Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy item response model: a new approach to generate membership function to score psychological measurement

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to propose an new approach, fuzzy item response model (FIRM), which combines item response theory (IRT) and fuzzy set theory, in the educational or psychological measurement. Applying FIRM to improve the predictive validity of psychological measurement is verified. We set up a detailed procedure for the FIRM and apply it to a valuable empirical study with Beck Depression Inventory-II (Chinese version) administrated on outpatient diagnosed as depression was given. The results showed the correct classification of depression based on FIRM scoring was 80.3% while that of raw score was only 73.2%. That is, via FIRM scoring, 7.9% of the erroneous judgments of depression inferred from self-reported inventory were reduced. It is also suggested that considerable cost concerning prevention and cure of depression might be reduced via FIRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agresti A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychiatric Association.: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC (1994)

  3. Beck A.T., Steer R.A. and Brown G.K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory–II. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bilgic T. and Turksen B. (2000). Measurement of membership function: theoretical and empirical work. In: Dubios, D. and Prade, H. (eds) Fundamentals of fuzzy sets, pp 195–232. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng S.J. and Hwang C.L (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubios D., Ostasiewicz W. and Prade H. (2000). Fuzzy sets: history and basic notions. In: Dubios, D. and Prade, H. (eds) Fundamentals of fuzzy sets, pp 21–124. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goleman, D. Costs of depression are on a par with heart disease, a study says. The New York Times, December 3, 1993

  8. Guilford J.P. (1954). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopkins K.D., Stanley J.C. and Hopkins B.R.    (1990). Education and psychological measurement and evaluation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krefetz D.G., Steer R.A., Gulab N.A. and Beck A.T. (2002). Convergent validity of the Beck Depression Inventory–II with the Reynolds adolescent depression scale in psychiatric inpatients. J. Person. Assess. 78(3): 451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Klir G. and Yuan B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kosko B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking: the new science of fuzzy logic. Hyperion, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Law C.K. (1996). Using fuzzy numbers in educational grading system. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 83: 311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Y.H. (2001). The simulation study of reliability of fuzzy linguistic scales. J. Test Stat. 9: 193–219

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lin Y.H. (2003). The comparison of different algorithms and scoring. J Taichuang Teacher Coll. 17(2): 279–304

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, Y.H.: The data simulation and empirical study of fuzzy linguistic scoring. (NSC92-2413-H-142-004) (2004)

  17. Linacre J.M. (2005). A User’s guide to WINSTEPS Rasch-model computer programs. Winsteps, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  18. Masters G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47: 149–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Masters G.N. and Wright B.D. (1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models. Psychometrika 49: 529–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masters G.N. and Wright B.D. (1997). The partial credit model. In: van der Linden, W.J. and Hambleton, R.K. (eds) Handbook of modern item response theory, pp 101–122. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Medasani S., Kim J. and Krishnapuram R. (1998). An overview of membership function generation techniques for pattern recognition. Int J Approx Reason 19: 391–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen H. and Wu B.L. (2000). Fuzzy mathematics and statistical analysis. Junjie, Taipei

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nunnally J.C. and Berstein I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rasch, G.: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. [Danish Institute of Educational Research 1960, University of Chicago Press 1980, MESA Press 1993] MESA Press, Chicago (1960)

  25. Thurstone L.L. (1931). Measurement of social attitudes. J. Abnormal Soc. Psychol. 26: 249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wright B.D. (1994). Rasch factor analysis. Rasch Measure Trans 8(1): 348–349

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wright B.D. (1999). Fundamental measurement for psychology. In: Embretson, S.E. and Hershberger, S.L. (eds) The new rules of measurement: what every educator and psychologist should know, pp 235–255. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wright B.D. and Linacre J.M. (1989). Observations are always ordinal: measures, however, must be interval. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilitation 70: 857–860

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wright B.D. and Masters G.N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. MESA Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu B.L. (1995). Fuzzy statistics analyzing: a new approach to survey research. Newsletter Nat. Chengchi Univ. 2: 65–80

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wu B.L. and Hsu Y.Y. (2004). The use of kernel set and sample memberships in the identification of nonlinear time series. Soft Comput 8: 207–216

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, B.L., Lin, Y.H.: Fuzzy mode and its applications in educational and psychological assessment analysis. Paper Presented on the Second International Conference on Information. China, Beijing (2002a)

  33. Wu B.L. and Lin Y.H. (2002b). The introduction of fuzzy mode and its applications. J. Test Stat. 47: 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, S.: Fuzzy partial credit scaling: applying fuzzy set theory to scoring rating scales. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan (2005)

  35. Zadeh L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8: 338–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmermann H.J. (1996). Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sen-Chi Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, SC., Wu, B. Fuzzy item response model: a new approach to generate membership function to score psychological measurement. Qual Quant 43, 381–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9114-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9114-2

Keywords

Navigation