Skip to main content
Log in

Civic Opportunities and Democratic Practices in Yemen and Libya after the Arab Spring

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2011 Arab Spring uprisings are often portrayed as a wave of failed revolutions that devolved rapidly into anarchic violence. Yemen and Libya appear to illustrate this dynamic par excellence, as interim governments collapsed in the face of violence, war, and humanitarian disasters by 2014. Although studies of these revolutions have proliferated in recent years, the fuller range of outcomes emerging from the Arab Spring at the local level and in everyday life have comprised a theoretical and empirical black box. Based on the grounded analysis of ethnographic data from Yemen and Libya during the post-Arab Spring interim periods (2012–2013), this study argues that although the 2011 revolutions failed to achieve their major goals, they succeeded in breaking down normative forms of incumbent authoritarian power across major urban centers. As a result, activists and ordinary citizens gained what we call newfound “civic opportunities” to make political claims in Yemen and Libya’s emergent civic spheres. Participants did so by repurposing their built environment for artistic expression, engaging in peaceful collective action, and publicly commemorating the victims and heroes of anti-regime resistance. While civic opportunities were later eclipsed by violence, we argue that revolutions failing to instigate democratic change from “above” can nevertheless create meaningful civic opportunities for democratic practices from “below.” The study concludes by suggesting how this mobilization matters for future waves of protest and democratization, and for the scholarly investigation of revolution outcomes more generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

For queries about data availability, please contact the corresponding author.

Notes

  1. Freedom House categorized both Yemen and Libya as “Not Free” in 2010 and 2011, indicating that citizens “endure systematic and pervasive human rights violations” pre-revolution (Freedom House 2010, 2011).

  2. The Saleh regime presided over a weak state and never exercised a monopoly over the legitimate means of violence; state infrastructural and centralized military control outside of the capital was also weak. Tribes and tribal confederations both supplemented regime power and competed against it in significant ways. Tribes headed by elite families operated as statelets by controlling territory and collecting taxes; they also provided security with armed forces and were duty-bound to defend their members from threats and attacks from outsiders. This means that the central regime had to be cautious in not infringing upon tribal leaders’ authority or autonomy, or else risk sparking armed confrontations. Tribes were also represented at the national political level in government through their members’ affiliation with political parties. In addition, the state had no routinized legalistic claims of authority over the tribes, so relations between tribes and the state were based on a constantly-negotiated, competitive, and tenuous system of patronage.

  3. While Gaddafi’s bloated military apparatus was generally underequipped and undermined by the deliberate rotations in leadership, the best equipped forces, such as the Military Intelligence, the 32nd Brigade (katiba) led by Gaddafi’s son Khamis, the Revolutionary Guard (al-Hiras al-Thawri), and the Jamahiriyya Security Organization (Hayat Amn al-Jamahiriyya), were dedicated to rooting out domestic dissent and protecting the Gaddafi family (Bassiouni 2013, 133–142).

  4. Qat is a plant chewed daily in Yemen for its mild stimulant properties, similar to chewing tobacco. This is not to be confused with other varieties found in east Africa and elsewhere, which can have psychotropic and psychedelic effects.

References

  • Abaza, Mona. 2014. Post january revolution Cairo: Urban wars and the reshaping of public space. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (7–8): 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamyan, Shushan. 2019. The city and its walls: Street art, graffiti and the re-invention of public space in Yerevan. Doctoral dissertation, Central European University. https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2019/abrahamyan_shushan.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2024.

  • Al-Guneid, Abdulkader. 2021. Prison Time in Sana’a. London: Arabian Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allinson, Jamie. 2022. The Age of Counter-Revolution: States and Revolutions in the Middle East. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Kenneth T. 1997. The impacts of social movements on the political process: The civil rights movement and black electoral politics in Mississippi. American Sociological Review 62 (5): 800–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aulich, James. 2011. The democratic delusion: New media, resistance and revolution in Serbia 1995–2000. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 5: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachinska, Liudmila. 2018. Synthesis of arts in the ukrainian architecture of the 1960–1980s and 2010s: Common features and differences. World Science 2 (7): 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badran, Sammy Zeyad. 2022. Killing Contention: Demobilizaton in Morocco during the Arab Spring. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamyeh, Mohammed A. 2013. Anarchist method, liberal intention, authoritarian lesson: The Arab spring between three enlightenments. Constellations 20 (2): 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2013. Libya: From repression to revolution: A record of armed conflict and international law violations, 2011-2013. Belgium: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

