Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the reliability of unitizing textual continua: Further developments

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 19 December 2015

Abstract

This paper builds on an agreement coefficient proposed by Krippendorff (Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2013) for measuring the reliability of unitizing and coding continuous phenomena, for example, of texts, videos, or sound recordings. It serves three purposes: It modifies Krippendorff’s definition which turned out to behave not as expected when applied to more than two observers, coders, or annotators. It extends this reliability measure to a family of four coefficients able to assess the reliabilities of diverse properties of unitized continua. It adds a way to obtain the confidence intervals of these coefficients as well as the probability of failing to reach targeted reliability levels. And it describes and provides access to free software that calculates all values of this family of reliability coefficients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cappella, J.N., Turow, J., Jamieson, K.: Call-in political talk radio: background, content, audiences, portrayal in mainstream media (Report series no. 5). University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg Public Policy Center, Philadelphia (1996)

  • Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull. 70(4), 213–220 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., Mun, E.Y.: Analyzing Rater Agreement: Manifest Variable Methods. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76(5), 378–382 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guetzkow, H.: Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. J. Clin. Psychol. 6, 47–58 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology 3rd Edition. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Replacement of Section 12.4 to be introduced into its 2nd printing. http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/krippendorff/U-alpha.pdf (2013). Accessed 14 May 2015

  • Krippendorff, K.: Agreement and information in the reliability of coding. Commun. Meas. Methods 5(2), 93–112. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/278 (2011). Accessed 14 May 2015

  • Krippendorff, K.: On the reliability of unitizing continuous data. In: Marsden, P.V. (ed.) Sociological Methodology, vol. 25, pp. 47–76. Blackwell, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage, Beverly Hills (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: Bivariate agreement coefficients for reliability of data, chapter 8. In: Borgatta, E.R., Bohrnstedt, G.W. (eds.) Sociological Methodology, vol. 2, pp. 139–150. Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathet, Y., Widlöcher, A., Fort, K., Francois, C., Galibert, O., Grouin, C., Kahn, J., Rosset, S., Zweigenbaum, P.: Manual corpus annotation: giving meaning to the evaluation metrics. In: Proceedings of COLING 2012. ACL, Mumbai. https://aclweb.org/anthology/C/C12/C12-2079.pdf (2012). Accessed 10 May 2015

  • Scott, W.A.: Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opin. Quart. 19, 321–325 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widlöcher, A., Mathet, Y.: The glozz platform: a corpus annotation and mining tool. In: Concolato, C., Schmitz, P. (eds.). DocEng’12, Sept. 4–7, 2012, ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, ACM, Paris (2012), , pp 171–180. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2361354.2361394. Accessed 10 May 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Klaus Krippendorff

  2. Université de Caen Normandie, UMR 6072 GREYC, France

    Yann Mathet, Stéphane Bouvry & Antoine Widlöcher

Authors
  1. Klaus Krippendorff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yann Mathet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stéphane Bouvry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antoine Widlöcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Krippendorff.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0289-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krippendorff, K., Mathet, Y., Bouvry, S. et al. On the reliability of unitizing textual continua: Further developments. Qual Quant 50, 2347–2364 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0266-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0266-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation