Skip to main content
Log in

Physicochemical, Technological and Functional Properties of Upcycled Vegetable Waste Ingredients as Affected by Processing and Storage

  • Research
  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vegetable wastes are generated during harvesting, processing, and distribution, which implies a wastage of nutrients and evidence inefficiencies in present food systems. Vegetable residues are rich in bioactive compounds, for which their valorisation and reintroduction into the food chain are crucial towards circular economy and food systems sustainability. In this work, upcycled powdered ingredients were obtained from vegetables wastes (carrot, white cabbage, celery, and leek) through a disruption, dehydration and milling process. Disruption pre-treatment at different intensities was followed by freeze-drying or hot-air drying (60 and 70 °C), and final milling to produce fine powders. Powdered products were characterized in terms of physicochemical, antioxidant and technological properties (water and oil interaction), after processing and during four months of storage. Antioxidant properties were generally favoured by hot-air drying, particularly at 70 °C, attributed to new compounds formation combined to less exposure time to drying conditions. The powders showed good water interaction properties, especially freeze-dried ones. Storage had a negative impact on the quality of powders: moisture increased, antioxidant compounds generally diminished, and colour changes were evidenced. Upcycled vegetable waste powders are proposed as ingredients to fortify foods, both processing and storage conditions having an impact on their properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. FAO and the Sustainable Development Goals (2023) FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/about/strategy-programme-budget/strategic-framework/fao-sdg/en/ (Accessed 26th

  2. Henríquez C, Córdova A, Lutz M, Saavedra J (2004) Storage stability test of apple peel powder using two packaging materials: high-density polyethylene and metalized films of high barrier. Ind Crops Prod 45:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Korus A (2011) Effect of preliminary processing, method of drying and storage temperature on the level of antioxidants in kale (Brassica oleracea L var. Acephala) leaves. LWT-Food Sci Technol 44(8):1711–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.03.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neacsu M, Vaughan N, Raikos V et al (2015) Phytochemical profile of commercially available food plant powders: their potential role in healthier food reformulations. Food Chem 179:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramírez-Pulido B, Bas-Bellver C, Betoret N, Barrera C, Seguí L (2021) Valorization of vegetable fresh-processing residues as functional powdered ingredients. A review on the potential impact of pretreatments and drying methods on Bioactive compounds and their bioaccessibility. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.654313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen ML, Yang DJ, Liu SC (2011) Effects of drying temperature on the flavonoid, phenolic acid and antioxidative capacities of the methanol extract of citrus fruit (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) peels. Int J Food Sci Technol 46(6):1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02605.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mrkìc V, Cocci E, Dalla Rosa M, Sacchetti G (2006) Effect of drying conditions on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L). J Sci Food Agric 86(10):1559–1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Djantou EB, Mbofung CMF, Scher J, Phambu N, Morael JD (2011) Alternation drying and grinding (ADG) technique: a novel approach for producing ripe mango powder. LWT-Food Sci Technol 44(7):1585–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.01.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bas-Bellver C, Barrera C, Betoret N, Seguí L (2020) Turning agri-food cooperative vegetable residues into functional powdered ingredients for the food industry. Sustainability 12:1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernaert N, de Clercq H, van Bockstaele E et al (2013) Antioxidant changes during postharvest processing and storage of leek (Allium ampeloprasum var. porrum). Postharvest Biol Technol 86:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bas-Bellver C, Barrera C, Betoret N, Seguí L (2022) Impact of disruption and drying conditions on physicochemical, functional and antioxidant properties of powdered ingredients obtained from Brassica vegetable by-products. Foods 11(22):3663. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223663

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gulati T, Datta AK (2015) Mechanistic understanding of case-hardening and texture development during drying of food materials. J Food Eng 166:119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.05.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos PHS, Silva MA (2008) Retention of vitamin C in drying processes of fruits and vegetables—A review. Rev Dry Technol 26(129):1421–1437. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930802458911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chevalier W, Moussa SA, Ottoni MMN et al (2022) Evaluation of pedoclimatic factors and cultural practices effects on carotenoid and sugar content in carrot root. Eur J Agron 140:126577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miletic N, Mitrovic O, Popovic B et al (2013) Polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity in fruits of plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars ‘Valjevka’ and ‘Mildora’ as influenced by air drying. J Food Qual 36:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Márquez-Cardozo CJ, Caballero-Gutiérrez BL, Ciro-Velázquez HJ, Restrepo-Molina HA (2021) Effect of pretreatment and temperature on the drying kinetics and physicochemical and techno-functional characteristics of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima). Heliyon 7(4):e06802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Raja KS, Taip FS, Azmi MMZ, Shishir MRI (2019) Effect of pre-treatment and different drying methods on the physicochemical properties of Carica papaya L. leaf powder. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18(2):150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2017.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu Y, Xiao Y, Lagnika C et al (2020) A comparative evaluation of nutritional properties, antioxidant capacity and physical characteristics of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitate var L.) subjected to different drying methods. Food Chem 309:124935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vargas L, Kapoor R, Nemzer B, Feng H (2022) Application of different drying methods for evaluation of phytochemical content and physical properties of broccoli, kale, and spinach. LWT-Food Sci Technol 155(1):112892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Calabuig-Jiménez L, Hinestroza-Córdoba LI, Barrera C, Seguí L, Betoret N (2022) Effects of processing and storage conditions on functional properties of powdered blueberry pomace. Sustainability 14(3):1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Si X, Chen Q, Bi J et al (2016) Comparison of different drying methods on the physical properties, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of raspberry powders. J Sci Food Agric 96(6):2055–2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Serna-Cock L, Torres-León C, Ayala-Aponte A (2015) Evaluation of food powders obtained from peels of mango (Mangifera indica) as sources of functional ingredients. Información tecnológica 26(2):41–50. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642015000200006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martínez-Las Heras R, Landines EF, Heredia A, Castelló ML, Andrés A (2017) Influence of drying process and particle size of persimmon fibre on its physicochemical, antioxidant, hydration and emulsifying properties. J Food Sci Technol 54(9):2902–2912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2728-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahni P, Shere DM (2017) Comparative evaluation of physico-chemical and functional properties of apple, carrot and beetroot pomace powders. Int J Food Ferment Technol 7(2):317–323. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5771.2017.00043.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mokhtar SM, Swailam HM, Embaby HES (2018) Physicochemical properties, nutritional value and techno-functional properties of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana) waste powder. Food Chem 248:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.11.117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Viuda-Martos M, Barber X, Pérez-Álvarez JA, Fernández-López J (2015) Assessment of chemical, physico-chemical, techno-functional and antioxidant properties of fig (Ficus carica L.) powder co-products. Ind Crops Prod 69:472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Du J, Ge ZZ, Xu Z et al (2014) Comparison of the efficiency of five different drying carriers on the spray drying of persimmon pulp powders. Dry Technol 32(10):1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2014.886259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fernández-López J, Sendra-Nadal E, Navarro C et al (2009) Storage stability of a high dietary fibre powder from orange by-products. Int J Food Sci Technol 44(4):748–756. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dhiman AK, Vidiya N, Surekha A, Preethi R (2017) Studies on development and storage stability of dehydrated pumpkin based instant soup mix. J Appl Nat Sci 9(3):1815–1820. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i3.1444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma KD, Karki S, Thakur NS, Attri S (2011) Chemical composition, functional properties and processing of carrot-a review. J Food Sci Technol 49(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0310-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang LS, Karim R, Abdulkarim SM et al (2018) Storage stability, color kinetics and morphology of spray-dried soursop (Annonaï muricata L) powder: effect of anticaking agents. Int J Food Prop 21(1):1937–1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1510836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu F, Cao X, Wang H, Liao X (2010) Changes of tomato powder qualities during storage. Powder Technol 204(1):159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.08.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tavares IM, Sumere BR, Gómez-Alonso S et al (2020) Storage stability of the phenolic compounds, color and antioxidant activity of jambolan juice powder obtained by foam mat drying. Food Res Int 128:108750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Michalczyk M, MacUra R, Matuszak I (2009) The effect of air-drying, freeze-drying and storage on the quality and antioxidant activity of some selected berries. J Food Process Preserv 33(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2008.00232.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. del Caro A, Piga A, Pinna I, Fenu PM, Agabbio M (2004) Effect of drying conditions and storage period on polyphenolic content, antioxidant capacity, and ascorbic acid of prunes. J Agric Food Chem 52(15):4780–4784. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049889j

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to acknowledge Generalitat Valenciana for funding and Agricola Villena Coop. V. for their participation.

Funding

This research was funded by the regional government of Valencia (Generalitat Valenciana) under the Rural Development Program 2014–2020, and the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, fisheries and food, under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. Grant number AGCOOP_D/2018/025.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LS, CB and NB contributed to the conception and design of the work. CBB performed the experimental work under the supervision of LS and CB. LS, CB and NB contributed to funding acquisition. LS, CB and CBB performed the analysis and interpretation of data. CBB draft the paper. LS wrote and edit the final version of the paper. The paper was revised and approved by LS, CB and NB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucía Seguí.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bas-Bellver, C., Barrera, C., Betoret, N. et al. Physicochemical, Technological and Functional Properties of Upcycled Vegetable Waste Ingredients as Affected by Processing and Storage. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 78, 710–719 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-023-01114-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-023-01114-1

Keywords

Navigation