  • Bayat, Asef. 2013. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, Asef. 2017. Revolution without Revolutionaries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, Asef. 2021. Revolutionary Life: The Everyday of the Arab Spring. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Colin. 2011. The world-cultural origins of revolutionary waves: Five centuries of european contention. Social Science History 35: 167–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Colin, M. Bukovansky, E. Chenoweth, G. Lawson, E.N. Sharon, and D.P. Ritter. 2022. On Revolutions: Unruly Politics in the Contemporary World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, Mark R. 2011. “Mechanisms of maidan: The structure of contingency in the making of the Orange revolution. Mobilization: An International Journal 16 (1): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, Mark R. 2013. The semblance of democratic revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange revolution. American Political Science Review 107 (3): 574–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, Mark R. 2022. The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Alexander, and Will Jones. 2016. Mobilizing the Diaspora: How Refugees Challenge Authoritarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, Michael. 2013. How repertoires evolve: The diffusion of suicide protest in the twentieth century. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 18 (4): 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broers, Laurence. 2005. After the ‘revolution’: Civil society and the challenges of consolidating democracy in Georgia. Central Asian Survey 24 (3): 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Jason, Tarek Masoud, and Andrew Reynolds. 2015. The Arab Spring: Pathways of Repression and Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Paul Y. 2015. Protest Dialectics: State Repression and South Korea’s Democracy Movement, 1970–1979. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, E., and M.J. Stephan. 2012. Why Civil Resistance Works. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, Maria-Louise. 2018. Competing for control over the state: The case of Yemen. Small Wars & Insurgencies 29 (3): 560–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter, and Brian McQuinn. 2015. The Libyan Revolution and Its Aftermath. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, Michael. 2014. Benghazi women’s rights activist Salwa Bugaighis murdered. Libya Herald. https://libyaherald.com/2014/06/benghazi-womens-rights-activist-salwa-bugaighis-murdered/. Accessed 12 Nov 2023.

  • D’Anieri, Paul. 2006. Explaining the success and failure of post-communist revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39: 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Christian. 2014. How Social Movements Die: Repression and Demobilization of the Republic of New Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2000. Democracy in America, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L.L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Noah. 2020. The Arab Winter: A Tragedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foran, John, and Jeff Goodwin. 1993. Revolutionary outcomes in Iran and Nicaragua: Coalition fragmentation, war, and the limits of social transformation. Theory and Society 22: 209–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2010. Worst of the world 2010: The world’s most repressive societies. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/inline_images/Worst%20of%20the%20Worst%202010.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2023.

  • Freedom House. 2011. Freedom in the world 2011: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Freedom_in_the_World_2011_complete_book.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2023.

  • Gause, F Gregory, III. 2001. Why Middle East studies missed the Arab spring: The myth of authoritarian stability. Foreign Affairs 90: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerges, F.A., ed. 2015. The New Middle East: Protest and Revolution in the Arab World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Giugni, Marco G. 1998. Was it worth the effort? the outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 371–393.

  • Goldstone, Jack A. 1986. State breakdown in the english revolution: A new synthesis. American Journal of Sociology 92: 257–322.

  • Goldstone, Jack A. 2014. Revolutions: A Very Short Introduction. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack A., Leonid Grinin, and Andrey Korotayev, eds. 2022. Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Jeff. 2001. No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegland, Mary E. 2013. Days of Revolution: Political Unrest in an Iranian Village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Amy Austin. 2019. Coups and Revolutions: Mass Mobilization, the Egyptian Military, and the United States from Mubarak to Sisi. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Crisis Group. 2011. Holding Libya together: Security challenges after Qadhafi. Middle East/North Africa Report, 115 (December). https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/libya/holding-libya-together-securitychallenges-after-qadhafi. Accessed 25 Feb 2024.

  • International Crisis Group. 2012. Divided we stand: Libya’s enduring conflicts. Middle East/North Africa Report, 130, September. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/libya/divided-we-stand-libya-s-enduring-conflicts. Accessed 25 Feb 2024.

  • Jawad, Rana. 2014. Libyan human rights activist Salwa Bughaighis killed. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/worldafrica-28031537. Accessed 12 Nov 2023.

