests are tabulated by Pedroni (1999).
Beijing’s negative influence between venture capital and innovation implies that venture capitalists prefer profitable items like REITs and other financial services there. In the future we shall research on whether real estate or other financial industries influence venture capital and innovation.
Wang (2004) and Xu and Zhang (2011) argue that the pattern of traditional manufacturing development in northeast China (including Jilin province) results in high consumption, pollution, and low value-added features in the pursuit of output growth; however, this imbalanced development in the economic structure and a strong dependence on heavy industry reduce local economic growth and restrain R&D input.
Eastern region: Beijing, Fujian, Guangdong, Hebei, Jiangsu, Liaoning, Shandong, Shanggai, Tianjin, and Zhejiang. Central region: Anhui, Henan, Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Jilin, and Shanxi. Western region: Chongqing, Gansu, Guangxi, Guizhou, Neimenggu, Ningxia, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Xinjiang, and Yunnan.
This may match the VC-first hypothesis proposed by Hirukawa and Ueda (2011), who define that VC always spurs innovation for new firms especially in the start-up stage.
References
Anokhin, S., Schulze, W.S.: Entrepreneurship, innovation and corruption. J. Bus. Ventur. 24(5), 465–476 (2009)
Atanasov, V.: VCs and the Expropriation of Entrepreneurs. Working paper (2006)
Arestis, P., Demetriades, P., Luintel, K.: Financial development and economic growth: the role of stock markets. J. Money Credit Bank. 33, 16–41 (2001)
Arque-Catells, P.: How venture capitalists spur invention in Spain: evidence from patenttrajectories. Res Policy 41(5), 897–912 (2012)
Baum, J.A.C., Silverman, B.S.: Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. J. Bus. Ventur. 19(3), 411–436 (2004)
Bottazzi, L., Da Rin, M.: Venture capital in Europe and the financing of innovative companies. Econ. Policy 17, 229–270 (2002)
Bertoni, F., Croce, A., D’Adda, D.: Venture capital investments and patenting activity of high-tech start-ups: a micro-econometric firm-analysis. Ventur. Cap. 12(4), 307–326 (2010)
Bhide, A.: The origins and evolution of new businesses. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)
Caselli, S., Gatti, S., Perrini, F.: Are venture capitalists a catalyst for innovation? Eur. Financ. Manag. 15(1), 92–111 (2009)
Chang, C.P., Lee, C.C.: A re-examination of German government approval and economic performance: is there a stable relationship between them? Int. Econ. J. 24(1), 25–34 (2009)
Chang, C.P., Lee, C.C.: Globalization and growth: a political economy analysis for OECD countries. Global Econ. Rev. 39(2), 151–173 (2010)
Chang, C.P., Lee, C.C.: The effect of globalization and political party on economic growth - panel data analysis of former communist countries and European OECD members. East. Eur. Econ. 49(6), 5–27 (2011)
Chemmanur, T.J., Krishnan, K., Nandy, D.K.: How does venture capital financing improve efficiency in private firms? A look beneath the surface. Rev. Financ. Stud. 10(1), 85–105 (2011)
Cheng, S.: The venture capital situation development of Beijing. China venture capital yearbook, Beijing, China (2013) (in Chinese)
Cheung, J., Johnson, R., Turner, R., Braybrook, L.: Long term evaluation of LAAs and LSPs, collaboration, innovation and value for money call down project, Appendix 2 survey of LSP co-ordinators. London, CLG (2010)
Croce, A., Martí, J., Murtinu, S.: The impact of venture capital on the productivity growth of european entrepreneurial firms: ‘Screening’ or ‘Value Added’ Effect? J Bus Ventur 28, 489–510 (2013)
Da Rin, M., Penas, M.F.: The effect of venture capital on innovation strategies. NBER Working Paper No. 13636. Cambridge, MA (2007)
Engel, D., Keilbach, M.: Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment—an empirical investigation. J. Empir. Financ. 14(2), 150–167 (2007)
Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J.: Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 55(2), 251–276 (1987)
Faria, A.P., Barbosa, N.: Does venture capital really foster innovation? Econ. Lett. 122, 129–131 (2014)
Geronikolaou, G., Papachristou, G.: Venture capital and innovation in Europe. Mod. Econ. 3, 454–459 (2012)
Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., Rajgopal, S.: The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J. Account. Econ. 40, 3–73 (2005)
Hasan, I., Wang, H.: The role of venture capital on innovation, new business formation, and economic growth. Presented at the 2006 FMA Annual Meeting (2006)
Hellman, T., Puri, M.: The interaction between product market and financing strategy: the role of venture capital. Rev. Financ. Stud. 13(4), 959–984 (2000)
Hirukawa, M., Ueda, M.: Venture capital and innovation: which is first? Pac. Econ. Rev. 16(4), 421–465 (2011)
Hsu, D.: What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital aliation? J. Financ. 59, 1805–1844 (2004)
Iftekhar, H., Haizhi, W.: The Role of Venture Capital on Innovation, New Business Formation, and Economic Growth. Presented at 2006 FMA Annual Meeting (2006)
Jäger, P., Schmidt, T.: The political economy of public investment when population is aging: a panel cointegration analysis. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 43, 145–158 (2016)
Kao, C., Chiang, M.H.: On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi, B.H. (ed.) Advances in econometrics: nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels, vol. 15, pp. 179–222. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2000)
Kortum, S., Lerner, J.: Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. Rand J. Econ. 31(4), 674–692 (2000)
Popov, A., Rossenboom, P.: Venture capital and patented innovation: evidence from Europe. Econ. Policy 6, 449–482 (2012)
Pedroni, P.: Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 61, 653–670 (1999)
Pedroni, P.: Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of fooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econ. Theory 20, 597–625 (2004)
Pedroni, P.: Full modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In: Baltagi, B.H. (ed.) Nonstationary panel cointegration and dynamic panels (vol. 15 of Advances in Econometrics). Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2000)
Perman, R., Stern, D.I.: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental kuznets curve does not exist. Aust J Agri Res Econ 47, 325–347 (2003)
Romain, A., Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B.: The economic impact of venture capital (Working Papers CEB 04–014.RS). ULB—Universite Libre de Bruxelles (2004)
Sahlman, W.A.: The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. J. Financ. Econ. 27(2), 473–521 (1990)
Samila, S., Sorenson, O.: Venture capital, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93(1), 338–349 (2011)
Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W.: Evidence on structural instability in macroeconomic time series relations. J. Business Econ. Stat. 14(1), 11–30 (1996)
Tang, M.C., Chyi, Y.L.: Law environments, venture capital and the total factor productivity growth of Taiwanese industry. Contemp. Econ. Policy 26(3), 468–481 (2008)
Tykvova, T.: Venture capital in Germany and its impact on innovation. social science research network working Paper, presented at the 2000 EFMA Conference. Athens (2000)
Wang, S.: Regional cooperation of Northeast Asia and the revitalization of the old industrial base in Northeast China. Northeast Asia Forum 13(2), 3–6 (2004). (in Chinese)
Westerlund, J., Thuraisamy, K., Sharma, S.: On the use of panel cointegration tests in energy economics. Energy Econ. 50, 359–363 (2015)
Xu, C., Zhang, Z.: Research on the pattern of northeast manufacture industry development in China transformation and the path. Jilin Univ. J. Soc. Sci. Edition 51(3), 117–123 (2011). (in Chinese)
Zucker, L.G., Darby, Brewer, M.B.: Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Am. Econ. Rev. 88(l), 290–306 (1998)
Acknowledgments
We thank the editor and anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. Jun Wen and Xiu-Yun Yang are grateful to National Natural Science Foundation of China for grant No.71673216 as well as 71673215, respectively. Any remaining errors are our own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, J., Yang, XY., Feng, GF. et al. The comovement between venture capital and innovation in China: what are the implications?. Qual Quant 51, 2489–2506 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0405-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0405-3