  • Johnston, Hank. 2005. Talking the walk: Speech acts and resistance in authoritarian regimes. Repression andmobilization 21: 108–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Hank, and Carol Mueller. 2001. Unobtrusive practices of contention in Leninist regimes. SociologicalPerspectives 44 (3): 351–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M.A. 2022. Popular Politics and the Path to Durable Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kasinof, Laura. 2012. A voice of authority emerges from the opposition in Yemen. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/22/world/middleeast/former-rebel-leader-in-yemen-fills-a-leadership-gap-in-taiz.html.

  • Ketchley, Neil. 2017. Egypt in a Time of Revolution: Contentious Politics and the Arab Spring. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kudelia, Serhiy. 2007. Revolutionary bargain: the unmaking of Ukraine’s autocracy through pacting. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23 (1): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzman, Charles. 2004. The Unthinkable Revolution in Iran. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lacher, Wolfram. 2020. Libya’s Fragmentation: Structure and Process in Violent Conflict. New York: I.B. Taurus.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lackner, Helen. 2019. Yemen in Crisis: Road to War. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laessing, Ulf. 2020. Understanding Libya Since Gaddafi. London: C. Hurst & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latif, Rusha. 2022. Tahrir’s Youth: Leaders of a Leaderless Revolution. New York: The American University in Cairo Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, George. 2004. Negotiated revolutions: The Czech Republic, South Africa and Chile. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G. 2019. Anatomies of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108697385.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, E.L. 2020. Filling the void: Urban murals and National Identity in Russia and Ukraine after 2010. Romanian Journal of Political Sciences 20 (2): 112–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David, John Heathershaw, and Nick Megoran. 2018. Illiberal peace? authoritarian modes of conflict management. Cooperation and Conflict 53 (4): 486–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1988. Revolution and Counterrevolution: Change and Persistence in Social Structures, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael. 1968. Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review 62: 1144–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J., David A. Snow, Leon Anderson, and Lyn Lofland. 2006/1971. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Marc. 2015. How the media trashed the transitions. Journal of Democracy 24 (4): 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Marc. 2016a. Reflections five years after the uprisings. In The project on middle east political science, ed. Marc Lynch, 18. https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/work/3197xm41p.

  • Lynch, Marc. 2016b. Why it’s wrong to say that the arab uprisings failed. The Washington Post: The Monkey Cage Blog. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/03/28/why-its-wrong-to-say-that-the-arab-uprisings-failed/.

  • Mako, Shamiran, and Valentine M. Moghadam. 2021. After the Arab Uprisings: Progress and Stagnation in the Middle East and North Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, John. 2010. Abolition of feudalism: Peasants, Lords, and legislators in the French revolution. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, John, and Gilbert Shapiro. 1985. Consensus and conflict at the onset of revolution: A quantitative study of France in 1789. American Journal of Sociology 91: 28–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matar, Hisham. 2016. The return: Fathers, sons and the land in between. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1983. Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. American Sociological Review 48 (6): 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mische, Ann. 2009. Projects and possibilities: Researching futures in action. Sociological Forum 24 (3): 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Barrington, Jr. 1978. Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. White Plains: M.E. Sharpe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Aldon. 1984. The origins of the civil rights movement: black communities organizing for change. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Dana M. 2016. Transnational repression, diaspora mobilization, and the Arab Spring. Social Problems 63(4): 480–498.

  • Moss, Dana M. 2022. The Arab Spring Abroad: Diaspora Activism Against Authoritarian Regimes. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olishevska, Y.A. 2020. Murals as the newest tourist resources: The case of Kyiv. Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology 29 (2): 364–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, Jeffrey M. 1978. Agrarian Revolution. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, Callum. 2014. Seven killed in Benghazi as wave of assassinations continues. The Libya Herald. https://libyaherald.com/2014/09/seven-killed-in-benghazi-as-wave-of-assassinations-continues/.

  • Phillips, Sarah. 2017. Yemen and the Politics of Permanent Crisis. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Kenneth M. 2016. A rage for order: The Middle East in Turmoil, from Tahrir Square to ISIS. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/01/books/review/robert-f-worths-a-rage-for-order.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2024.

  • Polletta, Francesca. 1999. ‘Free spaces’ in collective action. Theory and Society 28 (1): 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Jeremy. 2010. You are all free: The haitian revolution and the abolition of slavery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsaat, Sharon M. 2024. Insurgent communities: how protests create a filipino diaspora. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radavičiūtė, J.ūratė. 2017. Linguistic landscape of Tbilisi: A case study of graffiti. Respectus Philologicus 32 (37): 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasler, Karen. 1996. Concessions, repression, and political protest in the iranian revolution. American Sociological Review 61: 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Atef. 2022. The rise and fall of the tahrir repertoire: theorizing temporality, trajectory, and failure. Social Problems 69 (1): 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Atef. 2024. Revolution Squared: Tahrir, Political Possibilities, and Counterrevolution in Egypt. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Atef. 2020. Tahrir and the Many Faces of Violence in the Egyptian Revolution. In Cultural Violence and the Destruction of Human Communities: New Theoretical Perspectives, eds. F. Greenland F. M., Göçek. Routledge.

  • Scahill, Jeremy. 2013. Dirty wars: The world is a battlefield. Utah: Sundance Selects Films.

  • Schwedler, Jillian. 2022. Protesting Jordan: Geographies of Power and Dissent. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, Jr., and H. William. 1990. Collective violence and collective loyalties in France: Why the French Revolution made adifference. Politics & Society 18 (4): 527–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewel, William H., Jr. 1995. Historical events as transformations of structures: Inventing revolution at the bastille. Theory and Society 25: 841–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, Jack G. 2003. Reel bad arabs: How Hollywood vilifies a people. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 588: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda, Jeff Goodwin, and Jack A. Goldstone. 2001. Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 139–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., Louis A. Zurcher, and Gideon Sjoberg. 1982. Interviewing by comment: An adjunct to the direct question. Qualitative Sociology 5: 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., Daniel M. Cress, Liam Downey, and Andrew W. Jones. 1998. Disrupting the ‘quotidian’: Reconceptualizing the relationship between breakdown and the emergence of collective action. Mobilization 3 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., Calvin Morrill, and Leon Anderson. 2003. Elaborating analytic ethnography: Linking fieldwork andtheory. Ethnography 4 (2): 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi, Nader. 1995. Historicizing revolutions: Constitutional revolutions in the ottoman empire, Iran, and Russia, 1905–1908. American Journal of Sociology 100 (6): 1383–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springborg, Robert. 2011. Whither the Arab spring? 1989 or 1848? The International Spectator 46: 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Verta. 1989. Social movement continuity: The women’s movement in abeyance. American Sociological Review 54 (5): 761–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1963. The analysis of a counter-revolution. History and Theory 3: 30–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1977. Getting it together in Burgundy, 1675–1975. Theory and Society 4 (4): 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 2008. Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tudoroiu, Theodor. 2007. Rose, Orange, and tulip: The failed post-soviet revolutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40: 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2019. Humanitarian crisis in Yemen remains the worst in the world, warns UN. United Nations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/02/1032811. Accessed 21 Dec 2023.

  • Vandewalle, Dirk. 2012. A History of Modern Libya. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walder, Andrew G., and Songhua Hua. 2009. Revolution, reform, and status inheritance: urban China, 1949–1996. American Journal of Sociology 114: 1395–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedeen, L. 2015/1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Wehrey, F. 2018. The burning shores: Inside the battle for the New Libya,. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, Shelagh. 2007. A Tribal Order: Politics and Law in the Mountains of Yemen. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, Kurt. 2012. The Arab spring: Why the surprising similarities with the revolutionary wave of 1848? Perspectives on Politics 10: 917–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, Kurt. 2014. Making Waves: Democratic Contention in Europe and Latin America Since The Revolutions Of 1848. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. 2012. A History of Libya. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, Maro. 2022. Strategic choices: How conservative women activists remained active throughout Tunisia’s democratic transition. Sociological Forum 37 (3): 836–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Ekkart. 1990. On the outcomes of revolutions: Some preliminary considerations. Sociological Theory 8: 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply grateful to attendees of the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies’ paper workshop (2021) for their helpful feedback, and to Layla E. Picard for her sage expertise on the Yemeni case. Research conducted by Dana M. Moss was made possible by funding from the National Science Foundation’s Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant 2014–2015 (#1433642) and the University of California, Irvine’s Kugelman Citizen Peacebuilding Research Fellowship, the Center for Global Peace and Conflict Studies’ Research Award, the Center for the Study of Democracy, and the Department of Sociology’s Summer Fellowship. All research was conducted in accordance with the authors’ respective institutional permissions and/or Internal Review Board protocols for the use of human subjects in research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dana M. Moss.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moss, D., Bath, C. Civic Opportunities and Democratic Practices in Yemen and Libya after the Arab Spring. Qual Sociol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-024-09559-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-024-09559-9

Keywords

Navigation